A critique of mainstreaming from Counter-Currents.
This seems to me a reasonably forceful criticism of mainstreaming, and I of course agree wholeheartedly:
Vanguardism must be repeatedly emphasized, because the instinct of every politician seems to do the exact opposite. Politicians are inveterate panderers and flatterers of the public mind, which unfortunately has been completely molded by our enemies for generations. Politicians follow the people. Vanguardists seek to lead them. Politicians take public opinion as a given. Vanguardists seek to change it. Politicians always seek to soften their message to appeal to the public. Vanguardists realize this is folly. If one attracts lukewarm followers who are in only partial agreement, then under normal circumstances, you will be fighting with them as much as with your opponents — and when things get tough, they will sheer off and leave you alone anyway.
That’s what I’ve been preaching for years – mainstreaming, at its best, will leave you with support a mile wide and an inch deep. I’d rather have the opposite: support only an inch wide, but a mile deep, and then take the time to expand that mile deep support ever wider. Greg seems to agree; thus:
Thus Vanguardists realize that there is no real substitute for the slow, painstaking, and difficult work of converting a significant minority of our people to our way of thinking. We have to uphold a radical and absolute vision and then bring as many of our people around as possible.
Yes, indeed. Less Le Pen and more Golden Dawn. Less Trump and more Salter. Less Alt Right/Alt Lite/Alt Wrong and more EGI Notes. Let’s talk about the ideas of Yockey rather than obsess over cartoon frogs or civic nationalist political candidates. How about more emphasis on Codreanu and the Legionary movement and less emphasis on how to boost Marine Le Pen’s vote totals?
And then we have this:
We should follow the old Roman maxim, “Suaviter in modo, fortiter in re”: suave, supple, and infinitely pragmatic and persuasive in style — yet firm and steadfast, indeed adamantine and dogmatic about essential principles.
Which is exactly what I’ve been saying for a long time. Modifying rhetoric and tone? Certainly. After all, the hard tone of this blog is not meant for the general public. But modifying core principles? Absolutely not. And even if we wanted to do so, it doesn’t work. Mainstreaming fails, time and time again.
…extremists are important. Cultural and political innovations take place on the extremes, at the margins, and then are diffused to — or imposed upon — the mainstream. Thus we should treasure extremists. We should cultivate them. We should encourage their creativity.
I certainly agree. I would like to see this attitude actualized.
Then we should steal their best memes and spread them far and wide.
If only people in the “movement” would steal my best memes and spread them far and wide. Please do.
And foremost among those memes is that the "movement" is a complete failure, needs to be deconstructed, and reconstructed starting with first principles.