The continued madness of Der Movement.
In contrast to the comically pathetic homoerotic fanboy mancrush worship of Trump by the likes of Roissy and the slightly more realistic Alt Wrong, we have the good sense of Kevin Strom, who sees the obvious beta race cucking of the Negrophilic civic nationalist Donald J. “Fats” Trump. Trump’s inauguration speech was classic race cucking, as I’ve already discussed. Bitter disappointment awaits.
A YouTube comment which reflects the deep knowledge of the typical “movement” activist:
Isn't Kevin MacDonald the pseudonym under which Molyneux wrote his anti-Semitic pamphlets?
Yeah, that's right - MacDonald is Molyneux. What stupidity. Der Movement marches on.
The Asiatrix at Majority Rights continues an analysis of the Enoch/TRS mess. Two major arguments are made there. First, that Enoch himself is Jewish. The data presented are suggestive, but not definitive or conclusive. It is mostly circumstantial. However, while I am not convinced, there is sufficient grounds to at least question possible Jewish ancestry. More data are needed; there seems to be more to this story than is coming from the TRS/pro-TRS side. The second argument, and one for which there is stronger evidence, is that TRS was not an innocent victim here, but was attacked after they themselves attacked another forum. There’s probably no “good guys” and “bad guys” in this story. I do not have the interest to “go down the rabbit hole” after this latest round of “movement” insanity other than to express the general attitude of – “a pox on both your houses.” Both sides here are discrediting racial nationalism and giving the Left, once again, a hearty laugh over Rightist dysfunction. That most activists refuse to recognize that Der Movement is a defective failure is itself a manifestation of that defectiveness and failure.
When you have a half-Iranian in the fold, now “Persian” Iranians are “White.” Of course, “White” is a subjective term, and, of course, the mainstream “movement” does not consider a half-Iraqi, half-Nigerian such as myself to be White. Maybe we should just talk about Europeans instead – which Iranians, “Persian” or not, definitely are not.
With well-placed contacts in the big networks and government, it’s almost certain that Trump is aware of the social engineering propaganda that has been staging shootings in order to pass gun control legislation. He is, after all, a staunch supporter of the Second Amendment. The Sandy Hook shooting, portrayed as the Pearl Harbor event of gun crime is, at least on the Internet, the most mocked and parodied piece of news fakery in recent years. Trump’s refusal to denounce “Sandy Hook deniers” has not only upset The New Yorker and Rachel Maddow, but worse than that, Trump has appeared on Alex Jones and even invited a Sandy Hook denier to speak at a rally.
Why is this kind of delusional nonsense posted at Counter-Currents? Imagine you are a parent – maybe even a Far-Right, red-pilled one – and your child was killed in one of these massacres. Then you have to read paranoid retards promoting “denial” of the massacre. It’s all a hoax! Wax dummies in the coffins! The parents are actors! This is a goddamned embarrassment. It’s worse than that. It’s sick and degenerate.
Even author Tom Clancy, known for his inside knowledge concerning governmental operations, died in a hit ordered by Obama, according to ex-CIA agent Jim Garrow.
Yeah, and Miguel Ferrer died from an Israeli “hit” because he played a Jewish FBI agent in Twin Peaks. No wait, he was given cancer by Randall Flagg for sleeping with a “Free Zone” spy. No wait, it was payback against Daddy Jose from Captain Queeq/Humphrey Bogart from The Caine Mutiny. Further, the moon landing was (of course!) a hoax, to conceal the fact the moon is made of yellow cheese, which would ruin the international cheese cartels. Of course as well, smoking has no link to cancer, all made up by “Jew doctors” trying to ruin the hearty yeoman American tobacco farmer, and, of course, vaccination causes autism because, well, you know, Jewwwwww doctors…..
Here’s the point, which is glaringly obvious to even a low-IQ Afro-Asiatic swarthoid like myself, but which is somehow missed by all of our racially superior “movement leaders.” When normal people, concerned with the racial crisis, come to the Far-Right, they are going to encounter lunatic crap like what this fellow Zaja and other conspiracy nuts are peddling, and all of that nonsense – completely superfluous to the core of racial nationalism – is going to delegitimize racialism for the “normies.” They are going to think – “hey, if these racialists are so crazily wrong and paranoid about Sandy Hook and the Apollo Moon missions, maybe they’re just as stupidly paranoid and wrong about White genocide. Let me go back to the mainstream Right and vote for Lindsey Graham.”
I’m puzzled that otherwise intelligent people don’t get what I, in my abject inferiority, see as glaringly obvious. And guess what - even IF some of the conspiracy theories are true, it’s still a bad strategy to focus on them, since it associates the core of racialist thought with superfluous issues (and they are superfluous to the common fundamental core of racial nationalism) and creates extra controversies that we do not need. The fact that most if not all of these theories are in fact obviously nutty tin foil hat stupidity just makes it exponentially worse.
“Time to act accordingly.” When are any of these guys going to learn anything about operational security? Do NOT send Spencer out there essentially unprotected in the street to do interviews, for godssakes. Have some security “buddies” with him. Better yet, make sure some of the "buddies" are just blending in with the crowd, or even pretending to be “antis” – ready to defend Spencer the next time some coward tries a cheap shot. The assailants would not have gotten away if there were some “bystanders” present ready for such events and capable of detaining such criminals.
Of course, once this tactic is adopted, the other side will escalate, but that’s the point. As the “Intolerant Politics” article makes clear, we’re headed for Weimar Germany type street brawls between Right and Left. That’s better than one-sided assaults by Left on Right. You do the best you can in every given situation. Having prominent activists standing alone, essentially with a “hit me” sign painted on them, is not doing the best we can in that situation. In every competitive give-and-take between opposing forces, you must always force your opponent to “up their game.” Play the percentages and don’t give away any advantages. This is similar to leftoid stupidity about racial profiling in airports – “if we racially profile, the terrorists will try and recruit some wholesome-looking White folks.” Well yes, that’s the whole point – you make things as difficult as possible for them. You force them to exert time and energy and resources getting around your best defenses, at which point, in the “evolutionary arms race,” you improve your defenses. If you are going to let guys who look like Osama Bin Laden walk through airport security without a second glance, while at the same time strip-searching 80-year old Irish-American nuns, you are making things too easy for your opponents. Make them prove they can escalate their game. Likewise, yes, if the Right has proper operational security, sure, the Left will put more effort (if they are capable of doing so) to circumvent it. And that’s the point. Make them prove they can do it. It’s like in sports. If a hitter cannot hit a curveball, keep on throwing him curveballs, until such time he proves that he’s learned he can hit it, at which point try something else. But if the hitter can slam a fastball and is inept against curveballs, why would you make it easy on him and throw fastballs? Yes, eventually he may (or may not) learn to hit the curveball – but force him to prove he can do it. Play the percentages, improve your operations, and force your opponents to keep up – if they can.