Wednesday, August 31, 2016

What is the Alt-Right?

Reasonably good Taylor video.


As a description of the Alt-Right, that's reasonably good, although I notice certain "movement" websites that would consider themselves part of the Alt-Right were not mentioned.

As I've commented at Counter-Currents, I do not consider myself part of the Alt-Right, for reasons of both style and substance.

Style: I really am not interested in people acting like immature jackasses, Pepe the frog memes, "Game," and the whole emphasis on HBD and IQ. Maybe that has appeal to younger activists (the snark, manosphere, and Pepe nonsense) or to recently converted "normies" (the breathless HBD nonsense), but it's not for me.  I certainly do not want to be part of any group that includes morons like Sailer or absolute pieces of filthy scum like Derbyshire.

Substance: I think that national socialism goes off the charts as regards Alt-Right beliefs. Would someone like Pierce be considered part of the Alt-Right?  I don't think so.  I'm more or less as radical as him, except my ingroup is broader, as it includes all Europeans. Probably, Radix and Counter-Currents are at the absolute limits of the Alt-Right (they are the "right" of the Alt-Right, while the VDARE boys are its "left")

Race, Politics, and Der Movement in the News, 8/31/16

Several items.


And so Trump once again cries: Cuckadoodledoo!  The stupidity of Trump is exemplified by the fact that this is a winnable election only if he were not such a moronic jackass (*). Even with the demographic challenge, unrelenting media hostility, and the machinations of the GOP Establishment, the polls still show things relatively close.  Imagine if Trump was not engaging in Twitter feuds, making constant stupid comments, and showing shocking indecisiveness by changing hos campaign staff every other day and flip-flopping back and forth on the fundamental positions of his campaign.  We all await his speech on immigration.

*Maybe Trump is a Game-Alt-Righter after all?  What will Pepe say?  Did Trump attract his model wives by letting his hand slide down an escalator?

The absolute and utter worthlessness and shocking inferiority of the White race is on display once again.

From Counter-Currents:

Greg Johnson
Posted August 30, 2016 at 2:22 pm | Permalink
I have banned this commenter.

Excellent.  The ONLY way to run a blog with comments is to (strongly) moderate and to ban commentators who are obviously trolling (hello, GW).  And I say that as someone who occasionally has had his own comments moderated away from Counter-Currents.  One must be objective about things, and Greg has the right to direct the discussion in the manner he sees fit.  I have my own blogs that are the ultimate expressions of my views.

Ben
Posted August 30, 2016 at 7:06 am | Permalink
I just listened to an npr podcast with Jared Taylor attempting to explain the alt right. One speaker (not Jared Taylor) declared the alt right isn’t so much white nationalism as it is wasp nationalism, because there are little to no Catholics in the movement. I’ve never heard this interpretation. Mr. Johnson, does this have any merit in your estimation? How would anyone even know there are no alt right white Catholics? Is there an anti-papist element of the alt right? Can a white Hispanic be a white nationalist?

Anyway, that’s all I have. I’m curious to read any feedback, and yes I am a white nationalist of Catholic background.

Reply
Greg Johnson
Posted August 30, 2016 at 2:18 pm | Permalink
I wish you could provide the name of the speaker. This is one of the stupider things I have heard in the recent discussions. The backbone of WN in America is “ethnic” Catholics, not WASPs, but the larger truth is that Christianity of any stripe is increasingly less important in our cause, and religion more broadly as well. People who want to inject old religious conflicts into our movement are frowned upon in the same as people who promote Old World ethnic conflicts. They are seen as sowers of discord, whereas white unity in the face of a much greater enemy is our goal.

Reply
Sharkeisha
Posted August 30, 2016 at 4:17 pm | Permalink
I believe the person who insisted that it is a Protestant movement was Robert P. Jones CEO, Public Religion Research Institute.

Reply
Greg Johnson
Posted August 30, 2016 at 6:08 pm | Permalink
He’s either uninformed or is simply trying to sow discord.

I’m of a mixed mind here.  No doubt, Greg Johnson is correct that Jones’ agenda is an anti-racist leftist attempt to sow discord. On the other hand, on the level of “leadership” of Der Movement, Jones is undoubtedly correct (there is one “leader” who is ostensibly “Catholic” – but who care about religion in the end, who believes? – but is ethnically compatible with the typical “movement” leadership).  This says something about the “rank and file.”  If “ethnic Catholics” were really the “backbone” of WN in America, why would they support an affirmative action program that closes off leadership possibilities and influence for themselves?

I think the most realistic interpretation is that “ethnics” form an important minority (heh) component of American WN, but certainly not a backbone, much less a majority – but they could.  The Trump campaign shows us that “Northeast White ethnics” are the “low hanging fruit” of potential activists. There is great untapped potential there.  But why should they join a “movement” that so openly and loudly despises them and holds them in contempt?  I know that many of my detractors believe that I am “thin-skinned” but actually the opposite is true. Many of these detractors, who fly off the handle at the slightest negative comments about their own ingroup identification, would not last five minutes associated with the “movement” if they were one of the “ethnics” that Johnson refers to.  One has to have the hide of a rhinoceros to associate with the “movement” – much less do so for decades – if one derives ancestry from European sources anywhere to the east of Berlin and/or the south of Vienna. Certainly, every once in a while, frustration sets in, but still the fact remains.

Tuesday, August 30, 2016

We're White Nationalists, Not White Supremacists

Setting the record straight.

As part of her moronic speech attacking the Alt-Right, Hillary Clinton - as well as all the “experts” and “watchdogs” who piled on after the speech – asserted the oft-told lie that White nationalism is the same as White supremacy, that White nationalism is just a euphemism for White supremacy, and that White nationalists are just White supremacists trying to use clever language to hide the truth about what they are and what they really believe.

Others have previously outlined the clear difference between White nationalism and White supremacy, between the idea of separatism and that of supremacism.

I would like to make some statements about my beliefs, and why I find the comments of Clinton and the watchdogs and other racial liberals and anti-racist nitwits so offensive.

I would hope that even some of my “movement” opponents – who have criticized me vociferously over the years on a number of matters – would at least agree with the premise that I am not dishonest. “Wrong, misguided, crazy, paranoid retard, etc. etc. etc.” – all these and other negative comments have been made – but at least admit that I believe what I write. So, now, believe me when I say this, as someone who prizes honesty and despises “mainstreaming” – I am a White nationalist, but NOT a White supremacist, and there is a very clear distinction between those two descriptions, clear to anyone who is not some sort of dishonest mendacious toad themselves.

I am someone who self-describes as a (radical) national socialist; I have no interest in using clever euphemisms to disguise my beliefs. Therefore, rejection of “White supremacist” has nothing whatsoever to do with an attempt to evade the truth; on the contrary, it is born out of a desire to be as truthful and as accurate and precise as possible. If I am not a White supremacist, then why should I accept that label? To do so would be dishonest and would obfuscate the facts and impede a truthful and frank discussion of the issues at hand. Indeed, one would think it obvious that someone who writes about White inferiority, about the “objective worthlessness of the White race” (from an adaptive fitness standpoint), that such a person is not, and could not be, a “White supremacist.”

Some would argue that a desire for separation implies a belief in supremacy. That is strange: I assume that those making that argument prefer to live on their own in a home or apartment rather in a communal dwelling; are they supremacists? Another analogy would be ecological. Ecologists and environmentalists are interested in preserving endangered species and subspecies. Some of the dangers facing such organisms are similar to those facing Whites - for example, competition from invading species and subspecies and/or hybridization with those invading competitors (note: contrary to popular belief, there does not have to be reproductive isolation between closely related species of the same genus, and sub-species are typically completely reproductively compatible). Insofar as I know, these ecologists and environmentalists do not express their concern in the language of supremacy, but rather stress the preservation of the diversity of life. One here is interested in difference, in distinction, not with superiority or inferiority. How much more urgent then should be the preservationist impulse if one is talking about danger facing one’s own group! There is obviously no logical connection between preservation and supremacy.

Further, even in the absence of an immediate danger to your group, it is perfectly natural and healthy to prefer those genetically closer to you; that is adaptive fitness, and is exemplified by family ties and familial interests. Parents, for example, do not typically express their interest in their children in terms of supremacy (despite the fact that they may sometimes brag about their children’s accomplishments). Concern for kin, at either the familial or ethnoracial level, is not “supremacy.”

Now, to be honest, there are of course some White nationalists who really are White supremacists – but a significant fraction of these are more concerned with supremacy of certain types of Whites over other types of Whites than with Whites compared to non-Whites. And, yes, it is certainly true that White nationalists like myself do believe Whites are superior by certain criteria, just as we believe Whites are inferior by other criteria. But this fact-based weighing of racial strengths and weaknesses does not constitute the foundation of our racial nationalism, which is based instead on genetic and cultural kinship, and a desire to promote the preservation and advancement of our race, without necessarily doing harm to other groups. Indeed, many of us promote Salter’s idea of “Universal Nationalism” and grant other peoples the same rights of existence and self-determination that we claim for our own people. Therefore, in the last analysis, for our type of White nationalism, the idea of some sort of general and fundamental “supremacy” simply does not exist.

So, I have no desire to use euphemisms for my beliefs. I am a White nationalist, a fascist, a national socialist, whose overall ideology can be called pan-European national socialism. I object to the label of “White supremacist” for the very simple reason that it is not true, it is a fundamentally dishonest distortion of my beliefs, and to support truth and honesty, I want a clear accounting of what it is I believe or do not believe. It is not for political opponents to impose labels on others as part of a strategy of emotional button-pushing. They say “White supremacist” in order to conjure up images of White plantation owners and Black slaves, of the alleged indignities of the Jim Crow South and of apartheid-era South Africa, of violence against civil rights protesters, of “good old boys” with their Confederate flags and juvenile acting out. They want to avoid people thinking about nationalism, about separation, about folks just wanting to be left alone to pursue their own destiny in their own nations.

So: White nationalism, yes; White supremacism, no. Not any sort of euphemism or covering up of the truth, but a reflection of the truth itself.

More of the Fraud, 8/30/16

:::Yawn:::

Riopel  TommyLiam • 9 hours ago
Yes. Whites should be the ones rioting and burning down cities, not blacks.
1  • Reply•Share ›
Avatar

silviosilver ✓ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ ˢᵘᵖᵖᵒʳᵗᵉʳ  Riopel • 4 hours ago
Finally, something you said I can wholeheartedly agree with.
 • Reply•Share ›

Now, I agree with Riopel as well, but then I'm a "crazy" "over-earnest" "deranged" "shiteating" extremist.  You know, the type that Silver was constantly attacking over at Majority Rights. But now that the grand fraud is burrowing into Radix like a deer tick into someone's leg, the "Trump supporter" needs to out-Nutzi the Nutzis...until such time when he needs to switch his persona again like a spastic chameleon and once again denounce extremist rhetoric.

Monday, August 29, 2016

Der Movement in the News, 8/29/16

Der Movement marches on.

Coming from Derbyshire of all people, here is a note (emphasis added) of interest to the good and great Sir Desmond Jones, who asserts with complete confidence that Italy is, and shall remain, 100% racially (and ethnically) homogeneous to the ends of time, forever and ever, amen:

The current focus of attention for the ongoing invasion of Europe is Italy. In the month of July twenty-five thousand illegals arrived in Italy from Africa. Twenty-five thousand in one month. And that was a twelve percent increase on July last year.

Put it another way, that would be 300,000 a year, although the numbers are actually smaller in the winter months. Let’s say to expect 200,000 this year. For comparison, the last year I can find numbers for, the year 2014, the number of live births in Italy was just over 500,000.
So the numbers coming in, almost all of them young men, are of the same order of magnitude as the number of new Italians being born.
Most of those July numbers came from Nigeria and Eritrea. Not many of them actually want to stay in Italy. They are aiming for the nations of northwest Europe, with their higher levels of prosperity and lusher welfare systems. That accords with the wishes of the Italians, who would prefer to just shunt them northwards.
Unfortunately the countries to the immediate north of Italy—Switzerland, France, and Austria—don’t want these invaders in their countries, even if they’re just passing through. Those countries have been fortifying their borders. So Italy is now experiencing what your plumber would call a nasty backup.

And here we see another "movement" advance:
This is a danger the Alt Right may face as well if it continues to grow in prominence. Already, we see attempts at co-option and a push to deny the role of race as central to the Alt Right.

I thought what is central to the Alt-Right was a combination of undercuts, Pepe the Frog, HBD race realism, "game," and snarky juvenile comments? 
Clinton’s speech and commercial have all but coronated Jared Taylor, Peter Brimelow, etc. as the leaders of the New Right.

If we accept that, we’ve already lost before we’ve even begun. Can I choose my own leaders, please?  

Sunday, August 28, 2016

Fisking the Trumponans

Delusions about the God Emperor.


“If some right-wing critics of him, having surreal hopes about D. Trump, don’t get it — it only proves they have no sense of what political realism is all about.”

Er, Tom, you’re a good guy and all, and I’ve always had a good opinion of you, but it’s not the right-wing critics of Trump who have a “surreal hopes” about the man – it is instead the shrieking schoolgirls and their pathetic womanly crush on a man who is, in the last analysis, a vulgar ignorant buffoon. 

We of the alt-right will never abandon Donald Trump,” Johnson added.

This Johnson is the same doofus who wrote a “Pace Amendment” that – instead of just saying American citizenship will be restricted to persons of European ancestry – tried to parse what levels of Amerind, Asian, and/or NEC ancestry that would be “acceptable.” After all, we have to make room for whatever quota queens have real or imagined “Indian Princess” ancestry, as well as accommodate our growing Euro-Jew-Asian Jeurasian elite. 

Even if Trump is softening his positions, not merely his words, some white nationalists will still give him the benefit of the doubt. “It is impossible to imagine Mr. Trump backtracking so far on immigration that the people who support him because of his immigration policy would vote for Mrs. Clinton instead,” said Jared Taylor, editor of the white nationalist publication American Renaissance.

Er, is that meant to be serious? That’s the only choice? What if his disillusioned supporters just stay home or vote third party? I mean, you know, gee, it seems obvious to me. But what do I know? 

Amren is not “White nationalist” by the way. They have self-described as “Yellow supremacist.” 

One white nationalist who has complained from the beginning that Trump isn’t the hero the movement is looking for is Bob Whitaker. He ran for president on the American Freedom Party ticket, before he resigned on the basis that the party was too focused on Trump and was moderating the “white genocide” message in order to attract his supporters.
“I would not be at all surprised if Trump went into desperate reverse on immigration and desperate groveling that would embarrass even the Republican National Committee,” he wrote on his blog on Thursday.

Bob Whitaker and Kevin Strom rank among the few ‘movement” personages who show any sort of sense. But they fail for not taking the implications of Trump’s campaign (not the man himself) seriously enough. 

“Well guys. We’ve made it,” wrote Andrew Anglin, founder of Neo-Nazi website The Daily Stormer. “Hillary Clinton is giving a speech about us today.”

Yes, sir! At 2 PM “we’ve made it!” And at 2:15 PM they’ve already forgotten all about us.


Some Photos and a Video for Der Movement

For the fanboys.








Der Movement in the News, 8/28/16

The usual stupidity.

Of course Sailer doesn’t see any problem in using standardized test scores to “estimate” IQ, which invariably puts groups like Northeast Asians (and that other very honest and ethical Asiatic group, the Jews) at the top. 

Hey, weasel-faced Jimmy Wideassmann – was German immigration an “unalloyed good” for America? (Better than that post-1965 influx though, eh?) Guess who brought in dat dere anarchism before dem wops? Was that part of the “race replacement that dare not speak its name,” Desmond Jones? A White nationalist “Kodak moment?” 

The fundamental dishonesty and all-around beta race cuckiness of Trump and his general election campaign.

A wise Counter-Currents commentator: 

Regarding Ann Coulter, much as I like much of what she says and writes, I myself would not want to enter her bed because it is defiled.

Hey! Don’t you know that the fossilized “movement” dogma is that Coulter is a “goddess” and a “lioness?” Just because she engaged in activity that Billy Boy Pierce considered worthy of being strung up in public in The Turner Diaries should just conveniently be ignored! 


The best part is Trump shilling for South Asian cogelite immigrants while the Der Movement continues creaming their pants for him (but not his supporters, that’s a bridge [or rather a wop] too far). 

Laguna Beach Fogey
August 27, 2016 - 9:49 am | Permalink
We’re sending shitlords and Alt-Right operatives into local Republican party organizations and GOP clubs. All their base are belong to us.

OK, fair enough. I’ll believe it when right-wing populist GOP candidates are elected to Congress in 2018, and when such a candidate is nominated for President in 2020 (assuming Der Touchback goes down in flames this November, or is elected and adopts the HBD-Neocon immigration policy). 

In a recent interview Ann Coulter made the observation that this election cycle may be the last chance for traditional America to regain control of the US government.

That’s great. And what happens if Trump loses? Will the “goddess” and “lioness” Coulter snuggle up in bed with Dinesh; maybe he’ll cook her some curry in the morning? 

A “Serbian” or “Serbian-Greek” or (whatever it is this week) doesn’t like dat dere Eastern Europe: 

silviosilver ✓ᵀʳᵘᵐᵖ ˢᵘᵖᵖᵒʳᵗᵉʳ advancedatheist • 14 hours ago
You see the same thing in Europe, especially eastern Europe. Lovely thin, well-dressed white people everywhere, it's beautiful. (And I say that as someone not typically enamored with anything eastern European.)

A General Question: Is the Alt-Right's 15 minutes of fame over yet?

Saturday, August 27, 2016

Behold the Parasite

Jews and net EGI.


Of course, Jews are neither wasps nor fungi, nor do they stand in the same relationship to us as do the parasitic wasps and fungi to their hosts just mentioned. Jews are either a closely related species to us, or are a subspecies of the same species. In either case, as repulsive as are parasites, and as loathe as we may be to admit it, Jews are genetically quite similar to us and are in fact extensively cross-bred with us. Doesn’t this effectively rule out their being biological parasites upon us? 
No, not at all. In fact, it makes it even more likely. In 1909, an Italian entomologist named Carlo Emery discovered what is now known as Emery’s Rule. The rule states that that social parasites (that is, parasites of social species — and Homo sapiens is certainly a social species) tend to be parasites of species or genera to which they are closely related. Matt Johnston of the University of Arizona states that, “One explanation for the apparently close relationship between social parasites and their hosts is that in order to get past the hosts’ defenses, the parasite needs to have evolved communication systems similar to the host. This may be more likely if the two share a close evolutionary history.”

This is why I talk about the importance of net genetic interests (not that anyone listens). If all you care about are gross genetic interests, then you would simply measure the genetic distances involved, calculate the child equivalents, and conclude that since Jews are genetically quite similar to, and cross-bred with, Europeans, then their presence in Western societies does not exert much of an EGI cost at all. However, Jews are a highly specialized, evolved parasitic ethny with interests that are incompatible with that of Europeans, and as such Jewish behavior exerts a significant fitness cost on Europeans, so that the net effect on European EGI is enormous. Therefore, net EGI takes into account all factors that affect the genetic interests of an ethny, and provides a final tally of the outcome. If Jews promote mass alien immigration, desegregation, miscegenation, and overall societal degeneration (that imposes severe costs on, among other things, family stability and reproductive success), then their presence is extremely destructive to host EGI regardless of what the relative genetic distances are between Jews and White Gentiles. Further, if Jews consider themselves a different group than are White Gentiles, and pursue a group evolutionary strategy of their own, they would not care that their behavior damages the interests of an ethny relatively genetically similar to their own. Of course, Identity is based upon more than just genetic distances, and issues of Identity, by influencing behavior, directly affect genetic interests.

Heavy Breathing on the Alt-Right

Delusion is rampant.

In the aftermath of Clinton's boring and predictable speech, the reaction of Der Movement has been, with rare exceptions, well...boring and predictable.

'We're in the news!  This is great!  A breakthrough!  We are now the real rightist opposition! The possibilities are unlimited!  The Establishment is scared and taking us seriously! There's no turning back!  The Alt-Right is now on the national radar!"

Meanwhile, the only sane thing I've read has been from Greg Johnson, who prudently observed:

No, the Alt-Right has not arrived. No, the Alt-Right has not finally been taken seriously. The Alt-Right is simply being brandished like a swastika or a flaming cross to scare the goyim and to stigmatize a new and potent threat to liberalism and globalization.

First of all, as is most likely, the "15 minutes of fame" will wear off quickly, as media attention shifts to Der Touchback's endless backpedaling, or his latest Twitter feud about the length of his fingers or other body parts.

Second, even if attention on the Alt-Right doesn't fade away more or less immediately, I ask: what contingency plans exist, and are being implemented, to take advantage of this new-found attention?  I mean, other than Pepe the Frog memes, undercuts, acting like jackasses while wearing Hawaiian shirts, babbling about useless esoterica, and patting yourselves on the back for "having arrived?"

Further, the Alt-Right needs to ask itself: what is our fundamental agenda with the Trump campaign?  If it is to draw attention to yourselves, to use Trump to advance yourselves and your agenda, well, you've accomplished that, at least temporarily, even though I'm doubtful it will last and even more doubtful you'll accomplish anything of use even if it does last.  On the other hand, if you really want your "God Emperor" to win, then, truth be told, you're really mucking it up.  Even if Trump stands firm and does not backpedal, he is still running as an aracial civic nationalist and not as a WN.  If your top agenda is a Trump victory, then you should have been strictly following Greg Jonson's lead:

But both Leftists and Alt-Right publicity hounds have selfish interests in proclaiming spurious connections. And American voters are stupid or naive enough to believe them. Which worries me, because this election could be really, really close, and the Alt Right canard might put Hillary Clinton in the White House.

But I really want Mr. Trump to win, so I have been declining invitations from American mainstream media outlets to comment on Trump and the Alt Right, simply because I do not want to give aid to the lying press’ latest “gotcha” campaign.

But, no.  As they say, "women don't know what they want," and the worshipful Trump fans of Der Movement, acting as they are like love-struck teen-aged girls, don't know what they want either. Their effeminate girl-crush on Trump has addled whatever "thinking" processes they are (barely) capable of, and they are passive aggressively sabotaging Trump's chances of wining, while doing nothing constructive with the limited and fleeting attention they're getting as a result of months of their "look at me, look at me" antics.

The likely result: more failure, Trump goes down to defeat as a pathetic backpedaling cuck, and that this failure is used as an excuse to move the political direction back to the pre-Trump status quo.

But the anti-Alt Right Left is even worse.  Besides Girdle Fats' ludicrous comments (e.g., that the multiculturalist, anti-fascist Putin is somehow the "Big Daddy" of the international "far-right"), we have all sorts of "experts" talking like idiots.

Two examples.  First, anyone who uses the term "White supremacy" (or its variants) to describe the Alt-Right, or WN in general, automatically disqualifies themselves from being any sort of intelligent commentator on the issue.  Pursuit of one's interests, at the individual or at the ethny level, does not, obviously (that is, obvious to anyone who is not a mendacious retard), make one a "supremacist" of any kind.  Yeah, yeah...hey, don't take that antibiotic - you don't want to be labeled as a "eukaryote supremacist" don't you know!

Second, any talk of how the "far-right" is "promoting violence" against "vulnerable populations" is a completely delusional inversion of reality.  Truth is, Trump supporters are being attacked throughout the country, and whenever these Alt-Righters try to hold any sort of public rally it are they who are the victims of violence.  The only "vulnerable population" in America are the folks who are politically to the right of Jeb Bush.

The only reason these "experts" and "watchdogs" (many of whom are less physically attractive than an actual watchdog) are taken seriously is that the Left has a monopoly on the mass media.  Why else would such charlatans and mountebanks be given any sort of serious forum?


Race in the News, 8/27/16

Several items.

A lot in this article is highly stupid politicized nonsense, but this:

I asked Wells whether my percentage breakdowns of Korean, Chinese, and Japanese meant anything. “Yes,” he said, “but I think it is misleading to go to a decimal place or even to go out two digits.”

Likely has some merit. As a crude, off-the-cuff opinion, I’d say that anything less than 10% is open to reasonable skepticism, less than 5% to more stringent skepticism, and anything in the range of 1% or less is more or less ludicrous (unless strong, reproducible, and definitive evidence is given to say otherwise).

And it’s not only Koreans and such groups that have poor coverage. There are Europeans who, at the higher levels of “significance,” have really large amounts of “unassigned” ancestry.

At best this is marginally better then DNAPrint…about 15 years later. I guess though to get Der Movement to be a bit more skeptical I should praise the test, which will provoke the opposite reaction.

So: 23andme is really good, it’s the best!


The “goddess” Coulter is a documented mudshark, and the “god emperor” Trump is cuckily backpedaling faster than a LSD-dazed clown on a unicycle.


“Suddenly, I just became a huge mainstream celebrity in the intellectual world,” says D’Souza, who was inundated with speaking invitations. He also became a hot commodity among blonde conservatives. After dating Laura Ingraham and then Ann Coulter, he found the ultimate prize in Dixie Brubaker, a beautiful blonde from a conservative California family, whom he had met while working in the White House; they married in 1992. D’Souza admits, “It was my mission to marry the all-American girl.”



Friday, August 26, 2016

What If Trump Was Not a Moronic Jackass?

Saying it in a different manner.

Could Trump have run an implicitly White, right-wing populist, civic nationalist campaign and still be in the lead in the polls now, with a strong chance of winning?

Certainly yes, if the man was a serious thinker, rather than a crude Beavis-and-Butthead type jackass.

Having already outlined how he should have answered the Brown Star family, and how he should answer Ms. Girdle Fats’ attack on the Alt-Right (his Manchester speech being interestingly similar to the advice), I now move on to broader perspectives.

Immigration.  Here is where Trump has had his greatest problems, re: policy.

He should have outlined his policies as follows:

1. A zero-tolerance policy for any further illegal immigration.  But, instead of bloviating about a “big, beautiful wall” that “Mexico will pay for” he should have stated, calmly but firmly, that a border wall is a necessity, that we must do it regardless of the cost, that Israel has managed quite well with their wall, that since the wall is a national security priority it will come from the defense budget, and since Mexico bears much responsibility for the problem, we will recoup part of the cost through a tax on remittances, a tax on Mexican commerce, and – tying immigration to outsourcing – a punitive tax on American companies that move overseas (or to Mexico).

2. The illegals already here have to go.  But rather than blustering about a “deportation force” he should have endorsed the reasonable policy of “self-deportation.”  By enforcing immigration law internally in the strictest degree possible, by raising it to the level of a national emergency and investing the necessary resources, we will take away from the illegals everything that makes life in America worthwhile.  They will be forced to go back where they came from, since all opportunities and benefits and necessities of living will gradually be withdrawn from them.  Gradually over time, their numbers here will decrease as they return home.  Absolutely no benefits for “dreamers” and no “in state tuition” and no looking the other way as companies hire illegals and no drivers licenses and no anything.  

3. Birthright citizenship should be abolished. Legal immigration should be cut sharply, if not ended completely.  No H-1B visas.  No “high skilled” immigrants needed.

4. Muslim immigration: what he should have said here was: “as part of my plan to cut legal immigration, there will be no immigrants or refuges from any area that constitutes a terrorist threat.”  Same effect, less “threatening” language.

Other issues:  You know, when asked about the “nuclear triad” you should not say “the devastation is important to me” but rather: “given the security threats to America, including a nuclear-armed China and Russia, who are modernizing their nuclear forces, as well as North Korea and the long-term uncertainty about Iran, it is prudent for America to maintain all three parts of its nuclear triad.  Indeed, we should be modernizing and expanding our arsenal, including bringing back high-yield multi-megaton thermonuclear weapons and MIRVed warheads for our ICBMs, and we should look into making at least part of our ICBM force mobile.  Even in the absence of any immediate external threat, America should maintain the triad, as a hedge against any future, heretofore unknown, threats to our national security."

And, also: no Twitter feuds, or comments about gushing blood, Mexican judges, or hand size.

But what do I know?  After all, Trump is an alpha male of vastly superior racial stock, so let’s all follow the God Emperor – as he merrily cucks away right off the proverbial cliff.

Cuck Emperor in the News, 8/26/16

August politics.

The fundamental dishonesty of Trump and his campaign: Trump is backpedaling on immigration while at the same time he and his campaign are trying to fool the rubes by denying they are doing so.  And most of the lick spittle “movement” – full of star-struck shrieking little girls – are enabling him in his dishonesty.

But I’ll be patient.  Who knows?  He may flip-flop back to this original viewpoint.  But if he explicitly outlines his cuckiness, Der Movement is going to be in the cross-hairs of a sustained barrage of criticism from my direction. Count on it.

An interesting juxtaposition:

This here, and


One wonders if the idiot commentator who criticized my advice on Counter-Currents realizes that his “God Emperor” said the same thing, in so many words, as I wrote.






Roissy vs. White Nationalism

Stupid gamester.

Surprise, surprise, HBD Gamester comes out against White nationalism, essentially repeating all of Steve Sailer’s dumb arguments, which were refuted (mostly by me) back on Majority Rights:

In practice, though, avowed White Nationalism is a non-starter. Whites aren’t a monolith. Italy looks and operates differently than England which looks and operates differently than Ukraine. There are four primary continental scale races — White, asian, amerind, black — and a nationalism ideology that attempted to place those races under an all-encompassing umbrella term would be viciously mocked and rebuked by popular revolt. There can be no Black Nationalism or Asian Nationalism or Amerind Nationalism. Try telling a Mexican he’s indistinguishable from an El Salvadoran.
Likewise, a White Nationalism movement will fail.

But, a White nationalist “movement” exists, and even the likes of Lothrop Stoddard talked about the “comity” among Whites in general, and the need for a broad White solidarity world-wide. No one has ever said that WN means that all Whites are alike, or should submerge their very real differences under some sort of panmixia, racial, cultural, political, or otherwise. But the similarities outweigh the differences, and in a globalized world where Whites as a race-culture are under mass attack, and where a clash of civilizations is very real (and being actualized in the streets of Western Europe), it makes perfect sense for a nationalist ideology, that has – as one but not the sole component – broad race-culture as the highest point of identification, to come into being.

Then again, it is not surprising that a weasel-faced piece of trash like Roissy – who has promoted miscegenation and has engaged in it himself with Negresses – is against WN. Further, given his lick spittle admiration for Trump, what does that tell you about the aracial civic nationalism of Der Touchback?

Roissy is just another Derbyshire, albeit one that engages in oil-drilling rather than mustard-dipping.


Thursday, August 25, 2016

Greg is Right, 8/25/16

Some useful points.

Trump, however, is not a White Nationalist. He is a civic nationalist.

Exactly. And he’s not “the last hope for White America” either. The hysterical girlish shrieks of pro-Trump hysteria coming from grown men (well, they are quota queens, so maybe it is understandable) is pathetic.


There is no relationship between Trump and the Alt Right, just a one-way man-crush.

More like a bunch of hysterical teen-aged girls shrieking wildly for Justin Bieber or whoever it is they shriek about these days.


But I really want Mr. Trump to win, so I have been be declining invitations from American mainstream media outlets to comment on Trump and the Alt Right, simply because I do not want to give aid to the lying press’ latest “gotcha” campaign.

That’s good and prudent. One can contrast Greg’s discipline with certain other “movement” figures - who shall go nameless - who are so desperate for attention these days they’d let themselves be interviewed by a middle school class newspaper. It is unnerving to see middle-aged men acting like juvenile jackasses, and hanging on to Trump’s celebrity coattails for his media scraps. 

And then there is the prominent “movement” figure – who shall also go nameless – who almost seems jealous of Trump’s electoral success as a right-wing populist and seems to be trying to passive aggressively sabotage that success.


Hillary Clinton has never gotten anywhere on her own merit. She owes everything to men. She would never have been senator, Secretary of State, or the Democratic nominee without her marriage to Bill Clinton.

Every woman I know of, even personally, in a position of authority has gotten there through the help of men. Why should Ms. Girdle Fats be any different?

No, the Alt-Right has not arrived. No, the Alt-Right has not finally been taken seriously. The Alt-Right is simply being brandished like a swastika or a flaming cross to scare the goyim and to stigmatize a new and potent threat to liberalism and globalization.

That’s correct. Unfortunately, the heavy breathing online and the delusions have already begin.


Wednesday, August 24, 2016

How Trump Should Answer Clinton's Upcoming Attack on the Alt-Right

Free advice.

Just like I suggested the proper way Trump should have responded to the DNC attack by the alien NEC Brown Star family, I know suggest - this time in advance - the proper way for Trump to respond to Hillary Clinton's scheduled Thursday attack on Trump's supporters in the Alt-Right.

Of course, his response should in part depend on what the harridan actually says, but his riposte should include something like this:

"The fundamentally dishonest Hillary Clinton is trying to distract the American people from their very real problems by unfairly mischaracterizing a group of people who are among my supporters. Crooked Hillary can smear me and these people all she wants, but the truth is that these folks she attacks are decent Americans - American citizens - deeply worried about the direction of our great country.  And they have a right to be worried, and to be even more worried about what will happen to America if my opponent is elected.

Maybe if Hillary would worry more about the very real worries of honest, law-abiding American citizens, instead of worrying about illegal immigrants, Syrian refugees, and how to cover up her scandals and frauds, she would know why so many Americans are worried - worried AND angry - about the direction America is headed.

Hillary Clinton can say whatever she wishes, but the American people will not be fooled.  And even though I do not agree with all my supporters on everything they say or believe, I'm not going to throw my own supporters under the bus.  Maybe if the Establishment had done a better job listening to the American people, there wouldn't be so much anger and division in this country, after eight years of Barack Obama's failed Presidency."

Etc. Etc. Etc.  Some variation of that would work well - defuse the attack while maintaining the respect of Trump's core supporters.

Can he do that, instead of ignoring it,  or muttering "disavow, disavow, disavow?"

By the way, the idea that a "pivot" is required is pure stupidity.  Trump's problem has never been his original hard-like on immigration.  After all, he was very tough on immigration at the RNC, and came out of that in good shape.  His hard-line didn't hurt him when he was doing better at the polls. No, his decline has more to do with his Twitter buffoonery more than anything else.  It's Trump the man who needs  a pivot, not his immigration policies.

Is Der Movement's Winter of Discontent Coming?

Does the God Emperor have feet of clay?

I guess I was too quick in saying the beta cucking fraud Der Touchback was not going to pivot.  Read here, emphasis added:

AUSTIN, Texas, Aug 23 (Reuters) - U.S. Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump held out the possibility on Tuesday of a softening of his hardline position on illegal immigration, a move that could help move him to the political center but hurt him with his most ardent supporters.
In an immigration town hall event with Fox News anchor Sean Hannity, Trump was asked whether he would be willing to change U.S. law to accommodate those illegal immigrants who have been contributing to American society, obeyed laws and have children.
"There certainly can be a softening because we're not looking to hurt people," Trump replied, insisting there were some "great people" among the immigrant population.
It was the latest example of Trump appearing to waver on his long-held stance he would deport all illegal immigrants back to their home countries. His new campaign manager, Kellyanne Conway, told CNN on Sunday that Trump's proposed "deportation force" for the 11 million people in the United States illegally was "to be determined."
But a change in Trump's position could prove to be dispiriting to some of his strongest supporters. Trump defeated 16 rivals for the Republican presidential nomination and one factor that helped him was being the most hardline candidate on immigration.
"Why would anyone be surprised that Trump has pivoted to becoming the 'amnesty' candidate?"

Now, Trump being who he is – a man defined by his supporters by his “alpha qualities” rather than his ideas – it is difficult to get a sense whether the God Emperor is reneging or not.  Those who have said that Trump is our last chance, our last hope, are now linking to articles asserting that Trump is “doubling down on deportations” despite the fact that the man’s own words suggest different.

We’ll see.  I’m not going to make any definitive comments on this today, because Trump himself, in a classic display of dishonest cuckiness, refuses to absolutely define his position. Very well.

But Der Movement needs to remember this.  The ONLY way for the quota queens to survive relatively unscathed from this election is for:

1. Trump NOT to renege on, and backpedal from, his original strong positions on immigration, AND

2. For Trump to be elected and then to proceed to act upon, the best he can, his original promises.

1+2 = Der Movement limping on in its current broken form and persons such as myself can criticize it on other things, but not this.

But if 1 and/or 2 do not come to pass, here’s a newsflash: a “movement” that has tied its credibility to Trump – with “leaders” and “activists” who swoon over Trump like the wop girl teenagers hysterically melting over Johnny Fontaine’s “olive oil voice and guinea charm “ in The Godfather Part I – this “movement” is going to be held accountable by me at least.

Do they think they can pull this stunt endlessly?  Tie themselves to the latest “man on white horse" savior, behave like love-struck schoolgirls, ignore all the warning signs, dangerously associate the credibility of racialism with some flawed public figure, and, then, when the inevitable happens and it all collapses around then, merrily skip away, making believe it all never happened?

No sir, not this time.  Even if I am the ONLY one calling them out on it (and I’m sure that will be the case), call them out I will – over and over and over again, without end, until the Nutzi followers wake up *which they probably never will do).

Until then, the next step is to wait and see what happens.  I’ll be REAL interested to see how the God Emperor reacts to this.

Stay tuned.  We’re in for a bumpy ride.





Tuesday, August 23, 2016

Affirmative Action Report: Blind Hero Worship

Pathetic.

Coulter is really no different from the "movement" as a whole:

Speculation that columnist Ann Coulter might not be disinclined to Donald Trump’s candidacy began when she characterized her attitude toward him as “blind worship…like the North Korean people with their dear, dear leader.” Her description of him as “my hero, our savior” and “the greatest candidate for president ever” did little to dispel the rumors.

The "savior" seems to be postponing his speech on immigration. Curious, indeed.  After all, if he was just sticking to his previously stated positions, why the delay?  It doesn't take too long for his staff to write something up expressing his original ideas in better language.  The delay suggests something else, but we'll find out soon enough.

Also curious that if Trump is being worshiped as a god (and he is, by many precincts of the "movement") than why aren't those who supported Trump during the primary campaign considered the "holy anointed ones" and those who opposed him (and continue to oppose him from within the GOP) considered to be the "evil blasphemers?"

Well, irresistible force meets immovable object: Der Movement's Trump worship meets its strident and dogmatic ethnic affirmative action program, so watch the cognitive dissonance ensue!



Monday, August 22, 2016

Racial Cuckoldry

A different type of cucking.

With all the talk of "cuck this" and "cuck that" in Der Movement these days, I had forgotten that I had written this article, back in 2009.

Although there does not seem to be any link between that article and the Great Cuck Meme Explosion of 2015, the fact remains that the article in question is, insofar as I am aware, the first use of the cuckoldry meme, re: race.

On the other hand, years earlier, I wrote (at the old LE site) about Salter's "Blank Slate Hypothesis" in refutation of the absurd claim made by an individual (who shall go nameless since it was on a private discussion list) that S. Euro men were engaged in mass-cuckoldry of N. Euro men (*).

So, that's two articles - ahead of the curve, I guess.

*At the same time, we are told that N. and S. Euros are so physically distinct that they are completely different and completely unassimilable races.  How that can be compatible with mass cuckoldry is unclear, unless it is taking place in a colony for the blind.  Never let it be said that Der Movement is strong on logic, common-sense, and consistency.

Race in the News, 8/22/16

The usual stupidities.



Unfortunately, Senator Sessions was too polite to call Trump’s touchback scheme what it is, namely just more lipstick on the amnesty pig, characterizing touchback as “not… the best solution.”
From a psychological viewpoint, rewarding illegal behavior is always wrong, and particularly so when it followed the failed amnesty from 1986 when the promised enforcement never happened. Even hinting that some sort of forgiveness might be considered after shutting the border is poison. Any reward for bad behavior just incites more of same — something that parents and teachers know.

Somewhere in the manosphere, Roissy weeps softly, the tears falling on his stained and sticky portrait of God Emperor Trump.


Adam Gemeli…physically could pass as a Southern European.

This is a picture of the person in question.  He is very obviously a non-European NEC, and could NOT physically pass as a Southern European. He could, perhaps, “physically pass” as Tom Jones’ son, I don’t know.


D’Souza is a smart man stuck promoting a stupid worldview. Hopefully one day nonwhites like him will make films as allies of color promoting white identity rather than demonizing it.

Let me rewrite:

D’Souza is a smart man stuck craftily promoting a stupid worldview to appeal to White GOP cucks.  What else to expect from a devious Asiatic Desi?. Hopefully one day nonwhites like him will leave America because they can never be allies of color promoting white identity rather than demonizing it.