Sunday, October 20, 2019

Racial Resentment, anti-Colonialism, and the White Future

Food for thought.

I’m no fan of Instauration, but I have no argument with this.  The interesting (in hindsight, obvious) point is that all of these Third World revolutionary movements were based on resistance to racial humiliation, and, in some cases, to racial-sexual humiliation.

Movie scenes of relevance: for Vietnam, see this.  For Cuba, see this.

Also, note the racial-sexual humiliation motivation of the North African Clement Dio character in The Camp of the Saints: “his grandmother, a black harem slavegirl, sold to a brothel for French officers ...”

All of the Third World anti-colonial resistance movements, wars of liberation, etc. were based on the sense of humiliation felt by Colored peoples by White political dominion.  It didn’t matter that Europeans ruled Black Africa better than the Black Africans did after the end of colonialism. It didn’t matter that British rule of India was efficient, or that American money contributed greatly to Cuba’s economy. Nor did whatever benefits brought to Vietnam by the French, or by White Americans, matter. The Coloreds wanted independence, they wanted an end to the humiliation, an end to paternalistic rule by an alien people, an end to seeing their women sexually used (willingly or not) by the racially alien men ruling their nations.  

On second thought, that White rule was seen as more efficient than native rule did matter, being actually more of a reason to end White rule – the humiliation, the constant attack against native self-esteem, to constantly be faced with the reality of White superiority, to have it constantly rubbed in their faces that these aliens could rule them better than they could rule themselves.  And added to all of these sources of resentment was the bitter tinge of racial envy, of hatred of Whites for being White, and all that entailed with respect to the manifest superiority of Whites. Have you ever read any of the anti-White bile that emanated from Black African and Black Caribbean “revolutionary theorists?”  Or how about the hatred toward Whites from Black Americans, from similar sources of racial resentment, the “Civil Rights Movement” being a form on internal, intra-American anti-colonialism (and the same applies to anti-White hatred coming from other non-White “American” peoples).

That’s where the conservative Right always gets things wrong, particularly with their emphasis on “economic theory” and “standard of living” and “rational choices.”  A purely rational, economic choice by non-Whites is to be ruled by Whites, but they reject this because there are things more important than purely material well-being. Racial pride, racial integrity and preservationism, a sense of identity, self-esteem, and end to the pain of national humiliation, you can call all of those things “irrational,” but they are powerful motivators nevertheless.

Will this paradigm one day apply to Whites?  Will Whites continue to be bought off by the System through material well-being (which is, by the way, has a limited shelf-life as the West spirals increasingly out-of-control)?  Will Whites continue to allow themselves to be subject to racial humiliation, including racial-sexual humiliation, without resisting?  Will they allow racial aliens to continue ruling over them?  Do they even recognize that this is the case?How “manifest” is “White superiority” if they do not even recognize, much less resist, the same sort of racial subjugation that non-Whites clearly identified and fought when it was their turn to do so?

Are Whites really and truly inferior after all?  Why do they put up with dispossession, humiliation, and subjugation?  Today the West is being colonized by the Third World. Where is the White anti-colonial movement?

Saturday, October 19, 2019

Der Movement Makes You Stupid

And HBD is particularly bad.

Following up on this, let us not forget this.
Sweden’s population is highly individualistic, but operates with a societal consensus, while Sicily has strong families but little cooperation at the societal level.
Now, contrast that with MacDonald’s shallow assertion that Southern Italy is collectivist. Now, the Counter-Currents review is of the same work of MacDonald that MacDonald himself was discussing. Thus, if we try to merge both viewpoints of the same work, then we can conclude that a people that exhibit “little cooperation at the societal level” are “collectivist.”  That’s obviously an oxymoron.  These guys, lost in their sea of lies and hand-waving spin, simply can’t keep their stories straight.  Also note that peoples who are “highly individualistic” also operate “with a societal consensus” – which is almost as inconsistent as stating that folks who can’t cooperate at a level higher than the family are somehow “collectivist.”  Amoral familism is not collectivism, quite the opposite, and the “highly individualistic” Germanic populations cannot be that “highly individualistic” as they are prone to “societal consensus” of a mind-numbing conformity (see the SJW hysteria currently infecting the West).

So, in summary, Der Movement believes that people that operate with a societal consensus, easily invest in collective social goods, and who effectively work together are “highly individualistic;” while people who do not cooperate at the societal level, resist investing in collective social goods, and are composed of squabbling atomized families who don’t pull together are “collectivist.”  If that sounds absolutely crazy to you, that’s because it is.

It’s ludicrous.  If Italy – at least the south – was “collectivist” then they’d band together to at least stop the “migrant” invasion of their nation.  What’s the reality? The anti-immigration Salvini (a “Germanic” “individualist” Northern Italian, by the way) is gone, and the influx (aided and abetted by Northern Europeans) continues. The Italian mafia actually enables human trafficking of illegal immigrants into Italy in order to make money. They are destroying their own people and culture for individual and family self-aggrandizement. Collectivist?  Is corruption and organized crime collectivist? If you really want to see collectivism as a national trait look at the Jews and the Chinese, the HBD favorites. Collectivism?  How about German National Socialism?  That seems to be a lot more “collectivist” than a bunch of Afrowops scurrying around, all wrecking their own nation and people to make a buck.

HBD makes people stupid.  Der Movement’s fetishistic dogmas make people stupid. Always having to shove a square peg of dogma into a round hole of reality should cause severe cognitive dissonance in all of our “movement” “rock stars.”

So, this is a good Taylor video, but it demonstrates a lack of self-awareness.
“Say yes to your friends and no to your enemies.”
So – maybe stop slamming White ethnics and praising Jews?  Who’s been trying to shut down Amren?  Jewish organizations and/or organizations with strong Jewish support.  Who, on the other hand, used to be Amren supporters, even writers? Who do you attack?  Who do you praise?  Indeed, stop taking orders from people who hate you.

And, getting back to the main point of the video – what does this say about that “sincere man of genuine greatness” Donald Trump?  Any comments about that Greg?

It isn’t just HBD that makes people stupid.  Der Movement itself makes people stupid. Look what’s happened to people who’ve marinated in the “movement” milieu for years. MacDonald went from being a courageous and thoughtful scholar to a sweaty Kempian, spouting nonsense that isn’t even internally consistent or even superficially logical, never mind historically accurate. Johnson went from being a reasonably useful metapolitical contributor to a gaslighting grifter concerned about spiting Richard Spencer and garnering as much “D’Nations” as possible. David Duke, maniacally focused on “Zionism” to the exclusion of everything else, has been reduced to endorsing an anti-White half-Samoan leftist who supports reparations for Negroes. The National Alliance has become a pathetic caricature of what it was under Pierce (which itself wasn’t so hot). Whatever promise Spencer had as an activist before he took over NPI has been flushed down the toilet, and he’s become basically a meme for both the Left (elbowing in the face videos) and the Right (the face of Beavis-and-Butthead White nationalism). Taylor is an intelligent and well-educated man, and articulate enough to have been a viable political candidate (in the proper context), but he doesn’t realize when his video criticisms of others apply equally to the direction Amren has taken (HBD is also a problem there). And if guys like Johnson label me as “crazy and bitter,” then chalk that up to my experiences in the “movement” as well.  If Ted Sallis is now unbalanced and defective, as my detractors claim, then that’s from 25 years exposure to the madness of the “movement.”

Food for thought, isn’t it?

Friday, October 18, 2019

Jews, the Decline of MacDonald, and Other News

Jews and other news.

An excellent Joyce piece about Jewish self-glorification.
Jews have a joke among themselves that goes something like this: A class of schoolchildren is asked to produce an essay about giraffes; little Tom Smith hands in a piece on the neck; little John Baker writes about its diet; others write about the tail, the environment, and so on. Then little Benny Cohen hands in his paper, and it is titled “The Giraffe and the Jews.”
The joke, little-known among non-Jews, conveys an important truism — that, for Jews, everything, no matter how distant or abstract, often comes back to the idea and feeling of being Jewish. In other words, it is a joke about Jewish ethnocentrism. That non-Jews aren’t very familiar with the joke speaks to the fact that Jewish ethnocentrism is something that is very frequently discussed and celebrated by Jews, but also something that is frequently downplayed, obscured, or even denied when queried by outgroups.
Indeed.
A particularly interesting aspect of the study by Brown et al. is the response to increasing rates of intermarriage among American Jews. Jewish intermarriage has been raised as evidence by some scholars objecting to analyses of Jewish ethnocentrism, most notably and recently by Nathan Cofnas.[6] However, as Brown et al. note, given more than a century of intense assimilation and acceptance by the host population and a population size of only around 3%, “an endogamy rate [among Jews] of 50% is surprisingly high.”
People familiar with my work over a long period of time may remember that I did a quantitative analysis of this, graphing various White American ethnic groups for proportion of the population (X axis) and outmarriage rate (Y axis). A linear relationship was established – the smaller the group, the greater the outmarriage rate (since the greater the chance of a partner of a different ethnicity). I then tried to place Jews (in America) on that line and saw that they didn’t fit; indeed, their outmarriage rate was depressed compared to gentile groups of similar population size (who had outmarriage rates of greater than 70%). Of course, the more ethnocentric Jews practice endogamy, and if ethnocentrism has, at least in part, a genetic component, this trend would have the effect of increasing Jewish ethnocentrism over time.

One can note that arguments about Jewish outmarriage rates, while perhaps relevant to Jewish genetic strategies, are not directly relevant to the effects of Jews in White societies. Even if Jews are destroying their ethnic integrity through outmarriage (which is questionable) that doesn’t obligate other groups to endure Jewish destructive behavior toward those other groups for the period of time that Jews are still extant.

And speaking of self-glorification, isn’t that what Jewish involvement in the HBD cult is about?  When is Joyce going to denounce that cult and denounce “pro-White activists” who seemingly care more about Jews than about European-derived peoples?  Both Joyce and Strom write good things about the general subject of the Jews, but when it comes to criticizing people on the (Far) Right who are slavishly pro-Jewish, they suddenly become reticent.

And then we have this nonsense:
TOQLIVE: JAMES EDWARDS HOSTS KEVIN MACDONALD: INDIVIDUALISM AND THE WESTERN LIBERAL TRADITION
What that basically is, is MacDonald going hardcore, ultra-Nordicist. And why not?  I've predicted a convergence of HBD, anti-panEuropeanism, Nordicism, etc., with the net effect of alleged anti-Semites being puppets being manipulated by the likes of Hart and Unz.  And, a per the vast majority of my other predictions, I've been proven right.  MacDonald is so hysterical in his HBD-Nordicism that he makes ludicrous comments.  One example is the Kempian talking points about complete population replacement in Rome, which is not only factually incorrect but logically inconsistent with the idea that North/South European differences have been place since the Neolithic. Another example is the idea that Southern Italy is "collectivist" while the truth is that the amoral familism there is inherently anti-collectivist - there is no sense of civic duty or ethnic loyalty or nationalism, just loyalty to smaller family units.  I wrote about that at my old Richard Lynn's Pseudoscience blog:
Amoral Familism is Not Ethnocentrism
This Afrowop defect is not the same as this.
That the HBDers are apparently unable or unwilling to distinguish amoral familism from ethnocentrism does not reflect well on their intelligence or their honesty.
Whether amoral familism is a step on the universalism-ethnocentrism spectrum, or represents an independent entity (in which case we would have at at least a triangle rather than a straight line representing the possibilities), is open to debate.
However, it should be clear that in many ways amoral familism is, practically speaking, as opposed to ethnocentrism as universalism is.  Universalism rejects ethnocentrism because it sees the ethnocentric view as too selfish and narrow, amoral familism rejects ethnocentrism because it is too broad and selfless.
For EGI, ethnocentrism is the "sweet spot," and the other two options are defects.  From the standpoint of building a civil society, amoral familism is the worst, ethnocentrism is the best in a (relatively) homogeneous state but leads to problems in multiculturalism.  Universalism allows for temporary smooth functioning in a multicultural state, but long term leads to ethnic replacement of universalists by ethnocentrists.  Universalism in a homogeneous state is not stable, since it will eventually lead to alien immigration and multiculturalism.
A moderate degree of ethnocentrism in a (relatively) homogeneous state is more optimal than the alternatives.
There is also a question of the relative hereditability of these behavioral patterns.  The more genetically influenced, the more the pattern should hold with migration and existence in multicultural societies. The two extremes of universalism and ethnocentrism may be most heritable.  Contra the HBDers, aside from a dwindling number of mobsters, Afrowops in America really don't practice amoral familism, while Jews and other Asians definitely still practice ethnocentrism. Thus, I doubt that amoral familism hereditability of these behavioral patterns.  The more genetically influenced, the more the pattern should hold with migration and existence in multicultural societies. The two extremes of universalism and ethnocentrism may be most heritable.  Contra the HBDers, aside from a dwindling number of mobsters, Afrowops in America really don't practice amoral familism, while Jews and other Asians definitely still practice ethnocentrism. Thus, I doubt that amoral familism is strongly heritable.  It seems like a very plastic behavioral phenotype.
While it may be extremely difficult to make ethnocentrics into more disinterested civic-minded people, hopefully the more universalist and ex-familistic can be "trained" to become more ethnocentric, in competition to those with an innate sense of extreme ethnocentrism.
This isn't the kind of analysis one would get from a HBDer, who instead would be pathetically groveling in front of the Altar of Asia, and worshiping a pile of yarmulkes.
HBD: the enemy of truth.
MacDonald is essentially trashing his legacy in his old age.  While it is sad to see, and unfortunate, it doesn't obligate me to pull my punches when I comment on such mendacity.

Trump’s campaign antagonism toward the military and intelligence world was at best a millimeter thick. Like almost everything else he said as a candidate, it was a gimmick, designed to get votes. That he was insincere and full of it…
But, hey, according to Greg Johnson, Trump’s sincere, a man of genuine greatness, who could have won with Jeb Bush’s political views.  Even Trump himself refutes the latter, as chronicled at this site.  But Johnson continuously insists otherwise. Is that rent-seeking behavior?  Is Johnson using the Counter-Currents platform to gaslight his readers in order to safeguard his own reputation and the flow of “D’Nations?”

Not a bad Zman essay…particularly as it repeats points made here years ago.

After all, she’s of great benefit to all humanity. Why would anyone think otherwise?  How dare you!  In all seriousness, the positive attitude of Der Movement to that obviously unbalanced little Ladogan is truly tragicomic and pathetic. It is also confirmation of the validity of my criticism of Der Movement.


Hey!  Giovanni Gentile had that Ray Luca-John Gotti-Judge Napolitano puffed up hairstyle.  It’s in the blood, apparently.

Thursday, October 17, 2019

Algis Budrys and the Question of Identity

Algis Budrys.

Lithuanian-American science fiction author Algis Budrys emphasized the question of identity, featured in his three major works: Who?Rogue Moon, and Michaelmas.

Read this.  What this summary doesn’t explicitly state about Rogue Moon is that the “matter-transmitter” makes the copies by scanning the person’s original body and coding the information – a process that completely destroys the original body (the copies are reconstituted from any available matter). Thus, there is a question of identity: Hawks insists that the copies are NOT the original, despite being biological duplicates and sharing the memories of the original.  And when Barker and Hawks (copies of the originals) both travel to the moon (via the "matter-transmitter") and survive the artifact, Hawks insists that they can never go back to Earth, because their duplicates (also copies of the originals) are already there, living their own lives. This moon version of Hawks kills himself after stating this, by walking away and letting his air run out; the Earth version of Hawks continues his life (although he is a copy of the original Hawks, and bitterly cognizant of that fact; the Earth copy of Barker, by contrast, could care less).  For a somewhat similar theme, see this Outer Limits episode.

The question of identity in Who? Is obvious and at one point, when nothing is left to be done, Rogers asks the man in question point-blank: “Martino, are you Martino?” The answer he gets back is a simple “no” – even though (spoiler alert!) we find out at the end that it really is Martino. After everything that has happened to him, his sense of self, his identity, has been erased.

In Michaelmas - which unfortunately contains snide attacks against “xenophobic populism” – the question of identity is also considered, as it involves copying individuals as well.

Issues of identity are of course of interest to us, so these works may be useful reading. Indeed, regardless of Budrys' politics, his work clearly suggests that identity - sense of self - depends upon the authenticity and integrity of physical being. That is certainly compatible with a racialist worldview; hence, these works are of value from that perspective.

Wednesday, October 16, 2019

All Part of the West, Even Though Different

Important Western Destiny essay.


That is a clarification of my pan-European focus, inspired by a nine word phrase found near the end of Yockey's masterpiece Imperium.

The power of Yockey's writing is such that he conveyed in only nine words an idea that it typically takes me an entire essay to articulate. 

Tuesday, October 15, 2019

Odds and Ends, 10/15/19

And the jackass Zman.




Italianthro is gone.  Was he intimidated by Greta Thunberg?

Fighting predatory, invasive, non-native species.  Good idea.  Let’s talk immigration.

I agree with dat dere Rienzi guy.

Jim Colosimo – “swarthy animal magnetism” – Der Afrowop.


More Zman:
I had an early flight out of Copenhagen back to Lagos, so I did the sensible thing…
For a Type I Alt righter
…and went out with the conference goers until the early hours…
Beavis and Butthead snigger.
…We have a lot of South Asians, who are not big on daily bathing. There’s usually one on the plane, so be prepared for it. On one trip, I saw one so ripe that the flight crew hung an air freshener on the seat backs…
The South Asian special – body odor mixed with cheap cologne.  A hallway or stairwell will stink of that for, literally, hours after one of the cogelites walk by. It is difficult to restrain from vomiting. Experto crede.
…started to think about those people living in the Roman Empire wondering why the water no longer comes from the big stone thingy anymore. 
Because invading Germans wrecked them?
Some may have remembered their ancestors working on them for some reason, but they no longer recall why. 
What bullshit.  When the water stopped running, it was because the city was sacked by, and later mismanaged by, the Holy Ones.
The people who knew how and why those aqueducts worked were long gone. No one was around who could figure out how to make them work again, because they lacked the capacity to do it.
Absolute, raging bullshit.  The water stopped flowing after the fall of the empire. Who was running the show then?  Maybe folks who never built aqueducts in the first place. Odoacer: “What’s that big stone thingy?  Can my horse drink out of it?” Hey, Zman, take your Kempian lies back to “Lagos.” By the way, the “Lagos” joke is so stale by now it’s starting to stink like one of Zman's South Asians.
I got into Montreal looking forward to some lunch. I had a good long nap and my olfactory receptors were cleansed of Mr. Bong’s stink, by the waves of perfume from the shopping area passengers are now forced to endure at airports. Everyone is forced through a shopping zone now, as they want to make sure you are always ready to consume next product. As a result, airports now smell like the dressing room of a strip club…
Zman knows how they smell.  Interesting.
Normally, when you connect on an international trip, you just walk to the next gate and maybe you have to go through passport control. In Montreal, I had to go through customs, then security and then passport control again. It was a slow mess...
But I thought all of the excess bureaucracy in Europe was because of the EU. You mean, it is in Canada as well?
I finally made it back to Lagos with a collection of great memories of a wonderful time with friends in the European scene. Frodi is a great host and wonderful person.  I’m thankful for having got to know him and now count him as a friend…
But he can’t understand a simple concept even when explained to him repeatedly over a period of months.  Well, he works with Counter-Currents....

Monday, October 14, 2019

Agreeing with Zman for Once

Some points (emphasis added).

I’m usually highly critical of Zman, but this piece is fairly good, particularly as some of his comments overlap with some things I’ve written about in the past.  A few comments:
That is a bit of an exaggeration, but the point is to give Antifa as little time as possible to organize a riot. It works pretty well, but not this year. They were onto the location just as the doors opened. 
What does that tell you?  That the group in question has been infiltrated.  That the Left knew all about your precautions and set-up, probably because all of the “extreme vetting” failed once again.  Operational security is a fatal flaw in Der Movement; and that applies to Europe as well as America. Remember Steadman?
As we see in the States, Antifa in Denmark enjoys broad police protection. 
And who votes into power the politicians that enable this?
This is an old topic I have been debating with Fróði for months…I’ve tried to explain this to them, but they don’t get it
OK, if they cannot understand a simple concept after months of debate (months!), then that doesn’t reflect well on their intelligence or common sense.
It also ties into another topic that is popular at dissident conferences and came up in this one during Q&A. In America, dissident politics tends to attract losers and weirdos, who have nothing to lose. They don’t care about being outed, because no one cares enough about them to bother. In order to attract high quality people, we have to deal with their fear of doxing. Allowing guys to stay anonymous is a part of doing business in American politics now. That’s not the case in Europe.
This is exactly the point I’ve been making for years now.  Defeating social pricing is a key for success for American activism.  We need POPA, among other things.
Another thing that is different in Europe from the US is the dissident movements spring from different roots. In Europe, the guys you see organizing came out of hard right party politics and the underground scene. Collett was in the British National Party, which is a fascist party, for the most part. Fróði got into politics through the far-right Scandinavian subculture and from reading people like William Pierce. Over time, their views moderated and changed in the face of multiculturalism and immigration.
That’s why they are more successful.
In America, most dissidents came through libertarianism…
That’s why American “activism” is pathetic joke – or one reason at least.
It is an interesting contrast, in that the Euros are trying to clean up their act, while the Americans are trying to dirty up their act. For example, Collett, who is a reformed drinker, is intolerant of alcohol and drugs in his organization. He is relentless in his demand for making the right presentation. He talks about health and fitness, personal grooming and how to properly approach people on politics. In America, dissidents are always on guard for cucking, to the point of distraction.
Yes, Zman, but that wasn’t always the case.  In WN 1.0, people like Pierce preached much of what Collett says. It is only with your vaunted WN 2.0, the Beavis-and-Butthead WN of the Alt Right, that we have the “dirtying up.”
All-in-all it was a good time. There are things Americans can learn from the Euros, particularly when it comes to organizing. It’s always good to socialize with people who understand the issues. A big part of the dissident project is community building and that can only happen with in-person events. No matter what comes next, the people to come out the other end in the best shape will be those who have the community strength to handle whatever comes. When the crisis comes, we have to be ready for it.
I agree about community building. The problem is that it is very difficult, if not impossible in America, due to the social pricing problems alluded to by Zman, the high degree of defectives in the “movement,” the incompetent organizing and consequent ease of infiltration, and the bad behavior tolerated at meetings (e.g., the Pilleater Chronicles).

Sunday, October 13, 2019

Racial Recapitulation Theory Revisited

Do aging human phenotypes recapitulate ancestry?

I previously posted about this idea; please read it here. However, revisiting it is not only useful for newer readers, but every iteration of the idea expands and extends the analysis, allows for more ideas to come forth, more hypotheses to be tested, and more possibilities to be discussed and evaluated.

Read this about recapitulation theory:
The theory of recapitulation, also called the biogenetic law or embryological parallelism—often expressed using Ernst Haeckel's phrase "ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny"—is a historical hypothesis that the development of the embryo of an animal, from fertilization to gestation or hatching (ontogeny), goes through stages resembling or representing successive adult stages in the evolution of the animal's remote ancestors (phylogeny). 
The idea of this post is this: Aging human phenotypes recapitulate ancestry.  In other words, as people age, their physical appearance (and perhaps other phenotypic markers including behavior) tend to reflect to greater or lesser degrees certain aspects of their ethnoracial ancestry.

Imagine a Greek-Danish hybrid.  Perhaps they look (and act?) “more Greek” when younger and “more Danish” when older.

Mono-ethnic individuals can display such trends; after all, modern ethnies are derived from mixtures of older stocks.

Here is a young Benito Mussolini, who looks remarkably like the Mexican General Mapache from The Wild Bunch, Mapache with obvious Amerind ancestry.

We can compare that to pictures of the Duce taken in later years:





Mussolini obviously looked more typically European as he aged.

This phenomenon may be restricted to just physical appearance, or, more interestingly, behavioral changes may track with appearance over time (see below), associated with phenotypes reflecting ancestral stocks. An individual may be a greasy, undisciplined southerner as a youth and a restrained, more gracile northerner in older age.

Does this tracking of ancestral phenotypes with aging follow a specific direction as does the ontology-phylogeny association (in that case toward greater evolved complexity and toward the final form of the organism)?  

In Mussolini’s case you can say that the direction was toward a more gracile and “northern” phenotype (but not by much, truth be told), although the coarseness of aging to a large extent counteracts any racial gracilization that occurs (perhaps this is why it is “not by much”), or from Mediterranid to Alpinid, or, perhaps more properly speaking, from East Mediterranean/Levantine toward a more West Mediterranean/Central European focus.  

That may be a specific case and not generalizable, or it may reflect some underlying trends, at least for some Europeans, as well as for people of part European descent (such as Ted Williams).  Here we see a young Ted Williams, who looks ready for a zoot suit riot; on the other hand, a John Wayne-esque older Ted Williams reflects more of his paternal heritage. Williams was of mixed British Isles (Welsh, Irish) and (diverse) Mexican ancestry.  

Getting back to Europeans - Mussolini was Northern Italian. What about a Southern Italian? A young Joe DiMaggio (Sicilian ancestry) looks like a S. Italian zip; an older Joe DiMaggio looks like a N. Italian banker. All anecdotal evidence to be sure; but provocative nevertheless.  A wholly Northern European celebrity?  Perhaps Sean Connery would be instructive here?

Does the same hold for unmixed non-Europeans?  Who knows?  Does it require some threshold level of different underlying ancestries and, if so, how far back?  Racial purity in the absolute sense it a myth, and, once again considering Europe, if you can far back enough all Europeans are mixes of different tribes or proportions of Hunter-Gatherer, Neolithic Farmer, Steppe, and other elements. In a case of someone of perhaps less “recent” “admixture” would they recapitulate their proportions of those ancient ancestral source populations?  These are all fruitful questions for more study. 

Individuals of mixed race, crosses of different continental population groups, would be expected to show similar patterns of phenotypic change with age.

What could be possible mechanisms for this phenomenon?  Epigenetic changes with age? Hormonal changes with age, affecting gene expression (including by epigenetic effects)? Are there timed sequences of gene expression “cassettes” activated by some mechanism (including those just mentioned) that activate different phenotypic profiles at different ages.

Also, we can ask whether this phenomenon is just an emergent property of the complexities of gene expression from mixed ancestry, or whether there is some sort of selective pressure at work. Is reproductive success at younger ages emphasized by a less gracile, more “southern,” more r-selected type phenotype, and then, with increasing age, and the need to provide for family, to be a stable provider, to increase fitness of grandchildren and the extended family, and/or group selective mechanisms for prudent group activity, older people expresses a more k-selected, gracile, restrained, “northern” phenotype?

Does this imply that behavioral changes accompany the changes in physical appearance? The impetuous energetic youth looking more like a greasy swarthoid, and the same individual in a more prudent old age, looking more like the centroid of the European phenotypic range (for Europeans)?

No doubt, we can find pictures of people who look less racially gracile with age.  So, for the theory in its broadest sense, phenotypic change with age is key, not necessarily becoming more racially gracile with age. It may not even be a matter of a unidirectional trend – toward either greater or lesser racial gracility with age. One could imagine a situation where a person, at different stages of their life, reflects different aspects of their ancestry in their phenotype, possibly fluctuating back and forth between different degrees of racial gracility. 

How long does it take for these changes to occur?  Decades would certainly be enough time.  But less than a decade? Years?  I would think that changes may not be so noticeable for periods less than ten years.

Saturday, October 12, 2019

They’re Lying to You

Can’t get their stories straight.

From a previous post, we remember this nonsense.

Now, here’s a key part:
There is a right-sizing to assimilating and naturalizing other peoples. Rome did well with assimilating Europeans with Indo-European/Early Farmer genetic stock, had more problems when it came to Indo-European/Western Hunter Gatherers from the north, and they didn’t assimilate Jews at all.
The implications of that is that the Romans (and other European peoples they assimilated well; for example, the other peoples that were located in what today is Italy, as well as the Greeks) were predominantly “Early European Farmer,” and these peoples were distinct from the more problematical northerners who were predominantly “Western Hunter Gatherer” (with low levels of “Indo-European” in both). This is consistent with the idea of the HBD-Nordicists of a North-South European difference in place dating back thousands of years, since the Neolithic.

Ahh…but the mainstream Nordicists of Der Movement, the Kempian Nordicists, have long told us that the ancient peoples of the Mediterranean – Romans, Greeks, etc. – were Nordic.  The original Roman stock were akin to Dolph Lundgren in a toga.  Except, now, the HBD-Nordicists say, well, that’s not the case, the folks in the togas were “Early Farmers” and the Dolph Lundgrens were “Western Hunter Gatherers.”  No, no, a thousand times, no!  What would Arthur Kemp, David Duke, and Ash Donaldson say?  Blasphemy!  March of the Titans!  Pierce weeps!  Who We Are!  

Taking all of these fetishists as a whole – and they should be taken as a whole since they post on the same blogs and are in fundamental agreement on most things and won’t even openly acknowledge the contradiction outlined above – we can see that they cannot get their story straight.  And when folks cannot get their story straight, what does that tell you? That they are LYING to you. Der Movement has been openly lying to you about race for many decades. Lie after lie after lie and now they cannot keep their lies straight, so they practice cognitive dissonance and pretend that their views are not internally inconsistent. Assuming that they are not so stupid (or deluded by blind fanatical dogmatic faith in their fetishistic belief systems) that they cannot realize the contradiction, then they must hold you in utter contempt, assuming that you won’t notice it (to be fair to them, most “activists” actually do not notice it).

Also note how this guy uses the term “Early Farmer” while the correct term used in the literature is “Early European Farmer” – have to delegitimize the "European bonafides" of that group, eh?  Wipe that sweat off your forehead, fetishist.
Sweden’s native population contains the most Western Hunter Gatherer DNA, and Sicily’s people have the most Early Farmer genetic material. Sweden’s population is highly individualistic, but operates with a societal consensus, while Sicily has strong families but little cooperation at the societal level.
Gee, you think that the long history of invasion and foreign domination in Sicily may have something to do with it as well?  Also, there is my theory of genetic heterogeneity, which builds upon the observation that diversity decreases the willingness to invest in collective social goods. This may hold true even in certain mono-ethnic societies, if the ethnies in question possess significant genetic heterogeneity, which is processed by members of that society through the proxy of phenotypic heterogeneity. The more different members of an ethny seem to each other, the less their willingness to invest in the broader society, and the greater the urge to invest in more “safe” concentrations of genetic interest, such as the family. Southern Europe has greater genetic heterogeneity than the North. Of course, ethnocentrism may play a role as well; although the North is more homogeneous, there are still some Bromstad/Bjork types there, who apparently do not trigger any anti-collective urges.  It is no doubt complex.
I believe that this Jewish ability to hijack altruistic punishment is unstable and only temporary. It is clear to this author that the single largest ethnic conflict in American history is that between Yankees and Jews. So far, the Jews have practiced aggression against the Yankee without receiving any response, but this situation will not continue indefinitely. People will always eventually respond to attacks.
Completely insane delusion.  Actually, according to the Lind thesis of American politics, the “Yankees” have been the most important and enthusiastic allies of the Jews in the destruction of America, and the unleashing of the Black/Brown plague on middle class and working class White Americans.  No, the single largest ethnic conflict is that of the Jewish-Yankee-Negro alliance vs. the White Southerner-White ethnic alliance, precisely what Lind outlined.  “Movement” heroes like John Lindsay, Hubert Humphrey, Elizabeth Warren, and Greta Thunberg are clearly on the side of Jewish interests, and all the sweaty fetishism and padded cell delusions can’t change that fact.

Stop lying, liars.

And if these guys truly believe that these differences between Europeans are so important, and if they will be honest enough to acknowledge the failures of the WHG-enriched “movement leadership,” why don’t they consider that it may be useful to get at least some input and leadership from more EEF-enriched individuals?  Perhaps some new perspectives would be useful?  But no. They’d rather reinforce their monopoly than let others have a hand in the endeavor.


Yeah…let’s not disguise it.  First, all these types were foaming at the mouth that Trump the “God Emperor" was “the last chance for White America” back when I was openly calling Trump a race cuck and a buffoon and when Strom was telling you not to believe Trump. Second, and infinitely worse, Greg Johnson is STILL saying that Trump was/is “sincere” and is a “man of genuine greatness.”  That’s your WHG-enriched “leadership.” Apparently, “social cohesion” is built by being painfully naïve, being wrong all of the time, and/or gaslighting readers in an attempt to avoid accountability for your endless failures and monumental errors of judgment.


Friday, October 11, 2019

Thanks, Assholes!

Hypocrisy and sweaty fetishism...it's just another day in Der Movement.

Until guys like Johnson take responsibility for these events, due to their history of constant failure and tragicomic ineptness, making activists desperate enough to lash out, I really am not interested in their cookie-cutter, intellectually lazy form letter style of disavowals and explanations. To quote – thanks, assholes.

An excellent comment (emphasis added):
Occident
Posted October 10, 2019 at 9:57 am | Permalink
This reminds me of an article I recently read that mounted an impassioned philosophical argument against pedophilia….quoting actual philosophers and stuff!! Because pedophiles are so susceptible to dialectical Hegelian logic, right? It’s gonna work. It’s gotta work!
Same thing here. We’re gonna have a civil and rational counter-hegemonic discourse with POC about a peaceful racial divorce? The author must not have much real-world experience with POC. The one thing that they absolutely must have in order to survive is access to White wealth and civilization. Separated from Whites, not one in twenty would be alive after three months. And they know it. And they hate both themselves and us for it. Attempt all the rational discourse you want. You may as well make faces at the Sphinx. As soon as they figure out we would like to stop subsidizing them, they will go apeshit. And POC sure as hell don’t give (and have never given) a single f-k about the doings of their own, especially jews, they revolutionaries that bombed Brits in encyclopedias and books of great importance.
Moreover, not a single revolution in history, in the magnitude you envision (massive racial separation and the gain (or loss) of a dominant status in the society as a group) has happened peacefully. Name just one, I’m waiting. And while you try to figure out some vague example, I’ll name Israel and almost every European nation-state post WWI that has achieved their goals with it.
All you propose is pearl clutching and pointless discourse that has failed in USA for almost a hundred years now, HUNDRED, and you keep on beating around the same bush.
More evidence for the Nordicist-ethnonationalist-HBDer alliance. Yet even more evidence. We’re headed in the direction where the morons of Der Movement will be manipulated from behind the scenes by the likes of Hart, Weissberg, Levin, and Unz.  Again – thanks, assholes.  

By the way, when are these hypocrites going to reconcile their heavy breathing over these “eternal lines” dating from the Neolithic with their fantasies of a Nordic Ancient Mediterranean later replaced by other peoples?  Hey, as long as the two sets of sweaty fetishism are in separate articles written by different people – and preferably not posted on the same day – then we’re all good!

Zman:
According to official statistics, 20% of the population of Sweden is now foreign born, but that is not the whole story. According to more sober minded estimates, the demographic replacement is advancing quickly. Like America, the white population will be a minority by mid-century or sooner. In that regard, it will no longer be Sweden. Why the rulers of Sweden decided to suicide their people in this way boggles the mind. America, can at least blame slavery. The Swedes can only blame themselves…
That must be from all that Western Hunter Gatherer social cohesion….destroying your nation in a very cohesive, a socially cohesive, manner.  And when that gets boring, take a boat out to the Mediterranean and start destroying other people’s nations as well.  

Brandon/Brendon and Pilleater will be the role models for this mentoring.  Remember, those who support Counter-Currents (with “D’Nations” of course), live in the Golden Age today!

Wednesday, October 9, 2019

Odds and Ends, 10/9/19

In all cases, emphasis added.

Even a stopped clock is right twice a day: 
In reality, people in marketing are mostly shiftless sociopaths
After the war, he developed a successful career in journalism and advertising.
You see, I don't always disagree with Zman.

Never forget, the subhuman slime Donald "sincere man of genuine greatness" Trump refuses to act against Antifa (although he's monitoring the situation...very closely), while, at the same time, his DOJ persecutes his own supporters who are victims of Antifa. The incident linked to above took place in Canada, but of course worse has been occurring, with regularity, in America.

While I am sometimes critical of Andrew Joyce, in general I agree with him more often than not. In fact, he is one of the best and most articulate anti-Johnsonian voices in Der Movement.  In the following, he needles the petty nationalist ethnonationalists, and exposes as a lie the ethnonationalist fraud that asserts that the UK is beset by immigration only because it is part of "the pan-European EU" - 
I must make myself clear. I am ambiguous about the actual meaning of Brexit. I firmly believe that the day after Brexit there will be violence in the streets, chaos in hospitals, resources and infrastructure will be stretched to breaking point, and government will be totally ineffective. Britain will be a disaster. But this will also be the case the day before Brexit, just as it has been the case in Britain ever since the multicultural project was embarked upon. Britain’s most pressing crisis has little or nothing to do with a series of transnational treaties binding it to other European member states. Britain has already imbibed the most potent of toxins, globalism and multiculturalism, and these toxins will remain in the system with or without supervision or government from Brussels. My point is that Brexit will not cure Britain of any of its ills. It will not stop or slow immigration, it will not halt cultural decline or the march of Cultural Marxism, it will not stop Britain being ruled by elites far removed from the life and environment of the everyday Briton. More than a departure from European bureaucracy, Britain needs a new departure from itself.
The ethno-nationalist looks at the Brexit debate and what does he see? He sees a choice between the migrant-welcoming EU globalist behemoth and … what? For a start, he sees “the most ethnically diverse” British government in history, led by a Prime Minister whose first act in office was to rule out setting any limits on the numbers of immigrants flooding Britain. This places Brexit voters in something of a quandary because the primary motivation for the Brexit vote was concern about immigration (see the excellent research of University of Kent’s Matthew Goodwin). What they are now faced with is a Brexit that won’t do anything to change immigration other than reduce the numbers of Poles and increase the numbers of Indians, Pakistanis and others from the Third World.

Tuesday, October 8, 2019

Trump and Johnson,10/8/19

Frauds and buffoons.

Many people on the Dissident Right voice the opinion that Donald Trump needs to lose in 2020. Trump didn’t build the Wall, he didn’t reduce immigration, he bows before Israel, he passed terrible criminal justice reform, he hasn’t dealt with tech censorship, he shows no concern for persecuted Rightists, he may go to war with Iran, he can’t stop posting cringe, and so on and so forth.
But he’s a man of genuine greatness, and don’t you forget it!
If you think censorship and deplatforming are bad now, just wait until the state pushes it under President Elizabeth Warren. 
Cue Counter-Currents articles telling us that we need more women like Elizabeth Warren and Durocher in The Unz Review telling us that Warren is of great benefit for all humanity.
The “Alt Right” became a major phenomenon due to Trump. 
Hey!  I thought it was the other way around? Didn’t the WN 2.0 heroes of the Alt Right “meme Trump into the Presidency?”
Dissident Right publications and organizations had existed for years prior to Trump, but few paid attention to them. 
Unlike now, right?
Journalists and politicians started talking about us when we provided an intellectual basis and online support network to Trumpism. Thousands of people came over to our ideas due to this association. Much of this attention was given in an attempt to derail Trump, but it had the unintended effect of empowering the Dissident Right and making us grow exponentially. We were able to punch above our weight with memetic warfare and by offering online support to the Trump campaign.
Delusion.
The “Trump must lose” crowd insist that censorship is worse under Trump than it ever was under Barack Obama. That’s undoubtedly true, but they forget that it’s increased with the aim of derailing the Trump phenomenon. The President isn’t the one pushing the censorship…
He’s just doing nothing about it.
…it’s major corporations and journalists who want to ensure that Trump is not allowed to enact a nationalist program…
Trump's nationalist program: Insane delusion.
…and moreover that America never again elects a nationalist. 
Again?  AGAIN?  Counter-Currents is the sewer of WN.
Liberal elites want us silenced because they see us as a threat and acknowledge that our memes helped Trump win.
Oh, there it is. The grand lie of the Alt Right.
The troubles we currently face are our growing pains as a dissident movement. 
Having an incompetent affirmative action leadership of freaks, perverts, morons, and grifters has nothing to do with it, no sir!
Arguably, the best reason to want Trump to win reelection is the persecution issue. It’s true that Trump hasn’t done enough on this issue. 
You think?
Big Tech continues to ban his own supporters and suffer no consequences, even though the President could use his executive powers to hit back. His Department of Justice has also unjustly pursued Right-wingers, such as the Rise Above Movement (RAM), while doing little about the antifa.
But he’s sincere, I tell ya, sincere in his genuine greatness.
You may think this is bad, but it would get a hell of a lot worse under a Democrat. A Democratic president would likely pressure tech companies and banks to deny all service to suspected “White Nationalists.” Association with the Dissident Right could result in the loss of your gun rights under a Democratic president’s new red flag laws. The Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security would be ordered to make White Nationalism their primary target, and investigate and prosecute many non-violent identitarians.
Note to retard.  Even if all this is true - guess what?  Trump can only get re-elected once, never mind that he’s old and decrepit.  You are going to get a Democrat (or, less likely, an equally bad Neocon Republican) in 2024 if not 2020.  Are you prepared?  What will you do with four more years of Trump?  More drunken podcasts?  More feuding?  More infiltrated meetings?  More homosexual harassment of flabby bisexual activists?  More grifting for “D’Nations?”
Not only will the persecution not turn us into martyrs in the eyes of white America, but we won’t have access to the platforms we need to spread our message. 
He just said no one is interested in us or our plight, but, by golly, we need dem dere platforms to spread our message!  Send in money to Counter-Currents!  Remember, those who give live in the Golden Age today!
The Rightists who want a Democratic administration the most will be the first to lose their social media accounts and domain hosting. Nobody can hear your message if you’re offline.
Oh, don’t we know that under Trump.
The only person who might possibly put a stop to tech censorship and bias is Trump. 
Delusion.
He has made it clear that he wants to protect online speech and punish tech giants.
Yes, he’s looking into it. He’s looking at it very closely. In fact, he might even tweet about it.
 A Republican-sponsored bill exists in the Senate that would target Big Tech’s special immunities and require tech giants to prove that they operate as neutral political forums. If the Republicans win in 2020, they might pass it. 
Why didn’t they do it 2016-2018?
Even if you believe that Trump is a total failure, it’s undeniable that he’s the only hope against tech tyranny.
He’s a total failure, but he’ll be successful against Big Tech.
Our movement’s main objectives should be to build communities and institutions. 
And to support Greg Johnson’s lifestyle.
A Democratic administration will make those objectives harder to achieve; a second Trump term at least offers the hope that we will gain federal protection. 
Federal protection!  Counter-Currents – meet padded cell.
A 2020 GOP win should be hoped for solely for this reason. It goes without saying that no Democrat will stand up for our rights.
Rightists who want Trump to lose believe that it would send a message: Trump has failed us so badly that he must be punished at the polls. If you cuck, you lose elections. The problem with this view is that the people who make this argument don’t have a large real-world constituency. There are no Dissident Right organizations of any significant size. 
Whose fault is that? Oh, that’s right, the Quota Queens.
Further, they can’t host events, can’t establish institutions, and in many cases they can’t even get along with other people in the same circles…
Doesn’t that very precisely describe Greg Johnson?
Yet, in their minds, they somehow influence the choices of large numbers of voters. This is a fantasy. 
Oh yes. Pot meet kettle.
There are probably a few thousand wignats, at most, and they are spread out all over the country – too sparsely to make a difference even in the battleground states. Moreover, nobody wants to be associated with our milieu. Republicans have won lots of elections without courting the National Socialist Movement’s votes; why will 2020 be any different?
That paragraph is completely inconsistent with everything else this shallow, juvenile retard wrote in all of the text that preceded it.
Over ninety percent of Republicans approve of Donald Trump – one of the highest numbers in the party’s history. There are no real cracks in his coalition apart from among white suburbanites – a demographic which does not get its news from Gab. If Trump loses, the message the party will take away is that he lost because he was too racist, not because he was too cucked. The party establishment is eager to return to the pre-Trump days and pass an immigration amnesty. Plenty of Republican politicians are more than ready to condemn Trump and his platform if he loses. They will return to the days of George W. Bush and Mitt Romney, and double down on ethnomasochism, neoconservative foreign policy, and economic buffoonery. The GOP will be far worse in a post-Trump landscape.
As I said, what happens in 2024, you short-sighted buffoon?
Ironically, given the wignats’ kneejerk hatred for the man, the only person who could effectively fight back against renewed GOP cuckery is Trump himself. In the event of a loss, he’s likely to return to his 2016 self and blame the party’s establishment. He will insist that he was right about immigration, foreign policy, and trade from the beginning, and push for the party to remain true to his America First promises. Trump would make it his life’s mission to uphold the righteousness of his campaign agenda and attack any who besmirch it. He will still have most of the party’s loyalty, and Republicans will not have the luxury of ignoring him. He’s not just gonna disappear into Mar-a-Lago if he loses. 
No, he’ll be in prison.
It won’t be the end of the world if Trump loses, and we will adjust to the new circumstances if that occurs. 
Which invalidates the entire essay.
The Dissident Right simply needs to realize that our fortunes are tied to Trump’s, and we would be weaker without him. 
Raving madness.
Yes, he has done a lousy job of turning our ideas into policy, but no American in recent decades has done more to advance them metapolitically. 
Sure!  Kanye West and Kim Kardashian make policy, so it’s a metapolitical win!
Immigration restriction, non-interventionism, and economic protectionism are all now part of the Republican mainstream thanks to Trump. More Americans than ever agree with the Dissident Right, and that number will continue to grow if he wins reelection. 
They all agree, but, at the same time, they are completely uninterested in us and our plight.  
The Republican Party will further adapt itself to Trump’s 2016 campaign message, and neocons and libertarians will feel even more unwelcome in the party.
They can always join the Alt Right.
If you don’t buy that, you should at least understand that Trump and the Republicans are the only ones who will not unleash the full force of the state against us. 
Sure!  Ask RAM!
We might still deal with tech censorship and deplatforming under President Trump; we never will with a Democrat.
Huh?
Trump may be too cringey for some to bear, but he’s our only option in 2020. We lose much and gain nothing if he loses.
Didn’t Johnson write that a Trump loss was 100% certain?  If so, what’s the purpose of this essay?

Experto crede does not apply here:
Greg Johnson

Posted October 4, 2019 at 2:31 pm | Permalink
The movie is a text. If you want to assume that certain details are just meaningless accidents, that atrikes me as a lazy way to interpret it. There is obviously aomething wrong in this marriage. So yes, I am going with the idea that two healthy people with one seven-year-child have something aberrent in their marriage. Maybe liberalism is that aberration. But I am going with marital problems.
Thus speaks the expert on male-female heterosexual relationships and marriage.  Can he become any more of a buffoon?  And he’s getting so excited over this he can’t distinguish “a” from “s” on the computer keyboard.


He’s a man of genuine greatness!

See this.  Zman, being a rather limited commentator, doesn’t bring the discussion to its natural conclusion – once America as a whole dives below 50% White, it is finished.  China has to only wait.  By then, the Chinese will probably be developed enough, overall, so that their internal consumption can provide the demand for their productive capacity, thus maintaining their economy.  A future America, as described, probably won’t have much of a demand for anything except basketballs, bananas, and tacos.

Your disgusting face is an aberration, you Levantine freak.  Contra the HBDers, Ginsburg’s entire ethny has a genetic load that makes Adam Pearson look like the Overman.

Speaking of the HuWhite folk.  An excellent Strom podcast/essay – albeit disturbing and disgusting.  One wonders if the online post that started the “fetish”- or at least the explosion of interest – was genuine, or planted by the usual Levantine suspects in order to trigger sicker self-destruction from parasite-infected Whites. Indeed, one wonders how many “spontaneous” self-destructive fads and fetishes are being planted, intentionally and with malice aforethought, to target Whites, particularly young Whites, with harmful memes. But, hey, the parasites are HuWhite, so it’s all A-OK! Let’s all write some more articles for Unz (question – are those contributions paid?) and it’s all good!  

Kevin, when are you going to initiate a full-throated attack on the Judeophilic HBD cult?