Really? You think? Pepe! Hail Kek!
And this is a formerly unknown Beavis-and-Butthead episode.
Altright.com runs an article about the migrant invasion of Palermo, and the response in the comments section is what is to be expected. Cue the crazed fetishists:
NineNorthSouthern Italy has a mongrel problem, the North is where it’s at. At this point Sicily’s been invaded by everyone at some point. #MakeSicilyNormanAgain
All of Italy has had a mongrel problem since the original population stopped having enough children to replace themselves during the jewish banking enlightenment.Show me an “Italian” that isn’t a greasy guinea. A katzenfresser.
Ah yes, but those euronigger cat eaters are not the ones who wrecked Europe with the invited migrant invasion, were they? That was Marmeladinger Merkel and her nation of cucked soyboys.
In any case, how about actually commenting on the topic of the article itself? After all, we can’t all be as purebred as this Aryan ubermensch. #MakeBromstadChineseAgain
Ethnic fetishism alert. More warmed over Kempian nonsense to keep you laughing. These are the same websites that huff and puff hysterically about “high trust hunter gatherers” and the Paleolithic/Neolithic divide. Newsflash: Italy was predominantly Neolithic, racially speaking, from the…Neolithic, which predates the “Bronze Age.” Yes, I know… the early Roman Republic, chaste and noble, was populated by a bunch of Dolph Lundgrens wearing togas. And those Etruscans, from 5th century BC north-central Italy were, undoubtedly, Nordic Aryans. No doubt about it. Newsflash #2 – if you are going to talk about morality, then the moral fiber of the Christian Late Western Roman Empire was at a higher level than that of the Early Empire shenanigans of Tiberius, Caligula, or Nero, or of the Republic period featuring such upstanding character studies as Pierce’s favorite, Sulla the Queer.
Speaking of degeneration, The Occidental Observer is vying with Counter-Currents and VDARE for the biggest downturn in material quality, rapidly becoming an embarrassment. It’s another empty suit website, in a “movement” defied by “empty suits.” Another website to erase from my reading list.
Note the hypocrisy and inconsistency here. On the one hand, we are told that Northwest Europeans welcome migrants because they are descended from “high trust hunter gatherers” and are a noble and honest people whose civilization-building altruism is being exploited by the migrant invaders – as opposed to clannish and collectivist Neolithic Southern Europeans who are not so exploited. Then, on the other hand, if the mayor of Palermo welcomes migrants, it’s because S. Italians are subhuman mongrels who are markedly inferior to all else, including N. Italian Lega Nord heroes (including Bossi and his obviously N. Italian wife), and thus are too degenerate to mount a resistance to migrants. That the “movement” lacks the self-awareness to keep the story straight from one day to the next is Sailer’s “Who Whom” in stark relief – the same behavior is judged differently dependent on who it is that does it. That degree of extreme ethnocentrism is not exactly very “high trust altruist Universalist” is it? It’s more like the behavior of Jews.
Doesn’t Der Movement ever get tired of endlessly spouting the same solipsist dogma? Here’s a challenge for all the Type I heroes of Der Movement: can you have an article – how about one single article, just one - about Italy, Greece, or Spain without endless comments about how “mongrelized” the populations are? Or an article about Rome without the usual nonsense about “racial degeneration” leading to “decadence?” If you guys are so racially superior certainly you can have sufficient self-discipline to refrain from the usual song-and-dance for one article, right? It’s not like you’re like a raging alcoholic with a bottle of whisky within arm’s length. Right?
Given we are dealing with affirmative action quota queens, whose only “merit” for “movement activism” or “movement leadership” is their caste system ethnicity, the same heroes who have led us all to endless decades of unremitting failure, who make the same man on white horse error over and over again – being more unable to learn from errors than the most primitive Negro, and whose “extreme vetting” at meetings is akin to Merkel’s border control policy, it’s doubtful that any of these would have the slightest discipline whatsoever to do anything.
Greg Johnson promotes “paternalism” –
Paternalism means treating people like children. Children lack the maturity and wisdom to make their own decisions. Thus they need parents — or people playing the paternal role — to tell them what to do and, on occasion, to force them to do it.
Let’s rewrite that.
Paternalism means treating incompetent, child-like “activists” like children. Children lack the maturity and wisdom to make their own decisions. They’ll host “extreme vetted” meetings at which one infiltrator is snapping secret pictures (and making speeches to beware of infiltrators) and another infiltrator is running a tape recorder in his carry case. Thus they need parents — or Type II activists playing the paternal role — to tell them what to do and, on occasion, to force them to do it, at which point these children will throw a tantrum and slam the door to their room in a hysterical fit.
By the way, who decides what the “good life” is? I would assume that Andrew Joyce would think one thing and James O’ Meara and his “mannerbund” quite another. Or is the “good life” simply that of living off of supporters’ donations?
I admit to failing in my task of sufficiently critically evaluating Der Movement. I’ve been far too lenient, far too uncritical, far too accommodating. But that’s a lost cause anyway. More important is not to be merely reactive but to articulate an alternative. Creating such content – even if it is inevitably ignored by idiots and rent-seeking graspers – is a better use of time than listening to the equivalent of Beavis-and-Butthead sniggering, reading sweaty fetishists, or watching tin cup panhandling.