Sunday, December 31, 2017

The State of Der Movement: 2017

2017: The Year of No Accountability

I will now review the State of Der Movement for the year 2017.  However, I am going to extend the analysis a bit beyond Jan. 1 2017 to include all events starting with the election of Donald Trump on Nov. 8, 2016.  The last two months of 2016 belong with 2017; together they form a seamless whole, as far as an integrated narrative goes.  After all, the last two months of 2016, including “Hailgate,” set the tone for “movement” ups and downs in 2017, so an artificial separation on 1/1/17 serves no purpose.

This analysis will be divided between (1) The American scene and (2) everywhere else.

1. American

There are many players on the American scene, but if we apply the Pareto principle here, and concentrate on the most important and influential figures, we have the triumvirate of Richard Spencer, Greg Johnson, and Jared Taylor.

Spencer is the “public face” of the American “movement,” the main organizer, the most important social media presence, the biggest “bogeyman” for the Left/System, and, given his relatively youthful age, the leading contender as the successor to, say, David Duke as the Godfather of American Racialism.  Greg Johnson represents the intellectual element, the Grand Thinker of Der Movement, and represents “traditionalism” as well as being an American exponent of “ethnonationalism.” Jared Taylor plays the role of “elder statesman,” and also represents the more moderate, Jew-friendly, HBD/race realist-oriented precincts of the American scene.

There are other important figures as well, no doubt.  Kevin MacDonald is an important intellectual figure, more science- and academic-oriented than Johnson.  Duke is still around, as is Kevin Strom.  VDARE laughably considers itself part of the Alt Right. There are of course other “movement” figures of greater or less importance, some of whom have delusions of grandeur. But, still, the Pareto ratio works; we can get 80% of “movement” importance in the 20% represented by Spencer, Johnson, and Taylor.

Let’s briefly consider each in turn, before getting to America in general, before moving on to Sallis/EGI Notes and then to the rest of the world.

Spencer: Richard Spencer is well meaning, good on camera, reasonably articulate, and has leadership potential.  The basic problem here revolves around judgment (or the lack thereof) – judgment and maturity.  One hopes that as he enters his 40s, more maturity will lead to more gravitas and better judgment, and an understanding that Beavis-and-Butthead White nationalism does not appeal to most people over age 30, and that the likes of Jorjani should never have been dealt with in the first place.  The “Alt Right’ brand has passed its expiration date, and realizing that will perhaps be the first test that Spencer has to pass to transition to a more serious and informed racialist leader. I’ll give Spencer credit for having good instincts in his initial reaction to Brexit and for being pan-European in his attitude.

Johnson: Greg Johnson is obviously intelligent, well-educated, and well read, and has produced good intellectual material for the “movement.”  No doubt about that.  Unfortunately, for some reason, over the time period considered here, Counter-Currents has taken a negative turn, with Johnson becoming ever more intolerant of criticism and displaying increasing irascible irritability.  Differences about ethnonationalism are one thing (however, the promotion of intra-European “ethnic cleansing” was indefensible) but the lack of accountability concerning the two infiltrations is something else entirely.  Everyone makes mistakes, sometimes bad ones, but to compound bad judgment with a lack of responsibility is disturbing. Coupled with bizarre turns, such as “fired donors” and expending political capital in defense of Lauren Southern (including laughable articles analyzing the onanistic habits of her viewers) and bringing back alcohol prohibition (I don't drink myself, but, hey, I thought we were supposed to promote "West Coast White nationalism," appealing to all sorts of people?), I have to say, objectively speaking, that if Counter-Currents doesn’t change direction back to how it was several years ago, the site will slowly, but inevitably, slip into Majority Rights-style irrelevance. True, they are still finding suckers to meet their panhandling goals, but I'm looking long-term.

One basic problem with Johnson is that he wrote an article stating that is OK to “punch right” when it is deserved, and he has done it himself (including asserting, in so many words, that your humble blog host is an embittered lunatic), but he has a “glass chin” when subjected to criticism.

He wrote (emphasis added):

…our resources are limited and our cause serious. We cannot, therefore, be held hostage to the most reckless and selfish among us, people who commit crimes or flout basic principles of operational security. 

Operational security…you mean like having two infiltrators attending your “extremely vetted” meetings at the same time?  You mean inviting an infiltrator to give a speech at your meeting about…drum roll please…the dangers of anti-fascist infiltration?  You mean letting in infiltrators who come with the flimsiest of pretexts (“I’m Swedish!”  “I’m a move critic!”)?

Showing solidarity to such people rewards vice and penalizes virtue. 

Oh yes, indeed.

Intelligence agencies regularly disavow spies who go rogue or allow themselves to be captured. We should take ourselves just as seriously and be equally ruthless with failure.

Yet when I called for accountability, Johnson banned me from commenting at his blog.

Second, in the battle of ideas, there is no sense in demanding that we present a united front, particularly on issues where there are real disagreements of principle.

Tell that to that Curwen fellow, who disagreed with Johnson about Lauren Southern and was essentially air-brushed off of Counter-Currents comments.  And when I disagree with “movement” dogma, I’m labeled “crazy” and “bitter.”

Taylor: Jared Taylor has, obviously, done good work over the years.  Like Johnson, he’s intelligent, well educated, and well read.  He’s articulate and good on camera.  Like Johnson, he’s run some of my work at his site.  But Amren has been doubling down on all the negatives it has been exhibiting ever since I stopped writing for them.  Thus, Taylor throws Spencer under the bus after Hailgate, because some Jews – huWhite Men of the West, we are told – might get offended, meanwhile White ethnics keep on getting bashed, the latest being Munro’s asinine hit-piece against Romanians (no “Men of the West” they).  If the “Alt Right” brand has passed its shelf life, then the tired “HBD/race-realist praise the Jews and worship the Orientals Alt Wrong” brand has long been giving off the odor of decay.  And as for the “gateway hypothesis” – that Amren is the moderate entry point for people to enter the “movement” after which they become more radicalized – I’ll say it again: there is no empirical evidence to support that hypothesis.  It is all conjecture, hypothesis, anecdotal “evidence” – it sounds reasonable so people assume it is true.  Arguing that there is no evidence that it is not true does not impress: it is part of Western logic and Western law that it is the party making the assertion who needs to provide the evidence.  If people assert that Amren is of value because it is a gateway, then actually show quantitative data to back it up.  Otherwise, all I see is a site that tells us that Jews are “huWhite Men of the West,” that asserts that Orientals are high-IQ supermen, and that White ethnics are cringing, low-IQ subhuman (and non-Western!) mongrels.  More of a cul-de-sac rather than any sort of legitimate gateway.  Don’t believe me? Read not only the Munro article but many of the comments to it, seething with contemptuous racial disdain for Romanians and other Eastern Europeans (with the occasional shot at Italians, what would any self-respecting Amren comments thread be without that?).  

Summary: Please note, as I've said in the past (and ignored by the hysterical), that any criticisms of leading activists is business, not personal. I'm sufficiently self-aware to understand that I am (including IRL) a cold and unfriendly person by nature; my interest is in ideas, not people. I, quite frankly, could care less about any "movement personality" at the level of them as individual people, my concerns are on their ideas, actions, effects on racial nationalism, and what they do and do not represent.  Even when I comment on qualities such as personal character, loyalty, moral fiber. etc. that is also business and not personal, since such comments are made solely looking through the lens of evaluating the person's fitness for "movement" leadership.  This point must be stressed because there are people - mostly Type I activists (and perhaps some individuals discussed above) - who really are concerned with "movement" gossip and with personalities as personalities.

If any of the abovementioned individuals were to correct what I see as deficiencies, I would be among the first to praise them for it.  I don't see much of a probability of that occurring in 2018; and I believe only Spencer is young enough, and mentally flexible enough, to change course, eventually.

Der Movement (America) in general: Wasted opportunities galore in 2017.  Trump’s election, the rise of right-wing populism, and the vast increase in sociopolitical chaos and racial balkanization left in its wake endless opportunity that was squandered in feuding, stupid antics, Charlottesville Ragnarok, infiltrations, panhandling Tin Cup White nationalism, and zero accountability.  Trump’s cucking exposed the “movement’s” obsessive “man on white horse syndrome” fetishism once again, and the year is ending with the absolute stupidity of feuding over stupid female YouTube celebrities, and Munro’s vicious attack against Romanians – the people who gave us Corneliu Codreanu and Ion Mota (as opposed to those huWhite Jews giving us Sigmund Freud and Noel Ignatiev).

Sallis: I made one large error - I dismissed the possibility of a Trump victory, naively believing the mainstream media and its polling.  I’ve admitted being wrong about this before; I will do so again.  This was a significant error of judgment on my part.  I was also a bit too optimistic about the meaning of Brexit; Spencer’s initial reaction was more on the mark.  On the other hand, I have been right about virtually everything else: that Trump is a vulgar, ignorant buffoon who will betray the “movement’s” “man on white horse syndrome” fantasies through continued cucking; the unwillingness of the “movement” and its leaders to admit being wrong about Trump (or anything else for that matter – no accountability); the costs of affirmative action and ethic fetish, culminating in the Hermansson humiliation; that the “movement’s” unscientific obsession with “racial purity” and its misinterpretation of genetic tests will lead to System mocking of how “you are not pure so racial nationalism is illegitimate” – 2017 being the year in which activists were roundly ridiculed by the System for getting “impure” 23andme results; that White ethnics would support a Presidential candidate deemed “racist” (as opposed to Bush/Romney/McCain overt cucks); and the fact that a Trump victory – his betrayals notwithstanding – would “trigger” the Left and promote chaos and balkanization.

As far as achieving objectives, with respect to political objectives, my efforts have been a complete and unmitigated failure. Der Movement continues to be dominated by Type I fascists, Nutzis, ethnic fetishists, and morons.  The proposed New Movement fundamentals outlined at Western Destiny are ignored. My influence on the general direction of the “movement” is, currently, non-existent.  Those are objective facts that cannot be evaded.  Nor do I currently have any bright ideas or strategies to alter this situation in 2018.  Being right most of the time (an objective, verifiable fact, not rampant egoism) doesn’t accomplish much if no one pays attention.  That’s stark reality. If the irascibility of this blog is cause or effect (or, possibly, both) of that reality is a determination I’ll leave up to the reader.

On the positive side, I’ve produced some material that at least I myself think has some value, and I finally did do at least a preliminary quantitation of genetic structure using the DifferInt program.  Last December, I introduced the Moralpath concept, which I believe has significant explanatory power and is a novel insight into human psychology.  And I’ve combined on the blog a mix of political commentary, some science and technics articles, ruminations of culture and civilization, analysis of EGI in the practical world, as well as the typical criticisms of Der Movement.  Even if few people know or care, I’m reasonably satisfied with the memes produced here.

2. Everywhere else.

There was some good news from Austria – “the first Far-Right government since WWII” – although they are hardly “Far-Right” by my standards. Well, it’s better than nothing. The news from Germany was worse than nothing: Merkel back in power. Yes, some gains for Alterative for Germany, but in the context of the “refuge” crisis (alien invasion of Germany and the rest of Europe in response to Merkel’s genocidal invitation) the response of the electorate was pathetic and disgusting.  In the UK, Brexit played out as the pan-Europeanists more or less predicted: Polish plumbers bad, “Commonwealth” Desis and Jamaicans good.  Pathetic once again.  

However, the biggest news from Europe was the utter failure of mainstreaming, particularly in France and the Netherlands.  This was a spectacular refutation of the mainstreaming meme (not that defenders of mainstreaming, in any of their online guises, had the character to come out and admit they were wrong – once again: 2017, the Year of Zero Accountability). There is no empirical evidence supporting mainstreaming, similar to the lack of data supporting the “gateway” scenario.  Mainstreaming seems eminently reasonable; the problem is it does not work in real life.  Instead, we see Orban’s continued success with farstreaming, a moderate rightist moving toward the extremes and becoming ever more popular. Mainstreaming fails for many reasons, not the least of which it allows the mainstream Right to shift slightly and overlap many of your positions and hence make themselves into more electable and palatable versions of yourself; while on the other hand, you disillusion your hardcore supporters and you still cannot appeal to that fraction of the electorate who are, and will always remain, unalterably opposed to you.

In summary, given the challenges Europe faces, the response from the Right and the White electorate has been pitiful.  And the elites are doubling down on their treason, saying that the demographic displacement of Europeans from their homelands is “inevitable” and needs to be “properly managed.”  How did such people get into power?  Ultimately, if you go back far enough (that is, even those traitors appointed by other elites are the fault of the voters, because the ones who appointed them were themselves voted into office) it’s because Europeans voted them in, and won’t vote out, and won’t vote nationalists in. There’s some resistance from Eastern Europe, but unless those nations have the gumption to leave the EU – and do so for racial nationalist and not civic nationalist (Brexit) reasons – then they are just playing cards on the deck of the Titanic. Either leave the EU or seize the EU for nationalists, but the latter cannot be done without a nationalist resurgence in Western Europe.

Outside of Europe (and the USA)?  Australia?  New Zealand?  Canada?  Nothing positive to speak of.

The milksop White race continues to be the historical embodiment of cuckiness. The descent into darkness continues.

Saturday, December 30, 2017

The Invented Italian

Philip Jose Farmer, another ethnic fetishist.

I’ve started re-reading the Riverworld science fiction series by Philip Jose Farmer, whose background is described here.  As regards plot and writing, it’s fairly good, but from a racialist perspective, it is not good at all.

I’m mostly through book one, but have extensively flipped through the other volumes, especially book two, to get a feel for the extent Farmer’s racial perspective filter though the series. Farmer was, perhaps not surprisingly, an extreme racial liberal, vehemently pro-Jewish and anti-Nazi, as well as sympathetic to Blacks and to the “civil rights” struggle.  And, oh yes, Black male-White female miscegenation is A-OK; accepting that is a sign of progressive mental advancement, don’t you know.

It is perhaps also not surprising that there is one ethnic group that fairs quite poorly (at least so far) in Farmer’s SJW storytelling: Italians.  Surprise!  With Farmer’s background and his extreme SJW anti-racist cuckiness, I’m shocked – shocked I say! – that he expresses the typical disdain of his type for White ethnics.

This, Italians – particularly Italian males – are portrayed by Farmer as brown-skinned, beak-nosed, no-chinned skulking low-character flotsam and jetsam, negatively contrasted to, say, sturdy Israeli heroes or proud, sticking-it-to-Whitey Negroes.  And, by the way, the Italians so described are northern Italians, not even southerners. 

Farmer represents a very real mix of character traits and opinions that is not so very rare – and not rare at all in Der Movement.

Maybe there really is something to this “high trust hunter-gatherer” paradigm after all.

We can consider Farmer’s ethnic depictions to be akin to what we get from pop culture, particularly from a heavily Jewish and Leftist Hollywood, with TV shows and movies that often use non-White actors and actresses (or real-life individuals adopted into Italian families) to play ethnically Italian characters (Saving Private Ryan, The Wedding Planner, A Bronx Tale, Ugly Betty, Cheers, Jersey Shore…the list goes on).  Of course, for perpetuating certain Italian racial stereotypes, we also have Der Movement’s favorite movie, True Romance.  

We can call this phenomenon: The Invented Italian. People with an ethnic axe to grind invent an image of Italians for public consumption that is at best misleading and at worst intentionally mendacious and racially destructive.  The Invented Italian: a cringing, brown-skinned, non-European, non-White, Arabo-Latino-Mulatto-Afrowop.  If Jesse Jackson and Rudy Giuliani were cast by Hollywood – a la Saving Private Ryan – Jackson would be cast to play an Italian, and Giuliani cast as some non-Italian White character.  After all, Spielberg specifically chose mixed-race Vin Diesel (he of ambiguous but “colored” paternal parentage) to play a wop after seeing him in the semi-autobiographical Multifacial, concerning the struggles of a multiracial actor.  Remind me again what character Dennis Farina played in that movie…oh, that’s right, surname Anderson.  Amazing. Or, more simply: Jewmazing.

Now, I can imagine some arguing: “hey, there really are genuine Italians who are very dark-complexioned, who look strange, etc.”  These people may cite certain celebrities or people they personally know, or whatever.  While that statement is technically true, it is also true that there are outlier phenotypes in every ethnic group and it is usually not the practice to substitute outliers for the norm.  When extreme outliers are misrepresented as the norm, intentionally reinforced by using members of other, racially alien, groups to represent the false norm in question, then we have a case of an “invented” ethny.  Ethnies should be judged - for better or worse – on their actual reality, not judged based on bizarre Hollywood casting choices or effete cuck sci/fi writers’ stylistic descriptions.

As to why this occurs – that can be an analysis for another day.  Suffice to say when it applies to Jewish/Leftist Hollywood, they probably have an agenda – conscious or subconscious – to divide Whites against each other by utilizing misleading characterizations of certain European ethnies so as to exaggerate distinctiveness and abrogate racial solidarity among European-Americans.

A reasonable assumption is that the Etruscan art portrayals reflected how they actually looked (similar to the ancient Greeks, whose portrayals were similar).  While Type I activists may look at the fresco and see Dolph Lundgren, I see swart, dark-eyed individuals with black curly hair, if anything darker than the average modern Italian.  And yet, Der Movement tells us the original pre-Roman population of Italy were akin to modern Swedes, subsequently darkened by the “racial morass” of Rome.  Sure they were.  Hope the eye doctor visit turns out well.

Friday, December 29, 2017

HBD and Silk Road News

HBD, Derbyshire, and Asians, oh my.

My listener’s speculation that females are more likely than males to die from wounds goes against the general truth that women survive better than men in most lethal scenarios. This is one aspect of the great universal principle that sperm is cheap but eggs are expensive.  Reading accounts of the Donner Party, for example, one is struck by how many more women than men survived.

Yeah, just off the top of my head, I can make two reasonable hypothesis, re: the Donner party.  First, women have smaller caloric requirements than men (at least back then, when the typical female BMI was less than 10,000), and, second, no doubt the “women and children first” white knighters were giving the women first crack access to food and protection from the cold, and the women were not required to do as much work or take the same risks..

Looking this up at Wikipedia more or less confirmed those ideas:

Men have been found to metabolize protein faster, and women do not require as high a caloric intake. Women also store more body fat, which delays the effects of physical degradation caused by starvation and overwork. Men also tend to take on more dangerous tasks and, in this particular instance, the men were required to clear brush and engage in heavy labor before reaching Truckee Lake, adding to their physical debilitation. Those traveling with family members had a higher survival rate than bachelor males, possibly because family members more readily shared food with each other.

But ignorant retard HBDer (redundancy) Derbyshire extrapolates from that that “the general truth that women survive better than men in most lethal scenarios” and that somehow then women would be better suited to survive combat-like scenarios.  Remember, HBD makes you stupid.

Asians once again behaving exactly like Negroes and other “people of color.”  Colored is as colored does.

The Asian embrace of Color.  Asians hate, hate, hate Whites – never forget it.

Related to that truth: Rizzo comes down, thanks to the pan-Colored alliance of Asians and Blacks.

Question: In the Silker dream of Chinese girls with guns guarding the borders of the West, will the Chinese actually facilitate the Black-Brown Global South invasion of Europe?  After all, the Coloreds need to stick together: it’s their rising tide after all!

But, but, but…I thought that southerners like Italians were high in “anxiety” (as well as "neurosis"); now we are told that Finns are high in anxiety because they are cold-adapted northerners?  HBD…the gift that keeps on giving!

Some White folks.

Thursday, December 28, 2017

More on DNA Testing

DNA testing.

Putting aside the issue of companies intentionally altering results for sociopolitical reasons - for which they should be sued by customers - I think these tests are reasonably good at determining majority ancestry at the continental level and also good at determining high (10-15+ %) “admixture” at the continental level as well.  23andme, with all the SNPs they use, will most likely be reasonably accurate for intra-continental majority ancestry – whether someone is of British Isles descent or more generally Northern European or Eastern European or Southern European, etc. Some other information may be more or less accurate as well, but there are limits.  As I’ve said before, I would have a healthy skepticism for any minor ancestry under 10%, definitely skeptical under 5%, and once you get below the 1-2% range it’s laughable to believe that’s realistically statistically different from zero.  The possibility that these companies screw around with customers is real; it may be more likely though that they make the significance levels so broad that they virtually guarantee some “exotic admixture” for many people, particularly those not people derived from parental populations from which gene frequencies were determined (*).

The tests are more useful than some of the more extreme detractors claim; they do work in the broad sense stated above.  But they do not work to the extent that they are advertised by the companies, and they certainly cannot be used to definitively determine ancestry in the Nutzi fashion of obsessing over “purity” – even the most stringent confidence intervals used by these companies is not at the levels commonly accepted in the literature, and these companies have already admitted that genetic distance from parental populations can create artefactual admixture.  Tools are useful when used properly and when you understand their limitations, and these tests are tools that can be used or misused.

The one good thing about these tests is the accumulation of raw autosomal DNA data, which could be used in the future for genetic kinship assays or genetic structure analyses.  Years ago, Decodeme allowed 23andme users to upload their raw data and gave back a ranked list of ethnic groups most genetically similar to the uploaded profile.  That was a form of genetic kinship analysis (crude and qualitative) that was useful, generating findings that refuted both the crazed race-deniers of the Left and the crazed ethnic fetishists of the Right.

I'd like to finish by answering certain fundamentally dishonest population geneticists, interviewed by leftist journalists, who make comments such as "there's no thing as a White European group" and "there are no single gene variants that distinguish one group from another; we all share such variants."

As regards the first comment, your own data refute your statement, a continental European group (which can of course be further subdivided as one gets ever more fine-grained in the analysis) clearly falls out of the data, and the fact that the group - depending on how things are studied - may be slightly fuzzy around its edges does in no way suggest it does not exist.

As far as your second comment goes, I do notice the word "single" in there, you misleading, mendacious bastards - who says single gene variants define any population group?  Isn't that why you study hundreds or thousands or hundreds of thousands of SNPs, you dishonest scum?

Fat chance any of these people ever doing genetic kinship assays or DifferInt analyses on large-scale human data.  It's not "paranoia" to say they have political agendas, it is just plain fact.  Anyone who doubts that should meet some of these folks at scientific conferences, go up to them at their poster presentations, and delicately bring up the implications of their work with respect to race.  You will get a hysterical SJW tirade in response; for these people anti-racist politics are more important than scientific integrity, by at least one order of magnitude.  Still doubt it?  Read this, particularly the last paragraph.

*Consider the category "unassigned" in these test results, which for customers of certain ethnies can reach very high percentages when the most conservative confidence intervals are used (and even those confidence intervals are too "liberal" by scientific standards).  So, what does it mean?  That these people are part-Martian?  No, what is actually does mean is that these companies have very poor ethnic coverage, and when one approaches reasonable confidence intervals large fractions of these people's genomes are left undetermined.  That also raises the question of how accurate the assigned determinations of the genome for these people are, for minority "admixture," as noted above.

Wednesday, December 27, 2017

SESTA and the Alt Wrong

The Derbyshire problem.

After historically opposing changes to the Communications Decency Act's Section 230, web giants came out in favor of a proposed amendment to the law, which would punish a website for knowingly facilitating sexual exploitation.

This would seem to be something that VDARE should be concerned about.  The logic here:

1. Derbyshire is a (presumably paid) blogger at VDARE.
2. Derbyshire, writing for VDARE, publicly questioned why possession of child porn is illegal. This can reasonably be seen as support for its legalization (possession) .
3. Legalization of the possession of child porn can reasonably be seen as increasing the demand for it.
4. Increased demand for child porn will, through the laws of economics, lead to increased supply to cater to that demand – leading to increased sexual exploitation of children (including, but not limited to, sexual abuse, rape, and possibly kidnapping and murder).
5. Hence, one can question whether points 1-4 would be interpreted as that blog running afoul of the proposed SESTA amendment.  I'm not saying it will or it will not, I'm merely questioning the possibility.  For the sake of prudent prevention, it would therefore be helpful for VDARE to disavow Derbyshire and remove him from their group of writers.

Tuesday, December 26, 2017

More I vs. II

Informative side-by-side comparisons.

Some tell-tale signs to distinguish Type I from Type II fascists:

Serious sci/fi fantasy:

Type I: Lord of the Rings
Type II: Book of the New Sun

General sci/fi fantasy:

Type I: Harry Potter
Type II: Dying Earth (Jack Vance), Voyage of the Space Beagle

Literary trickster/rogue:

Type I: Loki
Type II: Cugel

Favorite Fascist:

Type I: Adolf Hitler
Type II: Francis Parker Yockey


Type I: Roissy

Favorite historical weapon:

Type I: Viking axe
Type II: Nuclear tipped missile

Outdated yet technically intriguing weapon system that needs to be updated with more modern technology:

Type I: trebuchet
Type II: SLAM missile

Favorite “movement” books:

Type I: The Dispossessed Majority, March of the Titans, The Turner Diaries, Mein Kampf
Type II: Imperium, On Genetic Interests

Genotype vs. Phenotype:

Type I: Phenotype
Type II: Genotype 


Type I: Thinks it’s great; all hail the God Emperor
Type II: The most stupidly juvenile nonsense imaginable

How Trump won PA and the election in 2016:

Type I: Caravans of Amish horse and buggies descended on the voting stations
Type II: Actually studied voting patterns and notes that Trump gained the required votes in “coal country” that is full of working class White ethnics

Type of Fascism:

Type I: Feudal Traditionalism
Type II: Avant-Garde Futurism

American Literature:

Type I: Tom Buchanan in The Great Gatsby
Type II: Captain Ahab in Moby Dick

The Watchmen:

Type I: The Comedian
Type II: Rorschach

Marvel Comics:

Type I: Deadpool
Type II: The Mad Thinker

DC Comics:

Type I: Superman
Type II: Batman


Type I: Babe Ruth
Type II: Ty Cobb

Afrowop Philosopher:

Type I: Julius Evola
Type II: Giovanni Gentile

Ancient “ius”:

Type I: Arminius
Type II: Marius

Favorite East Asian export:

Type I: women
Type II: Gigantor

Mafia moves:

Type I: Goodfellas
Type II: Godfather

Corleone family:

Type I: Sonny
Type II: Michael

Upper arm exercises:

Type I: biceps curl
Type II: triceps extension

Christmas cartoon characters:

Type I: Yukon Cornelius
Type II: Grinch


Type I: 300
Type II: Gates of Fire

Psychological aberration:

Type I: Psychopathy
Type II: Moralpathy

Serial killers:

Type I: Ted Bundy
Type II: Zodiac

Animal protein:

Type I: red meat
Type II: chicken and fish

Typical dessert:

Type I: candy bar
Type II: fruit

Cake vs. Pie:

Type I: cake
Type II: pie


Type I: rat
Type II: beaver or porcupine

Venomous snake:

Type I: rattlesnake
Type II: cobra

Twin Peaks:

Type I: Sheriff Truman
Type II: Agent Cooper

Mighty Max:

Type I: Norman
Type II: Virgil

Body form: 

Type I: mesomorph
Type II: ectomorph


Type I: contacts, Lasik
Type II: eyeglasses


Type I: Aryan uberfrau
Type II: genocidal lunatic


Type I: science
Type II: pseudoscience


Type I: Land of the Gods
Type II: Yellow Peril

Fictional English spy/secret agent:

Type I: James Bond
Type II: George Smiley


Type I: Low IQ, Gypsyized, non-Westerners
Type II: A European people that produced Codreanu and Mota


Type I: Low IQ, mongrel, Arab Afrowops
Type II: A European people that are an integral part of the West

Monday, December 25, 2017

Merry HBD Christmas, Suckers: 2017

Some observations.

I have previously written, repeatedly, on how HBD is a political movement, with concrete political objectives, including, but not limited to, hostility to White nationalism and promotion of the competing ideology of cognitive elitism, which is a thinly disguised attempt to enhance the status and power of Jews and Asians in the USA and throughout the West as a whole.

In this regard, the obsessive promotion of the "Hajnal line" narrative can be reasonably seen as an important component of the HBD political toolkit, designed to turn Europeans against each other, and disrupt the organic solidarity of Europe, the West, and the racial nationalist project.

It is certainly interesting that one never observes HBDers - or their sycophants in Der Movement - using the Hajnal narrative against, for example, Jews (huWhite Men of the West), East Asians, or others of interest (e.g., certain non-White HBD bloggers and their offspring who look like they were expelled from their mothers by defecation rather than by parturition). No, it is always used against rowdy Russkis, drunken Micks, swarthoid Afrowops, Iberian dagoes, greasy Balkanoids, and all those nasty Cuman-derived alien Romanians dancing the Hora - all the flotsam and jetsam of Southern and Eastern Europe, as well as that of the extreme Celtic fringe.

Speaking of ethnocentrism, for example, to the extent that trait actually differs within Europe (and the refugee crisis and the European response raises the question as to whether it actually does), it's a mysterious coincidence that the more geographically peripheral areas of Europe that have historically been the subject of multiple invasions and occupations (by both Europeans and non-Europeans) are precisely those regions thought to be more ethnocentric.  It's almost as it - perish the thought! - that an ethnic memory of repeated invasions, occupations, repressions, etc. by various peoples, including but not limited to Mongols, Turks, Moors, Saracens, etc. (never mind the French and German invasions of Russia and the enormous loss of life those, particularly the second, caused), have left behind a population distrustful of outsiders and more willing to defend the group from such outsiders.  Baffling it all is!  And, it's almost as if regions of Europe historically secured against repeated AfroAsiatic invasion, and which never suffered the sort of trauma inflicted on Russia from Western Europe, would naturally be - shocking it all is! - less sensitive to being "triggered" by outside incursions.

No, let's invent all sorts of HBD theories to explain it - as long as the extreme ethnocentrism of Jews is never, ever discussed (they are huWhite, after all).  Likewise, by analogy, the "Napoleonic complex" would be explained by HBDers as some sort of "genetic inherited behavioral trait biochemically linked to shortness" and not as the result of a learned behavioral reaction to the manner in which male height differences are dealt with by society.

Curiously, the HBD propensity to explain everything biologically stops at the entrance to the synagogue or to the Chinese restaurant (with the notable exception of constantly praising Jewish and East Asian high IQ).  Certainly, we will look in vain for a treatment at Amren about how Jews are alien to the West or about how East Asians reflect Down's syndrome phenotypes.  After all, those degenerate Romanians are still dancing the Hora - long may it turn.

It are, by the way, Type I activists who are almost exclusively the ones so easily manipulated by the HBDers; Type II activists are for the most part immune (one can only imagine what Yockey would have thought about it).  This is yet another reason why the dominance of Type I activists in Der Movement is such a disaster and why more equitable power-sharing with Type II activists is absolutely required.

Merry Christmas, all you Type I suckers!  Long may you turn on your puppet strings manipulated by your HBD puppeteers.

Sunday, December 24, 2017

Bowden and Spencer on Nietzsche

An interesting analysis.

The point Spencer made at the end is important.  Pan-European nationalism is indeed the avant-garde of nationalist thought today, while ethnonationalism, the petty nationalism of the past, is the old and tired creaky remnants of entrenched failure.

Saturday, December 23, 2017

More East Asian/Down’s Syndrome Similarities

Infants. In all cases, emphasis added.

White babies started to cry more easily, and once they started, they were more difficult to console. Chinese babies adapted to almost any position in which they were placed; for example, when placed face down in their cribs, they tended to keep their faces buried in the sheets rather than immediately turning to one side, as the Caucasian babies did. They briefly pressed the baby’s nose with a cloth, forcing him to breath with his mouth. Most white (and black) babies fight this maneuver by immediately turning away or swiping at the cloth with their hands, and this is reported in Western pediatric textbooks as normal. While the average Chinese baby would simply lay on his back, breathing through the mouth, accepting the cloth without a fight.  

In addition, lower Negative Emotionality for infants with DS observed in this study supports the idea that lower levels of reactivity, related to decreased noradrenergic and adrenergic activity, may translate into fewer negative emotional responses for infants with DS…In this study children with DS were also described as demonstrating lower levels of Distress to Limitations (i.e., anger/frustration), which may in turn contribute to lowering the risk for behavior problems.

In an early study, Lind et al. (1970) found that babies with Down syndrome required more stimulation to provoke crying and had diminished visible responses to pain than control babies.

Thus, both East Asian and Down’s syndrome infants share important behavioral traits; traits that are inborn and physiological, centered on a greater passivity and lessened response to stimulus (including stimulation to cry).

And, guess, what other infants have problems with bilirubin and jaundice?

Surprise!  Down’s syndrome.

The evidence continues to mount that the evolutionary history of East Asians converged onto a phenotype functionally equivalent to a high-IQ Down’s syndrome “retardate” type.

East Asians = High-IQ Down’s Syndrome Phenotype

The Simian Crease

Down’s and Asians. Native Americans are of course ultimately of Asian origin.

Following up on this, more information; well, well, well

In humans, a single transverse palmar crease is a single crease that extends across the palm of the hand, formed by the fusion of the two palmar creases (known in palmistry as the "heart line" and the "head line") and is found in people with Down syndrome. It is also found in 1.5% of the general population in at least one hand.
Because it resembles the usual condition of non-human simians, it is also known as a simian crease or simian line, although these terms have widely fallen out of favor due to their pejorative connotation.
…it is more common among Asians and Native Americans than among other populations…

Very interesting.  In a sense, if the original hypothesis (linked to above) is true, East Asians can be considered functionally equivalent to very high functioning Down’s syndrome patients, the oxymoron of “high IQ retardates.” It would be useful to compare gene expression profiles and cell signaling in East Asians to Down’s syndrome patients.

We could also hypothesize that East Asians are a form of semi-autistic highly attenuated idiot savants, with an emphasis on spatial, mathematical intelligence and focused k-selected behaviors, with defects in most other aspects of the human experience - creativity, for example.

Please note that this sort of hypothetical rumination is not meant to be in any way hostile to East Asians.  However, from the standpoint of "human biodiversity" - that the "movement" proclaims it is ever so interested in - one would think that the possibility that a major racial group is akin in many ways to Down's syndrome is something that should be investigated.  From a practical standpoint, any potential findings could possibly be used to devise novel therapies for Down's patients or for others afflicted with cognitive and/or behavioral deficiencies.  If such people can be brought up closer to normal human (or at least East Asian) levels of function that would be a vast improvement in their quality of life.  One could focus on differences in gene expression and cell signaling between Asians and retards that allow East Asians to exhibit a "high IQ" despite the possibility of evolved deficiencies that overlap with Down's phenotypes, and leverage those differences to mimic these Asian patterns in retarded patients.