Wednesday, October 31, 2018

Silk Road Jews

Asians – including Jews – in the News.

But, she’s…HuWhite.  What’s the problem then?

The pro-Jewish Zman is worried about the likes of Goldberg; interesting that Zman is promoted by the anti-Jewish Johnson on Counter-Currents (*).  



I do not understand the problem the HBDers have with Chinese birth tourism. Isn’t such tourism simply increasing the proportion of the “American” population that is composed of “high-IQ cognitive elitists?”

If you object to the presence of Coloreds – including Asians – in the UK, then you are a “terrorist.”  By the way, who elected the current government of the UK?  Blame White Britons for that.

*Does anyone know what’s going on starting at 45:25 here?  If I hear the smirking Frenchman’s speech correctly, that’s “GBC?”  I did google it…the whole thing was and is bizarre.  If it is what I think it is, I’ll give credit to Johnson for handling it in the most mature manner possible under the circumstances; the Frenchman on the other hand behaved like a complete jackass.  That’s WN 2.0, I suppose.  Would WN 1.0 behave in such a manner? 

Tuesday, October 30, 2018

Der Movement Dishonesty

Analysis.

Surprise: Pro-homosexual apologia in this discussion.  Who would have ever guessed?  Starting at 1:27:30.

Logical flaw: Just because negative attitudes about homosexuality derived from Judeo-Christianity doesn’t mean that those attitudes are wrong. That’s a fallacy, sort of like ad hominem; instead, everything needs to be judged on its own merits.  One has to evaluate homosexuality based on its effects on society, independent of what people thousands of years ago said or did.

The DNA ancestry result mentioned (1% North African for Greg Johnson): tells you something about the validity of low percentage “admixture.”  Anything less than 10% should be viewed with skepticism, less than 5% with extreme skepticism, and anything less than around 1% is ludicrous. If we assume that Johnson’s ancestry is (more or less) fully of founding stock ancestry, then where does this 1% come from?  It could reflect some sort of ancient influx (“just so” stories of North African soldiers of the Roman Empire stationed in Britain), OR it could be some sort of artifact. I believe that the latter is more likely than the former; however, this applies not only to the Johnsons of the world but to everyone else.  The DNA testing companies err on the side of false positives, Type I errors, which makes the tests more attractive to the naïve looking for the “Indian Princess” in their background, or others attracted to “unexpected and controversial results.”  And, of course, there are political motivations as well. But Johnson’s results could be real.  However, if they are real, explanations better than popular “just so” stories are required. In the end, it really doesn’t matter; absolute racial purity is a myth.

Johnson’s initial dismissal of the Hermansson infiltration as essentially a “joke” that did no real damage is dishonest. He keeps on harping on the fact that “no real damage was done” – disregarding my comments again and again that the problem is NOT what the outcome was, but what is says about “movement” “leadership’s” piss-poor judgment and its obsessive ethnic fetishism.  Johnson then basically admits after 1:39 that the essential problem was the fact of the infiltration itself rather than the outcome, so why try to dismiss it to begin with? Excuse: Johnson trusted Steadman and his “extreme vetting.”  Why would you trust a guy wearing shorts at meetings, who blows on Viking horns, and who is an obsessive Scando-fetishist?  This is an issue of judgment.

Greg Johnson: Thin-skinned?  No, more like papyrus-skinned.  The latest from his blog:
By the way, this will be your last comment here. I do not provide a platform for people to spit in my face by accusing me of bad faith.
Obsessive attacks against Richard Spencer are, on the other hand, of course welcomed.  Note conversation starting at 19:30 in the Luke Ford podcast.  Spencer, Spencer, it is always about Spencer. Note how Johnson says “everyone” used the term “Alt Right” and jumped on the bandwagon – no, Greg, Strom was skeptical and I was always hostile to the Alt Right.  Thus, once again, a completely dishonest narrative.

More dishonesty: Johnson keeps on talking about how the Alt Right was ruined by people wanting to “control the movement” while ignoring the more fundamental problem of the Alt Right wanting to control the entire racial activist “movement.”

Greg blames the drinking and street fighting on WN 1.0, while the TRUTH is that the WN 1.0 denounced all of that, while the Pepe-Kek cosplay WN 2.0 crowd was solidly behind it.  The entire Alt Right “realm of ideas” was Pepe, Kek, Beavis-and-Butthead sniggering, drinking, juvenile jackassery – and while Alt Right apologists were praising the “youth culture,” “old school” WN 1.0 folks were denouncing all of that.  And here comes Johnson, blaming the faults of WN 2.0 on the WN 1.0 that was actually denouncing it.  Outrageous dishonesty.  And who was saying “the Alt Right is White nationalism or nothing at all?’’  Amazing.  “Bad faith?”

And, hey, Greg, you’re not going to get a “mass movement” based on Pepe and Savitri Devi.

By the way: “Dr. Johnson” – he earned it!  How about Dr. Sallis?   Get over yourself already. 

If Johnson believes that talk of “false flags” is mostly stupid – and I agree – then is he going to denounce Roissy’s promotion of the false flag narrative?

And by the way, Greg, Tara and Lauren are far from being “Joan of Arc.”  To even imagine such a comparison is ludicrous.  Greg:
This movement is full of disgusting people.
Indeed.

However, with all of that, I do essentially agree with this analysis.  Although I assume Greg will blame that on "WN 1.0,"  even though it can be traced back to both the 2.0 folks and their "boomer" enablers.

Meet the ethnically disinterested Dienekes Pontikos.  No ethnic agenda there!

Monday, October 29, 2018

Movement Monday

Odds and ends. In all cases, emphasis added.

Counter-Currents writer takes a Joyceian, rather than a Johnsonian, view of Mr. Screw Your Optics:
No White Nationalist should feel the slightest desire to apologize, backtrack, disavow, or rethink a single thing he believes because of this event. 
I do none of these things.  I need to rethink nothing: I believed Der Movement was a disgusting mess before and I believe so now.  I believed the Type I retards have ruined racial activism and I still believe so.  I believe “acting out” is a mistake – nothing has changed.  And why should I “apologize, backtrack, disavow?”  The incident was a Type I operation; it has nothing to do with Type IIs.
Continue as if nothing happened. 
That attitude worked with all the infiltration incidents, and all other “movement” failures, why not now?
Call out our enemies at every turn, mock them for their hypocrisy, ridicule their insanely childish ideals, and throw statistics and blunt truths at them as usual – do everything but blink. Don’t give them an inch of moral ground. They have absolutely no right to take it.
True enough.  However, the same can be said of the Type Is – who have long ago forfeited any moral high ground or legitimacy whatsoever.  I suggest that the Type Is burrow down into their snug hobbit holes and let adults run things for a change.

Zman:
That’s the real fight here. Rod Rosenstein can threaten obstruction of justice all he likes, but he has not power. Trump has real power. He can address the nation one night, reveal the secrets Rosenstein is trying to hide and then fire all of the people involved in this subversive plot and its cover up. Congress, even one run by Democrats, is not going to impeach Trump for exposing corruption. They will make the ritual noises and rush to their media outlets to complain about how Trump is a tyrant, but nothing will come of it. 

That’s probably why Trump has been sitting on this stuff until after the election. He has no fear of twerps like Rosenstein. He just needs to get through the election and then figure out the new game board. If the GOP keeps the House, then maybe he lets Congress work this case. If it is the Democrats, then maybe he calls their bluff and releases these documents to the public during the lame duck session. The one thing he will not be doing is worrying about what silly men like Rod Rosenstein have to say about it.
Here’s another possibility, regardless of the election’s outcome: Trump, as usual, does nothing.  Oh, not exactly nothing – he’ll continue with his blustering tweets, his late-night cheeseburgers, and will continue to trade insults with horse-faced porn stars, but with respect to actual governance, actual hardball politics, it will be, typically for him, nothing.  All talk, no action. MAGA!


This fellow – a German Borreby who claims to be “the head of the German Alt Right” (I’ve never heard of him) – seems like he has a good heart, but he’s naive about the whole thing.  He sees a difference between Johnson and Spencer, while, in reality, there is no real difference.  That’s why I don’t take sides in that feud – it’s mostly personality, not principled differences in fundamentals (superficial differences yes, fundamental, no).

HBDer Welton:
The likely moral for people in the West and especially in “secular” Western Europe: fundamentalist religiosity seems to be pretty important in defeating the forces of SJW chaos. It “gets things done”.
HBD and Sallis are as different in viewpoints as two entities both ostensibly on the “racially aware Right” can be.  I disagree with the HBDers on virtually everything.  It’s quite remarkable, actually.

Roissy:
Trump does have to do something, fast. He has to regulate these social media companies, internet hosting companies, and payment processor companies as common carriers. Do it!
Yeah, Trump is going to do something fast – what he does best.

Amusing:
1488D chess strikes again! Just tell the Cville and RAM guys, even those Proud Boy cucks, they have to sit it out in jail a little while longer until Trump reveals himself as the Great White Hope after the midterms, and walks back all the ZOG kissing and anti-WN rhetoric he has made. And don’t take those threats he made yesterday in the aftermath of the Pittsburgh shooting personally. He really isn’t coming after you just some strawman to placate the kikes and libs.
Crudely put, but essentially correct. The Trump worshippers will be waiting for their “God Emperor” to “do something” long after he’s dead (probably from a heart attack after eating a Big Mac) and buried.  Why, he’ll rise from the dead like Jesus and smite the heathens with some clever “negs.”

Kamikaze: a European invention.  Asians: copy, copy, copy, steal, steal, steal.

Puerile Brimelow is with his cheesecake pictures again.  This fellow used to be useful and mature.  I’m not sure what happened, but I suspect it may have to do with the tragedy of his first wife’s death - an event for which I had genuine sympathy for Brimelow and his first set of children) and his subsequent second marriage to a much younger woman.  Since then he’s been behaving like an absolute jackass.

Has Brazil elected a real right-wing populist, unlike the fraud Trump?

Roissy:
He says, without a hint of irony or glibness, that subversives within State will take Trump down if he doesn’t immediately clean house and fire at least three-quarters of the staff. He says, again sans glibness, that whatever negative blowback this will have on foreign relations is more than compensated for by removing an actively hostile threat to his Presidency, and he wonders why Trump has to date dropped the ball on this pressing matter. He presumes members of Trump’s inner circle are deliberately hiding State Department subterfuge from him, and if that’s the case, then the fix is in.
“…he wonders why Trump has to date dropped the ball on this pressing matter.”

Trump has other pressing matters to attend to…like pressing all those cheeseburgers down his throat.

“He presumes members of Trump’s inner circle are deliberately hiding State Department subterfuge from him…”

Yeah…it’s being discussed on juvenile gamester blogs, but the President is too clueless to know what’s going on in his own State Department.  MAGA!

Sunday, October 28, 2018

Nutzi Sunday

Type I filth killing racial activism.



Guess who the “your” describes, eh?  All the rest of the quota queens and their enablers, with their wink, wink, nod, nod toward dysfunctionals (because they are dysfunctional themselves).

It’s hard for me to express how much I loathe these Type I retards – whatever little memetic progress Der Movement makes, tiny baby steps, can be ruined, set back, by one thoughtless act.  So, Instead of “screw your optics,” how about “screw your juvenile acting out?”  Can this specimen explain to us – from his jail cell – exactly what he thinks he has accomplished with his little steel city escapade?

Is it fair to blame Der Movement for this?  After all, they’ll say, anyone can assert adherence to a cause and do stupid things.  Fair enough.  However, I make two points.

First, the Type I core of Der Movement, with its crudity, stupidity, quota systems, rigid dogma, etc. attracts and nurtures trash like Mr. Screw Your Optics

Second, the constant failure of Der Movement, its ineptness, its utter lack of any hope of real progress, induces despair in its followers, leading some to act out in frustration. They have no outlet for pent-up activist energies, because there is “no there there” in Der Movement, it is all sound and fury signifying nothing. So, some unbalanced Nutzis create their own sound and fury in response.

So, yes, indirectly, Der Movement is responsible.  And note I am not whining about Christian morality here or, worse, “mourning the victims.”  My concern is with White racial activism, and the constant harm done to said activism by Der Movement and its retarded followers.

And thanks a lot, Type I scum, for giving Mama Merkel, the Queen of Auto-Genocide, the chance to engage in international moral posturing.

Der Movement will NEVER make ANY progress as long as Type I trash are running the show.  The Type Is need to sit down, shut up, and let Type II adults grab the reigns for once.

Johnson and I sort of agree in one sense and disagree in another:
Counter-Currents

‏@NewRightAmerica

 37m37 minutes ago
More Counter-Currents Retweeted Joyce
Disavowing is too weak. We need to morally condemn cranks who go on shooting sprees. Since when does condemning evil NOT help you maintain your moral legitimacy? Doing good and shunning evil is pretty much the essence of a moral life. It doesn't matter what our enemies think.
Moral condemnation – but only in the sense described below.  Not in an absolute sense.  I don’t consider the shooter “evil” – merely incredibly stupid, reckless, and asinine.  I’m not concerned about how the broader society views my moral legitimacy other than how it affects White racial activism.  So, yes, I am concerned, but only in a utilitarian sense.  My morality is different from that of the broader society, and while I am currently forced to adhere to the latter (most of the time), I do not grant it an inherent legitimacy.  I maintain authenticity by following, in a moral sense, my own inner directives.

Now, how do I judge the morality of a racially relevant action?  Adapting Salter’s “mixed ethic” I propose a two part scheme:

First, does the action advance or harm White racial interests?  If it harms those interests, it is immoral.  If it advances those interests, then –

Second, does the action reasonably, and to the extent practically possible, minimize the harm done to the individual rights of Whites and to the individual and group rights of non-Whites?  After all, one could think of many actions that could in theory advance White interests but do so at costs that would offend most people’s innate sense of objective (aracial and disinterested) morality and human decency - even (possibly) offend my own sense of morality that is different from that of the broader society. If such an action was truly necessary, then the costs would have to be accepted; however, if significant moral cost is incurred for some marginal gain in White racial interest, a cost that would offend the inherent moral sense of Whites, then I argue that marginal advantage – something not existential, not required for racial survival and reasonable racial prosperity – can be foregone.

This idiotic attack on the Synagogue fails test one, and would fail test two even if it did not fail test one. 

At this point people looking to trap me in an inconsistency will say: “hey, I thought you were a Moralpath and such people will accept even war and genocide to do what they feel is right – so why do you reject this action?”  The point is – doing what’s right.  The underlying basis for moralpathy is pursuing one’s moral path regardless of where it leads. That does not have to be the most extreme choice in every instance. In some cases, restraint is deemed right, in other cases, war and genocide. It depends upon context. Shooting up a Pittsburgh synagogue achieves nothing positive that I can see, and instead is a net negative for White racial activism. Thus, it is not “right” as I define it, so I oppose the action.  On the other hand, if White survival in another context required war and genocide, then war and genocide it must be.  Further, if Whites become extinct I say let the world burn and I do not want “high IQ Asians” to rule and prosper; in my view, any human world that allows White extinction does not deserve to survive and prosper.  Context, my friends, context.

I recently critiqued Greg Johnson when he implied that he and his site do not obsessively criticize Richard Spencer. It would seem others share that view.  A partially censored comment by Andrew Joyce:
Greg Johnson…His fixation on Spencer appears almost Biblical, and is inexplicable unless one assumes Spencer occupies a massive role in his psyche. Strange…
I censored part of the comment because I’m not interested in personal ad hominem against Johnson or anyone else; I’m concerned with ideas and actions.  The issue here is the Johnson-Spencer feud, and what I termed the “ugliness” of Johnson kicking Spencer when the latter is at a low point, both “professionally” and personally.  Let it go, Greg.  How about a moratorium on Spencer comments at Counter-Currents?

And this humorous aside from Joyce:
My goal for 2019 is to think about my wife at least half as often as Greg Johnson seems to think about Richard Spencer.
Note carefully the comments to this essay, focusing particularly on those by miguel70, minsc, and, of course, O’Meara.

West Coast White nationalism, I suppose.  The “big tent” (of the circus freak show).

More O’Meara:
The Right of course promotes extermination of the homo; the Left originally promoted promiscuity and hedonism, but when AIDS made this impractical, pivoted to a modified version of the Right’s “family values” — contrary to all historical evidence, the gays always wanted to marry and raise children!

In both cases, society loses the important contributions of the homo to culture and statecraft…
Extermination?  How about not making Far Right activism a front for pushing a homosexual agenda?  This has been going on a long time.  I remember the early days of online Yahoo groups, with “gay National Socialist” groups. What was that?  An intellectual discussion of sexuality and politics?  No, instead it was a disgusting hook-up site with adverts such as “U Piss, I Drink.”  

Contributions to “culture and statecraft?”  How come those contributions were more legitimate in past centuries, when (religious) intolerance to homosexuality was greater?  Sublimation was the real outcome of “The Right,” not “extermination.”  It’s today’s tolerance that brings degeneration. Historically speaking, the evidence is that homosexual contributions to society are maximized in situations far more restrictive than in today’s society…or on certain WN blogs.
Greg Johnson

Posted October 25, 2018 at 2:12 pm | Permalink

I’m approving this comment because I am a connoisseur of jaundiced rants by paranoids. I love it when lunatics act patronizing.
A self-referential “meta” comment if there ever was one.

Pure delusion:
The Cultural Renaissance began more than eight years ago at Counter-Currents. Why not lend your shoulder to the wheel?
If Trump as not a retarded fraud, and if Sessions was not a far-left cuck, this here is all the “legal justification” they need to refuse entry of the Invasion Caravan. The “refugees” were offered “refuge” in Mexico.  They refused.  The want the USA.  They are economic migrants, they are invaders, and they are no different from the Wehrmacht marching through Paris in 1940.  This is a test for Trump.  Put down the Big Mac and act.


They’re …HuWhite.  Meyer Lansky, Antifa…what’s the difference?

I agree with much of what Strom says about the Jews, although we disagree on other issues.  For the most part, I agree with Joyce’s writings at TOO.  But for the sake of consistency, both men need to take on the Alt Wrong.  Why should certain people be sacrosanct and above criticism?  If both Joyce and Strom view Jews as a particularly pernicious influence, then why “hold your fire” against those who bring Jews into the heart of pro-White activism?  

Saturday, October 27, 2018

Saturday Movement Roundup

More of your “movement.”
21st Century WN

Posted October 26, 2018 at 12:45 pm | Permalink
“Ok, the ‘Stone Age WN’, is now in the past, and we need at least to move forward to the WN equivalent of the Iron Age. So, what in your opinion should be the qualities of WN fitting for the hi-tech 21st century world??”
A number of things, many of which have been proposed and discussed by others in the alt-right/WN movement. Among them: 
1 – Complete elimination of all Third Reich flags, symbols, uniforms, memes, etc. (think Jeff Schoep’s NSM)

2 – Complete elimination of all KKK flags, symbols, robes & hoods, memes, etc (think any KKK group today)
We will, of course, keep Pepe, Kek, Savitri Devi and The Men Who Can’t Tell Time, obsessions with Tolkien, March of the Titans, Who We Are, chugging gallons of milk, Trump worship, cosplay costumes, and Steadman wearing shorts.  That’s the hi-tech 21st century WN of today and tomorrow!  Get with the program!
3 – Willingness to completely ostracize all those who refuse to eliminate these practices (sounds “cruel” but it’s necessary)
Pepe vs. Saint Adolf.
4 – Establishment of WN headquarters, with a permanent paid staff of at least 50. (If the SPLC can do it, why can’t we? After all, it’s our problem to figure out how to finance it. If so, what’s taking us so long?)
You can start financing it by cutting off the funding of Brimelow’s lifestyle and by cutting off the lavish globe-trotting quota queen lifestyles as well.  And, oh, no more paying for “silly and frilly things” for YouTube civnat mudsharks.  That leaves the small problem of how one is going to physically defend the “WN headquarters” from leftist attacks and, more to the point, how to defend against lawfare (targeted prosecution, civil suits) if you DO successfully physically defend yourself.  Now, I agree with the objective of the Far Right having self-owned spaces – ultimately, you won’t be able to hold a meeting, or meet in public in any other way, otherwise. But, you need to THINK through the contingencies and consequences, not merely bluster online (after mocking Hale’s own bluster and thoughtlessness).
5 – Leadership chosen by election among supporters in good standing – (not arbitrarily by self-anointed “leaders” like Richard Spencer, Matt Heimbach, etc)
Hmm,”etc” – how about more names instead of “etc?”  Let’s see: Jared Taylor, David Duke, Greg Johnson, Matt Parrott, Richard McCulloch, Jason Kessler, Jorjani…the list goes on.  Would Greg have run your comment if you had included him in the list of self-anointed “leaders?”

And…elections? Are you mad? We’re going to bring all the corruption of electoral democracy into racial activism?  Sure, we should engage in the System’s electoral games as part of an overarching strategy, but to “elect” our own leaders?  On what basis?  Are we going to have campaigns?  Campaign ads (one can only imagine)?  

How about this: Leaders are those who get things done and who rise to the top by MERIT, not by affirmative action programs, and are confirmed in positions of leadership by the acceptance of informed and intelligent followers, who demand ACCOUNTABILITY of those leaders.
6 – Establishment of a nationwide network of “meeting halls” where AR/WN supporters can meet, discuss, strategize, and socialize, building strong white relationships and families. (Much like others gather for “church”, or at their local VFW clubs on the weekend, so that this weekly meeting becomes routine, productive, and desirable)
See comment to #4 above.  This is a good idea, as is #4, but the details…the details.  Therein lies the problem. How to protect such halls (in every sense of the word “protect”)?
7 – Establishment of weekend “WN schools” for our youth, where they can be taught WHY white civilization must be preserved – taught by interesting and intelligent teachers. (Think “Boys Clubs” and “Girls Clubs”, etc. as the template to guide us)
Like some of the other ideas, this is not bad, but the actualization of it is the problem.  Again: how to protect from physical attack and lawfare?  I agree it should be done, but FIRST you figure out the solutions to the problems and build the requisite infrastructure, and THEN you do it (not the other way around, as Der Movement usually does).  I can only imagine the specific topics to be taught in such schools; the mind boggles.
8 – Establishment of a “Breitbart News” (Whitebart?) of white nationalism, with correspondents in all major cities of the United States. With today’s inexpensive video cameras, the AR/WN movement should be able to field “reporters” within minutes of any breaking news story pertinent to our Cause. (not talking here about weekly podcasts, but actual “live” news stories that are channeled through HQ – accessible to everyone)
Each correspondent will have their own Antifa ready to elbow them in the face, with Sessions cackling with glee.
9 – Establishment of an AR/WN film studio, where very low-budget white nationalist movies can be regularly produced. Even now, amazingly good full-length movies are made by high school and college students (consult YouTube) so why hasn’t this avenue been exploited? (crickets) And no, it’s not for lack of money, since extremely low-budget, well-made non-professional movies are made all the time – some sold as Direct-To-DVD on amazon,etc. (do our supporters not have any talent or initiative?)
Talent or initiative? Well, I suppose making the cosplay costumes for Unite the Right took some talent, and, yes, screaming “Kek!” in public takes initiative, but I don’t know about the rest of it.  Question: since the Right is being deplatformed everywhere, where will these “very low-budget white nationalist movies” to be shown?  I won’t even ask what this specimen considers possible topics for such movies.  The mind boggles (again).
10 – Start producing a positive view of what white nationalism can do for white Americans. We already know what harm that negroes and mestizos are doing to America (and should keep saying so) but we have at the same time failed to demonstrate a shining vision of just what a white America would actually be like. In other words, what is the GOOD we white nationalists have to offer? Demonstrating that is the first BIG STEP toward building a “21st century white America”.
What WNs can offer?  Pepe, Kek, milk stands on every corner (straight from the udder!), free cephalic index measurements, and deep discussions of whether the man is above time, beyond time, or can’t tell time.
So, what are we waiting for?
A real movement to be born.

I mean, does anyone believe that the existing "movement" and its failed, inept "leadership could accomplish any of the goals listed above?

Good sense comment about Taylor’s wistful hopes that those high-IQ Asians will seamlessly replace Whites once Whitey goes extinct:
Ozark Recluse

Posted October 25, 2018 at 4:28 pm | Permalink
JT’s parting remark was oddly discouraging. Pondering what race we prefer to replace us should we go extinct is a pointless, wasteful exercise. We have no business even momentarily contemplating such an eventuality.
The types who write for Counter-Currents these days: KMacD’s works are too “academic” and no one actually reads them.  David Duke – now that’s the ticket!  Keep in mind that Counter-Currents has pretensions of being the intellectual, elite, highbrow version of WN.
Gregorian Mick

Posted October 26, 2018 at 3:08 pm | Permalink
‘By contrast, Kevin MacDonald’s trilogy was written on a much higher level – high enough that I suspect more people have claimed to have read his Culture of Critique (1998) than have actually read it.’
You can’t be serious? I’ve read the oiginal [sic] trilogy five or six times by now and the add ons a couple of times and it is a remarkably clear easy read free of academic jargon. Separation and its discontents is a masterwork. If you want a hard to read book that influenced cofc then read John Murray Cuddihy’s book about Freud etc. That had some academic jargon. Man that was slow going for me.
Reply

Morris V. de Camp
Posted October 26, 2018 at 5:24 pm | Permalink
Separation and Its Discontents is an easy read and a great book. The other two in the series are quite academic. The best book on the JQ is Duke’s book.
Trump the fraud:
The GOP runs white nationalist campaigns to win elections only to disavow “racism” and purge anyone who has pro-white views afterwards. They use our votes to advance a neoliberal, corporate agenda. 
We have to keep them accountable this time. No more betrayal.
This comment was in reply to Trump’s tweeting about “the caravan” and “the Democrats” while doing nothing but eating Big Macs and acting like a jackass.

Friday, October 26, 2018

Millennials vs. Matt Hale

Responding to a Counter-Currents commentator.
21st Century WN
In other words: “WN 2.0” – Pepe!  Kek!
Posted October 25, 2018 at 2:05 pm | Permalink
Matt Hale and his crazed World Church of the Creator never had a chance to succeed.
Unlike Counter-Currents, Altright.com. Amren, TOO, and the other bastions of unremitting success currently leading us to glorious victory.  Never mind Silver’s favorite writers, with decades of fulminating about ranking Americans based on some imaginary phenotypic scale.  Victory! Victory!
It reeked of costume Neo-Nazism…
Far worse than cosplay wanna-bes showing up at rallies dressed like Captain America or Batman.  Men, raise your shields!  Advance upon the enemy!  Damn the torpedoes, full steam ahead!
…with its thinly-disguised flag that mimicked both the colors and the basic design elements of the Nazi flag…
Certainly not as serious as a cartoon frog.
…its uniformed rank-and-file members…
Uniforms: bad.  Cosplay: good.
…and Hale himself, prancing about in a leather trench-coat ala Heinrich Himmler. It was LARPing writ large.
Well, my friend, who is it who constantly supports failed quota queen leaders?  People like you.
His “church” attracted mentally unstable people like Benjamin August Smith, crazed killer who “did it all for Hale”. 
In contrast to the mental stability inherent in drunken podcasts, car ramming, and running out of LA bars, chased by a bunch whose combined bench press is 10 lbs.
Okay, one point for loyalty, but minus two million for sheer idiocy.
Pepe!  Kek!  Pyramids of Atlantis!  The Spectral!  The Spectral!
 The Feds always believed Hale was in on the killings anyway (at least as a planner)…
Let’s believe the Feds.
…and that’s why they sent in FBI informant Tony Evola…
Any relation to Julius?  He’s a man who can’t tell time!  Traditionalism!
…to nail Hale to the jail cell – sans bail. Oh, well. But talk about irony. Evola was Hale’s “Chief of Security” and yet he was the biggest breach of security in Hale’s entire outfit! 
Hale would have been better served asking Patrik Hermansson to give an opening speech about keeping out infiltrators.
Yet Matt Hale never bothered to dig into Evola’s background and because he didn’t he’s now serving four decades in a negro rape cage waiting to die.
Steadman should have done the vetting – would have kept out Negroes like Evola.  Hale could have enjoyed Swedish homosexuals instead.  Blow on that Viking horn (is “Viking horn” a euphemism?)!
Hale, in the end, represented Stone Age white nationalism – from the era of Rockwell, Pierce, Metzger, Duke, and, of course, Ben Klassen. 
Nothing compared to era of, say, Richard Spencer, Greg Johnson, Zman, John Derbyshire, and Brimelow counting his money in the leafy blue state suburbs of CT.  Let’s not forget Jorjani and the pyramids of Atlantis being built by psychokinesis.  That’s enlightened 21st century WN for sure!
Bereft of ideas, all of these individuals simply created crude imitations of Hitler’s Third Reich that mostly misfits gave allegiance to. 
Instead, let’s imitate a cartoon frog.  Pepe!  Kek!
Hale, despite being intelligent, could not see a truly 21st century path toward victory…
As exemplified by Unite the Right – that paragon of activist success.
…unless he was sieg heiling this and that ever other minute. As such, he place a target on his back – and got “shot” – all the way into a Supermax Prison.
Yes, let’s mock a WN for ending up in prison.  
Let us silently bury Matt Hale and the failed era of white nationalism to which he belonged. 
And raise the flag of 21st century WN – featuring Pepe, Steadman in shorts, and a bottle of hard liquor.
His ideas about white nationalism are antiquated, and are best forgotten. 
As opposed to talk about Savitri Devi – always, fresh, current, and relevant to the “normies.”  Part of the “big tent,” don’t you know.
As for Hale himself, he will, just like Edgar J. Steele, die in prison…
And it is appropriate for a WN website to feature a comment mocking Hale for this.  Right?

Thursday, October 25, 2018

Fraud Trump and…Is There Oil on Arrakis?

Odds and ends.  In all cases, emphasis added.

Someone gets it; Trump is a fraud:
Because We Live Here‏
 @PKsbpdl

 Oct 21

More Because We Live Here Retweeted Donald J. Trump
Here's an idea: do an executive order to #BuildTheWall then start mass deportations of illegal aliens. Oh, and arrest sanctuary city mayors. JUST DO SOMETHING instead of TWEETING!
Cue Roissy praising Trump for “negging” a woman or screwing porn stars.  MAGA!

By the way, note Trump embracing Cruz in Texas.  Back at the 2016 GOP convention, I remember Roissy predicting Cruz was “finished” in the GOP because of his “betrayal” of Trump, complete with a picture of the Trump clan looking at Cruz with disgust.

Wrong, wrong, the quota queens are always wrong.

More on Trump the utter fraud, emphasis added:
If Trump isn’t what it takes, what is? The very question shows that Trump is neither more nor less than what serves his constituencies’ desires for protection and payback. President Trump has found it easier to proclaim victories over middle America’s enemies than to achieve them. Often, he has simply protested the bipartisan ruling class’s continued rule while acquiescing in it, as he did on March 23, 2018 when signing the $1.3 trillion omnibus bill that continued financing every Progressive group, and increased funding for all of the ruling class’s priorities; and as he did on September 17, 2017 when he signed the Joint Congressional Resolution that urged all U.S agencies to combat “hate speech”—and defined it in such a way as to accuse his supporters of it. On national TV, he confessed that wise men in Washington had convinced him that his (and his voters’) desire to withdraw from the Afghan war had been wrong. Having finally decided to declassify documents many of which the intelligence agencies had given to the Washington Post, he apparently let them convince him that doing so would harm national security. While complaining of the Democrats’ slander of Judge Kavanaugh, he led Republicans in refraining from asking the questions and bringing out the facts about the accuser that distinguish legitimate complaints from slander. Trump’s rousing speeches feed the body politic as empty calories feed the human body. Bluster followed by surrender has political legs both short and shaky. Trump’s tone has lifted his constituencies’ expectations. But tone does not give substance to public opinion, poses but a flimsy barrier to the ruling class’s concerted power, and does not begin to satisfy constituencies threatened by the ruling class machine that came of age in the anti-Kavanaugh campaign.
How about this: how about the USA withdraws from all “treaties” that obligates this country accepting “refugees?”  The “refugee” scam is just a cover for invasion.  Too bad these treaties didn’t exist 80 years ago – the Germans could have conquered Europe by claiming the Wehrmacht was just a “refugee caravan.”  Come now – they just wanted to escape the big bad Hitler, who can blame them?  Instead, Trump will probably meekly process their "refugee" applications, give them room and board, and have his DOJ indict more Nutzis for "hate crimes."

Come on, now, Greg, all this scifi stuff is just nonsense!  With “Peak Oil” how are we going to power our starships?  Let’s just stay snug in our hobbit holes, enjoying the “de facto anarchy in the provinces.”  But, hey, maybe like the Middle East, there’s oil in dem dere hills (of sand) on Arrakis, not just “spice,” so we can drive our space ship up to the nearest gas station and fill ‘er up!

More lack of self-awareness:

First, Johnson denies his site constantly attacks Spencer:
I don’t know what you mean by “a lot.” Besides this three parter and my review of Vegas Tenold’s book, I can’t think of any others.
Conveniently forgetting not only the major opinion pieces, but the constant sniping – by him and others - against Spencer in the comments threads of other articles.  I’ve been commenting on such comments regularly on this blog.  And let’s not forget this.

Second, this:
But everyone in this movement has amnesia.
Yes, they’ve already forgotten about Hermansson, Lewis, etc.

It would be best if Greg would forget about Spencer and just build his own Counter-Currents brand.  There’s a certain ugliness in kicking someone when they’re down – and Spencer is currently way down, both in his activist and personal lives. I’m sure Greg feels justified in his bitterness toward Spencer and Friberg - and perhaps he’s right to feel so (but I wonder if he has enough self-awareness to understand that others may feel the same way about him), but a bigger man would just let it go.  Another argument I suppose would be to counter “movement” amnesia by constantly reminding everyone of Spencer’s foibles, so as to attempt to prevent a Spencerian comeback.  That attitude would be more principled if it was aimed at the entire Alt Right brand, rather than just personally on a down-and-out would-be Fuhrer; then again, all the criticism would have even more “bite” if it had started when the Alt Right was riding high.  But only Sallis and Strom had the prescience to issue warnings back then.

Spencer is just a symptom, Der Movement is the disease, and the Alt Right is the most recent pernicious manifestation of that disease.  Spencer can permanently disappear from the “movement” scene, and all these problems would still be here.  EGI Notes tells you that, while Johnson fulminates against someone whose current status is equivalent to that of Hitler’s last days in the bunker.

Johnson also answers a lukewarm defender of Spencer who suggested that Richie Rich would have done better with a handler behind the scenes – to which Johnson, justifiably, answers that if someone needs a handler they are a figurehead and not a leader.  But that’s the point – Spencer would have been better suited as a player in electoral politics – yes, a figurehead – with the CMS guys being the handlers behind the scenes.  Regnery’s initial instincts were sound – Spencer should never have compromised his future political viability by taking over NPI and being directly involved in Der Movement to such an obvious extent.

Jared Taylor: If Europeans are to be replaced, I would far prefer that we be replaced by Asians than by Africans or Middle-Easterners and, certainly, by Muslims. I hope, of course, that Western civilization will survive, that white people will carry their civilization and their biological substrate forever into the future. I hope that’s what happens. But, if we are—if we really are—to be bred out of existence, or if we do not reproduce ourselves, if the continent of Europe becomes non-white, if North America becomes increasingly non-white, I would prefer they became Asian rather than African, Middle Eastern, or Latino. Asians are a high IQ group, and they would organize superior societies, whereas if the United States became populated by people like Guatemalans, Haitians, Syrians, then the United States would become a Third World mess.
That is of course not the classical HBD view, which instead actively does hope and prefer for Whites to be replaced by Asians as the optimal scenario.  

Anyway, I disagree with Taylor.  Why should Asians, or anyone else, inherit the Earth, and the achievements and inventions of Whites, if Whites become extinct?  On the contrary, let the world burn; if Whites are not around to fulfill their destiny, let the remaining featherless bipeds go rot.  Who cares about a “superior society” run by Orientals?

I guess that’s my moralpathy talking. Speaking of which – how many Nutzis have coined their own psychological term?  Ted Sallis – the gift that keeps on giving (Narcissism!  Narcissism!)!

Zman on the future of America:
All the while the role of the central government recedes domestically as the local cultural regions re-assert their authority.
De facto anarchy in the provinces!  And we can all be snug in our hobbit holes, reading The White Nationalist Manifesto!

Wednesday, October 24, 2018

Unraveling the Thread.

Understanding the problem.


I’ve been critical of Amren and also critical of the “movement’s” tin cup handling.  However, I strongly support Amren’s legal endeavors as described in the link, and I support activists contributing funding for these endeavors.  However, these endeavors, and writing and talking about them, is only a short term solution, only a superficial approach to the problem. It only deals with the surface manifestation of the underlying problem, it only attempts to deal with the end-of-the-line of a long thread that can be traced back to the ultimate cause of why groups like Amren are faced with suppression, deplatforming, and withdrawal of their basic constitutional rights. How to unravel this thread?

The basic problem is: WHY are these things happening?  Why does the state of Tennessee want to abrogate pro-White freedom of assembly?  Why does the entire governmental structure of the USA (federal, state, and local) – including the Trump administration and especially Sessions and the DOJ – support Antifa and oppose White activists?  Why are law-abiding pro-White activists jailed and indicted while leftist domestic terrorists operate with impunity?  Let’s trace the thread of the problem back to its beginning.

The elites – most of whom are White – are openly hostile to White interests.  The elites, the System, works hand-in-glove with Antifa and other terrorist groups to suppress free speech and free assembly. These elites – the ones who make their decisions at the governmental level * - are either elected officials, or non-elected official appointed by, or instructed by, elected officials.  Thus, the anti-White system has been in large part put into place by a majority White electorate. This can be traced back to a variety of factors.  First, some Whites openly support suppression of pro-White activists.  Many don’t care one way or another – they have no racial loyalty, no collectivist sense of race; they are individualists, many with pathological altruism and hyper-universalism (“high trust hunter gatherers,” I suppose).  Many Whites have a superficial “football team” view of politics, so that if “our guy” beats “their guy” that’s all that matters, and the fact that “our guy” believes and behaves in a manner exactly the same as “their guy” fazes these voters not one bit.  White voters are also swayed by, and gaslighted by, endless System propaganda.  Also, politicians lie, always feinting right for the election and then governing left, and the dumb and naïve voters, with short attention spans, never hold them to account (one has only to remember a squinty-eyed John McCain running for re-election with “build the danged fence” – and upon re-election once again started shamelessly shilling for open borders and amnesty). The System is controlled by special interests and wire-pullers, so that there typically ends up being no real choice at the polls, and then we get what I would call “Double Black Swan events” – first, someone like Trump getting elected on a wave of pro-White (albeit implicitly) right-wing populism, and then the second Black Swan – that both Trump and Sessions turn out to be frauds and traitors, “enforcing” the law as if they were radical left-wingers.  The election of someone like Trump was an unexpected Black Swan; that such a person would then preside over an administration on which his supporters have less rights, and are more persecuted, than before his election, that his own DOJ will indict his supporters and support his enemies, that’s a second Black Swan, even more unexpected and mystifying than the first. Thus, we have a complex web of problems that ultimately trace back to anti-White elites being in power, and being in power because Whites are too individualistic, dim-witted, naïve, and short-sighted to act, and vote, otherwise.

One can argue that it is because “the Jews” control the mass media and thus manipulate White voters, and through control of the media and control of voting, in addition to their vast wealth and power, control White politicians and impose their will on the body politic. So, we can add “easily manipulated” to the flaws of White folks, but it doesn’t change the ultimate problem and the ultimate outcome.  Let’s say your solution is to “expel the Jews.”  Very well.  You cannot do so without political power.  How do you obtain such power when you exist in a situation in which all of the above applies?  How do you obtain political power when you cannot even hold a meeting anywhere, where if any pro-White leader shows his face in public, that face can get punched (or elbowed) with impunity by an Antifa that is supported at the highest levels of our supposedly “God Emperor fascist” government?  All the big-talking Type Is will then talk darkly of “armed revolution” – how will this come off if, again, you can’t even hold a small meeting, when your “Proud Boys” get chased out of places of businesses by noodle-armed soyboys, when your private meetings are easily infiltrated by Swedish homosexual anti-racists or by snide alternative newspaper writers posing as curious “movie critics?”  How do you even begin to organize for such “armed revolution” when the very population you assert to be fighting for hates you, will not support you, and when the administration you voted for – the allegedly “right-wing populist” Trump administration – has pledged to use the entire force of the federal government against you, and is fulfilling that pledge, spearheaded by an allegedly “arch conservative” ex-Senator Attorney General who delights in indicting your followers for “hate crimes” for merely defending themselves from the leftist domestic terrorists that he so wholeheartedly supports.  Yes, all your fantasies of “armed revolution” are just hat – fantasies. Your spiel of “worse is better” is also nonsense and fantasy, since Whites have proven an ability to stomach any and all humiliations and abuse as long as the frog (Pepe?) is boiled slowly enough.  No – worse is simply worse.  Doing business as usual for Der Movement is doomed to failure.  You can win a legal battle and that’s great, and then in a year or two you’ll have to go through the whole thing again, this time with resources depleted from your last struggle, while the System as resources unlimited (most of which derived from feckless Whites).  This is a structural problem in large part due to “movement” ineptness, as chronicled and summarized at this blog endlessly. Nothing has been done correctly for decades, opportunity after opportunity squandered, potential recruits repulsed, failure piling up after failure.

White activists are facing and well-integrated power structure that has the ability to check almost any approach against itself, leading to the “movement” being checkmated.  It’s a self-reinforcing problem.  Some want to make an “end-run” around the problem by appealing directly to elites and having them impose “the program” top down; it is difficult to see how this can be achieved, as virtually all these elites are not only openly hostile to the White Cause, but their very status of elites are tied into maintaining this hostility.  Further, “movement” leaders are so undesirable and incompetent, and “movement” dogma is often so irrational  and repulsive, that it is hard to understand what will attract any open-minded elites (if any exist) to give the White Cause a fair hearing.  How would they defend themselves against the majority of their fellow elites who are the enemy?  And it was so easy, the “turning” of the elites, why hasn’t there been pone single (overt) success after endless decades of “movement” “activism?”  No, you are still checkmated, and your Man on White Horse hopes are always misplaced.

There are no easy answers to deal with this.  There may in fact be no solution if we are dealing with traits “hard-wired” into the White psyche, traits that did not manifest to this negative extent in other contexts, but are obviously self-destructive now.  Unlike the quota queens, who need to project optimism so as to keep the shekels flowing in (how many people would fill the tin cup for a cause destined to fail?), I’m deeply pessimistic.  By best guess is that we’re doomed, but we may as well go down fighting, as there is always a slim chance of success as long as you try.  If we do have success, it will be due to a variety of approaches done in tandem, not some single “magic bullet.”  I’ve written on these things before, but a summary would be:

Merit, accountability, and division of labor.  The affirmative action program for leadership in White activism needs to end.  Among those that belong to the ingroup (however you wish to define it – different people may have different definitions), merit, ability, and a record of success should be the defining characteristics of leadership.  There must be accountability: there must be consequences for failure due to bad judgment, weakness, stupidity, dysfunction, etc. Increasing the pool of prospective leaders through an end to affirmative action will allow for an effective division of labor, with people filling those roles for which they are best suited.  That would in turn make the issue of accountability less onerous; with people filling roles for which they are suited, and chosen based on merit and not ethnic fetishism, success will be more frequent and failure less frequent.  There will be fewer marked disasters and less need to have to impose accountability since there would be fewer instances requiring people needs to be held to account.

Drop the fossilized “movement” dogma.

Infiltrate the System.  Plant supporters among the elites, among the cogs in the machine.

I have written before of the urgent need to get involved in real-world politics, in electoral politics, in reaching out to people in the analog world, in campaigns, in governing, in concrete accomplishment to exert force on political reality.  I have explained why this is necessary, and hoe activist have political to maneuver even though the System has us checked.  The System’s controls has its limitations, particularly when one dives into the belly of the beast. Attacking dissidents outside of the System is safer, attacking dissidents acting within the System risks an “auto-immune” reaction in which System reaction begins to harm itself.

Probably the most important practical thing that can, and should, be done right now is gathering data. I’m a STEM person, a “quant,” and I want empiricism and data to inform the course to be taken. We need to find out WHY Whites are unmoved by racialist propaganda and memes, WHY we are not “winning hearts and minds,” and WHY Whites are unconcerned about racial interests or, if they are concerned, WHY they do not act. Then we need to find out WHAT (if anything) would motivate them, WHAT types of propaganda and memes would be effective, and then we need to determine HOW this can be implemented, and WHO is best to do it.  As regards WHEN: ASAP.

This would require opinion poling, market analysis, input from political scientists, ethnologists, advertising specialists, and the like. Money?  STOP FLUSHING MONEY DOWN THE PROVERBIAL TOILET SUPPORTING THE HAPPY PENGUINS SUBURBAN LIFESTYLE, STOP FUNDING “LEADERS” LIVING THE GOOD LIFE, STOP FUNDING INEPTNESS, STOP FUNDING “RADIO DERB’ AND OTHER DAMN NONSENSE.  GOT IT?

Think of all the good that could be done if a fraction of the wasted tin cup panhandling actually went to projects with real payoffs. Consider this: Salter is an ethnologist.  Ethnology is the study of human behavior.  Salter is an adviser for One Nation, so apparently he’s willing to put his expertise to work helping patriotic parties and groups.  What if the Happy Penguin money was funneled to him instead, to be a full time analyst and adviser for the cause? What’s better: funding an established academic ethnologist who wrote On Genetic Interests and who produces useful analysis on political nationalist, OR funding Brimelow and Derbyshire to sit around on lawn chairs in the CT suburbs? 

We need to look to the Legionary movement for guidance. Activists are flawed, activists are too often dregs, activists are embarrassments, and activists are pure dysfunction.  We need to create the “New Man,” creating better activists, being better people, will go a long way to make us more attractive as alternative o the System, make us more effective and ethical, make us more ready to withstand persecution, steel us for the struggles ahead.  The idea that the drunken Millennial Pepe-ites of the Alt Right can in any way be the vanguard of anything but absolute failure is a delusion.  We need better.  We must demand better.  
The Legionary Movement aimed to create a New Man (Omul Nou), to transform the entire nation through Legionary education by transforming each individual into a person of quality. The New Man would be more honest and moral, more intelligent, industrious, courageous, willing to sacrifice, and completely free of materialism. His view of the world would be centered around spirituality, service to his nation, and love of his fellow countrymen. This new and improved form of human being would transform history, setting the foundations of a new era never before seen in Romanian history.  
Codreanu wrote, “We shall create an atmosphere, a moral medium in which the heroic man can be born and can grow. This medium must be isolated from the rest of the world by the highest possible spiritual fortifications. It must be defended from all the dangerous winds of cowardice, corruption, licentiousness, and of all the passions which entomb nations and murder individuals. Once the Legionary will have developed in such a milieu… he shall be sent into the world… He will be an example; will turn others into Legionaries. And people, in search of better days, will follow him… will make a force which will fight and will win.” Therefore, a spiritual revolution would create the basis for a political revolution, since without the New Man no political program could achieve any lasting accomplishment.
The “movement” talks big about “eschewing defectives” while most of its leadership is highly defective personally.  Of course, they are ALL defective ideologically, and as regards strategy, but here I talk about person dysfunction.  Who among current American “movement” “leadership” is not obviously personally defective (ignoring ideology).  Probably only folks like Taylor and MacDonald.  Note that both are older gentlemen – the dreaded “boomers” – one being from a business background and the other an academic, people of substance.  Note that extreme dysfunction is not compatible with personal success outside of the “movement.”  Look at all the “movement” leaders whose entire lives have been practically spent as “leaders” and/or who failed in private, non-“movement” endeavors, and/or who quickly left “normie” life, probably because they couldn’t hack it, and realized they could live easier “off the fat of the land” as a tin cup rattling parasite.  A lack of personal success outside of the “movement” should be a warning sign.  And, no, please don’t invoke the spirit of Saint Adolf here as an example of a success who had no previous outside life success.  He was dysfunctional, made horrific errors of judgment, and helped wreck the White world with his ethnonationalist stupidities.  Looking closer to home in America, Yockey at least was a lawyer, he wasn’t some 20-something jackass who thinks screaming “Kek” is activism.  He may have become a sort of grafter later on, but he at least produced value, wrote important works, engaged in real-world activism, made an impact. Put it this way: he had a choice.  He could have become a successful lawyer, or even an academic, if he wanted to.  Can you imagine some of today’s “leaders” being successful in any “normie” endeavor?   That’s a litmus test.  One should become a leader by choice, not because one is incapable of being anything else.

*Of course, the deplatforming is being predominantly done by private actors, but with the same motivation.  In addition, we can ask why even rightist, conservative elites support the deplatforming ad refuse to use the power of the government to legislate major web business as public entities.  It comes down to the same thing: hostile elites.