Tuesday, July 23, 2019

Donald Trump and Greg Johnson

A tale of two hypocrites.

Ted Cruz is an infinitely better man that the walking pile of feces Antifa Don Trump.

Since literally the first day of President Trump’s term, the federal government has done very little to prevent leftist political violence. Now, there are attacks on law enforcement officials, cheered on by a nationwide network. What did the DOJ think would happen after years of tolerating lawlessness?
A government is the monopoly of force within a territory. If President Trump’s DOJ refuses at least to investigate antifa in the wake of Van Spronson’s attack, it has ceded that monopoly. Already, President Trump has proven himself unable or unwilling to enforce America’s immigration laws. Now, he seems indifferent to attacks on public servants. Rather than tweeting, he should act. Tolerate political violence and it will escalate. This attack is surely a harbinger of more. If President Trump won’t defend immigration law enforcement officials, they won’t defend America.
The Trump administration has not installed a single mile of new wall in a previously fenceless part of the U.S.-Mexico border in the 30 months since President Trump assumed office, despite his campaign promise to construct a “big beautiful wall.”
Roissy is back online.  Is he going to be man enough to admit how majestically wrong he’s been about Fat Donnie?

This here may be one of the most hypocritical and dishonest things Johnson has ever written. Yes, principles are more important than people, so even though HBDers themselves expose Rushton as a fraud and a hypocrite, Johnson defends him because he was his “friend.”
Now let’s apply this analysis to the question of how White Nationalists should approach the Trump question. Consider, for instance, Trump’s tweets inviting an America-hating Muslim, Somali-born Representative Ilhan Omar, to go back to her home country.
The broad-minded approach is to use this controversy to talk about ideas. 
I agree. I talk about the idea that Der Movement is an utter failure, as exemplified by its repeated Man on White Horse humiliations, and Trump is an excellent example to use to illustrate this point to the rank-and file.
The small-minded approach is to use this controversy to talk about people. For instance, Richard Spencer appeared briefly on CNN. Instead of talking about the issues raised by this debate…
And so Johnson hypocritically uses the CNN controversy to once again personally bash Spencer.  Calm down Greg and think about someone else for a moment.
The basic Spencer code is to denigrate his natural base while preening as big-brained…
Unlike Johnson, of course.
 …and grandstanding to the Left. A comic genius described it as glitter bombing. Sadly, it doesn’t leave much time to talk about ideas.
Such as the idea of endlessly obsessing over Richard Spencer.
It does not occur to them that nobody need support Trump the man—in part or in toto—to use him as an occasion to defend good ideas and attack bad ones.
Attacking bad ideas – like the Man on White Horse Syndrome or Der Movement’s ethnic affirmative action policy, both of are relevant to the author of the piece I am now critiquing.
And if Trump is only an occasion to enter the battle of ideas, then it does not matter if he means what he says, or whether he will follow through with his proposals. Obviously, we’d like Trump to be a sincere and effective advocate for pro-white policies. 
But if that is our constituency, then our movement has no future.
It doesn’t have a future.
Those who are playing a long game…
Snug in their hobbit hole.
…recognize that the nearly 60 million white Americans who voted for Donald Trump are the natural constituency for National Populism in America. The most important thing is to uphold the right principles and communicate them to the National Populist electorate that Trump has created and is increasingly disappointing and frustrating. When Trump is gone, it is our job to lead them. 
These guys can’t even lead a tiny “movement” but they will lead “nearly 60 million white Americans” to victory.
But we cannot lead them if we do not connect with them. And we cannot connect with them if we go out of our way to alienate them.
Yes, you will connect with them, and not alienate them, by running hyper-Nordicist screeds by the likes of Ash Donaldson, combined with other esoteric content of Counter-Currents. I thought Counter-Currents was aimed at the “high-IQ crowd” and not to “the nearly 60 million white Americans who voted for Donald Trump?”  
As far as White Nationalists were concerned, this was never just about Trump. It was always about advancing our ideas. 
Trump was always just an occasion for White Nationalists to enter the political debate. 
And they didn’t do it. Instead, they engaged in MAGA Pepe Kek hysteria, did Unite the Right, engaged in catty feuds, panhandled for "D'Nations," and did navel-gazing podcasts.
He smashed the Republican gentleman’s agreement never to talk about whether global trade and non-white immigration are good for America. It was truly magnificent.
Yes, talk about “big hands” combined with total ignorance during debates was truly magnificent.
Trump asked the right questions…
Such as “where is the nearest MacDonald’s?”
…but at best, his answers were half-measures, and half-implemented half-measures are not the solutions Americans need. They are not what his electorate is increasingly clamoring for. But that too is an opportunity for us.
An opportunity to endorse Any Eggroll. No, wait, Princess Tulsi Coconut, no wait….
I think some of the spoiled child reactions to Trump’s failures and betrayals come from people who somehow convinced themselves that Trump really was going to save America. 
” people who somehow convinced themselves that Trump really was going to save America” - like Greg Johnson, Richard Spencer, Richard McCulloch, Jared Taylor, Kevin MacDonald, and Roissy.
But that was never realistic. He was one man, advocating confused civic nationalist half-measures against the whole media and political establishment. Trump was never going to save America. 
And, again, the post linked here contains some of Johnson’s hysterical Man on White Horse Syndrome comments about Trump two-to-three years ago. 
That was always our job. It still is.
Pure delusion. 
Trump is not the last chance for National Populism in America. 
Tell that to Amren and The Occidental Observer.
He is just the beginning. He was not the last chance for white America. 
Why didn’t Johnson tell that to Taylor and MacDonald back in 2016?  20-20 hindsight three years too late?
He was the system’s last chance to preserve itself in the face of massive demographic change. When Trump is no longer President, our mantra must be “Trumpism has not failed. Trumpism has never been tried.” 
Boy, that’s inspiring!
Only then we will start calling it National Populism, and if we play the long game, we will have created a whole new political movement to secure its triumph.
These guys can’t even hold a small meeting without it being infiltrated but they’re going to build the grand political movement that will secure for us our – inevitable of course! – triumph.  National Populism -  brought to you by preening elitists who sniff about “Kali Yuga” and Guenon.
The bad news is that Trump turned out to be better at campaigning than governing. The good news is that he will soon go back on the campaign trail, and if “Send her back” is any indication, it’s going to be another magnificent opportunity to move the national mind in our direction. 
Like the grand success of 2016, which has led America to be farther to the left, and more anti-WN, than ever before.
When that time comes, I hope our best propagandists will not sit it out, sulking in their tents like Achilles.
Or sulking like male meeting attendees who failed in their flirting with Pilleater.
If we are going to effectively advance our ideas, we cannot get distracted by the politics of personality…
Including hatred of Spencer?
…including our own personal issues. 
Projection?
We must never lose sight of our ultimate aim, which is a homeland for whites in North America.
A snug hobbit hole for every White American!  A caliper for every skull!

Johnson’s essay is one part hypocrisy and two parts dishonesty.

Hypocrisy: We must concentrate on ideas, not people – except of course when we defend the likes of Rushton out of friendship and constantly attack Richard Spencer out of some obsessive animus. Never mind that when someone too sharply criticizes his own ideas at his blog, the response is "this will be your last comment here."

Dishonesty: First, by ignoring the fact that Johnson and his buddies were indeed engaging in God Emperor Pepe MAGA Kek hysteria about Trump and, more importantly, second, that pointed criticism of Trump as a fraud does not have to be a “small-minded” interest in “people not ideas,” but rather a principled argument against the endlessly repeated Man on White Horse Syndrome error, and also an argument that the same “movement” that makes that (obvious) mistake over and over again is unfit to be a vehicle for White preservationism.

Other news:

1969: America lands men on the moon
2019: We have this.  Racial harmony!

See this. While I have some degree of skepticism toward such tests (can they detect psychopaths? Can someone be trained to defeat them?) And while they are not 100% accurate, something is better than nothing, and perhaps such tests can be one component (not the whole thing!) of a real “extreme vetting” program, at least for more important positions. One wonders also if “random screening” should be done even after acceptance, since people who may originally be sincere, can “turn” later.  Also, in the case of a real infiltrator, if they somehow bypassed the test on the first go around, where they may have been prepared for it, on a second, unexpected, random screening, they may be caught.  The screening itself needs to be done by different people and double-checked – what if the screener is an infiltrator as well?




Sunday, July 21, 2019

7/21/19 in Der News

In der news.


I wonder if Oberth is now going to be “unpersoned.”  First Shockley, now Oberth – who is the next intellectual giant to be shown to have had healthy instincts?

Also, I wonder what Strom thinks of those in Der Movement who mock the idea of space colonization as “utopian dreaming” because of “peak oil” and who assert that the future of man is “the forest instead of the stars.”  After all, we need to leave the stars to The Holy Oriental, while the White Man cowers in his “snug hobbit hole” in the forest.

One can also criticize Pierce’s “twigs and branches” approach, because, truth be told, putting a man on the moon involved a massive scientific, technical, and industrial infrastructure, backed up by an urbanized state, not by a bunch of city-hating folks “living on the mountaintop.” 

Behold the God Emperor:
cerberus the devil dog

‏Replying to @EvanMcLaren @RichardBSpencer
tommy robinson a man whose life and family are truly in danger was on his hands and knees begging trump for help only to fall on deaf ears but for some gangsta thug rapper he springs into action  in a matter of minutes what piece of shit💩💩
Der Movement:
Richard  ☀️ Spencer

The Republican "race baiting" strategy really hasn't changed much in half a century. Trump is just less subtle about it. 
Race is always the *bait*. Working-class White people keep voting GOP... and remain mired in demoralization and decline.
Sallis rewrite of Spencer's comment:
Der Movement’s "dago baiting" strategy really hasn't changed much in half a century. Kemp, Donaldson, Durocher, et al. are just less subtle about it. 

Nordicism is always the *bait*. Type I activists keep supporting the Quota Queens.... and remain mired in demoralization and decline.

Saturday, July 20, 2019

Trump and The Bunker Syndrome

A classic case.

First, read this.


What a terribly shallow “take” on Trump.  Praising and supporting Trump’s stupid blustering tweets.  Yeah, man, all good stuff!  Meanwhile, as Trump is tweeting, the exact same failed countries are flooding America with immigrants, Antifa riots in the streets with impunity, while Trump’s DOJ persecutes rightists.

Spencer was 100% correct in his statements, but going to the Press is a mistake in general. Morgan at least admits that Spencer had a point. More importantly, being “in bed with the press” is bad when Spencer and Heimbach do it, but it’s A-OK when Johnson does it.  What hypocrisy.

Duke is “conspicuously successful” in his endeavors?  Are you mad, Johnson?  What? Jumping from one failed organization to another?  Fetishist books?  Gambling? The foray into politics wasn’t bad, but that’s it.

Johnson and Morgan agonize over “the State” and “the Government” not doing anything about Antifa terrorism, and mock Trump – but that’s exactly the point of why we should despise Trump and his empty bluster.

Trump embodies a classic case of The Bunker Syndrome.  He talks and talks, tweets and tweets, crudely blusters, but does nothing. His inaction is in perfect opposition to the image created to appeal to his naïve base and that which triggers the Left.

Now, the argument from the “movement” would be that while it is true that Trump is a useless fraud (they belatedly realize this now, years too late), his “outspoken tweets” embolden others to speak out. I argue otherwise.  What is the net effect of Trumpian bluster?  It is more Antifa terrorism (that he ignores), more deplatforming (that he does nothing about), more political correctness, more SJW hysteria, etc. And while that may be good for chaos and balkanization (and we can give Trump modest credit for inadvertently doing that) it also has the effect of intimidating and silencing Whites from speaking out. While the increase in chaos and balkanization is in theory good, it is so far only benefiting the Left, because the entire System – including the Trump administration – is enabling leftist radicalism while suppressing the Right.  If Trump were to level the playing field by cracking down on leftist domestic terrorism and by taking action against deplatforming, then perhaps his bluster would be useful for the reasons alluded to above.  But as it is now, his bluster only emboldens and strengthens our enemies; only they are leveraging the current chaos to increase their power.

Hey, he’s your God Emperor, right?  He’s stirred into action!

The ultimate statement about Trump, in red font (emphasis added):
Ranger

‏@RedPinecone
Follow @RedPinecone
More
Replying to @RichardBSpencer
His justice department is going out of its way to continue to find people to prosecute for the Charlottesville picnic. But Trump is going out of his way to help a black guy in Sweden. 
What did I get for my vote? We can’t even chant fun things at his rallies anymore! SAD!
Gee…I don’t know…who was it exactly who correctly identified Trump as a “Negrophilic race cuck” and a “vulgar ignorant buffoon” BEFORE the election?  Spencer?  Johnson? Taylor? MacDonald?  Derbyshire?  Brimelow?  No…guess again.

The future of America.  Enjoy.  Trump is monitoring the situation!

And now for the world championship of stupidity: Gunga Din vs. Tyrone.

The absolute worst writer in the history of racial activism writes (emphasis added):
Until that day, I shall keep on contributing in whatever way I can to an ethics for my own tiny niche, but with a new task: Do not interfere in the creation and developments of allied modes of ethics. For example, ethnonationalists should not begrudge the HBD crowd their absence of teleology, nor should they get all autistically trad while the pick-up artists are busy plying their trade. Likewise, if you see someone exhorting men of average IQ to curb their ambition, do not wail and gnash your teeth about him being a contemptible prophet of mediocrity, as I unwisely painted Dostoevsky and as Vox hypocritically described Peterson. Rather, understand that dogs cannot be expected to have the ethics of a lion. Whereas the god of lions will reward dominance, victory in battle, and proclaiming that work stinks while your many wives bring you food, the god of dogs will reward fetching sticks, holding in your poop until you’re outside, and barking at outsiders. Both gods, however, are subordinate to Gnon, the impossibly ancient principle of survival. In the abyssal cosmological-level analysis, yes, we all ultimately pray to him. But here in Middle Earth, the world is full of lions, dogs, and many other animals, and each has his god to serve and a role to play
Middle Earth!  HBD!  Pick up artists!  You should read Lynn and Roissy while snug in your hobbit hole!  And if you occasionally and fearfully look out from your snug hole, out there in the forest, and see strange lights in the sky, do not worry. That’s only the Chinese, launching themselves into space, using the White Man’s technology to reach the stars, while White men cower in “Middle Earth” measuring each other’s cephalic indices with Durocher’s calipers.  An orc, an orc, my hobbit hole for an orc!

Friday, July 19, 2019

Rackete is Guilty of Crimes against Humanity

And what did they to such criminals at Nuremberg?

First Norwegians were doing it, now Germans (emphasis added):
German captain Carola Rackete, who sparked international headlines by forcibly docking in an Italian port with rescued migrants, faces questioning by an Italian prosecutor on Thursday over allegedly aiding illegal immigration.
The captain of the Sea-Watch 3 is expected to be questioned in the southern Sicilian town of Agrigento from 10 am (0800 GMT).
Rackete was arrested on June 29 for entering Italy's Lampedusa port despite a veto imposed by far-right Interior Minister Matteo Salvini, and knocking a coast guard boat out of the way to land 40 migrants after over two weeks blocked at sea.
If this scum was so worried about the poor delicate migrants, she could have taken them to Libya or, perhaps more fittingly, instead of floating in the Mediterranean for two weeks, sailed past Gibraltar, up the Atlantic coast, then around to the North Sea, and disembarked at Hamburg.  Why not? 

Really, when is the rest of Europe finally going to stand up to these endlessly pushy, arrogant, and annoying Germans? First, they wrecked Europe with their fanatical hegemonic ultra-nationalism, and now they are doing it with their fanatical, hegemonic, pathological altruism. Enough is enough. That entire nation is in dire need of psychotherapy.

And can you imagine if this was the reverse? The fetishists of Der Movement would be screeching about an “omnidominant Med plot” – but with this, it is “move on, move on, there’s nothing to see here.”

Rackete should be put on trial for crimes against humanity – promoting genocide against the Italian people through the forced settlement of alien invaders. Since she is obviously guilty – no one (even Rackete herself) disputes what she has done as described above - after a guilty verdict, she should be publicly hanged in Rome by Italian officials.

The sheer arrogance of these types is incredible and no different in its fundamental origin than the behavior of Deasy, Munro, and Farrell. Deasy is traumatized by Bulgarian faces (“they take getting used to”) – in Bulgaria. Munro oozes with racial contempt for Romanians - while living in Romania with sexual access to a Romanian woman.  Farrell, while living in Italy with an Italian woman, mocks what he perceives as Italian ineptitude. You see, your NW Euro “ethnonationalist” lords and masters will live where they damn please, in your countries, with your women, while mocking you, defaming you, and criticizing the way you look (again, in your own country). Just like Norwegians and Germans who view Italy as a dumping ground for their migrant pets.

I know I have some readers from Italy.  Can someone there please – please – get Salvini to read Frank Salter’s On Genetic Interests?  Or at least read this.  If you can make a better translation of the original, please do so.

How about someone in Italy inviting Salter to give a talk about EGI and migration – and make sure Salvini is in the audience?  These guys need to know what’s really at stake, and they need to know why scum like Rackete are guilty of crimes worthy of the supreme penalty.

Thursday, July 18, 2019

Delusional Thinking, 7/18/19

From Counter-Currents.

If the group ramps up attacks on government facilities, you can expect the Trump administration to do something about it. 
No, I expect Trump to tweet that he’s “monitoring the situation,” and then do nothing.  On the other hand, any rightists who defend themselves against Antifa will have Trump’s DOJ come down on them like a ton of bricks.
While journalists won’t care, the feds will. Their attacks might be enough to get the group classified as a domestic terror group and for federal agencies to dedicate resources to their suppression. 
Does the author of this piece really believe this?
It would be a serious blow to their movement if a dozen black bloc members were hit with unimpeachable federal charges.
It’s more likely that the author of this piece is “hit” with “hate speech” charges than it is for an Antifa terrorist to be “hit” even with a powder puff.
Antifa terrorism may also radicalize Middle America. If they see politicians being attacked and government buildings torched, they will not think moderation is the answer. Middle Americans will demand a strong state response and view Leftists as their mortal enemies, not as fellow countrymen. 
No, they’ll continue to watch Negro behemoths run into each other on a football field.
Left-wing violence polarizes the nation and chips away at the center’s façade of civility. And the “Nazi” slur will lose its power if cops, soldiers, federal employees, and Trump voters are all called that and in turn deemed worthy of assault. If Middle America feels threatened, they certainly won’t turn to Mitt Romney for salvation.
No, instead they’ll turn to Warren or Harris.
Antifa terrorism is a danger to the country and our movement. In the near future, we will see American Leftists emulate their European comrades by undertaking more aggressive actions. German antifa plans to hunt down and assault known Right-wingers next week. We could very well see something like that in America. This escalation will make life more difficult for our movement, but also backfire for antifa.
It won’t backfire.
As Van Spronsen learned, the American state will not tolerate violent attacks against it. The media coddling of antifa will in fact encourage them to be more reckless and stupid – and eventually, it will come back to haunt them.
It won’t.
Antifa won’t remain untouchable for long.
I’ll believe it when I see it.  Until then, this is all wishful thinking and hot air.  And that last sentence leads to a very important question - why is Antifa untouchable now?

I hope everyone realizes that there is nothing – absolutely nothing – stopping Fat Don, as President and head of federal law enforcement, from going, right now, to his Attorney General, and to the head of the FBI, and saying: “Look, this Antifa problem is getting out of hand, I want something done about it, and done right now.  These are domestic terrorists, we need to crack down on them, and we need to put a stop to this. And for godssakes, you can start by stop letting them get away with attacking people in the streets with impunity, stop letting them violate anti-mask laws with impunity, and stop letting them violate people’s civil rights with impunity. Why the hell haven't you been doing this already? Why do you have to wait until I order you to do it?  Get moving right now!”

He can do that, but he won’t. You very well know he won’t. Constant attacks against his own supporters haven’t done it.  Armed groups training and openly espousing terrorism hasn’t done it. International armed interventions hasn’t done it. Attacks against federal facilities hasn’t done it. He’s not going to do it; whether it is out of sheer laziness, stupidity, a lack of concern, or secret agreement with Antifa objectives, Trump simply will not act.

Now, ”will not act” is, granted, a bit of hyperbole. I am sure that there must be something that Antifa can do to trigger Trump into action (yes, I know that putting “Trump” and “action” in the same sentence is somewhat oxymoronic). Perhaps if Antifa detonates a nuclear device on American soil, Trump may decide to more aggressively “monitor the situation.” Even worse from his perspective, if Antifa vandalizes Trump’s favorite MacDonald's, or sucker punches someone close to him, or throws milkshakes at “Diamond” and “Silk,” Trump may be stirred into action.  Maybe even continued Antifa attacks on federal facilities may stir some semblance of activity in the shambling lump of quivering lard that has to be pointed out to thoughtful foreign observers as President of the United States.  Who knows? So, no, it is not literally true that “Trump simply will not act” – instead it is true that “Trump simply will not act” in response to provocations that any other previous President, or any reasonable person, would have long ago responded to.

I don’t know what’s more silly – the idea of an energetic Trump raining wrathful justice down on Antifa, or the idea that Antifa truly believes that Trump is a “fascist” and that they themselves are “dissidents” “fighting the system.”  Hasn’t it crossed what passes for their minds yet that the System – including Trump and his administration – are either passively enabling Antifa through inaction (Trump) or actually supporting and praising them (international corporations, Democrat politicians, academics)?  I honestly believe the Left is more delusional than is the Right. If Trump is a “Far Right Fascist” why does he do nothing about Antifa while allowing his DOJ to persecute rightists like RAM?  If America is a fascistic White Supremacist State why can Antifa rampage with impunity and violate laws at will with virtually no consequences? Can all of this get any more ludicrous?

Wednesday, July 17, 2019

Dark Tweets

When given lemons, make lemonade.

Those on the (Far) Right complain, with justification, about the hypocrisy of being deplatformed from Twitter and other social media platforms, while those on the (Far) Left are kept on, despite outrageously radical, racially inflammatory, and cheerleading-about-leftist-violence tweets and posts.

Has it occurred to anyone on the Right to create “sock puppet” accounts on these platforms, pretending to be anti-White Colored racists, Antifa supporters, foaming-at-the-mouth SJWs, laughably ignorant race-deniers, etc.?  Push the envelope of leftist insanity (as long as you do not promote violence or any other type of illegality, of course, which goes against the stern pacifism of EGI Notes), have fun, create chaos and balkanization, sow discord and confusion, provoke leftist feuds on the basis of race-ethnicity-sex-sexual preferences- ideology-tactics, etc. Perhaps at some point, the Left will start to become paranoid, accusing each other of being sock puppet trolls. Outrage the Mainstream Right. Stimulate White race consciousness. See how far you can go without getting banned; I’m sure you can go quite far indeed, as authentic leftists prove every day.

The possibilities are virtually unlimited.  This is a form of metapolitical ju-jitsu, turning the hypocrisy of the System against itself. The only question is whether rightist sock puppets can mimic genuine leftist insanity; likely at the beginning, attempts by rightist sock puppets to be intentionally inflammatory will fall short of what actual leftists are posting on a daily basis.  But, practice makes perfect, after all.

Maybe someone Der Movement heroes are already doing this; if so, very good – do more, and better.  If not, then this displays, once again, the total lack of imagination of the Far Right.

Other items:

There are some who may question why I am always so harsh to Derbyshire, more so than to other ideological opponents. The answer is that his outrageous hypocrisy grates on me. He has the tiresome shtick of being a “humble working class English lad who longs for the days when England was England,” yet he is proudly married to a Chinese woman, has mixed-race children, and defends miscegenation. He brings his Chinese wife to America, a country in which he was an illegal alien, and then he writes for an American-based immigration restriction website (itself founded by an immigrant, but insofar as I know a legal one).  He calls Amren attendees “latrine flies” and heaps scorn on their beliefs, but then eagerly latches on to Amren and speaks at Amren conferences after he’s kicked out from National Review.  We are supposed to feel bad for Derbyshire over his defenestration from National Review, but he had no problem causing trouble for MacDonald at CSULB with his scurrilous The Marx of the Anti-Semites hit piece on MacDonald (that I vigorously criticized at that time). He always pushes his family in the faces of his readers while calling “race purists” “nuts” – and then when he gets the inevitable email response from outraged readers he threatens them to come to his home so he can greet them “in the proper manner.” I suppose we should give the old boy credit; he has balls the size of Jupiter and Saturn and more chutzpah than all the Jews in Israel combined. However, I still find him annoying.


As regards Spencer on CNN, I have no strong objection in this instance, although generally I am opposed to talking to the press.  It was no great victory either, more or less a “wash.” Interesting that they chose Spencer instead of Taylor, though.  The Far Right needs its own media. Oh, that’s right – “there’s no money.” After all, Derb and Pete have priority, do they not?

It’s laughable when the fetishists undermine their own arguments.   The last WASP on the Supreme Court!  Followed by about how much of a “turncoat” he was.  Bring back Earl Warren!  Actually, Warren was of Scandinavian stock – even better for Der Movement!  Of course, Warren’s name is synonymous with anti-White betrayal - are we surprised?

I don’t know.  If we are going to have a civil war in America over race, another one that is, and it is becoming increasingly likely that in some point in the future we will, then maybe we need to get as many Whites on our side as possible?  In that case, pan-Europeanism is a good idea, and the Nordicist-Fetishist types like Ash Donaldson should be eschewed.  We also need educated Whites on our side; perhaps Der Movement can tone down the anti-scientific “traditionalism,” get out of their “snug hobbit holes,” and put together a mature, future-oriented ideology?

Tuesday, July 16, 2019

I’m an Indigenous Swarthoid

A riposte.  Red font emphasis added.

This is what the “movement’s” fetish with “racial purity” has given us.

I warned all of you fetishists:
The concept of (absolute) racial purity was originally a racialist meme, one which had particular relevance in the New World environment of the intermingling of highly distinct racial groups (European, Amerindian, and Negro), Negro slavery, and fears of miscegenation. However, today, in the age of genetics, racial purity has become an “anti-racist” concept, a meme of the anti-White Left, a weapon to be wielded against the concept of racial preservation. The leftist argument goes like this:
Premise 1: The reality of race and the legitimacy of racial preservation depends upon absolute racial purity.
Premise 2: Absolute racial purity does not exist (as scientific studies tell us).
Conclusion: Therefore, there is no such thing as race, and racial preservation is illegitimate and irrelevant.
So, this is a logical argument that comes to a false conclusion because of a faulty premise: Premise 1. Premise 2 is however correct. Genetic studies tell us that groups heretofore thought “pure” are likely the result of ancient mixes of other groups.
But, hey, don’t listen to me. Instead follow the great and good Durocher and Ash Donaldson. Victory awaits!

It is also funny how “there is no such thing as indigenous peoples” applies to Europeans, but not to, say, Amerindians or Australian Aboriginals. Curious, that.
 “There’s no such thing as a Dane or a Swede or a German.” 
Hmmm, how about: “There’s no such thing as a Jew or a Nigerian or a Chinamen.” Mr. Netanyahu, tear down that wall!  Nigeria, hand over your land to Bushmen and Hottentots!  China, hand over your territory to all who wish to invade; after all, your national existence is an illusion!

I have, of course, dealt with the question of “what is indigenous?”  See here.

A simple one sentence definition: A group is indigenous when it is the oldest extant group inhabiting a territory in which the group underwent ethnogenesis.

Of course such groups are not “pure” – why should they be?  And why should fast talking Jews and their Goyishe kop puppet liars stop the analysis at “Africans and Russians?” Why not Homo erectus?  Why not self-replicating RNA molecules floating around in the primordial soup?

And by the way, you stupid bastard, ancient steppe peoples were not genetically equivalent to modern Russians.  They were not “Russian” any more than a Cro-Magnon from Provence was “French.”

In my case, I’m an indigenous swarthoid and damn proud of it!  Skin darker than a Nigerian and nostrils wider than an Angolan!

Twenty years ago, my mother was bedridden and near death. It was one of the last times I was with her, perhaps the very last time—I'm not sure. She was drifting in and out of awareness, sometimes just saying things out loud—random things, clear and coherent but not connected to each other.
So I was sitting there by the bed and heard her say: "I don't mind dying. At least I knew England when she was England."
Yeah, Derb, if your mother was still alive, would she see England in the faces of her grandchildren?


There is no truth to the rumor that Greg Johnson, being taller than Richard Spencer, scorns Spencer as an incompetent manlet.  No truth at all!  But, hey, focusing on a bagel dwarf and “incels” helps distract from things like this.  At this point, I think these guys are just trolling us. They can’t still be serious about racialism, can they? I mean, it’s a joke, right?

Yet, Taylor can’t be there because he’s banned from the EU.  The whole thing is curious.



Monday, July 15, 2019

The Wile E Coyote Theory of Racial Admixture in Europe

No line drawn on the European continent.

The most striking finding is a clear signal of admixture into northern Europe, with one ancestral population related to present-day Basques and Sardinians and the other related to present-day populations of northeast Asia and the Americas.
Me Chinese, me make joke, me draw runes on my can of coke.

Some more.  Less in the Northwest than the Northeast, but there’s still some.

Now, no doubt there’s going to be a bit more non-European admixture – and here I refer to real admixture, not artefactual admixture resulting from limited choices of parental populations in ancestry testing – in the South and East of Europe than in the more isolated Northwest of Europe.  But it is a matter of degree (and of kind), not of a binary yes/no.

The fetishists envision racial admixture in Europe sort of like Wile E Coyote painting a line on a road. They imagine some sort of magical, mysterious line drawn through the European continent, so that on one side of the line you have absolute racial purity going back through the mists of time, and on the other side, the populations are all heavily-mixed cringing colored subhumans. However, racial and genetic reality doesn’t work that way. There are qualitative and quantitative differences in admixture, but not absolutes of zero vs. large. It’s relatively low throughout Europe, with a bit more in some areas, and of different types.


Particularly this – if for no other reason – demonstrates the impossibility of absolute purity.  And there are other reasons – various influxes shown by population genetics – that result in low levels of real admixture.  But this is not all found on only one side of Wile E Coyote’s line.

That devil Forrest!  Read this. 
At a Chinese Labor Convention held in Memphis, Tennessee in 1869, Gen. Nathan Bedford Forrest pledged $5000 to bring in 1,000 Chinese workers.
An HBDer? Or maybe he was a Silker – he wanted some black-booted Chinese girls with guns guarding the borders of his plantation.

Or maybe he thought they were relatives, who knows?  Ethnic nepotism!

No, no, a thousand times no!  Too many carbs there!  Eat instead dem dere Big Macs and bacon-wrapped beefsteaks, washed down by gallons of full-fat milk!  What’s a little bariatric surgery and Da Vinci prostate surgery between friends?

The South Asian-Hispanic alliance.  Brown is a brown does.



Remember the EGI Notes paradigm: The existential meaning of Asians is hatred of Whites and of the West.  Would Sallis ever steer you wrong?  

Sunday, July 14, 2019

Mote and Beam

In der news.

Nordicists think alike:
Durocher – "Individual and ethnic amour-propre is a powerful motivator in the face of emotionally hurtful facts and hypotheses."
Ash Donaldson - "I seem to have struck an emotional nerve with you and a few others."
These no-character specimens love to use psychological projection. In fact, THEY are the ones who are so emotionally over-sensitive they avoid facts – including peer-reviewed published scientific papers – that absolutely refute their beliefs, and THEY are the ones who refuse to acknowledge similar published work indicating racial admixture in their favorite European ethnic groups.  They engage in the most unethical and fundamentally dishonest gaslighting imaginable – peddling lies as “truth,” mocking those who expose their lies as “emotionally sensitive,” while hysterically omitting any mention of published data that demonstrates the falsehood of their own doctrine.  

Perhaps Der Movement should stop agonizing so much over this picture, and start worrying more about this one.  Mote and beam, eh?  Let’s not strike any emotional nerves, shall we? After all, Siberian/East Asian-derived ethnic amour-propre is a powerful motivator in the face of emotionally hurtful facts and hypotheses.

THIS MONTH marks the 50th anniversary of the publication in The American Mercury of Dr. Revilo Pendleton Oliver’s After Fifty Years, in which he assesses the near-total failure, over the previous half-century, of White Americans to keep their freedoms and their country as of the year 1969. After Fifty Years was not only an article: It was also made into a short film narrated by Dr. Oliver, made to coincide with the launch of the National Youth Alliance, predecessor organization to the National Alliance, one of the sponsors of this program. Within the next month, too, it will be 25 years — a quarter century — since we lost this great man.
Over the next few weeks, we will be introducing you to the masterful works of Revilo Oliver, and then we will be re-assessing the situation facing our people, another half-century on, under the title After 100 Years.
I do not know whether it is a coincidence or not, but, in any case, I’m gratified that, after I challenged Strom about Revilo Oliver’s After Fifty Years and what Strom’s group proposes to do to end the endless cycle of “movement” failure, this series of works are planned. Let’s see what happens.

We should stop spending money on Colored parasites and wars for Israel, and spend more on our nuclear deterrent and on space exploration.

Instead of blaming health problems on “Big Pharma” vaccinations, perhaps you should pin more blame on “Big Food Companies” and the fatsos with no self-discipline to stop stuffing their faces and guzzling sugary drinks and beer.

The weakling fraud backs down again.  He’ll monitor the situation!

If women are naturally eugenic then how did Spencer reproduce?  Seriously though, I’d advise Richard to worry less about some micro-dwarf being tackled in a bagel shop and worry more about his own devastating failures of leadership. In that manner, we may observe some improvement as he moves through his 40s.

Saturday, July 13, 2019

Race and Movement News, 7/13/19

In der news.

Another good Taylor video. I had to laugh about the “warpath” part.

Excerpts from another “emotional nerve” comment left at the HBD "West Coast White nationalist” Counter-Currents site,  emphasis added:
The problem is, aside from cattiness, that they always feel the need to bring up Greeks (ancient only, for they know not a thing about any other era, and really, they know very little of even the ancient ones), Italians (they are ESPECIALLY and GLEEFULLY brutal to Italians), Spaniards/Portuguese, etc. Why not just leave it out and just STFU about them? You cannot prove your point with repeating lies about meds (or slavs)???? Really, you can’t?
“……….Pan-Europeanism is our only way out.”
It can’t work BECAUSE of this BS.
@Ash
“I seem to have struck an emotional nerve with you and a few others.”
Typical response really. When a repeater of nordypoo nonsense is called out, always surprised that meds dare to take their own side in a fight, there is talk of “emotion.” But my dear, dear Ash, there was no need to repeat that lie. The whole post could’ve been done without that usual, tired, jealous jab. I understand that nordies feel put upon and cowed by non-whites and anti-white propaganda; but they always try to pump themselves up by ripping on meds and slavs, who played no part in that propaganda, do not attack nordies at all and are not anti-nordy….so WTF?????? Such catty swipes seem to be currency in these circles.
I agree with all of that, and it is good some folks have answered the original inane post. Certainly, the fetishists have a particular sweaty animus toward (Southern) Italians – to them, several rungs below Negroes and Australian Aboriginals on the racial scale.  And the indirect allusion to Sallis’ Law is always correct - Der Movement will always bring up their attacks against Southern (and Eastern) Europeans regardless of the context. If “Ash Donaldson” wrote an article about the weather, or the price of milk, or the design attributes of the Atlas ICBM, or whatever…there would have to be the obligatory mention of admixture in Southern (and/or Eastern) Europe. What self-respecting “movement” post would be without it?

And I agree, pan-Europeanism is not going to work as long as there are people who openly lie about racial history and population genetics to fuel their obsessive dogma, which they proselytize with all the fervor of a crazed priest of the Spanish Inquisition or a modern-day cultist.

We’ve certainly come a long way since the days of Larry Scott, eh?
Di, Di, Di…versiteeee…..

We’ve certainly come a long way since the days of Christy Mathewson, eh?
Di, Di, Di…versiteeee…

Friday, July 12, 2019

Another Fundamentally Dishonest Fetishist

Just like Kemp.

The ignoramus who wrote that Counter-Currents article tries to defend himself by writing:
I seem to have struck an emotional nerve with you and a few others. It’s certainly the first time I’ve been accused of being a Nordicist; usually, it’s a Hellenophile.
Ah yes, but to this fundamentally dishonest dissembler, the Hellenes were Nordics; Dolph Lundgren philosophizing at the Agora. So, in his case, being a Hellenophile and being a Nordicist are functionally equivalent.  Well lied, liar!

This “I’m not a Nordicist” whine from extreme Nordicists is familiar to anyone remembering all the dust-ups over March of the Titans during the first decade of this century.  If I recall correctly, Kemp – who is considered one of the most extreme Nordicists in recent memory and is always cited by and defended by other extreme Nordicists – would deny his ideology by making comments like “But I say that Mediterraneans contributed to White history."

What Kemp left out, of course, is that his opinion was of a relatively minor Mediterranean contribution (after all, Ancient Egypt, Greece, and Rome were all Nordic), and that this modest contribution was all ancient, since he proclaimed that the “Mediterranean Race” no longer existed, being mongrelized out of existence, with many Southern Europeans being, essentially, cringing non-White untermenschen.  But he’s no Nordicist, no sir!

I also like how the Counter-Currents fetishist pulls a “Durocher” on us to imply that critics of his “truth” are motivated by emotion. Unlike him, who is, of course, motivated only by a non-emotional devotion to facts! Yes, indeed, and that’s why these truth tellers mysteriously ignore all of the ancient DNA findings that refute their beliefs, and also ignore population genetics studies that describe Siberian/East Asian admixture in their favorite parts of Europe.

Who has had an “emotional nerve” "struck," I wonder?  Those who lie by commission and omission, or those who merely point out the lies for all to see?

Another Answer to Retardation

He may as well talk to the wind for all the good it will do.

As regards this issue, see the comment below. I don’t agree with every detail, but the main thrust is generally in accord with my views, and the points to which I agree with most are highlighted. I am not correcting the various errors of writing or formatting; those are minor issues of no great relevance to the main themes of the comment.
GrandioseNationalist

Posted July 11, 2019 at 4:03 pm | Permalink
Another Nordicist who tries to “preach” us about history. This thing never ends; always trying to find artificial excuses to undermine Southern European contribution to Europe and further divide Europeans based on some outdated ideology. There’s a reason why the Star Systems and planets have Greek and Roman names and not Norse ones. See now how we’ve engaged in this fruitless debate that only serves our demise?
Furthermore all White Nationalists have to keep in mind a few things:

a) It’s not Greeks that have Turkish DNA but instead it’s the Turks that have Greek ancestry (along with other ethnic backgrounds). There is virtually no research or proof that shows that Greeks have Turkic ancestry. All racially mixed offsprings were either absorbed into the Turkish society or the Christian Orthodox women would commit suicide or murdered and shunned by their families before having kids with the “Muslim Oppressor”.
b) The Ancient Greeks had this ancient motto knows as “pas mi Hellen varvaros” which means “all non-Hellenes are barbarians”. Although there were some exception among the lines of the Persian, Celtic, and Roman kindred, Greeks shared an equal hatred even for each other (Spartans vs Athenians, etc.). Alexander was no exception, as the man who civilized the East.

c) Nordicist ideology has contaminated our tenets for more than a century and has only served to divide and conquer us, by placing basis on an abstract sub-racial division. There are Nordics common in all European nations just as there are Meds in Britain and Ireland.
c) Although not directly related to this article, it is vital to acknowledge that Pan-Europeanism is our only way out. When the Southern States, Southern And Northern Europe get overrun by migrants we ‘re gonna have to unite in a way that has never been done before. The US showed that White intermixia and nationhood is perfectly feasible and desirable if we proceed carefully step by step to that direction (that has already been happening for centuries now; look at us for example). It sure as hell didn’t lead to chaos and anarchy as some Ethnonationalists would wish. Now I’m saying this as someone who is of pure ethnic stock and has reached to that conclusion after lots of consideration and the studying of history.
The SYSTEM doesn’t give a penny or two about whether you’re Anglo-Celtic, Greek, Nordic, or what. All they see is a White person, and they attack our Whiteness because that’s the essence of our identity.
NATIONALISM is evolutionary: it extends for the POLIS to the REGION to the COUNTRY and eventually to the WHOLE RACE. By simply making a regression to these patterns would mean to be forced to repeat this endless loop of factricidal war and foreign infiltration. The Athenians would’ve objected to be united with the Spartans under the “generic definition” of the Greek, and they’d want to keep their “individual differences and have their separate ways”. Now that Greece is united, do you see any war between the two? Now they’re just Greeks and nothing else.
In less then two centuries time we’ll see the salvation of the White Race come to fruition under a life-saving fusion of all those who are Called Europeans akin to that in the US; under a centralized transcontinental state . Think on that.
The major problem with this well-meaning fellow is that he is wasting his time. He may as well talk to the wind for all the good it will do; he’ll get more of a useful response if he was addressing a pile of bricks.

It doesn’t matter that there is no evidence supporting the Counter-Currents viewpoint, it doesn’t matter that ancient DNA studies have so far refuted Kemp, none of that matters. When you are dealing with blind religious faith, facts do not matter and logic does not matter.  There is no place in Der Movement for pan-Europeanists, just as there is no place for Southern and Eastern Europeans. The Type Is have always had a stranglehold on control of the American “movement” and they will continue to hold on; if you want change, you’ll have to do it yourself by contributing to the formation of a new, alternative racial nationalist structure, a Type II-led movement.

I want to comment on this picture, much beloved by Nordicists. By modern phenotypic standards, we may say, subjectively, that Terentius Nero had an atypical phenotype. Very well.  So what?  That’s not evidence supporting that he was not of indigenous stock.  We do not know the range of indigenous phenotypes of ancient Italy.  For all we know, Nero's phenotype  may have been common, at least among those of plebian stock, and may reflect Neolithic farmer ancestry. On the other hand, maybe he did have non-indigenous ancestry. Can you know any of that by looking at that one picture?  It's not as if he looked like a Negro, a Chinaman, or David "Chopsticks" Bromstad, for example.

If you want to play the (frankly stupid) game of using single pictures to make snap judgments about an entire ethny, nation, people, or race, then what about this?  The ancient peoples of Italy were brown-skinned with black curly hair! Terentius the Etruscan!

This is the young Benito Mussolini, a representative of a people – Northern Italians – that Der Movement likes to tell us (absurdly) are “Celto-Germanic Nordics.” Judging by that picture, the typical Northern Italian male looks like the younger brother of General Mapache from The Wild Bunch.

By the standards of "one picture to judge a people," I won’t get into what the Bromstad family, or Bjork, may tell us about Northern Germanics.

Meanwhile, on a completely different (of course!) matter, I’m working on a post or posts in which I am going to admit that Sallis was wrong about an issue concerning the “movement,” in contrast to certain academic types who were right.  Stay tuned!