Oil drillers and mustard dippers should be ostracized as well.
Issues of miscegenation are important for EGI, as well as for parental and familial kinship. Dissuading relationships across wide racial lines is therefore a good thing. I note that Roissy is celebrating an example of “shark shaming” – White women who date Coloreds (“mudsharks”)* being ostracized by White men.
Now, such “shark shaming” is a good thing, so why not extend it to the opposite sex direction as well? Shouldn’t White women ostracize White men who date (or marry) Colored women? The outrageous hypocrite Roissy joyfully discusses his Negro and Oriental sex partners, and indeed claims that White men can “increase their SMV” by miscegenation; yet he supports “shark shaming.”
True enough, since women are the rate limiting step in reproduction, White female miscegenation is worse than that of White males. But “worse” implies degree, not a Manichean good/bad distinction. In other words, just because White male miscegenation is “not as bad” as that of White females, it doesn’t mean that White male miscegenation is good. It’s bad as well, and the “oil drillers” and “mustard dippers” should be ostracized as well.
Can we expect anything else from Roissy? This is the same liar who peddled the ludicrous idea that Trump won Pennsylvania, and hence the election, because of the endless caravans of Amish horse and buggies descending upon voting centers, while the reality was (and was pointed out here, with evidence cited) that the difference in Pennsylvania was all of the rust belt Micks, Wops, and Polacks from Joe Biden country who eagerly flocked to a candidate portrayed in the media as a “racist” and a “fascist.”
What else do expect from a HBD gamester but lies and hypocrisy?
*Does this include Ann Coulter? If not, why not?