Sunday, July 31, 2016

Cuckadoodledoo, 7/31/16

Der Clueless Movement.


What's Der Movement going to do if and when Der Touchback publicly backpedals like a clown on a unicycle?

What if he is elected and reneges on his promises?

What if he loses the election in an spasm of incoherent cuckiness?

Since he is the "last hope for White America," what then, oh ye "movement" geniuses? What price mindless worship of the buffoonish God Emperor Trump?

With respect to backpedaling, the debates will be the proof of the pudding.  He will be asked about this, and will have to give an answer.

If he stands firm, all well and good, but it is still insanely irresponsible to say he is a "last hope" when he may very well lose and leave us with the same fight for racial existence we have now (does Der Movement counsel surrender in that case)?

If he backpedals, what then?  Will the Trump worshipers resign their "leadership" in Der Movement?


Strom Knows His Jews

Amusing but accurate observations.

Read here.Seth Rich, to a seasoned observer, looked quite Jewish (of the puffy-faced, tiny-eyed, freely-perspiring blond type)…

I had to laugh reading that, since Strom quite clearly identifies a Jewish sub-type one can observe anywhere there is a concentration of Jews. As someone with much life experience with many diverse ethnies – including Jews – I know very well the type Strom describes.
Like so many Semites, Rich was also relatively tasteless and had no sense of restraint — as evidenced by the clown-like “stars and stripes” suit in which he recently allowed himself to be photographed. He also was not especially intelligent, as evidenced by his vapid political blathering on the Internet, which included such gems as: “We have to be better and defend each other more true. A life is exponentially valuable. I have family and friends on both sides of the law.” 

That Semitic lack of restraint is a general, not a particular, psychological quality — that is, it applies to a lot more than just clothing.

Another accurate observation.


As “Director of Voter Outreach” for the DNC, Seth Rich was in the business of creating deadly weapons aimed at White people’s lives, and he was caught in a crossfire of his own making.

Quite right.


Today we received news that the illegitimate NARRG group’s lawsuit, designed to turn over our National Alliance to a court-appointed “receiver,” has just been dismissed with prejudice, meaning that it cannot be reinstituted. The NARRG grouplet, which has recently joined with Jewish organizations and operatives in its efforts to destroy the National Alliance, will probably not stop its attempts to cadge donations from the well-meaning dupes who send it money, but their lawsuit is now dead, dead, dead — unless they can convince the Virginia Supreme Court to hear an appeal; a very unlikely outcome, especially considering the earlier ruling of the court that the grouplet had no standing to sue in the first place.

Sigh. Wouldn’t it be better just to start fresh and new without all the baggage from the Pierce era?

Taylor's Advice For Trump

Good advice but will the Negrophile listen?


That's all good, and there is nothing there to disagree on.  Unfortunately, I'm skeptical that Trump will follow such advice.

Trump is a committed Negrophile, on record as being a supporter of affirmative action. And he has so far been too incoherent in his campaogn to focus on a clear "implicitly White" message of sufficient power to enable ti grant White turnout envisioned by Taylor.

Trump can of course change, and I hope he does.  He's backpedaled before, let him do it this time - but in the right direction.  I just would not count on it.

Saturday, July 30, 2016

Cuck's America

Cuck’s America: “conservative” Rush panders to brownster visions of America and of American history.

First, (before getting to the main point of this post) let me start out by denouncing the stupidity of democracy, of giving the average drooling retard the same vote as the rare informed person. I’m always fascinated by such concepts as the “post-convention bump.” Now it appears that Hillary is “six points ahead” after the DNC. And, we also know that the polls for candidates go up and down dependent upon trivial matters, such as Trump criticizing a Mexican judge.

Let us consider together. Contrary to most US elections, in 2016 there is a real choice. Not much of a choice, not what I would want as a choice, but at least there is some difference there - particularly on issues of immigration, law and order, and foreign policy, as well as the contrast between Trump’s “implicit Whiteness” and Clinton’s “explicit Coloredness.” There has not been an election in recent memory (at least not since Ronnie Raygun), where there has been such a significant difference between the candidates.

Very well. My point: who exactly are these morons who would switch their preferences between such drastically different candidates merely based on who was the last one to host a convention, or based upon a single passing remark? Who exactly are the imbeciles who would make an important voting decision based on such shallow, superficial reasons? Who exactly are these idiots with no grounding in any philosophy or worldview, or even a sense of self-interest, that could drift between a Trump and a Clinton from day-to-day based on trivial events and on passing whims?

Well, these would overwhelmingly be Whites (non-Whites are voting for Clinton, 100%, with no doubts or wavering), these are White American voters. God (or whoever) help us all.

And, second, then we have this (the main point):

And part of what we show in the movie is that the Democratic Party is actually the party of slavery, of segregation, of Jim Crow, of the Ku Klux Klan, of lynching, of forced sterilization, sympathy for fascism in the 1930s.

Those are bad things? Oh, wait, to cuckservatives and alien brownsters, they are.

The Democrats are the ones who interned the Japanese-Americans after World War II. So unbelievably, this Democratic Party has been implicated in the most sordid and heinous acts of history, and yet in a move of unbelievable Jiu-Jitsu what they do is they take all their crimes and blame them on the south or blame them on the Republicans or blame them on America, as if America did this or America did that, but America didn’t do it. The Democrats did.

Thus, conservatives view segregation and sympathy for fascism as “the most sordid and heinous acts of history.’

RUSH: Well, now, you ran through that list pretty quickly, and I know you don’t want to give away the entire movie here, but there’s a couple things I don’t want to gloss over. You link the KKK to the Democrat Party. You link segregation, Jim Crow laws to the Democrat Party. Do you realize if you took a survey of the American people, that would stun them, and most people wouldn’t believe that. I’m curious to know how you figured that out, where you went to learn that, how it’s documented in the movie, and what your audience’s reaction to this is. Because that’s big; it’s huge.

Yeah, Rush, huge, just like your stomach and your ego.

D’SOUZA: So, Rush, I think this is the power of the movie. It completely interrupts and discombobulates the Democratic narrative. Now, it is a fact that it was a Democratic delegate to the Democratic National Convention, Nathan Bedford Forrest, who founded the Ku Klux Klan. It is also a fact that the Klan had a massive revival in the early twentieth century due to a progressive Democratic president, Woodrow Wilson, screening a pro-Ku Klux Klan movie in the White House. 
It is also a fact — and here I’m quoting the progressive historian Eric Foner — that for 30 years the Ku Klux Klan was the domestic terrorist arm of the Democratic Party in this country.

OK. Even IF we were to agree that this was all bad and horrible – who gives a damn about any of this today? How is any of this relevant to the Democratic Party of today? Do you think your average Negro is going to reject the Dems giving away “free stuff” and is going to reject Democrat pandering and Black identity politics because of things that happened decades ago? It has as much relevance as the Whig party. Stupid brownster and his cuck enabler.

D’SOUZA: Rush, I’m, as I say, a person of color. I’m a brown-skinned immigrant to the United States. I was born in Bombay, India. I grew up in a country that’s ruled by gangs. You saw a hint of it in Slumdog Millionaire. This is a country with corruption running all the way through it. You can’t get through the day without paying bribes. It makes you feel dirty at the end of the day. 
I came to America to live a different kind of life and to experience the American dream.

That’s great. But you know, Mr. D’ Souza, maybe Americans – native-born White Americans – have dreams as well, and those dreams and aspirations do NOT include having brown filth like you in their country.

We do not need alien Desis – with faces that could launch a thousand autisms – pontificating to us about their interpretations of American history, or lecturing us on how their unwanted presence in our country is part of the “American dream.” Your “dream” is our nightmare, D’ Souza. 

I cannot denounce this pro-brownster cucking strongly enough.

And if any naive reader thinks I’m being too hard on D’Souza, then remember this. Surprise! An anti-White colored liar. In other words – an Asian.

Trump wants America to be “great again.” Unfortunately, America is a dead country with no future, and one look at D’ Souza’s leering brown countenance is all the proof you need of that. Rush’s pandering only makes it worse.

Hillary’s America? No, it is Cuck’s America.

Friday, July 29, 2016

Merkel's Other Shoe Drops

Response to terror attacks by NEC invaders against German natives: defends her open door policy, says Germans must continue to be welcoming.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel on Thursday described recent attacks in the country and across Europe as "shocking, depressing and terrifying," but she refused to back down from an open-door refugee policy that has attracted fierce criticism following recent assaults in the country.

EGI Notes long term predictions:

1. There will be more terror attacks in Germany.

2. Merkel will double down on her policy.

3. More refugees will be "welcomed" to Germany.

4. Yet more attacks will occur.

5. German support for Merkel will increase and she will be re-elected.

6. Terror attacks will continue in France and spread throughout (Western) Europe.

7. Europeans will march in the streets, in large numbers, in defense of refugees and immigrants, and against "hate."

8. Muslim immigration into Europe will be sharply increased.

Thursday, July 28, 2016

"One More Incident"

Can't quite see any signs of a "civil war."

After the Bastille Day truck attack, a number of "experts" intoned that France was on the verge of a "civil war" and that "one more incident" would likely trigger a "backlash" leading to "conflict."

Well, the "one more incident" bluff has been called by the brutal murder of an elderly priest in his church.  That's your "one more incident," ye proud sons of France.  Backlash? Conflict?  Civil war? Don't make me laugh.  Unlike the "experts," EGI Notes knows better.  I am hard-pressed to think of any outrage that would stimulate even the most mild of aggressive responses from flabby deracinated European pansies. 

It will always be that mythical "one more incident."  When the native population of France is reduced to two last people - (1) an old man hiding in his basement eating snails and frog legs, and (2) Durocher measuring that old man's cephalic index with calipers - we'll still hear that "all it will take is one more incident..."

It's not only France of course.  What's England's response to Rotherham? Oh, yes, Brexit - while I support Brexit, it was aimed more at Eastern European immigration, not at the "holy NECs" groveled to by the Leucosa Loser Race of Europe.  And then we have Germany. One wonders - is Merkel's popularity still rising?

Some folks scoff at the notion that "all the real men died in Europe's wars, leaving degenerate weaklings behind to reproduce their kind."  We are told that this idea is "impossible" with all sorts of explanations why that is so.  

But then we are at a loss to come up with alternative explanations for the appalling lack of even the most minuscule trace of virility among the native peoples of Europe.  The native population of an entire continent seems composed of actual degenerate weaklings.  Maybe I'll be proven wrong in the days ahead, we'll see.  In the meantime, we'll all be endlessly waiting for that "one more incident."

Wednesday, July 27, 2016

Pederasty and Other Perversions

Should we be surprised?

VDARE has been recently shilling for Derbyshire's book Fire From The Sun (about, what else, China). While I have no interest in reading that trash, I was interested in reading the following comment left about it on Amazon, emphasis added:
Top critical review

See the critical review›
One person found this helpful
1.0 out of 5 starsA Good Book Ruined
ByATon June 13, 2014
Mr. Derbyshire started out writing a great book about early Communist China, and then decided to ruin it with pederasty and other perversions. A great disappointment.

I'm not surprised, given Derbyshire's strong defense of child porn on VDARE.

Importance of Culture for EGI

Culture influences EGI.

At my other blog I had written about the importance of gene-culture interactions and how the concept can be used prescriptively, not only descriptively, through the convergence of European genetics (without panmixia!) through a sealing off of Europeans from non-Europeans, and low level gene flow over time among the former and none between the former and the latter – a concept of genetic concentration based on Identity (current genotypes and phenotypes, culture, history, etc.). Thus, culture is directly related to EGI, and directly influences it over historic time.

I again cite this paper that I briefly mentioned before that describes the process as occurring in the past. Note how NEC genetics has been radically changed by an important cultural-historical shift (Islamization). Note also that the more EC-like genetics in the Levant (of important when considering pre-Islamic Levantine gene flow into Europe) were Middle Easternified. In general, actual genetic data tend to go against the fantasies of “the movement.” Emphasis added:

Abstract 
The Levant is a region in the Near East with an impressive record of continuous human existence and major cultural developments since the Paleolithic period. Genetic and archeological studies present solid evidence placing the Middle East and the Arabian Peninsula as the first stepping-stone outside Africa. There is, however, little understanding of demographic changes in the Middle East, particularly the Levant, after the first Out-of-Africa expansion and how the Levantine peoples relate genetically to each other and to their neighbors. In this study we analyze more than 500,000 genome-wide SNPs in 1,341 new samples from the Levant and compare them to samples from 48 populations worldwide. Our results show recent genetic stratifications in the Levant are driven by the religious affiliations of the populations within the region. Cultural changes within the last two millennia appear to have facilitated/maintained admixture between culturally similar populations from the Levant, Arabian Peninsula, and Africa. The same cultural changes seem to have resulted in genetic isolation of other groups by limiting admixture with culturally different neighboring populations. Consequently, Levant populations today fall into two main groups: one sharing more genetic characteristics with modern-day Europeans and Central Asians, and the other with closer genetic affinities to other Middle Easterners and Africans. Finally, we identify a putative Levantine ancestral component that diverged from other Middle Easterners ∼23,700–15,500 years ago during the last glacial period, and diverged from Europeans ∼15,900–9,100 years ago between the last glacial warming and the start of the Neolithic. 
Author Summary 
Population stratification caused by nonrandom mating between groups of the same species is often due to geographical distances leading to physical separation followed by genetic drift of allele frequencies in each group. In humans, population structures are also often driven by geographical barriers or distances; however, humans might also be structured by abstract factors such as culture, a consequence of their reasoning and self-awareness. Religion in particular, is one of the unusual conceptual factors that can drive human population structures. This study explores the Levant, a region flanked by the Middle East and Europe, where individual and population relationships are still strongly influenced by religion. We show that religious affiliation had a strong impact on the genomes of the Levantines. In particular, conversion of the region's populations to Islam appears to have introduced major rearrangements in populations' relations through admixture with culturally similar but geographically remote populations, leading to genetic similarities between remarkably distant populations like Jordanians, Moroccans, and Yemenis. Conversely, other populations, like Christians and Druze, became genetically isolated in the new cultural environment. We reconstructed the genetic structure of the Levantines and found that a pre-Islamic expansion Levant was more genetically similar to Europeans than to Middle Easterners. 
These results suggest that population migration to Europe from the Near East could have started after the LGM warming and continued until the Neolithic. In addition, these results show that the modern European genetic component is more recent than would be expected from a component that developed from the initial peopling of Europe in the Upper Paleolithic ∼40,000 y.a.

Tuesday, July 26, 2016

Another Day, Another Atrocity

Striking at the heart of Western religious tradition.


EGI Notes predicts the response of the native peoples of Europe to this continued stream of atrocities and humiliations:

nothing
Nothing
NOTHING
NOTHING
NOTHING

Well...perhaps not nothing - one could reasonably expect Europeans to rally in support of refugees and immigrants, to march against "racism," and call for a sharp increase in NEC immigration.

From an adaptive fitness standpoint: The White race, the lowest form of life to ever exist in the multiverse.  Behold this tragicomic heap of biomass, unable to even muster the slightest hint of dignity or self-respect, unable to stir to exhibit even the slightest degree of self-defense and self-preservation. Utterly and irrevocably worthless.

More Asian Perfidy, 7/26/16

Asians, Asiatics, and Desis, oh my.


Why say anything?  After all, it’ll be mostly White Americans getting sick and dying, and who care about those long-nosed, hairy barbarians, eh?


That cogelite’s disdain for “cranky old White folks” is just dripping like venom from his brown, alien, Desi mouth.  But even a far-leftist knows what Conservatism, Inc. wants to avoid acknowledging: non-Whites care not for conservatism, only “cranky old Whites” do, and those “cranky old Whites” have grown tired of alien Asiatic filth like Roy talking down to them, taking them for granted (while expecting their votes like a feudal lord expects his serfs’ services), and ignoring their interests and desires.  Mainstream conservatism is becoming an ideology without a constituency, as Whites begin to wake up, thanks to Der Touchback and his incoherent campaign.

Scum like Roy fail to understand that their own contemptuous dismissal of Whites and White interests is to a large degree responsible for the rise of Trump and the demise of mainstream conservatism.

Alien filth Zakaria – the face that launched a thousand autisms – gets put in his place by Putin.  Congratulations to Trad Vlad for sticking a metaphorical thumb in the eye of Zakaria’s leering Asiatic countenance.






Sunday, July 24, 2016

The Gay Community's Trump Test

No excuse for "prejudice?"

Trump is undoubtedly the most pro-gay GOP Presidential candidate in recent history. Who else would have had Thiel making a speech talking about proudly being gay and talking about "false culture wars?' Who else would have come our strongly in support of gay rights in their convention speech? Who else has a long, established history of these sort of pro-homosexual "New York values?"

Now, rightist apologists for gays state, or at least imply, that gay support for the anti-White, leftist agenda is in large part due to the association of "the Right" with anti-gay religious intolerance. Let "the Right" be more inclusive and then, problem solved.

Trump therefore is sort of a test. The test is so far not being passed:
For those hoping Trump's nomination will improve the party's reputation among gay rights proponents, there's another challenge: Mainstream gay rights groups have denounced Trump, arguing that tolerance for one minority group doesn't excuse prejudice toward others — like Hispanics and Muslims — or unflattering comments about women. 
"His hatred toward anybody is a huge concern," said Jay Brown of the Human Rights Campaign. "When he attacks women, he attacks us. When he attacks Muslims, he's attacking us."

Emphasis added. Thus, the idea is that one must be tolerant of all minorities in order to be politically satisfactory to gays. If that's the underlying idea there, then that community is inherently hostile to White racial nationalism, with parallels to the Jews being noteworthy.


That Erudite Cochran Again

More shallow stupidity.

Mr. Clogged Arteries writes:
Now you see some signs of other stuff in Sicily or Calabria today, but that seems to be later, from Arab or Byzantine times.

"Stuff." What "stuff?" Lasagna? Olive oil? A horse head in a bed? Oh, the idiot is talking about population genetics. As is typical of HBD, the analysis is shallow. The relative genetic continuity in Italy (Ancient-Modern) - contra the heavy breathing "movement" and Arthur "Pesci" Kemp - is not simply due to "the slaves all died out" or "the slaves were mostly European" but likely a combination of those two: many, not all, of the slaves died out, and the ones who were assimilated were for the most part European, and the others mostly NECs not very genetically distant (as would be Nigerians or Chinamen) from the native population. It's not that there was absolute zero genetic influx, that is absurd, it's that the influx was much smaller than is popularly believed, and was mostly European (with some Levantines mixed in). Likewise, the "stuff" in "Sicily or Calabria" from "Arab or Byzantine times" was also much smaller than is popularly believed, and mostly Near Eastern/North African NECs; the combination of a small influx of peoples not enormously distant from the native population didn't alter things too much (granted the Near Easterners and North Africans may have carried some sub-Saharan alleles). This later influx also (subsequently) included Normans, French, Spaniards, and North Italians, further adjusting the population back in the (overall genetic) direction of its original constitution.

Friday, July 22, 2016

Prime Sailerian Stupidity

Blame the Italians.


Of course, the destruction of the traditional America and its culture has nothing to do with Jews, it's instead a dastardly plot by "Italian-American directors and actors" of the 1970s, including Robert De Niro. who is genetically about as Italian as Jesse Jackson is English.

I mean, even by Breezy's low standards, this is dumb.

HBD marches on.

The Marching Morons, 7/22/16

Der Movement, Der Movement, Der Movement marches on.


The same imbecile who critiqued Trump (Der Movement's Scots-German hero) for being "too ethnic" (while praising champion cuckservative Romney as "America's Dad") now wants to protect genteel Negresses like Leslie Jones from criticism:


MylesStandish Kudzu Bob • 16 hours ago

There's nothing virtuous about tormenting some hapless colored woman on the internet.
Let's remember a real American nationalist's comportment in such matters, that of the great General Nathan Bedford Forrest addressing the Pole Bearers association in 1875: "Ladies and Gentlemen, I accept the flowers as a memento of reconciliation between the white and colored races of the Southern states. I accept it more particularly as it comes from a colored lady, for if there is any one on God's earth who loves the ladies I believe it is myself."


Yes sir! Those dastardly (Scots-German!) "ethnics" are bad, while Negresses are good. 

An an aside, just curious, is Jones related to Jayman?


The Triracial-HBD View of Cruzian Dishonor

Triracial Jamaican Jayman asserts about Cruz dishonoring his pledge:

Jayman
This was the studliest thing Cruz has done, ever.
You got it twisted. Cruz was courageous to perform a bait-and-switch and to foil his competitor. What subhuman omega sperg would have endorsed the man who attacked his wife? Trump went to great effort to extract that betrayal, and then he was surprised?
Cruz earns a B+ for late-stage damage control.
Trump earns a D for assessing Cruz’s loyalty after smearing him for so long.
C_H earns an A+ for favoring Trump over Cruz.
C_H earns a D for identifying “courage” and honor. Ain’t no honor for Cruz endorsing Trump after everything that’s gone down.
Check yourself.

Keep in mind that this thing is Derbyshire's HBD superhero, praised to the skies by child porn apologist Derbyshire at every opportunity

Getting wise to the anti-White political movement known as HBD yet, White man?

Thursday, July 21, 2016

Der Movement Marches On, 7/21/16

Reproduced without further comment, emphasis added:

Smythe
Posted July 21, 2016 at 5:44 am 
Australia had a national identity – we were British (with some Northern European accretions), but of a different character resulting from our unique history and environment. The first blow struck against that identity was from the mass migration of several million Southern Europeans (mostly Greeks and Southern Italians). They may be members of the European family of nations but they were (and still are) not us.
The fact that they are now considered “White” (which is a euphemism for Northern European) is a sign of our desperation. We are looking for allies wherever we can find them.

Wednesday, July 20, 2016

Race in the News, 7/20/16

Liberal hypocrisy, "movement" stupidity, and something for Derbyshire.

The liberals are getting all breathless about Melania Trump's alleged plagiarism.  Very well. When when will they denounce Martin King for the same?



The gothic is a quintessentially European aesthetic. Moreover, it pertains and appeals more specifically to those of North-West European descent and is to be found in various modes and tropes throughout North-West European culture and contrasts with the Classicism of Southern Europe.

It's true that Gothic culture was most strongly focused in NW Europe, and in the popular mind is associated with Northern France and Germany.  But there is this and also this and also this.

But that's not the major problem with the above quote.  The problem is in its use of the present tense: "pertains" and "appeals."  Yes sir, dem Krauts of today are all going into medieval Gothic themes (that is, when they are not welcoming axe-wielding refugees and supporting Merkel more than ever), while dem Wops are all flocking to the works of Aristotle (when they are not ship captains jumping off sinking vessels they ran into rocks or behaving like hedonistic jackasses).  And, certainly, your typical German-American loves dem dere Batman movies and those movies' Gothic themes, while your typical Italian-American eschews Batman and prefers Clash of the Titans (release the kraken!).  What utter stupidity.



In 55 Days, one of the Marines, Captain Andy Marshall (Jerome Thor), has a mixed-race daughter, Teresa (Lynne Sue Moon) who he has left at a French Catholic orphanage. Teresa becomes a complication for Captain Marshall and Major Lewis as the story plays out. Even though she is rescued by Major Lewis in a dashing way with epic music playing in the background in the final scene we know she is not going to really be at home in Illinois after being raised in a Chinese orphanage. In my personal life, I know a great many people whose father was a career military man and whose mother is from the Far East, usually Korea. It seems to me that about half the kids of those combinations fail to launch, there is drug abuse, poor personal and career decisions, and other issues. Recently, several spree killers, such as Elliot Rodger, came from such a background.[2] 
Moviegoers also learn that Baroness Natalie Ivanoff (Ava Gardner) has had an affair with a Chinese General, causing her husband to commit suicide. She is now alone in the world with a valuable necklace her only wealth. She is haughty to her in-laws angry at her infidelities, but one can see her haughtiness is empty bravado. The Baroness is in dire financial straits and irredeemable social trouble. By the end of the movie she has pawned her necklace. The Baroness’ problems are solved by her death in the siege. 
In The Sand Pebbles, the problem of personal, intimate involvement with Third World People is fleshed out more deeply. The deep personal involvement has three different layers. The first is institutional. On the USS San Pablo, the Captain, Lieutenant Collins (Richard Crenna) organized a group of Chinese as coolie labor on the riverboat. The Chinese coolies turn part of the ship into their living quarters and a no-go area for whites. The coolies cook the meals, launder the clothes, clean and paint the ship, and service the engine. The Americans do little but drill in their perfectly laundered clothes, argue over trifles, and drink. This institutional organization brings about serious problems as the plot of The Sand Pebbles thickens. 
It is in the bars where the problems start to crop up and the second layer of problems arises: intimate sexual involvement. When being shown around the ship, Frenchie (Richard Attenborough), tells Jake Holman (Steve McQueen) that the Pharmacist Mate is the critical person to know, as many of the men are getting venereal diseases from visiting the Chinese prostitutes. Normally, sailors visiting Far Eastern prostitutes is not a big deal. In fact, such a thing is often a rite of passage for many young men in the military. However, Frenchie takes the situation further when he becomes involved with a Chinese woman named Maily (Marayat Andriane) who works at the bar the sailors like to patronize. The woman is at the bar because she is burdened with debts that she manipulates Frenchie into paying. 
Far Eastern morality is also clearly shown. As soon as Frenchie has the money to pay Maily’s debts, her Chinese creditor seeks more money by auctioning off Maily’s virginity. Additionally, the Chinese Republicans simply lie about who killed who, declaring Holman a murderer although the Republicans themselves were responsible for most of the killing.

Tuesday, July 19, 2016

The Unbearable Stupidity of HBD (and Greg Cochran)

Laughable.

When that old IQ-GDP correlation doesn't quite go the way the HBDers want, they sure know how to wave their hands around and excuse subpar perfomances by their Asian darlings (you know, the folks who cheat on achievement tests and only report test scores from well-educated urban populations).

The arterosclerotic Greg Cochran says:

...bad choices (Communism), having the world kick you in the crotch (Mongols), or toxic intellectual fads can all make smart peoples unproductive.

Yes sir, the Chinamen (but not the Slavs, no siree) are held back by the legacies of Communism. And those poor pacifistic Mongols have been kicked in the crotch by the world, don't you know.

I mean, even for a misanthropic retard like Cochran, that's beyond delusional. Hey Greg, I don't know, but maybe the Mongols have been more the kickers than the kickees when it comes to global crotches, eh?

If memory serves, I do believe the Mongols established a vast empire through brutal warfare, terror, and the slaughter of civilian populations, followed by the exaction of tribute from the conquered peoples. And all that wealth and power resulted in what, pray tell? The Mongols are unique in human history in having established a long-standing empire lacking in any foundational cultural idea or impetus whatsoever. Ethnic Mongol cultural achievements: zero.

Hey, fundamentally dishonest HBDers - if you want to pick peoples of whom it can be reasonably said that they've been "kicked in the crotch by the world" how about the Balkans? Russians (Mongol conquest, Communism and genocidal Jewish commissars, Hitler's invasion, Jewish looting of the post-Soviet economy)? The Irish? Sicilians? How about the Basques?

Oh wait...they're not Asian, so historical excuses don't count, eh?


The Meaning of Pence

The Movement Megaphone won't discuss certain things.

As some on the Right mourn God Emperor Trump's choice of Pence, those same "truth telling" rightists cannot bring themselves to admit the underlying ethno-political dynamics at play.

Putting aside the animosity of Trump's Jew family for Christie (*), the bottom line is that the choice of Pence is an attempt by the Trump campaign to unify both Lindian American Tribe factions of the GOP behind Trump.  Trump himself appeals to Southern (and Rust belt) Whites as well as to Northeast (including Rust belt) White ethnics.  Pence is designed to appeal (primarily) to the Midwest cucks and to a lesser extent to the New England patricians.

Don't like Pence?  Blame his tribe.

*The media also joyously reports on the ongoing humiliations heaped on fatman Christie by Trump and the Trump campaign  Is that all payback for the prosecution of Kushner the elder?  Who is pulling the strings of Trump as he struts around like Vince McMahon?  Who has the ring through Trump's nose?

Race in the News, 7/19/16

Two items.


Those wild and wacky (German) ECs:

Merkel's popularity has rebounded recently…

White worthlessness on display once again.


Cuckadoodledoo! Sessions would have been a better choice. Even Christie would have been better, but Trump’s Jewish son-in-law objected, and we can’t have that! Cuckadoodledoo!

Monday, July 18, 2016

Kai Murros Moscow Speech

Excellent material.



I wholeheartedly endorse Murros' vision. The only difference in our viewpoints is that I am far more pessimistic that any European resistance will ever come to pass.

But as regards what should happen, he and I are on the same page, so to speak.

Against Lynn: First RLP Blog Post Reproduced Here

Answering Amren lies.

I see that Lynn has been defending his Italian IQ nonsense against Unz, which found its way on Amren in August 2012 – Amren of course always being willing to attack gentile white ethnics while being hysterically reticent to feature anything even remotely negative about Jews. Lynn’s understanding of population genetics and racial history is very poor, and features outrageous cherry-picking and misinterpretation of single locus data, along with a reliance on studies from the mid-1990s, along with the false claim that published findings agree with his Kempian cartoon-like imaginative “history.” Reality can be better observed with this more recent autosomal work, which is by Northern Italian authors who themselves use Lynnian rhetoric, but show data not compatible with Lynn’s misinterpretations and distortions. See here.

It is clear that Northern Italians have less of the Northern European-like component and more of the Near Eastern-like component than do Northern and Western Europeans. Central Italians have less of the Northern European-like component and more of the Near Eastern-like component than do Northern Italians and Southern Italians have less of the Northern European-like component and more of the Near Eastern-like component than do Central Italians. This in fact shows a very clear cline of gene frequencies, similar to what has already been shown by Novembre and colleagues (as well as others since then) – genes vary with geography. Looking at the data, it is clear that the three Italian groups are much more similar to each other than any are to the Northern and Western Europeans to the left or the Middle/Near Eastern and North African groups to the right. The relatively small differences are in the proportions of the genetic components and, again, it is clear that despite the differences, the Italian groups are remarkably similar to each other. Fst data from the same work support this; as is expected from clinal differences, Southern Italians are a bit closer to the Middle/Near East than are Northern Italians, but again, all Italian groups are very close to one another, and Southern Italians are genetically closer to Northern and Western European populations like CEU and French than to the Middle Easterners. 

Given the relatively small differences among Italian groups (looking at the data and not the breathless writing in the aforementioned manuscript), it would seem that if “low-IQ” Southern Italians are substantially “admixed” with Middle Easterners and North Africans, then the “high-IQ” Northern Italians are as well, albeit to a slightly lesser extent. But one does not need to invoke modern admixture to account for the bulk of these intra-European differences. This work [UPDATED NOTE: no longer online] suggests the possibility that Southern Europeans are predominantly of Neolithic European “farmer” origin and that Northern Europeans are a mix of that and earlier Mesolithic peoples, who had some affinities with East Asians.

From that work, the authors make the following conclusions about the overall genetic history of Europe:
1. The arrival of Neolithic farmers probably from the Middle East.
2. Nearly complete replacement of the indigenous Mesolithic southern European populations by Neolithic migrants, and admixture between the Neolithic farmers and the indigenous Europeans in the north.
3. Substantial population movement into Spain occurring around the same time as the archaeologically attested Bell-Beaker phenomenon (HARRISON, 1980).
 4. Subsequent mating between peoples of neighboring regions, resulting in isolation-by-distance (LAO et al., 2008; NOVEMBRE et al., 2008). This tended to smooth out population structurethat existed 4,000 years ago.

Thus: increased "Middle Eastern" Neolithic ancestry in Southern Europe, decreasing in a cline going northwards, and "isolation-by-distance" creating the smoother clines of gene frequencies observed in Europe today, and which are clearly shown in the Italian genetic data.

Now, one could argue that the Eurasian Mesolithic hunter gatherers were under greater selective pressure for intelligence, and, hence, populations with greater Mesolithic origin have higher IQs than the more Neolithic European groups. But there’s no need to invoke a mass, widespread historical admixture with modern Middle/Near Eastern and/or North African populations. Southern Italy no doubt has a bit more such modern admixture than Northern Italy, but the levels are small and cannot be invoked to explain Lynn’s purported IQ differences. Most of the genetic differences within Europe were likely in place by the end of the Neolithic.

With respect to the IQ issue, Lynn’s reliance on achievement tests and self-administered online IQ tests is laughable. g-loaded IQ testing has shown that Sicilian children did not have lower IQs than Northern Italian children. Another group mentioned in the same link, using a cognitive assessment test, found IQs of 100.5, 101.2, and 103.1 in Northern, Central and Southern Italy, respectively. That’s not the final word on the subject, and it may well be possible that Northern Italians, with greater Mesolithic origins, do have a bit higher IQ than Southern Italians. But that has to be established via careful IQ testing, not Lynn’s bizarre use of non-g tests and online self-administered test data.  It's unlikely that when the "dust settles" that Lynn's conclusion of a 2/3 of a SD difference in IQ between Northern and Southern Italy will hold.  Lynn's dogmatic and close-minded insistence on his original IQ claims, and the fanciful ancestry tales spun around those claims, does not reflect well on his commitment to serious academic scholarship.

But that’s to be expected from someone who “estimates” Irish IQ by averaging results from one test given to Irish children, with scores in the high 80s, and a different test given to Irish adults, with scores in the high 90s – giving an “average” in the low 90s. The almost comical absurdity of this – which may pass as “scholarly” in the oxymoronic “social sciences” – doesn’t past muster in real science, where averaging can be done only on real replicates.  You cannot average completely disparate data sets!

How would Lynn measure racial differences in running speed I wonder? Average Olympic sprinting times with that of five year olds running potato sack races in Kindergarten? The responsible approach to the Irish IQ data would be to attempt to evaluate why the findings were so different and which are more accurate. Even better – give the same standardized test to both Irish children and adults. But, no. As long as the “estimated” score falls into a preconceived notion of an IQ-GDP/achievement correlation, there's no need to seek the truth. It’s all a shame, since the study of racial differences in intelligence and behavior is important, and needs to be carefully examined by real scientists, not by biased, addled ideological demagogues, who are “enabled” in their shocking pseudoscience by a cheering section with a vested interest in the “findings” thus generated.   IQ fetishists on the right and IQ deniers on the left are two peas in a pod. Neither deal in real science and scholarship.

Sunday, July 17, 2016

Lynn's Method of Pseudoscience

In seven easy steps.


1. You come up with a hypothesis, such as the idea that GDP varies with IQ, and that there is a casual relationship so that national IQ determines national GDP (and other measures of national success and productivity).

2. Instead of being a proper scientist and viewing your hypothesis with skepticism, and attempting to falsify the hypothesis, you instead desperately try to find data points to support your hypothesis, including cherry picking data and “estimating” (i.e., fabricating) IQ scores based on some achievement test data (tests that are not necessarily g-loaded and tests that Asians are known to cheat on).

3. In order to explain the ludicrously low IQs “estimated” in this fashion, you invent “intermediate racial clines” in European populations, based upon laughably misinterpreted single locus data and/or outdated studies, while openly ignoring the established fact that autosomal DNA studies irrefutably reject the idea that the relevant populations are some sort of “intermediate racial cline” significantly different from other “non-intermediate” European populations (including those in the same nation state).  The data instead show the usual, known gradual genetic clines that exist within Europe along the North-South and East-West axes, so that there are gradual and proportional shifts in ancestry proportions moving along, for example, the North-South axis of of the Italian state.  Thus, S. Italians are slightly "less Northern European" and slightly "more Near Eastern" than are N. Italians, but are hardly some sort of mid-way, intermediate racial cline spanning between N. Italians and Near Eastern/North African populations.  In the same manner, one would not label Russians and Finns as "intermediate racial clines" between Europeans and Asians, just because they are a (small) bit "more Asian" than are NW European Celto-Germanic populations. Gradual genetic clines and low levels of admixture exist across Europe, and these do not define intermediate populations with IQs marginally higher than that of American Negroes.

4. You then ignore, or spin away, actual IQ data that completely refute the “estimates” you’ve “calculated.”  After all, your “estimates” fall neatly on a linear regression of IQ-GDP (actually, correlation, but since you assume causation, it’s akin to a [invented] linear regression), while the real IQ data present a more complicated and nuanced story.  So the real data must be “wrong.”

5. Instead of admitting that you are wrong, or even just admitting the possibility of being wrong, you double down on your errors, obstinately defending data and explanations that do not, and cannot, support your hypothesis.

6. Then someone on The Mankind Quarterly advisory board writes a fawning review of your work, with the interesting fact that you yourself are the Assistant Editor of the journal reviewing your own work (no conflict of interest there, certainly).  That review is then breathlessly reproduced at a pro-Jewish “racialist” site (that has previously described its viewpoint as “yellow supremacist”), despite the fact that site knows full well that the work is highly controversial and is hardly supported by iron-clad facts.

7. The most charitable explanation of all this is that Lynn is emotionally invested in his hypothesis, and identifies his entire career and his professional reputation (such as it is) on that hypothesis and its supporting theories being correct.  Therefore, he’ll refuse to accept the overwhelming evidence of being wrong (particularly on the population genetics data, about which there is no doubt), and he’ll be enabled in his pseudoscience by HBDers and Nutzis.

More Amren Lies on Lynn's Pseudoscientific Fraud

Amren is an embarrassment.


In the last edition, the Balkan countries were shown to have lower IQs than Western Europe. Lynn argues that they are clines, reflecting genetic admixture with peoples from the Near East, where the IQs are in the range of approximately 90 (Turkey), 87 (Lebanon) and 83 (Syria) and hence the peoples of the southern Balkans are a mixed race cline of European and Near-Eastern populations with IQs intermediate between the two peoples.

Absolute retardation. Note the word “hence.” Essentially, the senile fool is saying that admixture exists because his “estimated” IQ scores are in between the populations – as if (falsified) IQ score differences prove (or determine?) a “racial cline.” There is absolutely no evidence for any such cline, assuming that Lynn is not so absolutely stupid to confuse Neolithic farmer ancestry with modern Near Eastern ancestry – particularly stupid since varying degrees of Neolithic ancestry is found throughout Europe. Thus, the groups that Lynn calls “European” have the same ancestry (to a lesser degree) as the others. Even if all of this is true, one thing does not necessarily cause another. Even IF the IQ scores were intermediate between two populations does not mean that the population with those scores are genetically/racially intermediate between the other two populations.
Likewise, in the last edition, Lynn noted that Portugal’s IQ was significantly lower than other Western European countries, something he put down to Early Modern African slaves, an issue which was not a factor in Spain, for example.

So, the retard is arguing that the admixture exists in Portugal, but not at all in Spain? What about the “North African” admixture (which carries some sub-Saharan genes)? Lynn is a pathetic joke.

In this edition, it is shown that the IQ in the far south of Western Europe is, in general, significantly below 100.

That is not true.

In Sicily and in the South of mainland Italy it is 90, and in southern Spain it is 95.5.

That’s from Lynn’s “estimates.” However, as discussed previously at this blog, there is ZERO real evidence for these IQ scores based on actual IQ data. ZERO. There are data that the IQs throughout Italy are similar, and there is also data that IQs in the south may be higher.

Lynn argues that the populations here are a European-North African cline, so the IQ is intermediate between Europe and North Africa.


What an idiot. North African input here is maybe, at most, at the level of ~ 5% at most, which is not, as Lynn implies, some sort of half-way intermediate admixed cline. That low level of admixture is not reasonably plausible as a possible source of depressing IQ to the absurdly low levels that Lynn “estimates.” In reality, the Mediterranean Sea has been an effective genetic barrier. Those Southern European populations are NOT "racial clines." They are European populations with low levels of "exotic admixture" at levels comparable to admixture (of varying types/origins) found in different parts of Europe.

He quotes many expert sources–often verbatim and at length–to back up these interpretations and also substantiates his interpretation with gene frequency data.


Expert sources? The sources linked in his published papers were laughable and his interpretations of population genetics were comical, cherry picked nonsense. Again: there is ZERO evidence that actual IQ in Southern Europe is as low as Lynn asserts, and there is ZERO evidence that these populations are some sort of heavily admixed “racial cline.” Admixture exists throughout Europe at low levels; but of course, an Asiaphile like Lynn would consider East Asian admixture is a positive thin (boosting IQ, I suppose). The autosomal data linked in this post do not support the implication of a heavily admixed "cline" radically different from other parts of Italy or Spain. The differences are relatively minor and consistent with the "genes mirror geography" gradual clines found tthroughout Europe as a whole. Does this image suggest any sort of radical "racial cline" within Italy (North-Central-South)?


That Amren is still pushing Lynnian crap (while they still kowtow to Jews) tells you all you need to know about the destructive stupidity, mendacity, and cowardice of the conservative-HBD faction of Der Movement. Pushing outright LIES and pseudoscientific distortions – a complete embarrassment. Interesting how Jews have to be treated with “kid gloves” for political expediency, but White gentile ethnics can be lied about with impunity. The truth about Jews must be covered up, while fantastic inventions about dagoes must be promoted. I can't seem to remember that Jefferson quote suggesting we need to lie to protect non-European peoples, yet promote falsehoods about Europeans.

Even AFTER Lynn has been refuted on these issues, Amren still promotes these lies. Amren seems emotionally beholden toward lying to their readers. Amren is pitiful – part of the problem, not the solution.