The tin cups are empty.
Let us assume for the moment that the “movement’ deserves to be funded. Or, more generally, let’s consider the funding of racial nationalism as a conceptual entity, independent of Der Movement, Inc. We can ask a question. Why aren’t there extremely wealthy Whites willing to bankroll White racial nationalism?
The question is valid because we can assume that no such bankrolling exists, not at the level that the question implies. Indeed, if such existed today, various “movement” precincts wouldn’t have to be spending so much time with their tin cup panhandling, they wouldn’t be so concerned with deplatforming, etc. So, assuming that they aren’t running a cunning con job or are being very adept at hiding secret funding (and it’s unlikely the types who can’t prevent their meetings from being continuously infiltrated by pitifully transparent “anti” activists would have such cunning and discipline), we can assume that no such funding exists. Very well. Why?
What is it about wealthy Whites that make them unconcerned about their people’s interests, or unwilling to give even if they were so concerned?
The latter part of the question can be tackled first. One could speculate that the pro-White wealthy are being misled into contributing to more mainstream conservatism or to civic nationalism. But that’s not what I’m talking about here – to use an Alt Right phrase that I usually try to avoid, let’s assume the wealthy White in question is “red-pilled.” They know the score - that White nationalism is the way to go. So, what is it? Simple fear of being discovered? One would think that the wealthy would have their ways of discretely funneling money; on the other hand, if racial nationalists were suddenly flush with cash, the System would leave no stone unturned to find out where the funds came from. So, fear of being labeled a “wealthy Nazi” or a “rich racist” or a “millionaire/billionaire fascist” would inhibit giving. But still that really can’t explain the total lack of such people. One would expect at least a few wealthy individuals very committed to the cause, and perhaps old enough and/or ornery enough that they wouldn’t care what people think, that these people would shell out the shekels.
Is it because they don’t see anything worth contributing to? If so, I really wouldn’t blame them, but I doubt that is it either. Even if major American WN “leaders” are thought insufficient, there’s a lot of ideological (and other) diversity among racial nationalists, even with all of the smaller groupuscules like EGI Notes. Then there are in Europe some genuine nationalist activity that could be seen as worth support by their well-off countrymen. There are things to support if one was willing to do so.
So, let’s shift the focus. Instead of asking why the pro-White wealthy don’t give, we can ask - why there aren’t pro-White very wealthy individuals to begin with?
Is there a psychometric explanation? That the type of people well suited to generate/accumulate great wealth are the type to be unconcerned with racial interests? Are these hyper-individualists? Individualists with universal altruistic tendencies (hello, Bill Gates). The purely selfish? Dark triad psychopaths? Remember Bardeche saying all the fascists he knew were poor; is there a connection? Are Moralpaths bad at making money? Are racial nationalists – even those with a scientific bent – insufficiently materialistic to gravitate to money-making schemes? Are the wealthy wrapped up in their own little bubbles? Are they so insulated from the racial problems that most Whites face that they are unaware of those problems, or wouldn’t care if they were so involved? A la the theories of Sailer, do they see themselves as elite “Good Whites” at war with the crude, low brow “Bad White” “bigots and racists?” Do they see the world as White-White competition? Is it that all the Whites they deal with in their bubble are wealthy and powerful, so they are so stupidly shallow that they don’t even recognize that a racial crisis even exists? Do they just want to “enjoy life and “sit poolside” and so do not care if “after me, the deluge?” Is their conception of self–interest only financial, so that racial and cultural interests mean nothing? Do they only care about protecting their wealth and status, and eschew the chaos that racial nationalism would bring (racists are not good for stock prices, I suppose)? Do they have non-Whites as business partners – the opposite problem of them only knowing wealthy Whites – they see, on a regular basis, intelligent and successful non-Whites and see nothing wrong with that. It’s not that the wealthy are all drawn to libertarianism; there are leftist wealthy Whites – indeed, wealthy Whites come in all political flavors except the Far Right (I think it more likely, ironically enough, to find Far Left wealthy Whites than Far Right). Is there such a dichotomy between Economic Man and Raciocultural Man that the former and latter never meet? But what about people who become wealthy through invention or writing, etc? These may be more scientific or artistic types, not necessarily hedge fund manager types, and yet even the inventors and artists are unconcerned with race. Why is it that racial nationalism can’t “hit the lottery” in the form of having someone (even a lottery winner!) who is both wealthy and deeply concerned about White interests?
Should we try and proselytize to the White wealthy? Should we try and get racial nationalists to generate wealth? Both? Some alternative approach?