Friday, June 30, 2017

Sallis is Right Again: Farstreaming

Orban moving right.



Well, my comment that Jobbik is to Orban's right no longer holds, because Orban has continued farstreaming to his right, while Jobbik has been mainstreaming to the center.  The two ships have passed each other on the sea of political rhetoric.

Outcome:

Orban farstreaming to the right = sailing to political success.

Jobbik mainstreaming to the center = sinking and hemorrhaging supporters.

Mainstreaming may be good in theory but has no empirical support in practice. Mainstreaming fails.  Pushing the radical envelope succeeds.  Sallis is correct...again.

Fisking Costello

Analyzing Costello.

I cannot disagree with Costello on some of this…but he makes some errors, dependent on his meaning.

They will see that some of the most visible members of our movement, our self-described “leaders” are, in some cases, entitled, college-educated children of affluence. Vain, grandiose, egomaniacal, and attention-hungry.

Meet the Alt Right!

They will see that some in the Alt Right have not yet emerged, or only recently emerged, from living in their parent’s basement.

Some?


They will see that many exist as members of our movement only in a virtual sense, as internet trolls who hit and run. Vying with each other to prove who is the most “edgy” and “hardcore,” while usually backing up this posturing with absolutely nothing tangible and real.

True, but who does different?


They will encounter “purity spirallers” who seem less concerned with the real plight of their race than with ferreting out who in the movement might be “gay” — or with speculating that everyone in the movement is gay, except them.

I’ve already written about how “gay baiting” in Der Movement is clearly politically motivated, since there are some long-time “movement activists” rumored to be gay but no one ever mentions those people. The “gay baiters” usually fall into particular factions of Der Movement and they will turn a blind eye to the gays in their own faction.  On the other hand, there are some who push normalization of homosexuality too far.

They will see many childless, unmarried men who have turned necessity into virtue by “going their own way.” 

What happens when married fathers get so disgusted with women that they MGTOW?

Or worse, cultivating the cynical, misogynistic game of the pickup artist.

I agree with criticism of the gamesters. However. Not because of “misogyny” – in many cases richly deserved.  No, it is because the gamesters are hypocritical, illogical, juvenile, amoral hedonistic nihilists who typically ape the worst aspects of Der Movement (the Alt Wrong, for example); Roissy’s ardor for Trump borders on homoerotic mania and is frankly embarrassing,

They will see that others have the luxury of responding to the plight of the white working class, and the perils that face our civilization, by casting runes, or brewing mead.

Mead and runes?  Isn’t that all part of Der Dogma?  No blasphemy, please!


And within that group they will encounter large numbers of folks defending dead, despised dictators that, rightly or wrongly, hundreds of thousands of mostly working class Americans sacrificed their lives in order to depose. Those Americans being their grandfathers and great grandfathers.

Yes, we shouldn’t obsess over Hitler, etc.  We shouldn’t lie about WWII either to satisfy “boomers.” And doesn’t Counter-Currents run pro-Hitler essays and celebrates Saint Adolf’s birthday with posts?

They will see high flown intellectual discussions, usually presupposing the equivalent of a doctoral degree, of authors they have never heard of, and have no time or energy to read after getting home at night from eight solid hours of labor.

That could be construed as a refutation of some of my work, but of course I’ve never asserted that the details of, say, EGI should be used as propaganda to the masses; instead core concepts can be converted into “us vs. them” language of kin and tribe, and used in that manner for political purposes (as my Political EGI posts make clear).

Of course, Costello’s argument here can be used against most of the content of Counter-Currents: isn’t it too intellectual for the proles?  Is your local plumber going to care about Evola and “Savitri Devi?”  But it isn’t meant for the proles, you say.  Very well…my own work is mostly aimed at “movement” activists anyway (or may be dumber than the proles, but that’s another story).


Perhaps worst of all they are going to see chaos and disunity: character assassination, betrayal, rumor-mongering, doxing, trolling, back-biting, gaslighting, etc. 

Can Counter-Currents stop running articles on Friberg already?

They will see, in short, that the movement we offer them is, arguably, no movement at all. In a real sense, it does not exist.

When I say that, I’m “crazy” and “bitter.”  When Costello says it, it’s A-OK. Remind me why my criticisms of Der Movement’s ethnic affirmative action program is wrong.

In sum, the proles will see us as a lot of disaffected, spoiled, bratty, out-of-touch sacks of venom, who have created a little ghetto for ourselves replete with forums in which we may vent and posture without tangible results, and any real consequences. They will see that most of us have nothing in common with them, cannot understand their daily woes, and are entirely irrelevant to their lives.

Does that include posts in which the writer fantasizes about cooking breakfast for an aging mudshark?

And they are also perceptive enough to pick up on the dirty little secret of the Alt Right: namely, that many of us do not really love our race. That in fact we walk around most of the time consumed by hate for other white people, and that many of us have about as much contempt for the working class as your average liberal.

Many Whites – although not necessarily many working-class Whites - deserve to be hated.

The Alt Right has become nothing more than yet another “lifestyle choice” in the vast cornucopia of modern American lifestyles that coexist within the Great Beast, posing no fundamental threat to it. Despite our pretensions to the contrary, our dysfunction, disunity, and surfeit of bad character make us about as big a threat to the system as Wiccans. Who is the “leader” of the Wiccans? Or, who are the leaders? I don’t know, and I don’t care, and I don’t know anyone who knows because Wiccans don’t matter. I’m sure the Wiccan movement has been replete with struggles for power and internecine wars over doctrine and purity, but only Wiccans care about this. To the rest of the world they are simply irrelevant oddballs.

Again, how does any of that really differ from my own criticisms of Der Movement?  Obviously, it’s the messenger, not the message, folks.

So, forget any thoughts about riding the wave of the prole awakening and leading or guiding these folks. We are simply not worthy. Not now, anyway.

Can we become worthy? Here we can certainly be open to the possibility of becoming worthy to lead or guide, but let’s try to avoid falling into the trap of feeling superior to the proles. As a good corrective for our already swollen egos, let’s start by thinking in terms of becoming worthy of joining with them, in common cause. Now how do we do that?

Stop obsessing over a cartoon frog and screaming “Hail Kek?”

The other day a friend said something to me that was quite insightful. He said that a true movement might emerge if the internet were to be wiped away tomorrow. Now, this is not only unlikely but, most will say, undesirable since the internet can be (can be) such a useful tool. But consider it: if the internet ceased to exist the real movement would emerge from the great ocean of trolls and virtual friends. Why?

Because the real movement would consist in the people enterprising enough and committed enough to find some other ways to meet and keep in touch. The trolls and virtual friends would disappear overnight, because they were never really committed in the first place, or were “committed” for all the wrong reasons.
There would be fewer but better White Nationalists.

True enough.

Now, there are two important implications to be drawn out of this thought experiment: (1) The only really committed White Nationalists are those willing and able to form actual communities, as opposed to virtual communities; and (2) it follows from this that ultimately the movement is nothing without actual community, because actual communities are formed by, and attract, the most committed people, and a real movement is a movement of truly committed people. QED.

Fine, as far as it goes.

I submit that the most effective way to form ties with our awakening proles, and to facilitate their greater awakening is to come together with them in real communities.

In order to do this, we in what we already optimistically call “the movement” must overcome our own class snobbery and our tendency to only want to engage with others like ourselves. 

“…only want to engage with others like ourselves.”  In more ways than one, eh?


On more occasions than I can possibly remember my movement friends (virtual and otherwise) have asked, despairingly, “When are people going to wake up?” Well, now they are. But it’s not the sort of people who were always asking this question. Almost everyone I know in the movement has led a life of relative privilege and is college-educated, some with advanced degrees.

“…has led a life of relative privilege”  Speak for yourself.  You did say “almost” so I’ll give you credit for that.

But in the country as a whole, the vast majority of affluent, college educated people are sound asleep — indeed, many of them are monsters of entitlement, selfishness, and hedonism. It is the proles who are waking up — the people I’ve never even really learned to talk to. Honestly, I am just about as alienated from the proles as a limousine liberal. I too have never set foot in a factory (just like Karl Marx!).

Given that almost the entire American manufacturing sector has been outsourced to China, I doubt that many proles have set foot in a factory, either.  Is being a prole merely employment or is it to some degree culture, a lifestyle choice?  There are well-read blue collar folk, as well as the college-educated who “keep up with the Kardashians.”  It’s not so cut and dried.


The only manual labor I have ever done was whiting out errors on my college term papers, back in the old days when we were still using typewriters. My only prole friend — a high school dropout who actually has done manual labor — is really more of a prole wannabe: both his parents have master’s degrees, he’s a successful businessman, and in truth he is an intellectual with a long list of publications.

Serving breakfast to Ann Coulter – does that count as manual labor?

Many on the Alt Right profess to admire aspects of National Socialism, but very few really “get” what was arguably the central feature of that movement, and why it was so powerful at unifying the German people: true, deeply felt love of one’s own. A love that transcended class divisions, whether based on birth or wealth or education. Let us, in fact, borrow some pages from our enemies: love really is the answer; it’s just love of one’s own.

Dead dictators as role models?

And let us also celebrate diversity. The rich diversity of white people: the doctors and plumbers and stock brokers and waiters and professors and farmers and nurses and bricklayers and soldiers and programmers and Walmart greeters and actors and dentists and, yes, even lawyers.

OK, fine.  That should include people rightfully critical of Der Movement as well.  More to the point, does Costello also “celebrate” ethnic diversity among Whites?


And, to a great extent, we must also be tolerant of our people’s peculiarities, so long as they are committed to our cause. For example, it is priggish and dumb to want to run off someone genuinely committed to our cause because now and then in the evening they want to smoke a joint. Or because, through some cruel caprice of Mother Nature, they do something in private with other consenting adults that you wouldn’t do.

Er…what about the need for “good character” as explained below?  How does tolerance for character flaws square with Costello’s call for better men and women?  Inconsistency.

The only true movement is going to consist in loosely-connected, real communities that provide a safe space for white men and women and their families. For white people of all classes. These communities will provide opportunities for socializing and for protection. They will provide positive environments in which to raise children, safe spaces in which forbidden ideas can be expressed, and, at times, they will engage in advocacy and agitation.

This is necessary, but not sufficient.  That’s only one leg of the three. “Loosely-connected communities” are the gardens from which the real flowers of revolutionary activism will grow. The communities are not ends to themselves, as Costello seems to imply. “Loosely connected” of anything will not get the job done in the end.


Doing the hard work of building communities requires good character: dedication, dependability, honesty, genuineness, honor, and selflessness. Ultimately people will only follow and trust and respect those who exemplify these qualities.

Therefore the current “leadership” of the “movement” are out of the running here. Can Costello name any current (or past!) “movement” “leader” who has ever exhibited the full gamut of required character traits?

Aristotle teaches us in his Rhetoric that a necessary precondition of a man giving an effective speech — in other words, of persuading people — is that others must be convinced that he is of good character. Such men, and women, will draw others into a community. And so, the very first thing we must do to create a real movement, is to strive to become better men and women.

I’ve been promoting Codreanu’s Legion and the idea of the New Man since the early 2000s. Interest: none. Understanding: none.  Success: none.

We must disavow vanity, malice, gossip, trolling, and, above all, the suffocating pretensions of the ego. This real movement, if it is to emerge, is not a means to anyone’s ego-gratification. It demands that each of us place the good of the race above his own ego.

Please tell me - where in Der Movement such self-sacrificing idealists exist? Where is the niches where such people can develop and thrive?  Answer to both questions: nowhere. Thus, a New Movement is required.  QED.

There was a saying in Hitler’s Germany: “Du bist nichts, dein Volk ist alles” (you are nothing, your people is everything).

Quoting dem dere dead dictators?

How many do you know in our movement today who are truly living that saying? We must live it — we must live up to it — if we are to truly serve the cause we claim to be championing.

Living up to it: serving breakfast to Ann Coulter?

The goodwill and harmoniousness of communities built by and for individuals with such commitment will draw in others — persuading them that what that community stands for is positive and good. This point is absolutely crucial. The vast majority of people judge ideas not based on the arguments that are presented for them, but on the basis of the character of the people who espouse those ideas. In other words, they look at the “effect” those ideas have in a person’s life. This is especially true of those who have little formal education, and little time to peruse the intricacies of philosophical argument.

Good character, something which, like good judgement, the “movement” is in very short supply of.


In short, the key to building ties with the great number of awakening proles and the key to further radicalizing them is becoming something better than we are now — and coming together with them in real communities. Communities that, needless to say, are high-functioning, welcoming, and convivial, and that have mechanisms for weeding out individuals who are bad news. 

Bad news = 99.99999% of De Movement.

This is not just the key, of course, to building ties with proles, but with others as well. And my larger point, again, is that the only real movement is going to be based in such communities. As for the trolls, let them go their own way. And if men want to vie over who gets to crown himself King of the Trolls, that is fine. It keeps them busy and keeps them out of our way.

Ultimately, the only real “leaders” in this movement are the people who have the dedication, seriousness, and selflessness to build real communities. Such communities are the future of our movement, and the future of our race.

You know I’ve been advocating for community building ever since the early 2000s.  No one listened then and no one listens – to me – now.  Will they listen to the more acceptable messenger Costello? Who knows? But advocating to the masses is only one – the lowest – level or point or leg of The Movement Tripod.  Without building the other two legs will fail – you simply cannot build viable communities with the low quality human material of the “movement.”  Concomitant with community building must be building a New Movement, and to have the New Movement you need to have a sane and rational Elite, with fresh ideas and independent of “movement” dogma, to lead the way.  No one is interested in that because it is at cross purposes with individual agendas, factional interests, empire building – and of course the money-grubbing of “donations.”  One can expect Costello’s arguments to be met with “he’s right, you know” before all those folks go back to brewing mead and scribbling runes on Pepe cartoons.

In any case, at least Costello recognizes the deficiencies of Der Movement.



Thursday, June 29, 2017

Yet Even More Alt Right Madness

It continues.

I'm sort of oscillating between schadenfreude and disgust.



I'm not taking sides here - a pox on ALL their houses - but I do hope that Greg has learned his lesson with TRS, and will eschew lulzing jakasses from this point forward.

By the way, read the comments section of the AltRight.com piece.  With a few exceptions, it is like swimming through an open sewer.

When oh when is this Alt Right contagion going to burn itself out?  When even the Grand Lord Pepe turns against them, is the time nigh?


Wednesday, June 28, 2017

Political EGI VI: Know Your Audience

Calibrate your arguments.

With respect to introducing EGI to political discourse, I am sure the attitude will be: “most people will not be convinced by rational, scientific arguments; instead they will be influenced by emotional arguments instead.  No one will care about EGI.”

This is truth to that – but I also do not believe that ”most people” are going to be influenced by cartoon frogs or screams of “Hail Kek!”- but I’ve never said that “most people” should be addressed by discussions of gene frequencies or of “Hamilton’s Rule.”

Obviously, if you are addressing who Pierce would call “Joe and Jill Sixpack” then you are not going to be invoking “genetic kinship” and explaining the fine points of On Genetic Interests.  You could, however, invoke the language of family and tribe, stoke the “us vs. them” divide and equate face and family to stimulate protective instincts for the group against those threatening it.  

As one moves up the intellectual hierarchy then one can be more explicit about EGI, although the “full story” is likely going to make complete sense only to scientifically literate and sane individuals with triple-digit IQs (leaving most of the “movement” out of the running).  Along the continuum of human understanding, knowledge, and intelligence one must calibrate the rhetoric and arguments for optimal receptivity.

So, no, I’m not arguing that one should go to a local town hall with charts of Fst values or what have you, but the fundamental principles can be put forth in language understandable to the target audience, even if one must use analogies and rhetorical proxies for some major points.  In past “Political EGI” posts I gave some examples of calibrated arguments: I’m no politician or speechwriter, and I’m sure those that are can do an even better job of formulating EGI-based arguments that can resonate to even Mr. and Mrs. Sixpack.

One can also argue – and it’s likely correct – that the less intellectual Whites, the Sixpacks, are more inherently tribal and will require less prompting to unleash their instincts in that regard.  They just need guidance so as to direct that unleashing in the proper political direction (not to GOP cucks or Trumpain frauds, for example) and they need to be inoculated against “we are all the same” leftist rhetoric that, while they may not believe it “in their bones,” may still confuse them.

On the other hand, it are the more intellectually advanced “professionals” among Whites who lead rarefied lives apart from tribal instincts so it are precisely they – the ones best as understanding EGI concepts – would be benefit from more explicit, albeit still carefully calibrated, appeals to more rationalized EGI arguments.

So in that sense it works out well: those Whites least capable of understanding the more explicit EGI arguments are in the least need of them and those Whites most capable of understanding have the most need.

At this point someone will say I’ve missed the original point, which was one of emotion trumping logic, not one of understanding or not.  That’s true, but consider that the “lower class” Whites tend to be more emotional/irrational and the “upper class” Whites are relatively more rational, and hence rationality and understanding go hand-in-hand.  In addition, remember I’m still advocating calibration even for the upper classes; likely pure EGI is suitable for the highest intellectual groups, academics, top intellectual activists, etc. Some “irrational” arguments may need to be made to the rank-and-file upper class, but these would need to be calibrated differently than those used for the Sixpacks.  Perhaps less raw tribalism and more Universal Nationalism? This post is not the place to evaluate this at that level of detail, but to point out that those with rhetorical skills can make EGI-style arguments palatable to specific target audiences.  It’s more a matter of will – wanting to do it – rather than the rhetorical technics.

Tuesday, June 27, 2017

Alt Right News: Even Worse Than I Could Have Ever Imagined

Delenda est Alt Right.


I of course have no idea whether any or all of that is true or not.  It seems to be unlikely that Morgan could make all of that up, in such exquisite detail, although it could be that the interpretation of events is slanted. Or not.

The major point in my opinion is that even if a fraction of what Morgan says is true, then the Alt Right is broken beyond repair (and that includes Morgan's involvement with the Hare Krishnas - even if they are genuine avatars of Hinduism, why should any Man of the West be involved with Hinduism to begin with? Can we stop this insane "Aryan" mythologizing about India, please?).

Getting to the meat of Morgan's tale - again, if a fraction of that is true, the Alt Right goes way, way beyond mere bad judgment.  And if most (all??!!) is true - then the Alt Right is a raving madhouse beyond all imaging.

And then we have this, which is obviously true:

Furthermore, Arktos’ current Editor-in-Chief is a half-Persian and a practicing Zoroastrian who has already stated his intention of using Arktos to promote his pan-Aryanist beliefs encompassing Persia and India.

That alone should permanently discredit the Alt Right brand.

But, hey, it looks like my prediction of the Alt Right's collapse is starting to come true sooner than we could have ever suspected.

Betrayed by Pepe?  Say it ain't so!




Alt Right and Silk Road News: Madness and More Shoe Dropping

Complete madness.

Well, well, well… ignoring the typical juvenile jackassery, the key point is the declaration that the Alt Lite is the enemy and must be opposed…and “obliterated.”  Well, I can’t argue with Spencer there (*), but I do wonder whether he includes the VDARE/Amren crowd on his “Alt Lite enemies list.”

Hmmm…who was it who was denouncing the Alt Lite months ago and telling the Alt Right that the “big tent” was a mistake?  Who was it who termed “Alt Wrong” to describe the HBD-enriched Alt Lite faction?  You know who it was the person who has been right over and over and over again.  The dreaded “crazy” and “bitter” Ted Sallis.

My judgment is literally months ahead of the so-called “movement” “leadership.”  Who should you trust, dear reader?  The person who is consistently right and who can foretell these “movement” outcomes long in advance, or the folks who belatedly realize the obvious many months after?

My current long-term prediction (which may be wishful thinking I know) is that this whole Alt Right scene won’t last as it is.  The feuding will continue, current allies will have falling outs, unsavory details will be revealed (more than what has already occurred), people will tire of juvenile jackassery and social media memes as a substitute for actual ideological content, and some of the more mature Alt Righters will shift their focus elsewhere. Unfortunately, this will take some time to unfold, likely years – with possible “ups” and “successes” in the interval to boost Alt Right egos past their already overinflated points – and the ultimate damage to racial nationalism will be considerable.  By putting most of its eggs in the Alt Right basket, Der Movement is going to see most of those eggs do a “Humpty Dumpty” – perhaps later than sooner, but eventually.



Any intelligent person should, of course, find all of this quite tiresome. All this back and forth over who invited or didn’t invite or disinvited who sounds like Mean Girls high school birthday party drama.

Indeed.

And the best case alternative explanation for Wåg’s article that a defender of Friberg could give — indeed I think the only alternative which accords with the rest of the facts as we now unequivocally know them — is that someone close enough to Friberg to have caught wind of his original lies about Greg’s role in the Scandza Forum’s invitations—very quickly after they were made—must have been the source. As far as I can tell, this is literally the only other possibility—and yet, no one has come forward, or been suggested as the possible source by Friberg himself.

So which is more likely: that Friberg lied regarding the Scandza Forum in attempt at a Machiavellian political maneuver and engaged in other forms of sabotage against its organizers (as has been confirmed by Filmersson), and then also leaked his version of events to Wåg, someone we know he had at least a degree of contact with…

The Alt Right is complete madness.

More Kumiko, emphasis in original:

Regarding forced repatriation of Asian people because we disagree with you on stuff, there is one card that Asians have in the deck to prevent that. The upper class. The richest Asians will buy off your legislature in order to avert that possibility. I'm the only person who is willing to tell you it in such straight language!

This is incredible.  The Silker shoes (black boots?) are dropping on an everyday basis.  The Whites on MR are absolute race traitors if they do not denounce all of this and apologize to the racial nationalist community for their piss-poor judgment and yellow fever fetishism for allowing this creature to run rampant there. This childish Asiatrix doesn’t even keep track of her own inconsistencies.  First she asserts that the Far-Right wants authoritarian police states, then she threatens that rich Asians will buy off our "legislatures" to prevent repatriation.  Oh…a Far-Right authoritarian police state is going to have “legislatures” with political hacks getting paid off by diseased aliens.  Sure, makes sense.  Also amusing is the idea that the reason for repatriation is that “we disagree…on stuff.”  NO, IT IS BECAUSE YOU ARE A COMPLETE GENETIC AND CULTURAL ALIEN.

And once again, Ted Sallis is right: Silk Road White nationalism is enforced Asian imperialism and Asian colonization of White lands (and White nationalist blogs); you are not allowed to get rid of Asians, don’t you know, they’re here to stay!  The “majority” in Majority Rights is obviously the majority of China, Japan, Korea, all of East Asia – indeed all of Asia as a whole.  Asians uber alles!

Told you so.

And MR are not the only ones at fault.  Other people, who know better, gave this creature a forum, and applauded her juvenile scribbling, because her comments were useful ammunition against Spencer’s “Big Europe” ideas.  

Two words to describe Der Movement: bad judgment.

Roissy claims that “women are anti-civilizational.”  I agree. But, perhaps, then we shouldn’t promote a lifestyle that asserts that men need to ever-so-carefully calibrate their every thought, word, and action to appeal to the hypergamous instincts of ditzy females?

The incredible stupid bastard and homoerotic Trump fanboy Roissy somehow believes that a “Congressional Picnic” is more important than Der Touchback giving de facto amnesty to “Dreamers.”   The “game” faction of the Alt Right is probably the most childishly moronic part of it – and that’s really saying something.

*Actually, that’s about what I think about the Alt Right itself.

Sunday, June 25, 2017

Silk Road News: The Other Shoe Drops

This just does not make any sense whatsoever.

In all cases, emphasis added. From Majority Rights:
Kumiko Oumae works in the defence and security sector in the UK. Her opinions here are entirely her own.

How many Japanese females work in “the defence and security sector in the UK?”  Why would such a person, who has participated in what the System would label "a racist and extremist blog," publicly declare their work in that System itself?  Does this make any sense on the face of it?  Imagine an anti-Semitic Nigerian blogger who openly declares they "work in the defence and security sector in Iceland."  If the self-description was true, would such a declaration make any sense whatsoever?  Wouldn't any sane and sincere blogger keep their System affiliation secret?

And then we have Majority Rights having a self-proclaimed deep state (non-White) worker involved in their ostensibly “dissident, nationalist” blog.  We’ll be told it’s good to have “moles infiltrating the system.”  Yes, indeed, when such are of your own race, of the native stock, keep their infiltration secret, and, more to the point, what kind of genuine mole publicly announces the fact of their infiltration?  Nothing here passes the “smell test.” 

And then we have her openly declaring her enmity to the White men at Alt Right.com and again openly declaring working for the “defence sector” – 
Kumiko Oumae  JLawrence • 2 hours ago

Not interested in being productive for you in any sense. I'm the enemy, silly. The comments I make here are mostly for my own amusement, and to get a gauge on what you think.

If I were interested in actually helping anything, my behaviour would be completely different.
Also, regarding men having to ask or not ask. I work in the defence sector. I'm part of that thing which you refer to as 'in power'. This is part of why your smugness has no real effect on me. This whole conversation is a farce. The fact that you have a penis does not place you above me, and it never will.

- again someone who writes for an alleged “nationalist blog” and who tosses around terms like “motherfucking Jews” is a Japanese woman who works in the “defence sector” in the UK, and repeatedly open declares that fact.

If I’m the only one who thinks something here doesn’t add up, then Der Movement is infinitely more moronically dense and imbecilic-scatter-brained than I ever imagined.

Introducing Alt Right News

With a bit of Silk Road News thrown in for good measure.

We have Silk Road News here as well as Rotten Orange News so why not Alt Right News? Let’s every so often chronicle the cesspool contagion that is well on its way to destroying racial nationalism.


Let’s see: a police officer handcuffs a White man for mildly insulting a bizarre yellow Asian female. The Alt Righters justifiably are outraged about it.  Very good, I agree.  But, alas, since an Asian is involved, in comes raging anti-White hater “Kumiko” to critique the Alt Righters.  “Nothing really happened,” after all, the “handcuffs soon came off.”  Err…the handcuffs should never have been put on in the first place, based upon the mere fact that a bizarre Asian – as different from Europeans as a gray alien from deepest space – felt “insulted.”  That’s the outrage – that we’ve reached a point of White Man Inferiority in America that such a thing could have ever happened.  But, no, you see, according to the Silkers, let’s have the authorities harass White men based on the momentary hurt feelings of their Yellow Masters.  Right?

Do we need any more evidence that Silk Road White nationalism is ALL about the subjugation and humiliation of Whites, particularly White men, to Asians, particularly Asian females?  However, in the Silker Paradise, the Asian female would be marching around in black boots, holding a rifle, and thus could arrest White men directly without the need for an intermediary.

The retarded alien makes moronic arguments – since the Alt Right “wants to create a police state (Sallis: do they?), then it is appropriate for a White man to be handcuffed for making a mild joking insult.”  How about that the Far Right in general want a sane  ALL-WHITE society in which no bizarre alien Asians are present, and the police have better things to do than enforce conversations between young people who are joking around?

"Kumiko" does make the admission that she does not understand Whites – correct for after all we are practically different species – and has scaled back “involvement in WN” (except for jumping whenever there is lese majeste against Asians from uppity White men) – that makes good sense since this arrogant Asiatic had no business being involved with WN in the first place.

Someone needs to tell the hypocrite Roissy that “playing with gizmos” (that he advocates for [presumably White] males) is a beta not alpha endeavor. Hey, when I was young, I was taking apart radios to try and figure out how they worked, experimenting with magnets, etc. – and I’m no nihilistic hedonist “alpha shitlord.”   Someone also needs to tell this champion of Christianity that his self-described “preying on” vulnerable urban females is not exactly consistent with a Christian ethos.

I see that the typical “movement” stupidity of labeling opponents as “Jews” (some idiot way back even called Pierce of all people a Jew – “rabbi Pierce!”) is taken hold in the Alt Right, which makes sense since the Alt Right is nothing more or less than Der Movement for Immature Millennials.  So, Friberg is called a Jew, and morons on AltRight.com comments threads call each other Jews.  Oy vey!

Having Jorjani as a prominent Alt Right figure has led to the usual debates there of “are Iranians White” with one moron showing distribution of NRY lineages as if single locus markets have any significant racial relevance whatsoever.  “White” is subjective in any case – Iranians are not European, they are not Western, they are Asian NECs who have been enemies of Europe ever since the days of Ancient Greece.  This whole thing is just more “unprincipled exceptions” – Jorjani needs to be explained, just like others tried to explain Enoch’s (ex?)wife with a sudden switch to “Jewishness is mostly cultural.”

Now, having an assimilated half-Iranian as a (sincere) participant in the “movement” (albeit perhaps not in a high position) wouldn’t really be a serious problem if (1) the person in question wasn’t always emphasizing their Iranian-ness and promoting Iranian interests, and (2) their presence didn’t prompt others to make false equivalences between Iranians and Europeans.

Unfortunately both caveats do not hold in this case, indicating that an error in judgment was made. And before anyone asserts that this is another example of “Spencer’s bad judgment” they should reflect that the other side of the ongoing Alt Right feud also wanted to bring Jorjani into their fold. So, it is not “Spencer’s bad judgment” but rather “the Alt Right’s bad judgment” – although “Alt Right’s bad judgment” is a profound redundancy.

And before anyone asks what all these “News” categories has to do with the EGI focus of this blog, I reply that if you believe, as I do, that racial nationalism is required to promote “European EGI” then any threats to that racial nationalism – e.g., the Alt Right (including “game”), Silk Road White nationalism, slavish Roissyian Trumpism – are all highly relevant subjects for critical analysis.



Saturday, June 24, 2017

Silk Road News: Meet Nathan Yau

Only delusional Silkers would be surprised by any of this.


Mumbo-Jumbo Nation

Posted June 24, 2017 at 11:53 am | Permalink
Nathan *Yau*, from UCLA, has been for quite some time leveraging his “Flowing Data” website to either celebrate the demise of everything hated by the Left or to point out all the things they still have to destroy.
Here’s the guy in Amazon:
https://www.amazon.com/kindle-dbs/author/ref=dbs_P_W_auth?_encoding=UTF8&author=Nathan%20Yau
In the latest installment of his series “how to hate europoids with an intellectual spin” he explicitly “like(s) the evaporative quality coming up in the southwest.”
“Percentage of white people”
http://flowingdata.com/2016/11/04/percentage-of-white-people/
Deliciously ambiguous, so that he can always say he was referring only to the aesthetic aspect of it. It’s a pity, though, that his long history of maps devoted to Leftism and (barely restrained) Racism exposes him.

Remember: the existential meaning of Asians is hatred of Whites.

Silk Road News: 6/24/17

More Asian perfidy.



Duchesne found it hard to avoid the conclusion that today’s Detroit is no more part of the West than ancient Egypt had been under the rule of a tiny Greek-speaking elite. The same goes for majority-Chinese Vancouver, where the remaining Whites are being forced into small apartments as foreign Chinese millionaires buy up the city’s housing stock, pricing them out of the market. A city can no longer meaningfully be considered Western when the majority of its population is pursuing interests opposed to those of its European-descended inhabitants.

Question: are the snide remarks of Silkers about “Puerto Ricans in the movement” aimed at Duchesne as retaliation for Duchesne’s steadfast opposition to Asians colonizing Canada? After all, as we all know, Asians absolutely have the right to colonize Western lands, which is of course somehow consistent with “European EGI.”

Another member of the “evil party.”  Evil is as evil does, eh Silkers?

No problem!  Once we institute the Silk Road White Nationalism program, Asians living in White lands can have White slaves to toil for them!  It all helps “European EGI,” don’t you know!

Here’s an example when we should all support the police.



Friday, June 23, 2017

Resist the Alt Right

We need to fight this contagion.

Alt Right memetic imperialist:

Call yourself what you want, but you are part of the Alternative Right whether you like it or not. White nationalist? Your Alt-Right. Fascist? Your Alt-Right. National-Socialist? Alt-Right. Race-realist? Alt-Right. It’s a brand with recognition that is slowly appealing to the mainstream and making White Nationalist ideas tenable to people. But because you don’t like the predominance of younger people and youth culture, you defame the name and act like your too good for it. Your like a Hispanic person who says “I’m not Hispanic! I’m Colombian!”

Putting aside the grammar errors, let’s look at the content.  This is the most outrageous nonsense imaginable, a perfect example of the Alt Right’s memetic hegemony.

Let me be crystal clear: I am a national socialist White nationalist and I am NOT – repeat NOT – of the “Alternative Right.”  Don’t like “youth culture?" Look, the Alt Right is nothing more or less than the most superficial and intellectually shallow fossilized “movement” dogma dressed up in juvenile jackassery to appeal to the absolute worst aspects of social media and “youth culture.”  

I am unalterably opposed to this disgusting and disgraceful contagion of the racial nationalist ecosystem, I reject the Alt Right without reservation, and fervently hope for its quick collapse.

Arrogant retards like this semi-illiterate commentator should stop projecting his Pepe/Kek lulzing on sane and rational racial nationalists.  “”Too good for it?”  You’re (not “your”) damn right I am!

I hope that EGI Notes can be one nexus of the anti-Alt Right resistance among racial nationalists. I’d like to see more posts/thoughts from racial nationalists on building an Alt Right-free Movement.

Revisiting Putnam

No White racial solidarity.

Let’s again consider Putnam’s oft-discussed findings about diversity eroding societal trust and repressing social engagement and investment in public goods (similar to findings by others and a topic often brought up by Salter).

Putnam not only found that diversity decreased trust between groups but within groups as well.  That latter finding is somewhat counter intuitive, since one could reasonably assume that increased diversity, and the consequent increased distrust between groups, would strengthen a tribal “us against them” mentality and therefore increase trust within groups. But the opposite occurred, at least with those examples Putnam studied. 

How can we interpret the counter intuitive finding that diversity erodes trust and societal cohesion within groups as well as between groups?  This depends on whether this “within group” problem applies to all groups, or only to Whites.  Perhaps those more familiar with the nuances of Putnam’s work – which I read some time ago and have no interest in revisiting as Putnam is a disgusting excuse for an academic who hid his findings for years and only published it with an accompanying screed promoting social engineering to grease the wheels of White dispossession (*) and my hypothesis here will require more data in any case for a fair evaluation – know more of this.

My hypothesis is as follows. 

If within group trust is eroded by diversity for all groups, then this phenomenon reflects a general human (or should I say “hominid”) trend to withdraw and “hunker down” when faced with diversity,

If the effect is restricted to Whites (which I believe will be the case if a careful quantitative study is done), then this is a strictly White mental phenomenon.  And how does this happen?  The hypothesis suggest the following.

One could speculate various mechanisms if this was the case, but consider – a la Ignatiev’s “Race Traitor” paradigm – that Whites are the only group in which large numbers of the group – including a majority of influential elites – act overtly against group interests.  Thus, there is no racial solidarity among Whites, no one you can racially trust unless you really know them – hence, when faced with diversity, Whites will mistrust other Whites because  - given the omega cuckiness of many Whites – one can never be sure whether a given White is “on our side” or “on their side.”  In a homogeneous White community this isn’t so much of a problem (of course political disagreements – including whether or not to import diversity – can precipitate such mistrust, but even so, in a homogeneous community such conflicts would be muted).  However, in the presence of diversity, Whites must tread carefully.  Is your White coworker someone you can trust to share your disgust over multiculturalism, or will they “report you to HR” because of your “bigotry?”

On the other hand, non-Whites (including Jews) can reliably depend on their co-ethnics showing ethic/racial solidarity, and siding with them against “the other” (and particularly against Whites).  For Whites, a given fellow White is just as likely to be a Universalist cuck as they are to be someone sharing your beliefs.  

Thus, diversity erodes within group trust among Whites (and likely only among Whites) because Whites are ideologically split on this race-diversity issue, and many Whites are SJW “altruistic punishers, so that in diverse environments fellow Whites may pose a threat since they would identify with “the other side.”

Ignatiev would be proud.

*Salter rightly claimed in On Genetic Interests that for a majority being replaced, the only thing worse than a multiculturalism that does not work is one that does work, since the workable multiculturalism will make race replacement more agreeable to those being replaced, while the pain of a failed multiculturalism may wake the majority up to prevent their dispossession.  Putnam is clearly on the side of those who want multiculturalism to succeed.