Wednesday, January 31, 2018

Immigration: No Free Lunch

It’s NOT the economy, stupid.

I note, and have noted many times before, that the immigration question among the mainstream is continuously presented (almost solely) in economic terms.  The latest manifestation of this is the claim that immigration is the “closest thing to a free lunch” since population growth fuels economic growth via an increased number of workers and consumers. This Ponzi scheme view of economic growth fails for a number of reasons, including the obvious point that a larger economy divided over a larger population is not increasing the per capita payoff – it may be a larger pie, but not larger pieces for each individual. I note that as immigration has flooded into America over the past several decades, allegedly “fueling economic growth,” real wages for the typical American have stagnated, and the American middle class is in a well-documented and oft-discussed decline.  Is it that all this “growth” is lining the pockets of big business, and also benefiting the immigrants themselves and not natives?  Then we are constantly being told that automation will “make work obsolete,” and so a “basic guaranteed income” will be required in the wake of the mass unemployment thus created – a “citizen’s dividend” based on the productivity generated by automation and artificial intelligence.  If so, why do we import more people who will not only become superfluous as workers, but who will compete with natives for the proceeds of the productivity to be distributed as that guaranteed income?  

And even putting the issue of automation aside, the Ponzi scheme aspect of the immigration-population-economy equation becomes more clear when we ask: if immigrants do the work natives won’t do, then who will do that work in the next generation (assuming no automation) when the immigrants’ children are “Americans” or “Europeans” with American or European expectations and the consequent disdain for manual labor?  Do we import another generation of immigrants to do this unwanted work, repeated ad infinitum, until the entire nation is full of the posterity of those brought in to do cheap manual labor?  Conversely, if we need “high skilled immigrants” as we in America are constantly told, then why can’t we find Americans to do these desirable, highly-paid professional jobs?  Are native Americans stupid as well as lazy?  And, if so, how did they build a nation so attractive that all these immigrants want to come to in the first place?  And, further, if immigrants are required to fund “the retirement of an aging native population” (assuming that young non-Whites would politically support funding the retirement of old Whites who they hate), what happens when the immigrants themselves get old and retire?  Would more immigrants be required to fund those retirements – an endless pyramid scheme of immigration and inter-generational wealth transfer?  Or will the immigrants have enough children to support their retirement, underscoring the race replacement aspect of the immigrant influx?  Speaking of which, we can further ask – even if a declining native population “hinders economic growth” (a popular meme, along with the “who will pay for retirement” ploy, to justify genocidal alien immigration into Europe) – so what?   Eventually it will be a self-correcting process, as automation, increased productive efficiency, altered economic structures and expectations and, very likely, an eventual increase in the native birth rate, balances things out – sans replacement immigration.  I can also point out that bringing in hordes of cheap labor aliens to crowd out, compete with, and displace, natives is not exactly conductive to increasing native birth rates.  Or is that the intention?

Finally, we get to the most important, the most fundamental point.  Even if everything the pro-immigration crowd says about economic benefit is true, it still is not worth it.  A nation is not an abstract economic zone, and a people are not an atomized mass of workers and consumers.  Nations and peoples are historical entities, with particular ethnic, racial, social, and cultural profiles, and a people being demographically and culturally displaced and replaced are not benefiting, even if “the economy grows.” Mass immigration of alien peoples, particularly in the context of declining native populations, is genocide against the natives, and what price economic growth if historical nations and peoples cease to exist, and vanish from the Earth?  Read this post for a more technical analysis of the precedence of genetic continuity and genetic interests over any economic concerns, and if you still insist on putting a “dollars and cents” measure on these issues, then read this.  Existence, not economic growth, is the fundamental concern of any people, and no amount of “economic growth” – most of which the native masses will never themselves enjoy – can never justify criminal genocidal policies targeted against beleaguered European-derived peoples.

This post is also relevant to another pro-immigration argument I’ve seen making the rounds again recently: “if you are against (legal and illegal) low-skilled immigration, then you have no good reason to oppose high-skilled immigration, which is such a net positive for our nation.”  Nonsense.  Read this post again, particularly the last section that emphasizes race and culture, and the genocidal implications of displacing and replacing the native population.  Read the linked posts, especially the one outlining the EGI concept and its importance to immigration.  Of course high-skilled immigration is harmful; indeed, one can make the argument that high-skilled non-White immigration is worse for Whites than low-skilled non-White immigration.  High-skilled immigration brings in more clever and capable enemies, more capable and clever competitors, the importation of an alien ruling class, using ethnic nepotism to displace native White Americans from positions of power and prestige.  High-skilled immigrants, free-riding on the society and infrastructure painstakingly built up by White Americans, will climb to the top of the human energy pyramid, leveraging ethnic cartel networks to squeeze Whites out and reduce White Americans to a subaltern caste within their own nation. Is that a good enough reason for you?  Is that sufficient reason to oppose high-skilled immigration?  They are not us, they are not wanted, we need to develop and nurture our own high-skilled population.  We do not want or need leering aliens lording it over us.

Monday, January 29, 2018

Behold the Female: What’s the Difference?

It’s all one.


Sex workers.  And now please tell me how that is different from ordinary female behavior – exchanging sexual favors in return for “goodies” from men (including beta male commitment).

If you think this is stated just for the misogynistic shock value, think again.  Consider: what is meant by a “trophy wife?”  A “Mrs Degree?”  A woman “looking for a good provider?”  The meaning of the fact that on dates typically men are expected to pay for everything, plan for everything.  In each case, what is milady providing in exchange for male resources?  Answer: sex or at least the promise of sex. It is essentially legalized prostitution.  The honorable behavior for women is motherhood (and, later, grandmotherhood) - family formation and nurturing.  The contribution to genetic continuity is worthwhile, but the typical cunning female exploitation of male sexual weakness is nothing more or less than glorified whoredom.

By the way, fresh from tearful courtroom speeches and #MeToo Activism, the female always returns to her roots: trade sexuality for attention and resourcesYou Go Girl!  A rotifer has mores self-awareness than a typical woman.

Even a morally deficient cognitive weakling like Derbyshire notices the obvious:
My question: Nassar was doing the stuff he was doing for twenty-five years. How’d he get away with it for so long?
Part of the answer, I’m sure, is the same as the answer to the same question in the matter of show business sexual harassment. In both cases there was a thing that the harassees wanted very, very badly —so badly that they, or in the case of younger victims, more likely their parents—might have considered that submitting to harassment or molestation was a price worth paying for that thing.
In the showbiz cases the thing wanted was a movie part; in Nassar’s case, a shot at competing in the Olympics.
I don’t say that’s the whole story, and I certainly wouldn’t say that all the victims took that cynical view. Twenty-five years of silence needs explaining, though. I’ve no doubt that’s part of the explanation.
The media likes to concentrate on the isolated cases when complaints were made and were ignored, while blithely not mentioning the fact that many of the victims said nothing at the time, and are now being hailed as Tankgrrl Heroines for marching into court (after being emotionally soothed by a Labrador retriever wearing a tie) and browbeating the NEC pervert (or, simply, and non-redundantly, the NEC). Consider that powerful male celebrities are suffering auto da fe if accused of looking at a woman the wrong way back in the Ice Age.  So, if the entire woman’s Olympic gymnastics team, and their parents, had complained, nothing would have been done?  If all of “America’s darlings” had come forward publicly, together, nothing would have been done?  Yeah, sure.  If you believe that, I also have a bridge to sell you, spanning Manhattan to Brooklyn.

No, just like all the women who went to visit HuWhite Harvey, despite “it was known all over Hollywood what was going on”, and like all the women going to the office of Levantine Lauer (and his door-locking desk button) despite his own reputation, sometimes Tankgrrl ambition gets in the way of right thinking, eh ladies?  Or like those actresses who publicly decry being “objectified” and then post scantily-clad pictures of themselves on social media for all the world to see – a complete lack of self-awareness and adult-level agency.

A not-so-secret secret revealed to the women reading this blog: likely, most of the men you know and interact with on a regular basis have a well-disguised contempt for your sex, and it is justified.  When you act like children but demand to be treated as more-than-equals, supported by a hysterical SJW System, the contempt is well-earned.


Sunday, January 28, 2018

Asian Invasion

Sallis right again.

Strom on the Chinese-Asian threat, which includes miscegenation.

That underscores the genocidal, anti-White evil of HBD “race realism” and the Derbyshire school of thought, never mind the masochistic yellow fever Silk Roaders.  Racial imperialism, indeed.


After writing about race-mixing Alt-Righters, we get this passage (below), and if you ignore the pathetic anti-racist screed sections and instead concentrate on the main message of Der Movement’s (sometimes literal) lovefest for Asians, it might as well have been lifted from posts at this blog (emphasis added):

But the nebulous acceptance of Asian people goes beyond the so-called “alt-right’s” dating preference; it’s baked into much of the ideology of white nationalism. Take, for example, the far right’s obsession with IQ tests, which builds off of junk intellectuals like Charles Murray, author of the infamous 900-page book, The Bell Curve, and Jason Richwine, a scholar who was fired from the Heritage Foundation after his racist dissertation was dug up (Richwine now writes for the National Review). With this, the far right loves to peddle the thoroughly debunked argument that differences in IQ tests show that black and Latinx people are genetically disposed to be “less intelligent” than white people.

The use of pseudo-science by racists to make their ideas sound more respectable is nothing new. Intellectual racism persists, but the guises change. While Bell Curve-era “race science” was once all the rage, now the online alt-right bangs out Wordpress blogs about “human biodiversity” written by users with monikers like hbdchick. 
But one pesky problem for racists is that East Asians actually score higher on IQ tests than white people. (As do Ashkenazi Jews, a fact rendered even more complicated when dealing with neo-Nazi and anti-Semitic segments of the far-right.) “It’s almost like [the alt right] having to make that sacrifice,” Keegan Hankes from the Southern Poverty Law Center told me. “If your whole world view is based on this idea that there are meaningful genetic differences, you have to acknowledge that Asians score higher on IQ tests.” 
Jared Taylor, who runs the white nationalist website American Renaissance and is one of the most avid hawkers of racist IQ theories, expounded on the “good culture” of East Asians in an interview with Splinter. Taylor spent the first 16 years of his life in Japan and speaks fluent Japanese. He told me that “if whites are to be replaced by some populations other than themselves, it would be better that they be replaced by Asians.”

Now, let’s see: where have you read someone warning you about the HBD Alt-Wrong, and their yellow supremacist ideology?  Where have you read someone warning you that HBD is a political movement meant to advance Jewish/Asian interests over that of Whites?  Where have you read about the IQ obsession of Der Movement’s HBD precincts, and the stupidity of taking a disgusting creature like HBDCunt seriously?  Yes, you are correct: at EGI Notes.  Sallis, and only Sallis, will tell you the truth about the HBDers and their lickspittle admiration of, and promotion of the interests of, West Asians (Jews), East Asians, and, to a lesser extent, South Asians.  It’s all Asia, all the time.  Interested in what’s good for Whites?  This is the blog for you. If you are instead interested in self-hating yellow supremacist Whites, race-mixers, sexually deranged masochists who want to be ordered around by Chinese girls with guns, idiots who think that Chinese “maidens” and deep state Japanese “shady ladies” are their allies, who are led by the nose (or another body part) by Asiatic honeypots, who value Asia over Europe, who do the bidding of their Jewish/Asian masters – well, you know where to find them

It’s your choice.

Saturday, January 27, 2018

Whither the White Ethnics

Men or mice?

Considering all the usual “movement” shenanigans, which go on and on without end, it is clear that Der Movement, Inc. has nothing to offer to so-called White ethnics (Southern Europeans, Eastern Europeans, and Irish Catholics).

At best, you’ll be nothing more than a subaltern step-and-fetchit caste; at worst, you are “the niggers of Europe” (Irish), “Euroniggers” (Italians), “Asiatic subhumans” (Slavs), “Med filth” (all Southern Europeans”), “Tatars” (Russians), “hora-dancing Gypsies” (Romanians), or “greasy Gypsies” (the Hungarian Orban, of all people, has been called that).  And if you say that “movement leaders” don’t believe that or use that language, I’ll tell you that at best they tolerate it (wink, wink, nod, nod) at their websites and in their organizations, and at worst, they really do believe it and encourage it (typically indirectly so as to keep enough “cover” to maximize tin cup panhandling among their White ethnic adherents).

What then to do if you are a racially aware White ethnic?  Indifference or hostility to racial nationalism is maladaptive. Narrow ethnonationalism is a self-defeating dead end. So is any sort of makeshift subracialism or regionalism. Staying within Der Movement, Inc. and accepting it as it is means that you really are the cringing racially degenerate inferiors the fetishists claim you are.  

What is necessary is for all pan-European-minded persons of European stock worldwide – both the Anglo-Germanic pan-Europeanists and the White ethnic pan-Europeanists - to together reject the Old Movement, and build a New Movement, based on sound principles (my suggestions are here).

Unfortunately, I suspect that for the most part this will fall on deaf eyes and blind eyes, and many White ethnic racial activists will be content to fil the role of “movement” court jesters, vying for table scraps, the target of (in this case) well-deserved contempt and disdain.  Why should you expect Anglo-Germanic pan-Europeanists to be concerned if you won’t lift a finger to help yourselves first?  A pan-European Movement cannot be a mirror image of the EU – or at least, popular perceptions of the EU – where hard-working and disciplined Germanics have to carry along lazy, undisciplined, and incompetent PIGS peoples. I’ve tried to do my part for two decades; why can’t the rest of you demonstrate that there are some men left among the micks, wops, dagoes, and hunkies?  

Men or mice?  You decide.

Now, let’s flip the analysis, and look at it from the perspective of the “movement.”  What I say to Der Movement is this.  If you want to restrict your ingroup to Anglo-Germanic Europeans, if you want to repel and eschew White ethnics, then by all means continue doing what you are doing, full steam ahead, you’re doing a great job.  However, if you want to appeal to, and recruit, White ethnics, I must tell you in all sincerity that you are sabotaging your efforts on a regular basis. Typically, the way to appeal to, and recruit, people is not to constantly and gratuitously offend them, distort their identities, and go out of your way to use dubious (at best) or obviously ludicrous (at worst) memes to undermine your target audience and say, in so many words (and sometimes more or less directly), that they are worthless.  It’s also not conducive for recruitment when you use dubious or ludicrous memes to denigrate those you ostensibly want to recruit, while suppressing genuine, objectively verifiable memes that focus negative attention on outgroups like Jews and Asians.  If your alleged objective is to appeal to all Whites, then you are digging a deep hole for yourselves.  Maybe the first step to remedy the situation is: stop digging.  

An amusing side note: on a pussy pedestalization website, a post about The Godfather.  Excerpt of a comment left, re: “Don Corleone”:

He was a Saracen rape baby and so was his son. 90% White America was a stranger to a not-at-all White Sicilian.

Sallis correct again.  It is impossible for there to be even one post, anywhere in any precinct even tangentially related to Der Movement, about White ethnics without the usual kneejerk response. 

Keep on digging your hole.

Friday, January 26, 2018

Deport the Nightmarers

Out with the trash.


So, the Alt Righters believe that taking an extreme hard-line position on DACA and immigration is stupid and short-sighted; they assert that we need to be practical and understand the realities of political horse-trading to make progress to ease the demographic pressures from immigration.

I have four ripostes to that position:

1. First, whether or not that opinion position is valid or not, it would seem to be valid only for those people in political power who actually have the option to engage in such pragmatic political negotiations.   Miller in the White House may well need to consider such a course of action.  However, perhaps it would be best for Alt Righters talking and lulzing in their “Hate Loft” to take the most extreme positions possible, to push the discussion as far in the radical direction as possible.  Leave the mainstreaming to those who have the power to actualize political deals, and manifest vanguardism to keep the mainstreamers honest.

2. The only deal worth making in exchange for DACA amnesty is one that truly eliminates all future illegal immigration and makes enormous cuts to legal immigration.  A true end to the illegal influx and a mass decrease to the legalized dispossession of White Americans.  Does anyone believe that’s what we will really get?

3. Why can’t we get enforcement of existing law - perhaps coupled to the decreased legal immigration that a majority of Americans want – without giving amnesty to the Nightmarers?  Why must following existing law be held hostage to amnesty?  Why must listening to the will of the American people be held hostage to amnesty?

4. There is a more fundamental reason why amnesty is a bad idea, even with lots of concessions in return: trading something irreversible for something reversible is always wrong, always a bad deal

Amnesty for the Nightmarers will indeed be irreversible (absent revolution and the ethnostate), and giving them eventual citizenship would just solidify that irreversibility.  However, “strict enforcement” can always be reversed by a future administration, by a shift in Congress, by judges striking down laws, by cuts in funding, by passive aggressive refusal to enforce existing law (as we have today). Enforcement can be ignored, but amnesty is forever.  Don’t we remember the fiasco of the Reagan amnesty?  How soon we forget.  What about the “wall?” Isn’t that permanent?  First, that assumes it will ever get built.  Second, even if it is built, its utility is limited, people can get in other ways, without strict, ongoing internal enforcement of immigration law, the grant wall is mostly symbolic rather than effective.  Third, legal immigration quotas can always be increased in the future, putting those “big beautiful doors” in the almighty wall.  The wall itself, even if built, doesn’t amount to much compared to the will to actually enforce the law – with that will, the wall wouldn’t be necessary to begin with.  The wall, in the end, built or not, may end up being another Trumpian scam.  Why doesn’t the Trump team and all his fanboys realize #4?  Readers of this blog know the answer to that.

The Nightmarers should be deported.  That’s actually the humane option, as one could argue that the Nightmarers should be treated like part of an invading army; the military should be sent after them.  If the Nightmarers surrender, put them into POW camps until the immigration war is won, and then repatriate them to their nations of origin.  If they resist, treat them as you would any resisting military enemy – destroy the opposing force.  Have the army gun them down.

One could argue that.  This blog, steeped in humanist pacifism and the love for all peoples, obviously would not argue that, but some people may do so.






Thursday, January 25, 2018

More Brief Comments on Crowley

Type I follies.

Fetishist:
Concerning the Etruscans and their origins, I’ve found the works of Prof. Cavalli-Sforza to be the most convincing. Specifically, he posits that the Etruscans developed in an autochthonous fashion from the earlier Iron Age Villanovan culture.
…support the hypothesis that the genetic structure of Italy still reflects the ethnic stratification of pre-Roman times.

And these are those autochthonous Etruscans – who portrayed themselves as darker than even modern day S. Italians.

There’s a very good possibility that the original peoples of Italy were swarthier, and more dissimilar to Crowley, than are the Italians of today.

Since Crowley is so obsessed with “Viking Supermen” he can reflect on the absence of such men in contemporary Scandinavian populations, which are generally characterized by racial liberalism, pacifism, feminism, openness to invasion, and sociopolitical conformity.  Changes in culture and behavior can occur without Kempian fantasies.  

Frost’s genetic pacification is a more realistic possibility:
Over the last 10,000 years, the human genome has changed at an accelerating rate. The change seems to reflect adaptations to new social environments, including the rise of the State and its monopoly on violence. State societies punish young men who act violently on their own initiative. In contrast, non-State societies usually reward such behavior with success, including reproductive success. Thus, given the moderate to high heritability of male aggressiveness, the State tends to remove violent predispositions from the gene pool while favoring tendencies toward peacefulness and submission. This perspective is applied here to the Roman state, specifically its long-term effort to pacify the general population. By imperial times, this effort had succeeded so well that the Romans saw themselves as being inherently less violent than the "barbarians" beyond their borders. By creating a pacified and submissive population, the empire also became conducive to the spread of Christianity--a religion of peace and submission. In sum, the Roman state imposed a behavioral change that would over time alter the mix of genotypes, thus facilitating a subsequent ideological change.
So, pacified Romans of the 5th century passively watched as Germanic barbarians sacked Rome; today, pacified Scandinavians watch as non-White barbarians sack Stockholm. 

How does that square with the idea that the “high trust hunter gatherers” evolved to be egalitarian altruists from the very start?  No fear, Der Movement Spindoctors will get out Occam’s Butterknife and spread around some more pseudoscientific speculation and it’ll all work out just fine.

How immigration destroyed Rome.  No, not all the “slaves” and consequent “racial degeneration.”  Instead it was the acceptance of unassimilable hordes of German tribes.  The Merkelization of Rome. 

And with that, enough with Crowley and the TOO disaster.


Wednesday, January 24, 2018

Romans and Germans

Some notes about Ancient Rome.

We all know the “movement” dogma on Rome: originally a moral city state, founded by Dolph Lundgren look-a-likes, it became a morally corrupt, decadent, and degenerate Empire, as “racial mixing” destroyed the “original Nordic population” and repopulated the area with cringing swarthoid subhumans (i.e., modern Italians), to see the degenerate Empire crumble before the moral purity of those stalwart Germans.

Contra to “movement” dogma, it is difficult for normal people, informed historians, and the non-dogmatized educated, to consider the austere Christian Roman Empire of, say, Theodosius I (the last emperor of an undivided empire) as more “decadent” and “degenerate” than the early empire of the patrician emperors Nero and Caligula (Caligula!), or Tiberius, or of the later Republic of Catiline, Crassus, and Caesar, or the earlier Republic dictatorship of the bisexual Sulla (a favorite of William Pierce because of Sulla’s fair complexion - Pierce being nothing if not sophisticated in his historical tastes, Metrobius be damned [or sodomized]), or any of the earlier examples of corruption and rent-seeking avarice.

We can consider the 1942 classic The Roman Commonwealth by English historian Ralph Westwood Moore. With respect to the idea that Rome went from a virtuous city-state to a degenerate empire, Moore classified that as a “pious myth” and further stated: “Morality in the large sense was a thing which Rome achieved as she grew, not a Garden of Eden from which her destiny expelled her or a state of innocence from which she fell.”  Blasphemy!  That doesn’t accord with “movement” dogma so it must be wrong, wrong, wrong – or Moore was secretly Moori, a swarthoid with a Medish agenda!

And of course, there is Ferrill’s military explanation of the fall of Rome, which ironically enough, pins blame on the “barbarization” of the Roman military, as well as dubious strategic choices, as being primarily responsible, along with the obvious difficulty of maintaining such a far-flung empire for centuries against repeated assaults by determined and numerous foes.

Now, from an EGI standpoint, Rome would have been better off not building an empire and becoming a cosmopolitan city to begin with, but the storyline of moral degeneration and fall due to “racial admixture” is hogwash. 

In the battles between Romans and Germans (and Gauls) Der Movement of course historically sides with the latter against the former. There are a number of reasons for this: the typical Nord/Med divide (even though the original Romans are said to have been “Nordic”), that most activists are ethnically derived from stocks akin to Germans/Gauls rather than Romans, the whole dogma of a racially degenerate Empire trying to take the freedom aware from racially pure and noble Germanic “barbarians.” The Type I preference for barbarism over civilization, the knee-jerk Teutonophilia in all things.

We can ask though more objectively what’s going on there.

A more insightful pro-German view is to say that the existence of the Germans as an independent people is what was necessary for the creation of the Faustian Western High Culture after the Fall of Rome, that the Germans racially and morally revitalized a feeble and degenerate empire population, and that the racial integrity of Europe was endangered if Rome conquered Germania, since they would have populated those racially untouched regions with the degenerate cosmopolitan populations drawn from throughout the Empire.

Those arguments are not without merit, but they may be overblown. The Roman conquest of Gaul did not racially destroy the region, although a counter-argument is that France was later racially revitalized by settlement of Germanic peoples. Certainly, a non-ethnic fetishist view is that the demographic impact of Roman cosmopolitanism has been exaggerated.

Nevertheless, if we take seriously the argument that the future of the West as we know it was preserved trough the continued independence of the Germans, then we can reasonably view the Germanic victory of the Battle of Teutoburg Forest as being a positive outcome for the future of the West.  However, later military successes against the Germans in the early Empire period suggests that conquering and administering the region was considered negative from a cost/benefit ration; in other words, practical considerations, rather than the outcome of a single battle, is what led to the Rhine being set as the northeast boundary of the Empire.  Regardless of the reasons, again it can be stressed that the preservation of the Germans as an independent entity was important for the future development of the West.

But there is a difference between that and other battles.  In the earlier wars between Rome and the Germans, for example, the victories of Marius (and colleagues) in the Late Republic Period, it would take an extreme Germanocentric view to argue that the Germans were then on the side of the right, on the side of the West. This was not the case of peoples trying to preserve their freedom, but of barbarians attempting to conquer (and destroy) a civilization that was just them embarking on an imperialistic expansion.  The destruction of Rome at that point could well have short-circuited the progress of culture and civilization in Europe, lost to Europe the fruits of the Classical High Culture, and perhaps have prevented the West from ever coming into being.  It is perhaps not surprising that Der Movement typically forgets Roman-German warfare before Arminius.

What about later wars?  Was the destruction of the Western Roman Empire by the Germans good or bad?  If we take the traditional (and “movement”) view that the (later) empire was completely degenerate, then it was undoubtedly good; however, if we take the view, discussed above, that the later Western Empire was actually more morally sound than it ever was, then the question becomes more interesting.

Rather than frame it in the form of “good” vs. “bad” perhaps a counterfactual analysis would be useful.  What if the Roman Empire, the Western Empire, was able to act from a position of strength in the fourth and fifth centuries AD to reform the European situation to one of a power-sharing confederation mode? What if Rome has won the Battle of Adrianople, and had corrected certain deficiencies and regained some degree of vigor.  What if a wise Emperor had realized that maintenance of a far-flung centralized Empire was no longer feasible (note that the division into Western and Eastern halves was the beginning of this realization) and had reformed the Empire into a Confederation of Peoples – Romans, Germans, Gauls – with cooperation, considerable local autonomy and various common objectives (e.g., eastward expansion, defense against the Huns [Chalons as a crude example of what was possible], etc.).  That may have been unworkable given the attitudes of people of that time; on the other hand, the Gauls were Romanized after exhibiting such resistance centuries before; and, and, at this time, the Germans were no longer the same “barbarians” as in the past, some degree of “Romanization” had taken place, at least to an indirect degree. 

Rome could have at some point attempted to cut its losses, preserve itself as an independent "Mediterranean" power, and come to an accommodation with other European peoples.

Would that have hastened the development of the West, bypassing the Dark Ages?  Or would it have inhibited the development of the West by preserving the fossilized remnants of the Classical past its expiration date?  These are all interesting questions, ones that are never asked by a (itself fossilized) “movement” steeped in inflexible dogma.

That last point is the present relevance of this analysis.  Whether or not ancient historical events meant “this” or “that” are not directly issues of importance.  Getting the “movement” to break free of its blind adherence to fossilized dogma, and develop an increased flexibility of thinking – that is important.  And if at least questioning dogma on the ancient past – mere questioning, not necessarily even any profound change in opinion, but at least an honest consideration of the possibilities – can effect such increased flexibility, then such ruminations are all for the good.


Tuesday, January 23, 2018

SLC News: 1/23/18

Two bits.

Here is one post from BeavisandButthead.com that summarizes The Man on White Horse Syndrome as it is manifested as Trump Fanboyism.

All Trump has to do is release one thirty second video ad against illegal immigration (nothing about legal immigration, mind you), and he is suddenly “officially our guy, he was always our guy.”  Talk about low standards.  How about waiting for Trump to actually do something before sweatily declaring your undying allegiance to the fat-draped obese porn star-screwing with no protection then home to wifey vulgar ignorant buffoon Trump?  Yeah, yeah, MAGA and all that.  

And by the way, why must we exchange DACA amnesty even for an end to chain migration and the other goodies?  How about we both deport the Nightmarers and do all these other Millerite agenda items?  That would be a real MAGA indeed.

Morgan of Counter-Currents, who is insofar as I know still living in Hungary without being ethnically Hungarian writes:

Bucur is right to praise Germany for its willingness to spend billions to bring their kin home, to a safer place. This is the sort of ethnic consciousness that we, as European identitarians, should extend not only to our own ethnic kin but to all those of European descent in this time of crisis. Germany stood up for its own. The failing of the contrasting approach is exemplified by the actions of the Romanian Communists: out of bigotry and the desire for short-term material gains, they were willing to turn their backs on their German countrymen rather than attempt to address their problems…

But, hey, I thought you guys were all ethnonationalists?  Doesn’t that mean Germans live in Germany and Romanians in Romania?  Why should there be Germans in Romania, considered as the Romanians’ “countrymen” unless your “ethnonationalism” really is the ethnoimperialism I suspect it is?  I guess those cringing subhuman hora-dancing Gypsy Romanians should consider themselves lucky to be colonized by Germans, right?

Monday, January 22, 2018

Behold the Female: Expired Shelf Life

Rotting yeast.

My problems with the gamesters is essentially one of prescription, not description.  With respect to sexual matters, the game crowd are correct in their fundamental analysis.

For example, Johnny Redux:

A sexless marriage, in many (if not most) cases, is the result of a man marrying a woman his own age, and after time losing all sexual interest in her as she quickly morphs into an old woman before his eyes, much quicker than he is aging.

As they say: when a man gets older, he looks more and more like Sean Connery, and when a woman gets older she looks more and more like….Sean Connery.

Indeed, one wonders how much of the retroactive outrage pouring out from #MeToo past-their-prime yeastbuckets is due to the bitterness of aging, sagging hags, who have all the charm of rotting meat and all the grace of a wilted flower, looking back with desperate longing to the days when men actually found them attractive - before the inexorable ravages of time worked to make milady into a pathetic and pitiful shell of her former self.  Unlike Dorian Gray, it’s the woman herself, not her portrait, which decays with every passing day, to the dismay of every man who looks, disapprovingly, upon her.

Some good advice for (White) women: gain some humility, marry and have children in your 20s, suppress your urge to hypergamy, and cultivate a pleasant personality so you will be tolerable when your looks fade (which will occur sooner rather than later). You’ll want to have something to fall back upon when you hit the wall, other than the love of a good cat.

The connection between sexual behavior and EGI should be, I hope, obvious to the reader.  We are, after all, a sexually reproducing species.

Sunday, January 21, 2018

Meet Chad Crowley: Anti-White Activist

Another Type I fetishist.

I am postponing the post originally scheduled for today, to make some brief comments about Chad Crowley, the latest Type I Alt Righter who regurgitates warmed over Kempism, deluded that some novel insights are being made.

Crowley’s all-too-familiar, and, from a general “movement” standpoint, boringly repetitive and grossly unimaginative, ramblings on Rome are both non-historical as well as anti-scientific (*).

I know I’ve seen the name “Chad Crowley” before, and a cursory search brings up sweaty mumbling about “Indo-Europeans” that laughably accepts Gunther as some sort of serious scholar, instead of the embarrassing crank that he was, at Beavis-and-Butthead.com, and we can also observe more juvenile Alt Right nonsense at Counter-Currents.  Let’s examine a piece about “Viking Superman” (of course).  Emphasis added:
Viking — the word itself still conjures up the stereotypical image of bloodthirsty blonde barbarians, whose rage can only be sated by acts of pillage and rapine. Fortunately, this dated historical perspective has been somewhat revised, and establishment historians now tacitly acknowledge that Norse civilization was much more complex than previously thought, and a lot less one-dimensional. 

If only Der Movement could consider the history of Rome and the rest of the Classical World, as well as that of “modern” Southern Europe, in a manner that is “much more complex” and “a lot less one-dimensional.” Alas, that would entail some original thinking and a break with fossilized dogma (blasphemy) so such revised “historical perspective” will not be forthcoming from the babbling zombies of “movement” discourse.
If you are familiar with any of my writings, you’ll know that I firmly advocate the study and superimposition of past historical experiences onto present circumstances. Julius Evola

Who was of course a non-Indo-European, non-White, subhuman mongrel (which doesn’t prevent the Type I crowd from being fascinated with Evola and his insipid ramblings)
…presents my view of the usefulness of history succinctly when he posits that exploration of the past isn’t done for the ghoulish resurrection of long-dead peoples or cultures, but rather for the perennial spirit that animates and gives life to both. 

Or to engage in the usual “movement” ethnic fetishism.
The Vikings were many things — warriors, poets, explorers, statesmen — and in the dark days to come, I can think of no better “spirit” to invoke and study than that of our intrepid and oft-misunderstood Norse brethren. Like White Nationalism, Norse culture and the ‘Viking Age’ are still a sadly misunderstood phenomena, and this makes their examination all the more relevant. 
The Roman period, particularly the Later Western Roman Empire, is still “a sadly misunderstood” period (misunderstood by Nutzi nitwits); I plan to read up on that period and eventually share my insights here (which you should not read if disagreement with “movement” dogma gives you fainting fits).
Furthermore, for centuries the Vikings were feared and hated by their non-Norse contemporaries, and later despised by generations of the anti-White academic establishment. All of this has only changed within the past several decades. What does this tell us? It illustrates that like our Viking kin, we White Nationalists will too someday be vindicated retrospectively, because nature favors the victorious, and our cause is glorious.

Please don’t say “we White nationalists.” I neither consider you a White nationalist nor part of “we.”
The White/European predisposition for heterodox thinking
Oh, the irony!  Someone who parrots decades of rigidly fossilized “movement” dogma with nary an original thought anywhere to be found talks about the “White/European predisposition for heterodox thinking.”
… is rooted in our people’s unique ethno- and evolutionary history. The great prophet of decline Oswald Spengler

Who would vehemently disagree with the bulk of your writing, including the confusion of Apollonian with Faustian.
...speculated that the Nordic (Aryan/Indo-European/European) soul was forged in the “harder struggling” environs of the “Nordic steppe,” and though I am not an environmental determinist, I would hold that this is partially true.[4] In the early Indo-European world, and even later in the Norse world of the Viking Age, the love of competition, permeated by the struggle of low-intensity conflict and in conjunction with the extreme climes of Northern Europe, gave birth to an inegalitarian and hierarchical society of aristocratic-warriors and heroic individuals. 
At the same time, the HBD-Nordicists tell us that Germanic Northwest Europeans are egalitarian altruistic universalists, uniquely helpless against immigration, being descended from “high trust hunter gatherers” who evolved in "the extreme climes of Northern Europe."  The fact that these internally inconsistent views cause no cognitive dissonance is clear evidence that we are not dealing with rational analysis, but with a form of secularized religious faith.

These individuals favored deed and action over the pettiness of mere physical existence and material comfort. The cumulative tempering effect of all of these forces gave shape to the White/European man, whose desire to transcend the biological and the material…
That coming from someone who is a biological-minded materialist, albeit one peddling pseudoscience.
…whose penchant for a grounded abstract, became a proclivity for transcendence through self-overcoming. The White race’s ability to think clearly and creatively, harnessing our inner ‘Faustian’ nature has always been our people’s greatest strength, and we would be wise to continue to harness that which has always made us strong. 

As White Nationalists…
Crowley is an anti-White activist, not a White nationalist (see below).
..we’ve dedicated ourselves to representing the highest, most transcendent attributes of our race, and the utilization of our ‘Faustian’ spirit in the service of a cause greater than our individual egos should be one of our greatest ideals. Ernst J√ľnger proclaimed that the underlying principle of the modern world is the centrality of pain. By experiencing and embracing hardship we have much in common with our Viking and Indo-European ancestors, and as such possess the potential for yet-undreamed-of greatness. 
Such greatness not manifested by the likes of Crowley.
Adolf Hitler once said that the Aryan “is the Prometheus of mankind” and I can conjure up no better epithet to describe the collective awesomeness intrinsic to our blood.
“Collective awesomeness.”  Cue cries of Pepe!  And Hail Kek!

Crowley is just another run-of-the mill, dime-a-dozen ethnic fetishist; same old, same old. By peddling distortions and untruths to divide Whites against themselves, Crowley does the dirty work of the System, and therefore can be considered a dedicated anti-White activist, not a White nationalist.

Sadly, The Occidental Observer has degenerated into a highbrow version of Chateau Heartiste, being a mix of Trump fanboyism, HBD pseudoscience, Nordicism, and juvenile AltRightism. More evidence that Der Movement, Inc. corrupts everything it comes in contact with, including otherwise intelligent and well individuals (TOO blog founders, not necessarily all of the contributors).

*Further, looking at Novembre’s “genes mirror geography” study, we can see that Italian samples, derived from various parts of that nation, fall exactly where one would expect given the geographic cline of gene frequencies.  There is no significant shift, as one would expect if the population base of the nation had been significantly replaced by others from origins outside the European genetic cline.

Saturday, January 20, 2018

SLC News: More Type I Retardation

More stupidity.


Really?  You think?  Pepe!  Hail Kek!


And this is a formerly unknown Beavis-and-Butthead episode.

Altright.com runs an article about the migrant invasion of Palermo, and the response in the comments section is what is to be expected.  Cue the crazed fetishists:


NineNorth
Southern Italy has a mongrel problem, the North is where it’s at. At this point Sicily’s been invaded by everyone at some point. #MakeSicilyNormanAgain 
Cryptic

All of Italy has had a mongrel problem since the original population stopped having enough children to replace themselves during the jewish banking enlightenment.
Show me an “Italian” that isn’t a greasy guinea. A katzenfresser.

Ah yes, but those euronigger cat eaters are not the ones who wrecked Europe with the invited migrant invasion, were they? That was Marmeladinger Merkel and her nation of cucked soyboys.

In any case, how about actually commenting on the topic of the article itself? After all, we can’t all be as purebred as this Aryan ubermensch.  #MakeBromstadChineseAgain

Ethnic fetishism alert.  More warmed over Kempian nonsense to keep you laughing. These are the same websites that huff and puff hysterically about “high trust hunter gatherers” and the Paleolithic/Neolithic divide. Newsflash: Italy was predominantly Neolithic, racially speaking, from the…Neolithic, which predates the “Bronze Age.”  Yes, I know… the early Roman Republic, chaste and noble, was populated by a bunch of Dolph Lundgrens wearing togas. And those Etruscans, from 5th century BC north-central Italy were, undoubtedly, Nordic Aryans.  No doubt about it.  Newsflash #2 – if you are going to talk about morality, then the moral fiber of the Christian Late Western Roman Empire was at a higher level than that of the Early Empire shenanigans of Tiberius, Caligula, or Nero, or of the Republic period featuring such upstanding character studies as Pierce’s favorite, Sulla the Queer.

Speaking of degeneration, The Occidental Observer is vying with Counter-Currents and VDARE for the biggest downturn in material quality, rapidly becoming an embarrassment.  It’s another empty suit website, in a “movement” defied by “empty suits.”  Another website to erase from my reading list.

Note the hypocrisy and inconsistency here.  On the one hand, we are told that Northwest Europeans welcome migrants because they are descended from “high trust hunter gatherers” and are a noble and honest people whose civilization-building altruism is being exploited by the migrant invaders – as opposed to clannish and collectivist Neolithic Southern Europeans who are not so exploited.  Then, on the other hand, if the mayor of Palermo welcomes migrants, it’s because S. Italians are subhuman mongrels who are markedly inferior to all else, including N. Italian Lega Nord heroes (including Bossi and his obviously N. Italian wife), and thus are too degenerate to mount a resistance to migrants.  That the “movement” lacks the self-awareness to keep the story straight from one day to the next is Sailer’s “Who Whom” in stark relief – the same behavior is judged differently dependent on who it is that does it.  That degree of extreme ethnocentrism is not exactly very “high trust altruist Universalist” is it?  It’s more like the behavior of Jews.

Doesn’t Der Movement ever get tired of endlessly spouting the same solipsist dogma?  Here’s a challenge for all the Type I heroes of Der Movement: can you have an article – how about one single article, just one - about Italy, Greece, or Spain without endless comments about how “mongrelized” the populations are?  Or an article about Rome without the usual nonsense about “racial degeneration” leading to “decadence?”  If you guys are so racially superior certainly you can have sufficient self-discipline to refrain from the usual song-and-dance for one article, right?  It’s not like you’re like a raging alcoholic with a bottle of whisky within arm’s length.  Right?

Given we are dealing with affirmative action quota queens, whose only “merit” for “movement activism” or “movement leadership” is their caste system ethnicity, the same heroes who have led us all to endless decades of unremitting failure, who make the same man on white horse error over and over again – being more unable to learn from errors than the most primitive Negro, and whose “extreme vetting” at meetings is akin to Merkel’s border control policy, it’s doubtful that any of these would have the slightest discipline whatsoever to do anything.

Greg Johnson promotes “paternalism” –

Paternalism means treating people like children. Children lack the maturity and wisdom to make their own decisions. Thus they need parents — or people playing the paternal role — to tell them what to do and, on occasion, to force them to do it.

Let’s rewrite that.


Paternalism means treating incompetent, child-like “activists” like children. Children lack the maturity and wisdom to make their own decisions.  They’ll host “extreme vetted” meetings at which one infiltrator is snapping secret pictures (and making speeches to beware of infiltrators) and another infiltrator is running a tape recorder in his carry case.  Thus they need parents — or Type II activists playing the paternal role — to tell them what to do and, on occasion, to force them to do it, at which point these children will throw a tantrum and slam the door to their room in a hysterical fit.

By the way, who decides what the “good life” is?  I would assume that Andrew Joyce would think one thing and James O’ Meara and his “mannerbund” quite another.  Or is the “good life” simply that of living off of supporters’ donations?

I admit to failing in my task of sufficiently critically evaluating Der Movement. I’ve been far too lenient, far too uncritical, far too accommodating.  But that’s a lost cause anyway.  More important is not to be merely reactive but to articulate an alternative. Creating such content – even if it is inevitably ignored by idiots and rent-seeking graspers – is a better use of time than listening to the equivalent of Beavis-and-Butthead sniggering, reading sweaty fetishists, or watching tin cup panhandling.

Friday, January 19, 2018

Racial Envy Once Again

More on racial envy.


The Hutu have always resented the tall, imposing, attractive Tutsis, who had dominated them on-and-off since the 15th century. When Hutus picked up machetes to slash to bits nearly a million of their Tutsi neighbors in the 1994 Rwandan genocide, they were, on a deeper level, contends Richburg, “slashing at their own perceived ugliness, as if destroying this thing of beauty, this thing they could never really attain, removing it from the earth forever.”

That is very similar to what I’ve written about before on racial resentment and racial envy. The bottom line is that much of anti-White animus has its genesis in envy of Whites, White accomplishments, and White characteristics. Separation would help, but with globalism, there’s probably no way for non-Whites to fully escape feelings of racial inadequacy.  But at least Whites won’t have such resentful and embittered people living amongst us.


Thursday, January 18, 2018

More SLC News: Trump, Obesity, Porn, and Chinatrices

More, more, more.




Wow, what an “alpha!”  Cue Roissy’s fawning admiration.

Remember when Roissy predicted that Bezos was going to turn “hard right” politically because he was working out?  

Der Movement in all its forms – always wrong.  Ted Sallis – always right.


As far as The Good Shepherd goes, see this.

It’s interesting, and ironic, that generational warriors with their rage against “boomers” behave like stereotypes of jackass Millennials.  The bible verse about motes, eyes, and beams comes to mind.

Optimal diplomatic relations along the Silk Road.  Get some!

Contrary to the Asian supremacist-White omega male yellow fever sexual masochism fundamental dishonesty of the Silkers, the reality is of Jewish-Chinese collaboration against White interests.
U.S. officials warned Jared Kushner earlier this year that his friendship with Wendi Deng Murdoch could be used as a conduit by the Chinese government, The Wall Street Journal reported on Monday.

Unnamed sources told the outlet that counterintelligence officials had warned Kushner that Murdoch, a Chinese-American businesswoman who was married to News Corp. founder Rupert Murdoch, could leverage her close relationship with Kushner and his wife, Ivanka Trump, to push the interests of the Chinese government. 

The Wall Street Journal is owned by News Corp.

Among U.S. officials’ reported concerns was a proposed garden in Washington, D.C., funded by the Chinese government. The $100 million project has reportedly been declared a national security risk due to a tall tower that’s part of the design, which intelligence officials worry could be used for surveillance.

Note also how the Chinese utilize their women to influence White and Jewish males to help “to push the interests of the Chinese government. “  Sound familiar?

Not a Romanian.  Surprise!  Who has been warning you about the Asian invasion?

Sallis right again, and again, and again…endlessly, until the rightness of Sallis overcomes Der Movement and Silker lying mendacity.