It’s all one.
Sex workers. And now please tell me how that is different from ordinary female behavior – exchanging sexual favors in return for “goodies” from men (including beta male commitment).
If you think this is stated just for the misogynistic shock value, think again. Consider: what is meant by a “trophy wife?” A “Mrs Degree?” A woman “looking for a good provider?” The meaning of the fact that on dates typically men are expected to pay for everything, plan for everything. In each case, what is milady providing in exchange for male resources? Answer: sex or at least the promise of sex. It is essentially legalized prostitution. The honorable behavior for women is motherhood (and, later, grandmotherhood) - family formation and nurturing. The contribution to genetic continuity is worthwhile, but the typical cunning female exploitation of male sexual weakness is nothing more or less than glorified whoredom.
By the way, fresh from tearful courtroom speeches and #MeToo Activism, the female always returns to her roots: trade sexuality for attention and resources. You Go Girl! A rotifer has mores self-awareness than a typical woman.
Even a morally deficient cognitive weakling like Derbyshire notices the obvious:
My question: Nassar was doing the stuff he was doing for twenty-five years. How’d he get away with it for so long?The media likes to concentrate on the isolated cases when complaints were made and were ignored, while blithely not mentioning the fact that many of the victims said nothing at the time, and are now being hailed as Tankgrrl Heroines for marching into court (after being emotionally soothed by a Labrador retriever wearing a tie) and browbeating the NEC pervert (or, simply, and non-redundantly, the NEC). Consider that powerful male celebrities are suffering auto da fe if accused of looking at a woman the wrong way back in the Ice Age. So, if the entire woman’s Olympic gymnastics team, and their parents, had complained, nothing would have been done? If all of “America’s darlings” had come forward publicly, together, nothing would have been done? Yeah, sure. If you believe that, I also have a bridge to sell you, spanning Manhattan to Brooklyn.
Part of the answer, I’m sure, is the same as the answer to the same question in the matter of show business sexual harassment. In both cases there was a thing that the harassees wanted very, very badly —so badly that they, or in the case of younger victims, more likely their parents—might have considered that submitting to harassment or molestation was a price worth paying for that thing.
In the showbiz cases the thing wanted was a movie part; in Nassar’s case, a shot at competing in the Olympics.
I don’t say that’s the whole story, and I certainly wouldn’t say that all the victims took that cynical view. Twenty-five years of silence needs explaining, though. I’ve no doubt that’s part of the explanation.
No, just like all the women who went to visit HuWhite Harvey, despite “it was known all over Hollywood what was going on”, and like all the women going to the office of Levantine Lauer (and his door-locking desk button) despite his own reputation, sometimes Tankgrrl ambition gets in the way of right thinking, eh ladies? Or like those actresses who publicly decry being “objectified” and then post scantily-clad pictures of themselves on social media for all the world to see – a complete lack of self-awareness and adult-level agency.
A not-so-secret secret revealed to the women reading this blog: likely, most of the men you know and interact with on a regular basis have a well-disguised contempt for your sex, and it is justified. When you act like children but demand to be treated as more-than-equals, supported by a hysterical SJW System, the contempt is well-earned.