Not properly using the resources at hand.
This analysis is from a left, hostile perspective, but is nevertheless troubling. Thus we read:
It remains to be seen what influence, if any, Salter may have on the further evolution of One Nation thinking on Islam and immigration. This may become more evident in 2017. To date, however, his contribution appears to have been quite modest. One Nation co-founder David Oldfield, once a close confidant to Hanson but now estranged, recently observed that ''She just doesn't really read. She doesn't read serious material.” Oldfield went on to claim that “it’s hard enough to get Pauline to read a single paragraph let alone documentation that's research or scientifically based.”
Salter's academic style is not obviously evident in Senator Hanson's statements or One Nation policy documents published so far. Instead the core elements of One Nation policies, especially the claim that Islam is not a religion, appear to be largely lifted from American far-right writings which have their origins in conservative Christian evangelist attacks on Islam and the intellectual contributions of a handful of far-right ideologues. Although One Nation is stridently in favour of “Buy Australian” policies, its core policy on Islam is a foreign import.
I do not argue that a political leader needs to be a learned academic, nor a “layman” expert on the work of academics (although that would be helpful). But at least the leader must be conversant in the fundamentals of key material that should – no, must - inform their worldview. If an academic is available, “on site” so to speak, ready to help, and the leader does not take advantage of that help, you have a very serious problem. How can the Right compete with the Left Leviathan if the Right refuses to take advantage of even those meager resources it has available at hand?
Some new leadership cadres are required, I think.