Friday, January 10, 2014

Tarnished Silver

The following is a summary (written in 2009) of Silver's early "career" as a disruptive influence at Majority Rights.  Since that time, he has gone through many more anti-White incarnations; nevertheless, the following gives a good idea of what Silver really is about:

The following should be of interest only to readers of the blog “Majority Rights," who are familiar with the events and personalities there. Other readers can bypass this post.

I would like to say a few words about the controversial "Majority Rights" commentator “silver,” who has been causing dissension and critiquing me and others. In general, I believe he is best ignored. But given his recent spewing of nonsense, including stating that certain European groups - including his own alleged ethnicity - are not "white," and his renewed mocking of yours truly, I'll just dust off an old essay I wrote about this despicable piece of filth and run it as follows.

Both silver and his critics assert that his history can be summed up as “he came onto the 'Majority Rights' blog as an ‘anti-racist,’ hostile to the blog, but then changed his commentaries to be more sympathetic to the agenda there.” That’s quite an over-simplification; in actuality, one can discern at least four distinct incarnations of silver:

1. Silver, Mk 1. In his initial set of comments, silver stated that he was a South Asian living in England (a Pakistani living in London, I believe) and was extremely hostile to "Majority Rights," the agenda of that blog, and most of the bloggers and commentators there. He exulted in white racial decline, crowed about his plans to miscegenate with white women, and, in general, was as hostile to racial preservationism as any person could be. In what was perhaps his most honest statement in all of his time commenting on "Majority Rights," he stated that he had discovered a "weakness" in “white nationalist” thought, which he would proceed to exploit to undermine the mission of "Majority Rights."

2. Silver, Mk 2. Having been met with derision, silver then reappeared in his new guise as a “Serbian living in Australia.” Now less hostile to "Majority Rights" and racial nationalism, silver proceeded to explain his “dilemma.” As a “Serbian” living in Australia, he is caught between two opposing impulses, you see. On the one hand, he acknowledges the threat that exists to the West and its peoples. On the other hand, he asserted that his greatest fear was that rising white racial consciousness would lead to an enhanced Anglocentric and Nordicist feeling among Australia’s Anglo-derived majority, and that this would negatively influence his own standing as a citizen of that nation – he, being of course, a “Serbian,” with a distinctly “balkanoid” appearance. He stated that living in Australia was very good to him, he had a number of Anglo-Nordic friends and associates and no real problems; however, he feared that these friends may turn against him in a “Nordic backlash.” He also stated that Southern European “white nationalists” were being exploited by Nordics as “useful idiots,” and that the purpose of his commenting on "Majority Rights" was to warn these “S. Euros” of the dangers inherent in their position. Silver MK 2 was also very hostile to the Anglocentric commentator Desmond Jones (who I at least can respect for being honest in his opinions and agenda, unlike the mendacious silver), and in general, this version of silver was anti-Nordicist and a self-declared defender of “S. Euro” interests. This version of silver also demonstrated a fairly thorough knowledge of "white nationalist" writings and controversies.

3. Silver, Mk 3. The Mk 2 version not having achieved any of its goals, and being increasingly ignored by the "Majority Rights" commentariat, silver then launched the “Mk 3” version of his persona. Now, instead of the Nordicist backlash being something to be feared in the future, he stated that he has been harassed presently by “Australian racialist nationalists.” He stated that he had tried to assimilate into Australian society, but had failed because of his distinctive “phenotype,” often commented on by said “racialist nationalists” (what happened to all of his Nordic friends?). This version of silver, trying to ingratiate himself with the "Majority Rights" rank and file, started to increasingly support basic "Majority Rights" viewpoints, even debating with some “antis” (i.e., those similar to silver Mk 1) who appeared on the threads. He toned down his anti-Desmond Jones attitude and acknowledged that the Nordicists had some points in their favor, but he hoped that they would be “reasonable.” He also accused Jared Taylor of being a hypocritical “closet Nordicist” – which prompted a comment by Taylor in response (a denial). Of interest, this version of silver could be induced, virtually at will, to suddenly reappear at "Majority Rights" with commentary, simply by another party making harsh critiques of the blog “Gene Expression” (which silver claimed never to have had heard of – this despite his admission of having studied "Majority Rights" for some time, which means that the “Gene Expression” “question,” oft discussed at "Majority Rights," should have come to his attention).

4. Silver, Mk 4. This version of silver, almost a mirror image of Mk2, is now a supporter of Nordicism. From being a “defender of the S. Euros” against “Nordicist perfidy,” silver now mocks the “S. Euro” Rienzi while praising Richard McCulloch. Desmond Jones is no longer really attacked (after all, silver Mk4 is now a more of a Nordicist than is Jones); instead Rienzi and Fred Scrooby are the subject of silver’s critiques (silver admits to “hounding” Scrooby). Apparently, the hostility to Scrooby is due to Fred’s justifiable skepticism about silver and his motives. Silver Mk 4 now promotes everything that silver Mk 2 asserted he was fearful of, and wanted to “protect S. Euros” from. Having a person of stated English descent merely say “thank you” to silver gives Mk 4 an opportunity to describe how gullible Nordics are in sacrificing their interests to people like him (note: compare to Mk 3 and that version's complaints of ethnic harassment by racially aware, non-gullible, Anglo-Australians). Of course, unless prompted by the commentariat, the intensely “Serbian” silver has no opinion about the Kosovo crisis; when forced to comment due to direct “calling out,” he says “there isn’t anything to be done.” Obviously, given that the Kosovo crisis doesn’t give silver Mk4 a clear opportunity to promote “The Racial Compact,” it isn’t really all that important to him.

Now, who knows, perhaps we will next see the development of silver Mk 5. The mind boggles. Will silver now claim to have been privy to a vicious “Medicist” plot – perhaps spearheaded by unassimilable "balkanoid" Australo-Serbs – to exterminate the “Nords?”

It is clear that I believe that silver has been acting in bad faith at "Majority Rights." My impression is of someone inherently hostile to the nationalist agenda at the blog and who has been fishing around for some sort of formula to disrupt the blog and alienate key participants, usually by attempting to inflame the “Nord/Med” divide (which I presume is the “weakness” silver Mk 1 was referring to). Having tried, and failed, to do so as an “anti-Nordicist Med,” his latest shtick is to be a “pro-Nordicist honest Med,” who must “speak the truth” in defense of the “good hearted gullible Anglo-Australians” who, without his “help,” would not know what their interests are.

Until he has the honesty to discuss his real views and real agenda, he is not worth any further comment or effort. I’ve made my reasons for skepticism clear, and I hope that others at "Majority Rights" will understand that “feeding the troll” in this case will only make him hungry for more.