Saturday, March 31, 2018

One Advantage of WN 2.0

They have no single “Grand Poobah” holding them back.

While I tend to be critical of White Nationalism 2.0 (the Beavis-and-Butthead Alt Right) and their pretensions of being ever-so-superior to White Nationalism 1.0 (the Pierce model), I do have some positive things to say about the WN 2.0 crowd.

The fact that the 2.0 folks are much more decentralized than we 1.0 folks used to be (I’m talking about my analog activism period “back in the day”) is helpful in getting things done.  Now, often (i.e., almost always) the things that get done are stupid and counter-productive, but at least for the purposes of spreading chaos and promoting balkanization, it’s sometimes a net good.  It’s true that the times are more propitious for street activism now than it was in the past, with the declining racial status of Whites combined with Trump’s incoherent wrecking ball campaign and “train wreck” Presidency, and the presence of the Internet is another important factor promoting a more decentralized “do-it-yourself” activism, but, still, a major factor is the Millennial free-wheeling independence of 2.0 to do things without needing “permission” from some “movement”-appointed affirmative action Fuhrer.

It’s not like we WN 1.0 folks ~20 years ago didn’t want to do “in real life” street activism.  We did.  I remember some of the more rambunctious fellows at meetings had to be “restrained” like attack dogs on a leash.  But, we were told, you see, "you are political soldiers” and have to subject yourselves to the discipline of the “national leadership” and “follow directions” like good little boys.  By some strange coincidence – I’m shocked, shocked! – the only activities we were allowed were those that were directly or indirectly tin cup panhandling for the “national office.”  Buy books!  Buy tapes!  Buy all the pre-made, moronic, locally-irrelevant “propaganda materials!”  Pay your “membership dues!”  Distribute stickers and leaflets, which were nothing more than membership and fundraising for the selfsame “national office.” Have pathetically infrequent meetings in the “little rooms” (as per the Dresden song) to discuss distributing more leaflets or putting stickers on bus stops.  Strike a blow for the White race!  Buy more of the pre-printed garbage displayed on the table!  And if someone had the idea of designing their own propaganda that was actually relevant to current events and particularly relevant to the locale in question?  No, no, a thousand times, no!  After all, the propaganda had to be “professional” and “standardized” – code words for funneling the shekels to the Grant Poobah for laughably irrelevant, uninspiring, and tiresomely boring material produced by the budding Goebbels of our heroic leadership.  Really, we weren’t allowed to use the restroom at a meeting without getting approval from the “national office.”  And so nothing got done, people got discouraged, and the whole enterprise collapsed.

WN 2.0, for all its faults, is too independent of mind, too free-wheeling, too proud of its own freedom, to be constrained by rent-seeking martinets and their calls for a highly centralized, vertical command structure, where orders flow downward and the shekels flow upward.

Yes, the 2.0 folks need to ditch the Beavis-and-Butthead attitudes, the tragicomic cosplay optics at rallies, and have better planning, strategy, and tactics.  But, at least they have the freedom of action to get things done.  Those “things” need to be done better and more professionally, but they do need to get done. They should learn a lesson how WN 1.0 activism was “smothered in its crib” by self-seeking quota queens play-acting as Der Fuhrer, and the blind obedience of 1.0 activists to the prancing martinets, as opposed to just organizing among themselves to get things done.

Friday, March 30, 2018

SLC News, 3/30/18

Yet more stupidity, lies, and cowardice.


Hmmm…who was it who predicted the downfall of the Alt Right - that the Alt Right fever would eventually burn itself out?

“Movement” failure can be chalked up to three inter-related reasons:

1. A defective ideology; the same old tired fossilized memes, sweaty racial fantasies, obsessive ethnic fetishism, rigid dogma, all with a healthy helping of solipsism, self-delusion, and pseudoscience.

2. A failed leadership.  Affirmative action leads to incompetence, and this holds true not only for “women and minorities” in the broader society, but also for “cuck naggers” in Der Movement.

3. A significant fraction, possibly a majority, of rank-and-file activists are Type I Nutzi defectives.

So, the defective ideology justifies the affirmative action policy and attracts the Nutzis. The failed leaders grasp onto the ideology that props up their own “leadership,” while the Nutzis support and enable the tragicomic failures of their leaders.

Neither the leaders nor the followers will condemn themselves and break the cycle, and they certainly will not denounce the ideology that forms the center of (what passes for) their identity.

A New Movement needs to arise to displace the crumbling ruin of the Old.  Do I believe that will happen?  No, but I will continue being a “voice in the wilderness” and hold out hope.

Roissy endorses this comment:

One thing that beta male white knight faggots don’t want to hear about is the obsession that bitches have with wanting to fuck mass murderers. […]
If you want to live in some fantasy dreamworld where “they’re not all like that” then go ahead, but if you don’t accept the truth you’re just going to go through your entire life getting fucked over by these skanks.
Conversely, if you look at them as what they are – stupid, wild animals – they you might have a chance to make a relationship with one work. Just always remember that as a boyfriend/husband you are basically a zookeeper, trying to keep control over a twisted amoral beast.

I endorse the comment as well, the description is 100% correct.  It goes off the rails with its subsequent prescription: we need “game” you see, which is, in essence, pure pussy pedestalization; men need to modulate their every word and action, down to the most minute detail, to appeal to these “twisted amoral beasts.”

How about this: NO.

Sir MGTOW vs. the Yeastbuckets!

Yeah, and there’s no god either, but Frannie boy won’t tell you that.

The Sallistrian religious paradox: The higher one goes up the religious hierarchy the less likely one is to actually believe in god or all the other religious nonsense.

Some old hag fumbling with her rosaries in church believes unconditionally, a priest has his doubts, a bishop understands the value of religion for social control, and the college of cardinals, and the pope derived from then, knows full well the truth and its ideological utility.

Surprise, surprise.  “America’s Senator” fails again.

Hey Jeff, just do what you do best: stand around helplessly, looking like a Howdy Doody doll without the ventriloquist.


Dem Russkis are already ahead of us and pulling away fast.  Hint: having a nuclear deterrent that dates from the 1960s and 70s, with some sprinkling from the 80s, is not going to scare Russia or China.  Another hint: the constant US trend to downscale its nuclear bomb arsenal in both numbers and yield per weapon is not going to scare anyone either.  I realize, Donnie, that your Presidency, nay your entire existence, is all about empty blustering, but the hard men of Russia and China are not going to be deterred by your windbag exhortations.  No, only true force will do the job, and true force includes missiles than are not older than the fathers of the men whose fingers are on the button, and true force includes nuclear bombs than actually have yields greater than the early atom bombs of the late 40s.

Chinese Nationalist Whore writes:

As a Chinese, I come from a highly collectivistic society and I find it deeply naïve to think that Jews as a group will not have a major advantage over individuals who do not network in the same ethnocentric way.

Yes, indeed, and one good reason (besides of course their alien genotypes and phenotypes) Chinese should not be allowed into Western nations and should not be allowed on Western blogs.

As a kind Japanese writer named Riki Rei at Counter Currents points out, the Chinese elite is in bed with the Jewish elite.

Of course, the MR Silkers who say that any criticism of China is due to the critic being “a Jew or someone who sucks Jewish cock” (their words, not mine, in case you the reader are offended by the vulgarity).

Of course the Chinese are “in bed” with the Jews – the problem is that the Silkers want the Chinese to be in bed with them, literally, preferably all those Chinese girls with guns who are going to the “border guards of the West.”  Among White manlets, Silk Road White nationalism is nothing more or less than masochistic yellow fever fetishism.

Thursday, March 29, 2018

Donald Cuck Redefines the Meaning of POTUS

Trump the omega male loser.

Trump is a low-life turd, and not only because he is alleged to have committed adultery with a low rent porn star (*).

Read this.  Put aside for the moment the article’s key point, and also put aside the usual Amren concern for Jewish interests, and concentrate on this:
Even if we were to believe that Rep. Ellison has cut ties with the Nation of Islam, his extremism is hardly a thing of the past. He recently tweeted out a picture of himself seemingly endorsing a book promoting antifa, the far-left group that assaults its opponents. The book’s author, Mark Bray, explicitly endorses violence against Trump voters: 
Our goal should be that in twenty years those who voted for Trump are too uncomfortable to share that fact in public. We may not always be able to change someone’s beliefs, but we sure as hell can make it politically, socially, economically and sometimes physically costly to articulate them.
Trump as President is the head of federal law enforcement, and his Attorney General is the “ultra- conservative” “America’s Senator” Sessions (**).  And yet Far Left domestic terrorists run wild through the streets of America, they threaten Trump voters, attack Trump supporters, all with impunity as Sessions does nothing and Trump signs congressional legislation condemning rightists and pledging government resources to attack the victims, not the perpetrators, of domestic terrorism.

What is this Trump?  How can one describe such as disgusting low-life?  Trump: A White-hating ultra-cuck, a loser, an omega male degenerate, an obese bugman, trash, filth, a pathetic embarrassment staining the office of President of the United States with his useless and lazy lardass.

With Trump, POTUS now means “Piece of Turd Utter Shit”

It is hard for me to express in words the complete contempt I have for the obese wreck of a cuck Trump.  He’s not even capable of promoting racial balkanization anymore, the only reason I supported him.  But I have even more contempt for all the quota queens who hysterically supported Trump, who actually and seriously thought that Trump was “the last chance for White America” and “a new American Caesar who will stabilize our demographic problem” (laughably, that pompous quota queen actually wrote his fear that Trump would be so successful as an authoritarian pro-White right-wing civic nationalist populist that he would stabilize the System and make WN more difficult), “In Trump We Trust,” “this is what victory looks like,” “the Alt Right has connections to the White House,” blah blah blah.  Meanwhile, this blog was calling Trump a vulgar ignorant buffoon and a fraud FROM THE VERY BEGINNING, but pay no attention; after all, I’m “crazy and bitter” (translation: not one of the boys, a group that includes Coulter, literally or figuratively I do not know; “she” appears to be female, but barely so).

Der Movement’s quota queen affirmative action leadership is fit only as an object of well-deserved mocking ridicule.

* Who looks remarkably similar to all those square-jawed, big-boned, floppy-breasted blonds J Richards was posting at Majority Rights as paragons of “White beauty” (complete with smiley faces covering their nipples).

**Now, most of what Strom said about Giuliani is true; after all, there’s a reason I and others called him “Jewliani” long ago.  But forget about Rudy the Presidential candidate or Rudy the groveling mayor.  Fact is, Giuliani as Trump’s Attorney General would have enacted whatever agenda Trump wanted of him, and he would have done it with energy and efficiency.  Giuliani, with all his gross defects of character and politics, is an effective tool (in more ways than one, eh Jews?), and he would not have wasted endless months helplessly standing around looking like a dumbfounded Howdy Doody, as Sessions has.  When is Strom going to critique “America’s Senator” I wonder?  I know that’s not “Who We Are” and all, but, still.



Wednesday, March 28, 2018

Cultural Group Selection

Interesting paper. 

Human cooperation is highly unusual. We live in large groups composed mostly of non-relatives. Evolutionists have proposed a number of explanations for this pattern, including cultural group selection and extensions of more general processes such as reciprocity, kin selection, and multi-level selection acting on genes. Evolutionary processes are consilient; they affect several different empirical domains, such as patterns of behavior and the proximal drivers of that behavior. In this target article, we sketch the evidence from five domains that bear on the explanatory adequacy of cultural group selection and competing hypotheses to explain human cooperation. Does cultural transmission constitute an inheritance system that can evolve in a Darwinian fashion? Are the norms that underpin institutions among the cultural traits so transmitted? Do we observe sufficient variation at the level of groups of considerable size for group selection to be a plausible process? Do human groups compete, and do success and failure in competition depend upon cultural variation? Do we observe adaptations for cooperation in humans that most plausibly arose by cultural group selection? If the answer to one of these questions is "no," then we must look to other hypotheses. We present evidence, including quantitative evidence, that the answer to all of the questions is "yes" and argue that we must take the cultural group selection hypothesis seriously. If culturally transmitted systems of rules (institutions) that limit individual deviance organize cooperation in human societies, then it is not clear that any extant alternative to cultural group selection can be a complete explanation.
Of course, “non-relatives” is relative (no pun intended).  In an ethnoracially homogeneous society, and focused on that society to the exclusion of the outside world. One can view cooperative social structures as being among “non-relatives” since, in that monoethnic background, non-family = non-relatives.  However, in a demographically diverse state, or when considering the interactions of a monoethnic states with the rest of the world, genetic gradients become salient, and one can view the ethny among which group cooperation may work as a group of relatives.  If “kin selection” is invoked as one explanation for large cooperative societies, then the genetic gradients that exist between groups at levels greater than that of between families must be considered.  Further, as genes and culture exhibit bidirectional feedback, cultural group selection will, by its very nature if practiced by competing genetically distinct groups, will lead to genetic group selection (a form of kin selection) as a matter of course.

Also importantly, the concept of cultural group selection, particularly: “…culturally transmitted systems of rules (institutions) that limit individual deviance…” is a tool of social control to repress free-riding (the knee-jerk response of the mendacious who wish to poke holes in group selectionist theories, or even the EGI concept of Salter, which at its most fundamental is not dependent on group selection theory) – never mind my previous argument (made here at this blog) that inter-ethnic free-riding is always ignored by those who foam at the mouth about intra-ethnic free-riding, despite the fact that the inter-ethnic form is more damaging (due to the greater genetic distance between those riding and those being ridden) and also harder to control my social norms (it is easier to control the behavior of culturally similar people of your own group than bizarre aliens who are exploiting you).

Tuesday, March 27, 2018

SLC News, 3/27/18

In der news.

I’m no fan of Johnson, but the action of the gym is despicable.

The Far Right Seattle community should just pitch in and buy weights and whatever equipment and set up their own gym is some space, for their own people.  Tin cup panhandling could pay for it, I suppose.  Just make sure Hermansson and Lewis don’t show up.

If you want to build “community” you can start with your own gyms, instead of using commercial gyms co-owned by whining Jews.

Yet another objective, ethnically disinterested post by Dienekes Pontikos.

We put Trump in office. We elected a renegade candidate. We achieved what many thought impossible. The entire establishment opposed him, the corporate overclass opposed him, the lying press opposed him, but we elected him anyway. And yet fascinatingly, incredibly, public policy hasn’t really budged even a tick with him in office. What do we actually have to show for it? I mean, is there anything, anything at all? A Muslim ban that isn’t even close to an actual Muslim ban? A budget-busting mega-bill that pays for walls in Syria, Egypt, Lebanon and Tunisia, but allocates not one cent for a wall along our own southern border? How many millions in aid dollars to China, a nation with a booming economy and a GDP that surpassed ours a year or two ago? A massive tax giveaway to the rich, written by banksters and oligarchs? John Bolton and the resurrection of the Bush regime? Nothing meaningful has changed. Nothing meaningful at all. It’s sheer black pill.
When Trump invited her to his suite, he boasted about being on the cover of a magazine, and she wasn’t impressed, she said. After telling Trump, “Someone should take that magazine and spank you with it,” she did exactly that, Clifford told Cooper.
Yes sir, nothing says “alpha male” like being spanked, with a magazine with your own picture on it, by some low rent porn star.

This fat embarrassment Trump isn’t even doing the one thing for which I supported him and voted for him: causing racial balkanization and societal chaos.  Anti-Trump hatred remains, but it is now merely personal and political, not racial-based, and we’ve reached the point that some leftists view Pence’s religiosocial conservatism with more alarm than Trump’s milksop bumbling.  

Apparently, Mudshark Annie does not trust Trump any more.  Roissy weeps.

Behold your leadership. Hail Pepe!  Hail Kek!

That pug looks brachycephalic and thus not a true Nordic.  To the ovens with you!


Monday, March 26, 2018

Kemp Weeps: Greeks

Population genetics

Read this.  Emphasis added:
Now, ancient DNA suggests that living Greeks are indeed the descendants of Mycenaeans, with only a small proportion of DNA from later migrations to Greece. And the Mycenaeans themselves were closely related to the earlier Minoans, the study reveals, another great civilization that flourished on the island of Crete from 2600 B.C.E. to 1400 B.C.E. (named for the mythical King Minos).

Not surprisingly, the Minoans and Mycenaeans looked alike, both carrying genes for brown hair and brown eyes. Artists in both cultures painted dark-haired, dark-eyed people on frescoes and pottery who resemble each other, although the two cultures spoke and wrote different languages. The Mycenaeans were more militaristic, with art replete with spears and images of war, whereas Minoan art showed few signs of warfare, Lazaridis says. Because the Minoans script used hieroglyphics, some archaeologists thought they were partly Egyptian, which turns out to be false. 
When the researchers compared the DNA of modern Greeks to that of ancient Mycenaeans, they found a lot of genetic overlap. Modern Greeks share similar proportions of DNA from the same ancestral sources as Mycenaeans, although they have inherited a little less DNA from ancient Anatolian farmers and a bit more DNA from later migrations to Greece.  
The continuity between the Mycenaeans and living people is “particularly striking given that the Aegean has been a crossroads of civilizations for thousands of years,” says co-author George Stamatoyannopoulos of the University of Washington in Seattle. This suggests that the major components of the Greeks’ ancestry were already in place in the Bronze Age, after the migration of the earliest farmers from Anatolia set the template for the genetic makeup of Greeks and, in fact, most Europeans. “

Sunday, March 25, 2018

Meet Jared Spencer Johnson

The title of the post will become clear at the end: the post itself is an evaluation of judgement and accountability.

Last year, the Northwest Forum’s June and August meetings had three infiltrators. One was Patrik Hermannson of Hope Not Hate. The second was the girlfriend of a member of the local Cascadia group. The third was David Lewis, a Seattle journalist.
I will give Johnson credit here for admitting an unpleasant truth – it wasn’t two infiltrations, it was three.  But the second one described here – the yeastbucket infiltration – is puzzling. Was the Cascadia member an infiltrator himself (using the masculine here, since I’m assuming we are not talking about lesbians)?  If not, if he’s sincere, then why was his girlfriend an infiltrator?  Was she an anti-racist honeypot with a mission to infiltrate the Far Right by hooking up with a Nutzi?  Were they a genuine couple and the guy was too clueless to know she was a leftist?  Der Movement is so bizarre that anything is possible?  Update: this is sort of answered below.
Obviously, we needed to rethink our vetting procedures.
You think?
Hermansson got in because he was vouched for by the organizers of The London Forum. 
That includes a grown man who attends meetings wearing shorts (hint: a London Forum meeting is not the Afrika Korps in the North African desert; there’s no reason for a mentally competent adult to attend such a meeting wearing shorts) and who blows Viking horns.  I mean, why doubt such a stalwart fellow?
The London Forum generally has very good security, so I thought it reasonable to trust them. 
See above.
This was obviously a mistake. 
The mark of a prudent and competent leader is to realize the obvious in advance, not in retrospect.
Simply being vouched for is not enough. We need to take an independent look into everyone who is sent our way.
I could have told you that from the beginning.  It’s the same thing I was telling IRL Nutzis 20 years ago.  
 In Hermansson’s case, simply asking him to show me picture ID before we sat down to an interview would have been enough to expose him as a fraud.
But you didn’t do it.
But here’s the rub: virtually everyone at the June 2017 Northwest Forum would have refused to give his picture ID, even the ones who later whined most loudly about the security breach. 
There’s no “rub.”  If the people don’t trust the meeting organizer enough to show picture IDs (and here the lack of trust would have been justified), then what’s the point of attending a “extreme vetted” meeting?  How is this “building a community?”  
Indeed, most of the people in the Cascadia group knew each other only by online aliases. 
All that security botched by the incompetence around them.
I even wonder if the fellow whose girlfriend later declared herself an infiltrator knew her real name. 
That comment lends credence to the honeypot hypothesis.  Regardless of how the loving couple met, we ask: what kind of unmitigated idiot brings to a private Far Right meeting a “girlfriend” he obviously knows little or nothing about?  Let me guess: this must be one of the wonderful Alt Right WN 2.0 Millennials who is going to save the White race.  Hail Pepe!  Hail Kek!  Sane response: flush the entire “Cascadia group” down the Type I toilet.  Der Movement talks big about “eschewing defectives.”  Case in point, no? 
Obviously, in such a culture, “extreme vetting” is just a meme, and I was foolish to think that anyone vouching for any individual was meaningful.
Just a meme.  Very nice.  You know, the sincere activists who attended probably expected “extreme vetting” that was not “just a meme.”  I cannot understand, cannot fathom, why all you rank-and-file activists out there accept this Keystone Cops routine
As for the Lewis breach: that was entirely my fault, for which I am sorry. 
That’s not accountability.  Real accountability is taking action instead of saying “sorry,” said action including admitting you are not cut out for a leadership role, and making way for people who are.
Again, though, his cover would have evaporated if I simply asked to see his picture ID. Fortunately, the Hermansson story had already weeded out the people who were most skittish about doxing. 
Chutzpah alert!  Johnson’s third mistake is explained and excused by the fallout from his first mistake.
Beyond that, Lewis was simply a journalist looking for the opportunity to sell some snark, not an antifa agent, and as far as I can tell, the only people harmed by his story were the perfectly nice people who rented the venue to us. They got some bad publicity and were shaken down by local Leftists, who offered to take the blood money we had paid them, to cleanse them of guilt by association. Such is the price of doing business in the liberal utopia of Seattle.
Dear god, he still doesn’t get it.  Dr. Johnson: the point is not what damage these people did, the point is your bad judgment (and that of Steadman and others) for allowing it to happen in the first place.  The same lack of judgment can – and likely will – lead to an even greater disaster in the future.  We are not talking about 20-something people here. If middle-aged men cannot show minimal judgment by now, they likely never will.
At that point, I decided to quit doing The Northwest Forum. 
Good call.  Some good judgment at least.
But others in the Northwest wanted to continue it.

Two Proposals for Dealing with Inflitrators

Two proposals to deal with the infiltrator problem were discussed but ultimately rejected for reasons outlined below.
The first suggestion was simply to make The Northwest Forum a public event, open to all who buy tickets. This would make a virtue of necessity. It would make publicity work for us rather than against us.  It would attract new people who are not afraid of attending public events, and it would keep skittish people away. (No vetting procedure can be 100% foolproof, and public meetings strip away any false sense of security.)
The sense of security was “false” because the genuine attendees were misled that there was going to be “extreme vetting,” rather than letting any Swede or movie critic walk in without interference.
The second suggestion was to allow journalists to cover the event as long as they would abide by the same rules set down at the American Renaissance conference, namely that they would be clearly identified as members of the press (with the equivalent of a yellow star) and would not disclose the names or faces of attendees without their permission. The benefit of this is that our message would not be confined to just the people present. The media would carry at least some of it to the larger public.

Both of these suggestions would deal with one of the main problems of private meetings: namely, the fact that they can be framed as “secret” and thus invite “undercover” journalists and antifa. Leftists wish to frame our activities as secret because they wish to make them seem sinister, even criminal, with the eventual goal of using the state to ban our ideas and their dissemination.

For instance, Patrick Hermanson’s entire “scoop” from The London Forum and the Jonathan Bowden Dinner consisted of framing information that he could have gotten without false pretenses as the result of an undercover investigation at sinister secret conclaves. But I said nothing to Hermansson’s hidden microphone that I had not said in public many times before, and my picture had already been released online by movement scum.
I presume the “scum” in question is The Movement Critic. Now, while I appreciate The Movement Critic blog, I do not agree that Johnson’s picture should have been revealed, that’s a form of doxing and is unacceptable.  That said, Johnson’s continued attempts to offload accountability by repeatedly downplaying the impact of the infiltrations, are, frankly, disgusting. So, then, if The Movement Critic had not posted Johnson’s picture, then Hermansson would have been the first to do so. Regardless of the specific outcomes, the piss-poor judgment underlying the Hermansson infiltration remains the same.  It does not matter – repeat, IT DOES NOT MATTER – that the “scoop” wasn’t that damaging.  It could have been, had Hermansson not been a bumbling amateur, or if he had decided to stay undercover longer and really burrow his way in deep as a mole (for that matter, we do not know if any such moles already exist).
Furthermore, to underscore how completely unnecessary Hermansson’s deception was, a legitimate journalist was present at the same London Forum meeting and Jonathan Bowden Dinner. She was identified as a member of the press and agreed to respect people’s privacy, and she heard basically the same things that Hermansson did, without the necessity of deception.
More misdirection from Johnson.  The point is that a more competent and dedicated (and patient) infiltrator than Hermansson could have leveraged the lax security and ethnic fetishism to become deeply integrated within the Alt Right, including Counter Currents, and have done incalculable damage.  Question: why do typos in a job application scare off potential employers?  Is it because the typos are damaging in and of themselves?  No, it is because a person who would submit a sloppy resume is someone who cannot be trusted to show the attention to detail to perform the job effectively.  Likewise, the problem with these infiltrations is not what the immediate outcome was, the problem is in what it tells us about “movement” “leaders.” The problem is with the poor judgment and easily-manipulated obsessions of “leaders” – not that the infiltrators did or did not do any specific action.
This frankly, is the only benefit to having mainstream media around, since we have our own media to get our messages out. We can, for example, post videos and audios of Northwest Forum speeches online, for the whole world’s edification.

Why We Will Not Invite the Press...Beyond that, the purpose of events like the Northwest Forum is not merely to disseminate ideas. After all, we could do that online without leaving the privacy of our own homes. The main purpose of the Forums is to promote face-to-face community and networking. Having speakers is simply an additional incentive to get people to come to events. Such networking and community building cannot take place at public events, where members of the press and complete strangers are free to roam about.
Networking and community cannot take place either at private meetings where every other attendee is an infiltrator.
The Way Forward

Public events are a way of combating a false sense of security about doxing. But the best way to do that is to give people a real sense of security by establishing better vetting. Thus, going forward, Northwest Forum events will be for a closed circle of highly vetted people. No more aliases. No more loose vetting and vouching. The people who are continuing the Forum all know one another’s real names and addresses. If you want to join that circle, you will have to:
pay for a background check to verify your identity
present picture ID to register
And don’t forget your Swedish passport for immediate admittance, no vetting required.  Cephalic index measurements optional.

And, how about some transparency on your part?  Who is going to have access to this personal information?  Greg Johnson?  Patrik Hermansson?  Who?  Who is going to be responsible if something goes wrong?
Should we have had these sorts of procedures in place from the beginning? No, for the simple reason that the Forums never would have gotten off the ground. 
Absolute bullshit.  No, you could have gotten the Forums “off the ground” with a very small circle of highly trusted people – like you are suggesting now after the fact! – and slowly built it up over time.  You could have built up trust by running successful and non-infiltrated meetings. Johnson argues here that AFTER he has botched the meetings by allowing the infiltrations, NOW is the time to tell people to reveal their personal information to leaders who have lost the confidence of activists by repeated bouts of bad judgment.  He’s got the entire order of things reversed.  Better to have a successful private meeting with three people, then “off-the-ground” forums publicly infiltrated and subverted.  Over time, the three could have become six, then twelve, then thirty, then sixty.  You don’t first allow infiltrations and expose yourself to public ridicule from the likes of Hermansson and Lewis and then turn around and say, “hey after all our successes, now you guys have to prove your identity.”  Madness.  Madness.
Still, we managed to have three very successful meetings 
”Very successful.“ Madness.  Sheer madness. Is being delusional sufficient grounds for being dismissed as leadership material?
…even with loose vetting, and those meetings formed the basis for ongoing real-world relationships, which created a desire to continue the Forums and a willingness to adopt stricter vetting going forward.
That self-serving mendacity is beyond disgraceful.
The Northwest Forum will continue as a private event. We will not seek publicity. Who attends and what is said will be off the record, although we will continue to record some of the presentations for future release with the permission of the speakers. We will do our best to keep away journalists and other antifa, but please bear in mind that no vetting is foolproof, and no real-world meeting is without risk.
No vetting is foolproof, but it would help if there are vetting criteria other than “are you Swedish?" or “are you a movie critic?”  or “are you someone’s girlfriend?”  
If you wish to be invited to future Northwest Forum events, please email samantha.hilton@protonmail.com

The next Northwest Forum will be held in Western Washington on Saturday, March 24, from noon to 5 pm. The speakers include Greg Johnson, James Allsup, Matt Flavel, and C. B. Robertson. I hope to see you there.
Is there a reason to announce any of this information in advance?  After the fact, you can discuss the wonders of your super-secret meeting, particularly if you have more genuine attendees than infiltrators this time.  But why give out any information on a public forum in advance?  Where’s the percentage in that?

I need to stress this point: it is the judgment not the outcome that is the issue here.  To better illustrate this point, let us consider two scenarios:

Scenario A. John Doe organizes a private racialist conference.  Doe does everything right and has air-tight security at the meeting, couldn’t have done it better.  The keynote speaker is an internationally known and respected racialist activist, Jared Spencer Johnson, who has been a leading figure in “movement” circles for almost 30 years.  Johnson later mingles with the crowd, recruits people to join his organization, gets subscription information for his journal, and is accepted into the local activist community.  Later, it is revealed that Jared Spencer Johnson is a mole, a deep-cover infiltrator into racial nationalism, supported and funded at the highest levels, who now takes all his information and connections and uses those to wreck the “movement” and specifically to wreck John Doe’s local group.

Scenario B. John Doe organizes a private racialist conference using piss-poor judgment, laughable operational security, and does almost everything wrong.  A comically inept infiltrator, Nordrik Swedensson, is welcomed into the local group with no vetting at all; later Swedensson comes out as an infiltrator and writes a tawdry “tell-all” piece about his time with the local group.  In the end, no lasting damage is done.

Obviously, the outcome of A is much worse than that of B.  Equally obviously, A does not really reflect badly on John Doe’s judgment – after all, if Jared Spencer Johnson is a mole, anyone could be.  At that level of deception, worthy of a Le Carre spy novel, Doe cannot realistically be blamed for the outcome.  However, in B, Doe’s behavior and lack of judgment demands censure, and the fact that the outcome was better than in A was due purely to luck and circumstances.

By the way, in Scenario A, one could speculate that Jared Spencer Johnson was allowed to infiltrate and worm his way to the top in the first place because of the bad judgment of other people decades in the past.  So, yes, some people are responsible for Scenario A, just not John Doe.

Saturday, March 24, 2018

SLC News: Science Edition

Better: pseudoscience.

Why people with no background in science shouldn’t blithely assume they are qualified to embarrass themselves by rambling on subjects they so obviously do not understand.

And why Der Movement needs genuine scientists to do quality control on sweaty “movement” ramblings.

Hint: scientific “materialists” understand more about organism development that what is implied in this retarded essay.

Another hint: the fact that all facts are not yet known doesn’t mean you are free to invent whatever fantastic fantasies you wish.

Having said that, the essence of real science is open-mindedness, testing hypotheses – hypotheses that have real explanatory power.  I do not dismiss “morphogenetic field theory” out of hand.  Who knows?  It may be true.  But we need evidence, not “movement” solipsism.  And the need for such a theory has to be based on real gaps in existing theory, not imagined gaps that do not exist, or small gaps that are rapidly closing.

A last hint: interesting similarities between separated identical twins could well be genetics, random chance, and confirmation bias.  There are no doubt separated identical twins who lead completely different lives with no overlap – but we do not hear about those, as they are not interesting.

I’m not surprising that Der Movement finds someone like Sheldrake seriously.  If I recall correctly, this hasn’t been the first time his “work” has been brought up by some uninformed Type I idiot.

Let’s reverse the course, and have someone like me write long rambling essays about “traditionalism” and “theosophic philosophy” without knowing a damn thing of what I’m talking about.  I’m sure all the Trad-Nutzis wouldn’t like that at all.


From VDARE:
Greg Cochran is doing a fundraiser at West Hunter to pay him to review “Who We Are” in depth.
That’s the sound of a tin cup being rattled around.

Disgusting. How about just reviewing the book for, like you know, nothing?  For free?

Better yet: Ignore it.  How many times do the same leftist lies on race have to be refuted again and again?  But if you are so motivated, go to it.  For free.

Friday, March 23, 2018

Race and Der Movement in Der News (Old News)

In der news.

Is this some sort of joke:
Furthermore, the Alt-Right remains a very open and meritocratic movement.
Nothing about Der Movement is even faintly meritocratic.

If I recall correctly, “JPod” himself was likened to “looking like a big toe” by the folks at MPC, which is a fairly astute phenotypic comparison.  In all seriousness though, in what way does Gareth Porter’s physical appearance match a “central casting” archetype of a “filthy anti-Semite?”  I have a feeling that this reflects Jewish animus toward phenotypes representative of founding stock Americans, a group Jews have long had an issue with.  Does JPod look like a “filthy anti-Foundite” then?  One straight out of central casting?  I think he does.

Wednesday, March 21, 2018

Movementball

Food for thought.

I have a good opinion of Robert Griffin, and not only because he interviewed me for his book.


Putting aside the debates about baseball strategy (who really cares?), the main points are these:
We believe what makes us feel good about ourselves.  Moneyball is a self-confirming experience for its audience.  We get to feel in the know and on the side of the angels and linked up with a cool guy like Brad Pitt, and all we had to do to achieve that status was spring for a movie ticket or a DVD or streaming rental.  And we are safe; nothing goes on that challenges or threatens us.  We are nestled comfortably among the wise and righteous and don’t have to think about anything or do a damn thing.
That’s what Der Movement and HBD does.  It makes a certain subsection of Whites “feel good about themselves” (typically by throwing other Whites “under the bus” so to speak) so as to make the poison easier to swallow.  “A spoonful of sugar makes the cyanide go down” is one way of putting it.
We are basically lazy.  If you are halfway slick you can tell people just about anything that is simple to understand and has a surface level of plausibility (as long as it doesn’t make them feel bad about themselves—these all go together) and be rest assured that they aren’t going to put effort into thinking about it or checking into its veracity or coming up with alternatives to it.
Most “movement activists” are indeed lazy.”  They “drink the movement Kool-Aid” without a moment’s  hesitation.  Thinking for themselves is too difficult.
So what can we do?

We can take seriously my mother’s advice to me when I was a kid: “Robert, you are a nice boy, but you believe everything anybody tells you.  Quit doing that.”
We can differentiate mediated from direct experience.
We can distinguish abstractions—images, words, concepts, assertions — from the concrete realities they supposedly represent.
The Lenny Bruce joke: we can trust our eyes more, our senses, our experience of things.
We can look directly at the people pushing something and ask: Who are these people?  What’s their agenda?  What’s in it for them and theirs if we buy what they are selling?
We can think for ourselves and not let other people do the thinking for us.
We can become mediators of reality ourselves.
Isn’t that what EGI Notes has been telling you all to do regarding the “movement” for years now?

Is anyone listening?

Doubtful, but I’ll still try.  If even one person is converted to reality, it’ll be worth it.

Monday, March 19, 2018

The Debate Challenge

I support the challenge.

Why don’t any of the great leaders of the Alt Right, Alt Wrong, etc. take up The Movement Critic on his debate challenge?  That would at least be an insightful contrast of viewpoints, as opposed to Beavis-and-Butthead sniggering or pompous “metapolitical” rambling.

As more evidence (as if you needed it) for the intellectual and moral vacuity of Der Movement, Inc. read this.  
Jorjani likes to speak elliptically, making wide and often demonstrably false academic claims. Some are absurd, like his belief that the pyramids in the lost city of Atlantis were built through collective psychokinesis…
If I had to pick one fundamental defining element of Der Movement, it would be bad judgment, which encompasses and explains all of the varied manifestations of “movement” problems.  If it wasn’t enough of a red flag that a person is a half-Iranian “Indo-Aryan” fetishist who identifies with his Iranian half, then promoting bizarre esoteric fantasies and genuine (as opposed to leftist designated) pseudoscience should have been the clincher.  Then again, remember that Der Movement accepts, with nary a moment of uncertainty, the “work” of Richard “make the data fit the hypothesis” Lynn, Phil “French Army Surgeon” Rushton and the Joe Pesci look-a-like Artie “Ancient Egypt was a Nordic Desert Empire” Kemp, so the support for Jorjani’s rambling is not surprising at all.
He needed to find a publisher for his book “Prometheus and Atlas,” so he Googled the term “archeofuturist,” which he thought was an original phrase that described his work. He found that an Arktos-published writer had beat him to the term, but he also realized that Arktos might be interested in publishing his book — and that’s what happened. The book was well-received in extremist circles. A review on the website of the white nationalist publishing house Counter Currents compares it to “Moby Dick,” and anoints Jorjani as the movement’s “‘pagan harpooner’ folded in the flag of Ahab.”
Jorjani’s work compared to Moby Dick?  Well, you can tear out pages from Prometheus and Atlas to use as bookmarks when you read Moby Dick, but the connection doesn’t extend past that, I fear.  Jorjani as a “pagan harpooner?” – yes, I guess it would be this one, no?

Der Movement needs people with hard science backgrounds (biology, chemistry, physics, engineering, mathematics) to do quality control on the flotsam and jetsam that spews forth from retarded “movement” discourse. And, no, there is no “scientific conspiracy” to “hide the truth” about “the spectral.” There is instead a justifiable contempt toward the type of solipsism that exists in “movement” circles – “The Lathe of Heaven Syndrome” – in which people think things are true simply because they believe that they are true.

Real problems with science are discussed here.

Sweaty fantasies about “Atlantis” make the situation worse, not better.  We need to take the high ground, not fester in the fever swamps of “movement” lunacy.

Sunday, March 18, 2018

Dissecting the Fundamentals, Part I

Another look at “the fundamentals.”


Pan-Europeanism as the major focus will replace other more narrow “isms” – be they national, ethnic, subracial, etc.  The narrower “isms” will not disappear, they can continue to exist, but at a lower level than the overarching pan-European unity.  The two fratricidal world wars of the 20th century wrecked Europe, the West, and the White race, and those who continue to promote division even now, are, whether they know it or not, working for the enemy, working for the Death of Europe and for the destruction of the worldwide fraternity of the European Peoples.  Therefore, all those who preach division within the European family – be that division genetic, phenotype, cultural, historical, religious – are the enemies of European Man and enemies of the West and enemies of our Identity and our Future.

Pan-Europeanism is the First Principle, the non-negotiable, the underlying thesis, the Idea of Yockey (opposed by those ethnonationalists who make pretense of being some sort of Yockey acolytes, presumably for fundraising purposes), the organic evolution of the West. Now, as Yockey stated, and I certainly agree (as does Lowell and others), narrower forms of Identity can and will exist within the context of pan-Europeanism, but these will be local and secondary.  The European, the Western (in the broadest sense, not equivalent to the modern decadent West nor even to the current Faustian High Culture, which we must overcome and supersede, as it is dying, if not already dead) Identity must be primary and existential.

Let’s quote Yockey here:

Our European Mission is to create the Culture-State-Nation-Imperium of the West, and thereby we shall perform such deeds, accomplish such works, and so transform our world that our distant posterity, when they behold the remains of our buildings and ramparts, will tell their grandchildren that on the soil of Europe once dwelt a tribe of gods.

That’s what is important, that’s the inspiring vision for the future, not a dismal future of squabbling ethnonationalists ready to “ethnically cleanse” each other over disagreements about “sovereignty.”

Now, I must stress: to a large extent this Yockeyian vision is for elites.  Nietzsche was willing to grant the masses their Christianity, their religion of resssentiment, if they so required, but the elites, the Overmen must eschew such childish crutches.  Similarly, the masses can have their ethnonationalism for the time being, as they are slowly weaned off of it; better ethnonationalism than globalist universalism.  But the nationalist elites have to be true acolytes of the pan-European Ideal, and eventually lead the masses in the correct direction as those masses become improved and enlightened over time.

Genetic kinship will replace racial “purity.”  As per Salter, ultimate interests are genetic interests, and genetic interests are based upon genetic kinship.  Only genetic kinship is relevant for biopolitics.  This contrasts to the unscientific strawman of racial “purity” which is usually derived from some a priori comparison to a picked parental population.  Since all genetic differences, regardless of their derivation (e.g., “admixture” [real or an artifact], selective pressures, genetic drift, etc.) influence genetic kinship, measurement of such kinship is the most inclusive and definitive approach for understanding our ultimate interests.  We accept the European genepool for what it is now and strive to improve it in the future.  To use Yockey’s terminology in a new way, we completely replace outdated and unscientific “vertical” concerns with “purity/admixture” with “horizontal” concerns with genetic kinship and genetic interests.

The “movement” will resist this, no doubt.  Some precincts of the “movement” play lip service to this idea, but as always look at that they do more than what they say.  Look what posts they present, what authors they promote, what memes they spread, what their commentators are saying – it doesn’t match their ostensible “position” on this matter.  Remember Horace: “You may drive out Nature with a pitchfork, yet she still will hurry back.”  Unscientific fetishistic fantasies will collapse under the edifying light of science, the reality of facts, and no “movement” flim-flam and sweaty fossilized dogma will stand up to truth in the long term.

How to fuse these horizontal concerns with genetic interests with Yockey’s vision, which was flawed by its blithe dismissal of “materialistic” race concepts?  See this.

Total biocultural Identity will replace as narrower biological and cultural identities as the major focus of European Being.  The narrower identities will still exist, but as part of Identity, and the narrower identities will become increasingly aligned with that of Identity.  Biological and cultural classifications by themselves are not disjunctive, only total Identity is disjunctive. The ultimate solution to any discordance between Identity and biological identities is this: we will align our biological/genetic interests with Identity by closing the borders and stopping non-European gene flow into European territories.  Thus, over time the genetic boundaries between Europe and the Others will become ever larger and more distinct; the genetic commonalities between Europeans, compared to the Others, will become larger and more integrated.  The same applies to any potential cultural overlaps between The West and The Rest.  Examples of this possibility, as exemplified by the Levant and by China, are shown here.

This is an important point, and an answer to sweaty fetishists using minute difference in Fst values – ignoring that Fst is a flawed metric for measuring genetic differentiation – to make asinine comments about negligible levels of relative ethnic genetic distances.

Biopolitics will replace the old fraud of Right vs. Left.  We care not if any specific policy of ours, or our entire program, is deemed “rightist” or “leftist” or whatever outdated label.  We are not conservatives, reactionaries, not in any way beholden to “right-wing” thought.  We are revolutionaries, striving to create a new order.

This should be self-evident.  We are not conservatives, reactionaries, or traditionalists.  We look to the future, not to the dead past.  This leads to:

Futurism, not Traditionalism.  Unlike some of the more reckless statements in support of Futurism, we do not call for the abolition of museums, the disregarding of our past and the great deeds of our ancestors.  Past, Present, and Future are all linked.  However, we look to the Future, our real Golden Age is that which we will make in the Future, it is not some sort of delusional Traditionalist fantasy set in the Past.  We will not reject the deeds of our ancestors, but these are not the sum of our being, we do not settle for them – we must surpass them.  We remember the Past, but for the purpose of spurring us to achieve greater deeds in the Future. 

One of the most unpleasant aspects of the “movement” is its obsession with gnostic esoteric “traditionalism” and with a Lord of the Rings style romanticization of feudal values.

Rational realism and empiricism is for facts, values and objectives can be irrational.  Thus, we reject the old, timeworn, factually incorrect knee-jerk beliefs, memes, and paradigms that have defined to so-called “racialist movement,” particularly in America.  With respect to facts, history, knowledge – the age of “movement” dogma is over.  We reject the misanthropic freakishness and lies of the old movement.  With respect to facts, we depend on rationality, on realism, on empiricism – on real Science.  But these things cannot provide us with our values and our objectives – they are merely tools.  Our values and objectives can be irrational as they spring forth from our vision of the reality we want to come into being.  But we cannot confuse what we want with what actually is – nor can be settle for what is instead of what we actually want.  What is – that is the current reality, which must be discerned with empiricism.  What we want is derived from our values, irrational as they may (or may not) be, and for these objectives, empiricism is only a tool, a means, not an end to itself.  As part of this, the fantasies of Traditionalism – which invents false facts – must be put aside in favor of empirical facts and the irrational objectives of an enlightened Futurism.

This gets to the core – one core at least – of my criticism of the “movement,” and why “movement” “leaders” have made me persona non grata in their circles.  My message is blasphemy and, what’s more, gets in the way of “business as usual,” and the concomitant tin cup panhandling that is facilitated by giving “movement” “activists” the dogmatic “red meat” they crave.  The “movement” wants to continue dwelling in its little cul-de-sac of crazed religious fervor with its fossilized memes; but this is an dead end, a recipe for failure, and anyone who actually wants to win, and actualize their ideology into reality needs to understand – truly understand – what that reality is all about.

Preservationism plus eugenics replaces static preservationism.  We are not interested in preserving a racial stasis…We wish to promote eugenics to improve the stock and, also, allow for the creation of new stabilized blends of European stocks – while also at the same type preserving the original stocks – to increase the diversity of European Man. Ethnic genetic interests are compatible with (gradual) genetic change within the race…

There are a number of important points here, all of which focus on a forward-looking, palingenetic view of race (i.e., futurism, not traditionalism).  Contra to misinformed complaints that a concern for EGI leads to “genetic stasis,” here we see an overt call for eugenics (albeit a prudent form of eugenics that seeks to avoid both unnecessary loses of genetic interest and unforeseen negative consequences to designating traits – and the alleles that code for them – as worthy of replacement or increase without understanding possible consequences of such changes), and the call for “the creation of new stabilized blends of European stocks…increase the diversity of European Man.”  As long as original stocks are maintained, there’s nothing wrong with creating new variants of European man, in diaspora regions such as America.  When such crossing create excellent new strains, such can be cultivated as new ethnies to be preserved and improved; if negative strains (however defined) are produced, they can be selected against.  The creation and selection of new dog breeds can be a model for this process. Gradual genetic change that eschews mixing across continental population groups (broadly: races) and that preserves the vast bulk of genetic interests is a natural part of the lifecycle of evolved organisms, is part and parcel of genetic interests, and is wholly compatible with a prudent and well-informed eugenic scheme.