Play the piano, Durocher, play it well.
For if the early twentieth century’s racial science, however flawed, was more accurate than the blank-slatist ideas that have become culturally hegemonic in the West since 1945, then there would need to be a radical and far more nuanced reassessment of Hitler. Indeed, it is now documented that many of the founding fathers of the blank-slatist consensus, namely Franz Boas, Theodor Adorno, and Stephen J. Gould, were ethnically-motivated pseudoscientific fraudsters.
“ethnically-motivated pseudoscientific fraudsters.” Like Jayman?
You want pseudoscience? Look at all the HBDers. How about real racial science instead?
The nations of Europe, including the Germans, form identifiable genetic sub-clusters, being in effect intra-continental sub-races only somewhat blurred on the edges.
How about looking at the original paper instead of a 23andme blog post? The “blurred edges” are so large that Germans are not “in effect” an “intra-continental sub-race.” Looking at the broad North/South and East/West distinctions within Europe could indeed identify such significant sub-races, but not at the national level, you idiot. Can you say that “DE” really is a separate sub-race based on this figure?
Do you have any idea how close the genetic distances are? If you are going to make such fine distinctions, while ignoring “blurred…edges” than you can call Northern vs. Southern Germany as “separate sub-races” – what would Saint Adolf think of that?
Survivors of the Ice Age have left a genetic imprint, particularly in northern Europe. In the words of one scientific publication: “Scandinavians are the earliest Europeans.”
And the next words from that publication that the fundamentally dishonest Durocher doesn’t quote for you are:
However, the genome also indicates that many European traits, including those from the Middle East, were already present in the first Europeans.
…and the enduring interest in the so-called Hajnal Line
If by “enduring interest” you mean by anti-WN HBDers like HBD Chick, triracial Jayman, “actor on the stage of history” Frost, and “creative genius” Cochran, yes. Otherwise….
And of course, resistance to immigration in Europe today, and the rise of anti-immigration parties, does not strictly follow the “Hajnal line” – said line being interpreted by HBDers in ways that I doubt Hajnal himself would consider scientifically valid.
The geographical extent of the Yamnaya migration is not clear, but the researchers note that the eastern migrants could have completely replaced existing populations, at least in what is now Germany.
This does not mean, as Durocher slyly implies with that quote, that Germans are fully descended from that population. Only that locally, certain pre-existing populations were replaced. Germans show the genetic signature of not only this population but of the Paleolithic hunter-gatherers and the Neolithic farmers as well. To say Germans are enriched in the Yamnaya ancestry compared to other groups, yes, that is likely correct.
That a leading proponent of "mainstreaming" is now citing the anti-White anti-Salter non-White HBDer "Jayman" as well as the pro-Jewish Frost, and is trying to justify bizarre Nazi pseudoscience through the strawman argument that it is better than "blank slatism" is not surprising.
One shifts from starry-eyed admiration for extreme moderates like Orban to fanboy rock star admiration for the extreme radical Hitler. This on the surface makes no sense, unless there is an intent to disrupt and mislead.