Who is the victim? The “racist” father – the one his scum daughter wants to portray as a villain. Look, the man thought he was marrying, living with, and procreating with a woman he perceived as White, was misled (by her) to think as her being White, while she was actually a light-skinned (mixed race) “African-American.” The man had one life to live, he married and reproduced with (insofar as I know) one woman, and he wasted his life, and wasted his genetics, on an indescribably evil race fraud. Evil? Yes. If she knew her husband was an anti-Black racist, how could she fool the man, in the most intimate manner possible, for their entire married lives? It’s at least as bad as cuckoldry, passing off another man’s child as his own. She was passing off someone else’s racial identity for her own, and passed off the offspring of an inter-racial marriage to the husband as if they were a product of an intra-racial marriage.
Evil. Disgusting. Horrific.
However, the father can’t get off without criticism. He was a victim, but was also victimized by his own stupidity. I cannot image marrying someone without having a very clear idea of their ancestry and without meeting their family (or even seeing pictures of said family). The fraud looked, as Grant said about Argentinians, “suspiciously swarthy,” so the man should have looked more deeply into the genepool he was going to dive into.
But, even with that, he’s clearly the victim in this story – defrauded into destroying his pre-existing genetic lineage, foregone parental kinship, lost European progeny.
If you allegedly “love” and “care for” your life partner, how could you willfully defraud them in such a callous manner?