In the previous analysis I noted Steve King’s denial of a racial basis for his comments on immigration and civilization, and his assertion that it is only “cultural.”
How would a more honest and EGI-informed individual responded instead? Perhaps like this:
Of course it is about race – race, ethnicity, and demographics. I can make the argument – and it is a sound argument – that only the people who create a specific culture and civilization are the ones truly capable of carrying it forward, maintaining it, and building upon it. And Western civilization was built by Whites, by people of European extraction.
But I’ll go further. Any people have an inherent right to exist, even independent of their cultural, or any other, accomplishments. All life, and all human life, has an interest in its own continuity – and that’s genetic continuity, not just culture. We do not begrudge a family its interest in its existence and continuity, in its posterity, its children and grandchildren, etc., and any ethnic group or race is like a very large extended family. No one would condemn Africans or Asians or Latin Americans the right to their existence and continuity, but it is only Whites, Europeans, who are specifically excluded from the most basic rights of existence and self-interest granted all other peoples. Why is that? Who exactly are the haters here?
He could have abbreviated that, if space was an issue, but the major points are clear, and could be expressed in non-scientific language understandable by the average person. And are these comments so “bad?’ If King was condemned for saying this, would that reflect badly on him or those making the condemnation?
The same principles apply to more openly nationalist politicians, such as in Europe or Australia. Stop conflating everything to “culture” and stop tip-toeing around the issue – which is physical biological, demographic, genetic race replacement. And more fundamentally: White racial interests. Read Salter’s book, for godssakes. How can someone call themselves a (White) nationalist leader and not even have the time, interest. Or understanding for something so basic as EGI?
On Genetic Interests is a mine of ideas, a toolkit, for White nationalists and nationalist politicians (actually, of use for those of any race, but it are Whites who are uniquely challenged today).
Part IV will continue this discussion.