In all cases, emphasis added.
Before we get to the women, something to consider:
Each year, the American Cancer Society estimates the numbers of new cancer cases and deaths that will occur in the United States and compiles the most recent data on cancer incidence, mortality, and survival. Incidence data, available through 2015, were collected by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program; the National Program of Cancer Registries; and the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. Mortality data, available through 2016, were collected by the National Center for Health Statistics. In 2019, 1,762,450 new cancer cases and 606,880 cancer deaths are projected to occur in the United States. Over the past decade of data, the cancer incidence rate (2006-2015) was stable in women and declined by approximately 2% per year in men, whereas the cancer death rate (2007-2016) declined annually by 1.4% and 1.8%, respectively. The overall cancer death rate dropped continuously from 1991 to 2016 by a total of 27%, translating into approximately 2,629,200 fewer cancer deaths than would have been expected if death rates had remained at their peak. Although the racial gap in cancer mortality is slowly narrowing, socioeconomic inequalities are widening, with the most notable gaps for the most preventable cancers. For example, compared with the most affluent counties, mortality rates in the poorest counties were 2-fold higher for cervical cancer and 40% higher for male lung and liver cancers during 2012-2016. Some states are home to both the wealthiest and the poorest counties, suggesting the opportunity for more equitable dissemination of effective cancer prevention, early detection, and treatment strategies. A broader application of existing cancer control knowledge with an emphasis on disadvantaged groups would undoubtedly accelerate progress against cancer.
Note how health indicators mirror the sociopolitical-ethnoracial realities of America. Given that America worships People of Color, and gives them every advantage over despairing, subaltern, low-caste Whites, it is not surprising that the “racial gap in cancer mortality” is decreasing, and that is occurring despite the poor lifestyle choices of Coloreds, including the observable fact that the typical Black female has a Googolplex BMI. On the other hand, “socioeconomic inequalities [in cancer] are widening.” So, if socioeconomic inequalities are widening at the same time racial gaps are narrowing, this suggests the cancer burden is increasingly on middle-class, lower-middle class, and poorer Whites, likely from red states, and from the “poorest counties” in such states. This is all consistent with the Global Elite-Colored Alliance against Whites, manifested in cancer rates – the wealthy and the Coloreds doing better, and Whitey – squeezed between “socioeconomic inequalities” and Colored empowerment – doing worse. They are literally killing our race.
The only surprising thing from the social standpoint is the greater improvement in the situation for men compared to women – most likely explained by the inability of the System’s anti-male regime to compensate for the rampant obesity, promiscuity, etc. of women. Note obesity is linked to many cancers, and some cancers are caused by sexually transmitted viruses. Also, we need to have a racial breakdown of these sex differences. It may be that White women - despite all their faults – are doing better, but this is compensated by higher cancer rates and mortality among female Coloreds, for reasons stemming from lifestyle choices and genetic differences.
A Roissy commentator:
And the silly, age-old (lol) question that older women always ask me: “How can you be interested in young(er) women? What do you have in common?” I have to imagine that they are not totally clueless that men want younger women for their better/fresher looks, tighter skin/firmer bodies, more energy, generally better personalities, and (most important) their fertility.
As I have said here a few times, men should not, if possible, marry women their own age. That is what supports the boner-medicine industry. Most men can get erections, it is just that they cannot get them for their old wives or gfs, but aren’t black pilled enough (or feel to guilty) to recognize/acknowledge that truth. Older women simply have very little, to no, sexual capital. It has all been spent (in many cases, wasted away). Give these older men a younger woman and….BOINNNNNNG! Feminist society and the pharmaceutical industry instead want to blame the man for his failure to get/maintain an erection, instead of focusing on the object of his attempts. It’s bullshit. Men in their 20’s and thirties should date women 5-10 years younger than them. Men in their 40’s and above should date women at least 10 years younger than them. If marriage is in the forecast, the age difference should be 10 years. You’ll thank me for this advice, if you take it, when you are 40+, when your younger wife still gets you hard.
Finally, I have seen many older women who are beautiful, in their own way, when they have class and a sense of noble pride, but that should not be confused with sexual attraction to them.
One can speculate about female bitterness about “hitting the wall” explaining some of the crazed “extreme cat lady” SJW nuttiness of many older women (Warren being a perfect example). We all have to suffer because they are being ignored by men?
This brings up another issue: Advice to younger White male readers here about marriage. I am of two minds here. On a collectivist level - what is good for the race – then family formation and reproduction is important, and, yes, get married. From an individualist level - personal happiness and actualization – getting married (and all that comes after) will be by far the biggest life mistake you will ever make. So, you need to make a choice: Race or Self. If you value the former higher, then “take one for the team” and become another miserable man with a ring through his nose; if you value the latter, avoid marriage like the plague. For the latter men, if you are younger and can’t do without female companionship, then I suppose you can become a jackass gamester, a nihilistic sexual hedonist. If you are made of sterner stuff – MGTOW - avoid the yeastbuckets completely. Know thyself – and then make the correct life decision. MGTOW – combined with men’s rights activism – is preferable to being a gamester jackass.
Compared to the rest of most of the Far Right, at least I’m being honest with you on this issue. They’ll just tell you – “get married and have White children.” You DO need to know the costs involved. Balance benefits (of course the largest personal benefit is the massive fitness boost in your individual genetic continuity) and the costs.
In support of this, see some of the AOC quotes here. Speaking of “the wall” as it pertains to females (is that what Trump has really been talking about all this time?), AOC has hit the wall (and hard) at age 29. That may explain much as well. The obvious connection to White interests and EGI requires us all to speak out on this issue.
In a normal society, aging women can distract themselves from their zeroing-out SMV by focusing on their grandchildren. Note to older females – your unmarried daughter’s cats are not your grandchildren.
The yeastbuckets are well on their way to destroying the field of economics. And I won’t even get into the whole hysterical co-ed vs. Trevor Bauer Twitter feud, except to state:
1. White and Jewish athletes were tweeting each other.
2. A young White female stuck her nose (or another body part) into the conversation, insulting the White athlete (of course).
3. The White athlete counter-attacked.
4. White female then publicly claims “harassment,” says her “last three days have been ruined,” gives newspaper interviews, and contacted his team in order to get him into trouble.
Lots of “agency” there, right Greg? A new Joan of Arc, ready to lead the White race into battle? By the way, these white-knighting news stories always tend to omit that not only did she attack him first, but ALSO stated that he was like a “16 year old girl on her period” (projecting much?).
Once again, John Morgan emerges as the voice of reason in the pathetic dumpster fire that Counter-Currents has become. Where is Johnson digging up this new crop of writers? Are they scraped off the side of a toilet bowel in a men’s room in Grand Central Station? I won’t even mention Chad Crowley’s latest “effort.” My prediction that Counter-Currents will become the new Majority Rights is coming to pass.
Hey, Roissy, dishonesty by omission is still dishonesty:
Hey, Jeff, you little pissant wall-eyed value-eating slave labor-loving wage-gutting nation-wrecking globohomo nerdo, was the tranny blowjob worth it? Asking for a friend named Donald Trump.
***Some thoughts on the Bezos Bimbo.News is out (thanks to Trump’s friends at the National Enquirer) that Bezos cheated on his wife of two decades and had an affair with a 49-year-old woman sporting staypuft lip injections. That’s her above, Lauren “dirty” Sanchez. She is the wife of a friend of the Bezos’. The timeline is murky, but the latest reporting suggests Bezos was slamming Slamchez while both were still married, but you know how these satanic cult elite marriages are arranged to allow for “managed indiscretions”.There were questions if the Bezos marriage blew up because Jeffy or his wife stepped out, but now we know — the rich husband cashed in his inflating SMV. The cosmic order remains in balance, and we may enjoy the spectacle of TDS sufferer Bezos getting his name dragged through the mud.Bezos has been looking jacked since Trump became President. It’s known that lifting will raise testosterone levels, and higher T will increase the risk of infidelity (jacked up muscles => jacked up libido). I wouldn’t be surprised if Bezos has more than one mistress in his closet that he acquired after he started throwing the iron.
It was Roissy (if I remember correctly, channeling the MPF crowd_ who publicly stated that Bezos will do a “hard right turn politically” now that he was “jacked.” How’s that production turning out? About as well as the lifelong liberal Democrat Jack Nicholson as a prospective political “alpha shitlord?”
Wrong, wrong, they’re always wrong.