Saturday, August 31, 2019

Crud Bonemeal Writes the Truth

About Trump

Emphasis added:
Crud Bonemeal
I confess to being slightly surprised by the actions of the Trump administration.
It’s understandable and expected for them to “sell out” in some way and even screw over the more radical elements of their base.
But if you assumed they were a real political faction of their own, you’d expect them to engage in self interested actions, to strengthen their own position and weaken their rivals. Self preservation SHOULD be one of their most basic desires.
And, if it had existed, this desire for self preservation would have created opportunities and incidental benefits for at least some of their supporters.
But there is no evidence of a desire for self preservation, quite the opposite, all efforts of the Trump administration have been directed towards the destruction of the people that made the Trump faction possible and towards discrediting and taking away the issues that got Trump elected.
The explanation provided by Bannon is that Trump basically didn’t expect to win, and when he did win, he just decided to sell out to the establishment immediately.
“In the 48 hours after we won, there’s a fundamental decision that was made. You might call it the original sin of the administration. We embraced the establishment. I mean, we totally embraced the establishment.”
I don’t like or trust Bannon but this is plausible.
I seem to recall someone back in 2016 speculating that Trump really did not want to win, that he was a fraud, and that he would likely betray his base if elected.  Who was that? Oh, that’s right – me.

Meanwhile, Johnson still claims today that Trump is sincere and a man of genuine greatness.

Friday, August 30, 2019

Another Grand Ethnonationalist Victory!

Sieg heil!


Inevitably?  Sure.  What with all of this Nordic Celto-Germanic Northern Italian competence and all, amplified by ethnonationalist superiority, what could possibly go wrong?  Hail Padania!  Hail Ethnonationalism!  Hail Victory!  Hail!

Zman:
Trump really is the quintessential Baby Boomer male. He made a lot of money, but will never have much to show for his time. Everything about Trump is wrapped up Trump the person, the selfish, boorish oaf living for the moment. When the wife got too old, he traded her in for a new one. When he hit middle-age, he bought a sports car and started dating young women. His story will be one of endless self-indulgence.
Zman’s buddy Greg Johnson argues that voters – including White evangelicals – voted for Trump purely based on his persona (as described here by Zman), and not his policies. The existential meaning of Greg Johnson is pure unadulterated dishonesty.

So much winning!  The future for White nationalism looks bright!  Following the brilliant guidance of our racially superior leadership, we’ve leveraged the 2016 election prudently to achieve a clear path to victory!  All that’s left for us is to dance through cemeteries wearing swastika-soled boots!  Hail!


Thursday, August 29, 2019

Spencer and Johnson, 8/29/19

Comic relief.


I had to control my outburst of laughter over this.  That may be the most comically self-unaware tweet in the history of Twitter.  
A fundamental reason the Alt-Right is in such a pathetic state. Losers make a movement in their image.
Really, Richie?  You think?  Have you looked in the mirror recently?  Dear god…this is pure gold.  Gee, I don’t know…following up on Zman’s recent comment, can we think of any prominent Alt Right leader, considered the major representative of that “movement,” who had a large share of responsibility for running it into the ground?  Think hard now, Richie, think hard.  My only disagreement with Zman is that by focusing on you he relieves your brother in affirmative action Johnson of any responsibility as well.

Spencer is also under the impression because he screws NECs (Jews, Georgians, etc.), as well as SJW leftists, and has had  a “cute” Asian girlfriend, he’s a superior human being to the masses of his pimple-faced incel followers who sit in their parents’ basements jacking off to anime.  True enough, he is superior, at least in this sense, to the guys who engaged in homosexual sexual harassment of Pilleater at “racialist meetings,” but that’s not saying much, is it?

Now, Johnson.

Trump: A man of genuine greatness!

Read this. Emphasis added.
Jaden McNeil 🇺🇸

@McNeilJaden
 *every conservative is wiped from the internet*
Trump: "I am watching this closely."
Yet Conservatism Inc. quickly captured the Trump Administration, especially after Steve Bannon left. Instead of focusing on immigration and trade, the GOP Congress and the White House spent their political capital on tax cuts and a failed effort to repeal Obamacare. 
Instead of President Trump transforming the conservative movement, the movement transformed him. The social media figures who championed his 2016 campaign have been kicked offline. Meanwhile, the conservative personalities that opposed him, from Glenn Beck to Ben Shapiro, thrive. With few exceptions, the conservative movement promotes capitalism, support for Israel, and tax cuts. These policies may be good or bad, but they aren’t what put the President in the White House. Not surprisingly, he’s trailing badly in most 2020 polls…
Hey, it’s almost as if Amren agrees with Sallis (and every other sane person) - and disagrees with Johnson – in that Trump won because of his policy proposals, not his jackass personality.  When will Der Movement ditch Gaslighting Greg?
…Some claim President Trump will win in 2020 because the Democrats have become too “extreme.” Yet who determines what’s extreme? Ultimately, those with media power. Through his inaction, President Trump has given his enemies a media monopoly…
…Donald Trump’s enemies label him “authoritarian” because he calls journalists “enemies of the people.” Yet he’s so weak he makes Jimmy Carter look like Alexander the Great. President Trump once noted that Twitter essentially gave everyone his own newspaper. That power is being taken away, but he’s done nothing. 
Note again:
Yet he’s so weak he makes Jimmy Carter look like Alexander the Great.
But he’s a man of genuine greatness, genuine I tell ya!

That’s only to be expected, because we have the better arguments, and most of the civic nationalists are cringy, uncool, and obviously dishonest.
That’s opposed to Johnson.  His phone conversation with Pilleater is not cringy, his persona is not uncool, and his nonsense about the possibility of Trump being elected with Jeb Bush’s platform is not in any way obviously dishonest.
3. Leave YouTube and watch it burn. It was never realistic to think that we could overthrow the most evil system in human history on a platform owned by the most evil corporation in human history, and be able to make money off it at the same time.
Let me reword:
Leave Der Movement and watch it burn. It was never realistic to think that we could overthrow the most evil system in human history by a “movement” lead by affirmative action grifters and populated by sweaty fetishists who become sexually aroused by thinking about their animus toward particular ethnic groups.
Back to Johnson:
White genocide is real. The Great Replacement is real. That means that at the core of the anti-white system are people who are morally equivalent to Genghis Khan, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, and the like. We were never going to defeat them from the comfort of our own bedrooms. 
Or from the comfort of your snug hobbit hole.
They see us as an increasingly serious threat. They are going to do everything they can to shut us down. If they want us all dead, logically they are willing to inflict all lesser forms of discomfort on us as well. YouTube was enormously useful to us, but it is owned by them, so of course they are banning our channels.
Of course they are.  And why didn’t you plan for that in advance?  See below for the answer.
Fortunately, they can’t get us off the world wide web without shutting the whole thing down. And they can’t shut it down, because their own global system depends on it.
That’s an oft-repeated Johnson argument, but I don’t buy it.
And even if they could get us off the web entirely, they are still going to lose, because the main force driving the rise of white identity politics and National Populism is the failure of globalization and multiculturalism. As long as the establishment keeps doubling down on globalization, degeneracy, and anti-white hate, they are going to drive more people in our direction — even if we are not around to help deepen their consciousness and suggest workable and morally defensible solutions.
Hail Victory!  Is it now, or 50 years from now?  Or 200?
And we will always find some way to hang on to some spaces online, so eventually we are going to win. 
As long as you send in those “D’Nations.”
Censorship and deplatforming will only slow us down. They will never defeat us.
No, you’ll defeat yourselves.
But nobody has deplatformed me from Counter-Currents because I own it.
Didn’t Polignano own a piece of it at one time as well?  Paging Friberg and Forney.
There are, of course, ways to attack platforms that you own. So far, though, every one of them has been tried on The Daily Stormer, and they are still online. Counter-Currents lost our webhosting company in the aftermath of Charlottesville, but we easily found another service and were not down a single day. None of the people who have been bounced from YouTube are as big a target as the Stormer, and if they have survived, you will survive as well.
As long as you have dem dere “D’Nations.”
Don’t get a site hosted by WordPress, Blogspot, or similar companies, unless you want to go the way of Heartiste. Reserve your own domain name and find your own hosting company. You can use WordPress software without being hosted on the WordPress platform. You don’t have to host your own videos. There are platforms to do that, and you will probably have to change them from time to time.
The main benefit of owning your own platform is psychological. It is liberating to have a place where you determine the rules. The most harmful thing about YouTube is not the outright cancellation of channels. It is the uncertainty of living under the tyranny of arbitrary censors, which leads some to self-censorship and outright paralysis.
Paying attention, Richie?
7. Promote freedom of speech and regulation of censorious tech giants. These are now the two most important political issues for the Dissident Right. We all need to give them at least some of our time and effort. Again, censorship will not defeat us, but it will slow us down. It will delay the day of victory. And every day victory is delayed is measured in white lives: whites who will die and whites who will never be born because of the Great Replacement. Thus every effort you put into fighting censorship and promoting freedom will save lives.
Paying attention, Richie?  What does it say about you that even Gaslighting Greg shows more sense?
8. Calm the tards. 
In other words, calm 99.9% of Der Movement.
9. Conspire together for a better world. A couple of years ago, I came to a rather sobering realization. As fond as I am of writing books and crafting arguments, I concluded that the most important thing I could do with my life is to help create a censorship-free, monetizable alternative to YouTube. And I don’t even like videos.
Such a site should be structured like YouTube used to be: to constantly expand people’s intellectual horizons. Such a platform could be curated to foster a cultural and political renaissance. 
As long as you curate out all of Der Movement's videos.
And it would be good for the Dissident Right, because we win every fair and open debate. 
Yes, which is why you ban critics from commenting on your blog.
An additional benefit would be to stick a knife in the guts of the world’s most evil corporation, and twist it a few times.
I’ve slowly been putting together a vision and the necessary pieces to bring this project about. But you can’t do much without a consensus that an alternative is needed. If something isn’t broken, you don’t fix it. Such projects remain pipedreams without the requisite sense of urgency. But now YouTube is forcing our hand.
Right.  God forbid any of these heroes, with their supporters and fiscal resources, actually have the sense, prudence, and pre-planning (all allegedly strengths of their racially superior ethnies) to start the project BEFORE the problem occurs.  No, the attitude is - 
If something isn’t broken, you don’t fix it.
That’s the sort of foresight we must expect from our fearless leaders!

This is all followed by an appeal for “D’Nations.”  After all, how is Greg going to travel to all those Scandza forums?

Wednesday, August 28, 2019

Sallis' Law Confirmed Once Again

And other news.

Was Italy unified? It’s still racially, and thus IQ-wise, and thus everything else wise, split in 2 as it ever was.Southerners who emigrate to the North still frequent each other, and there’s very little mixing between the two real Italies even at the “acquaintance” level. Then of course everyone in the “classes that matter” pretends to things being other, and it makes all quite happy. (Including the beneficiaries of the billions spent to “bridge the gap”, along the same lines of USA’s gap-bridging, and with equal outcome).
The Bossi family testifies to the lack of mixing between the two. Hail Padania!
The northern Italians have a saying, which translated into English is that Garibaldi didn’t unite Italy so much as he divided Africa.
You have none of those Africans in leadership positions in Der Movement.  Thus, you must be enjoying unprecedented success.  Hail Victory!
I couldn’t get past the first half hour of this film, probably due to its tedious pace and attention to the extreme decadence of the Italian Aristocracy. If you’re going to glorify aristocracy, I’ll accept the British, but the Italians can’t figure out how to practice self-control.
As long as you don’t bend over to pick up the soap in a shower stall at Oxford or Cambridge.
S Italy was a mess under the Bourbons. It got much worse after Italy was unified. It got so bad that by 1880 the S Italians fled to America and brought their mafia government here. Wretched refuse indeed.
Indeed!  What we need instead are more Aryan Barbarians dancing around cemeteries in swastika-soled boots.  Hail Victory!

Sallis’ Law confirmed once again. It's a law of nature more definitive than that of, say, gravity or electro-magnetism. As well, my open call for White ethnics to abandon Der Movement is also further legitimized. Just leave it to the swastika-soled boots, drunken podcasts, Pepe, homosexual flirting at meetings, etc. crowd and sit back and watch it fail, as it has for the last 50-100 years.

The following is perhaps not unrelated to the preceding - Zman:
Another reason co-called conservatives were happy to call Koch a right-winger is the Left was happy to call him a right-winger. The best maneuver in the Progressive playbook is to select the leaders of their opponents. They focus their attention on one soft target, making that person the symbol of their cause. That person then becomes the easily mocked and ridiculed leader of the opposition. For example, they turned the alt-right into a joke by cultivating Richard Spencer as the face of the movement.
Yes, he’s right about Spencer, but Zman’s buddy, Gaslighting Greg, is no better.  And ALL the rest of them. Blaming Spencer alone – or even predominantly – for the collapse of the Alt Right is ludicrously naive or dishonest to the point of breathtaking mendacity. I for one was denouncing the Alt Right, and predicting (and hoping for) its downfall, even at its peak in 2016 and early 2017. The only thing that surprised me is how quickly it collapsed; even I couldn’t predict the astonishing levels of stupidity and ineptness coming from that distortion of racial activism.

The racially superior hero expresses himself.  Yes, at which point they’ll just ban you anyway, and invent ever more narrow speech codes to justify it.  Anyone with an ounce of sense understands that the free speech issue is discrete not continuous.  You either have it or you do not. Trying to parse different levels of censorship means that you’ll always be at the mercy of the censor and their changing standards.  Why does Spencer believe that any “defined” YouTube policy will last a second longer than the start of SPLC/ADL screeching about “White supremacists taking advantage of loopholes” and Huffpost/Guardian articles asking (i.e., ordering) YouTube to “do something about it?”

It is one thing to recognize the reality of censorship and try to do something about it, both short term (adjusting to the reality) and long term (fighting for pure free speech rights).  Yes, it is one thing to deal with the reality while vigorously denouncing it, making arguments against it, and, perhaps, getting involved in the political process to deal with it.  It is another thing entirely to be so naive and simple-minded that you actually believe that Internet/social media entities would establish a definitive and permanent set of rules and guidelines. They are not playing by a set of idealistic rules; their rules and guidelines are, and will remain, purely utilitarian.  If it shuts down Far Right speech, then that’s the rule. If it doesn’t, then the rule will be changed until it does.  You do not embrace speech codes and call for a “clearer statement” of them.  While dealing with the reality, you oppose the reality, and, realistically point out what I’m saying here – that there can be no compromises on free speech, because once the precedent is set, the “line” dividing acceptable from non-acceptable will always be redrawn for political purposes.  And as I’ve written about before, let no one believe that the over-rated “successes” in Europe (with their own speech codes) in any way argues against this.  Those “successes” are for the most part small wins in minor skirmishes, confined within narrow guidelines of acceptability, and whenever any leader or spokesmen steps out of line, it’s prison or fines for them. Why should Americans so blithely give up on free speech, then?  And I don’t want to hear about “free speech is the government, and private entities can do what they want.”  First, these social media giants are essentially utilities and borderline monopolies and should be regulated as such. Second, it is NOT TRUE that private entities can “do what they want” with their property.  Let’s see a White homeowner publicly advertise selling or renting only to Whites, let them state that, for example, they refuse to sell or rent to Blacks, Hispanics, or Muslims (of any race).  You’ll see then how quickly “private property rights” evaporate.

In summary, again, Zman has a point.  Spencer is so shallow that he makes a piece of tissue sliced by a microtome look as deep as the Grand Canyon by comparison.

Speaking of shallow: “The devastation is the most important thing,” after all.  A man of genuine greatness!

I laugh at how articles about “super commuting” completely  ignore a major reason – perhaps the major reason - for such commuting, and for long commutes in general – RACE.  That is, White workers cannot, or will not, live in or around those urban areas that have the jobs because those same urban areas and their surroundings are infested with “vibrant” Color.

Granted, long commutes in more rural regions have other causes, some alluded to in the article, but the fact is that long commutes are still overwhelmingly a blue state coastal and Rust Belt phenomenon.  It is something found wherever you have large numbers of Blacks and Hispanics and the flight of Whites away from them.  It is another symptom of White Flight, and another indication that the Contamination of Color is metastasizing away from the urban cores into surrounding suburbs, and into smaller cities as well.  Whites need to keep on moving farther and farther away to escape the rising tide of Color, but the jobs stay where they are. Hence, the long commutes.





Monday, August 26, 2019

Following Up on the National Alliance

More on why all those "free riders" are keeping their distance.  

Following up on this, see this.  Emphasis in original.
WILL WILLIAMS
13 JUNE, 2016 AT 7:11 PM — REPLY
Thanks, Mr. Seeber. I take responsibility for hiring the nutters and have been paying the price for it. In December 2014 we had to have someone, preferably someone who was trustworthy, on the WV property, and fast. Volunteers were scarce with so few Alliance members at the time, especially with winter coming on and the facilities in shambles. David Pringle and his fiancee Laura Lee have been getting settled on The Land now for over a month and are whipping the place back into shape. Theirs is the presence we’ve been needing on site for a long while. Before they arrived, it was like, you work with who is available, not with who you wish you have.
He takes responsibility.  Very well. However, apart from personally paying a price for it, what are the organizational-wide consequences for it?  None that I can see.  As far as “the facilities in shambles” and “few Alliance members at the time” whose fault is that?  The NA has been in existence for decades, it was getting a steady stream of revenue in the Pierce days, and after that, there’s nothing to show for it. They'll blame it on Gliebe - see more about that below.
...it was like, you work with who is available, not with who you wish you have.
Exactly the opposite of the attitude that proper leadership would have.  The proper attitude should be – “if you don’t have who you wish you had, then postpone your projects and prioritize recruiting precisely those people that you really need and wish for.”

And how was this sorry state reached?  Some answers are perhaps here.  In all cases, emphasis added.
"Pierce loved Erich and kind of protected him," says David Pringle, a former Alliance membership coordinator. "He would always sing Erich's praises."
Good judgment there Pierce.  After all, someone of German ancestry – father a WWII soldier no less! – who fought as “the Aryan Barbarian” has all the requisite attributes for “movement” leadership. Heil!
And Pierce was a good man to know. By the time he died in 2002, his organization constituted the elite of the white-power movement. The Alliance was earning more than $1 million a year and was considered "one of the leading institutions of the radical right in the Western hemisphere," according to the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), which monitors hate groups.
There was money.  Der Movement has always had money.  It’s just squandered by the Quota queens.
But the good times didn't last.
Who would have ever guessed?
Pierce died unexpectedly from a swift strike of cancer and kidney failure. On his deathbed, he appointed Gliebe to the board of directors. It ensured his protégé a leading role in the Alliance.
Good judgment there Pierce.  Having the most pathetically abysmal judgment imaginable is a prerequisite for “movement” leadership.  
Shortly after Pierce was gone, three board members gathered in a cottage in West Virginia, sipping coffee. Fearing that the cause would lose momentum, they wanted to name a new leader fast.
Sure!  For a decision of this magnitude, make it fast, fast, fast – while sipping on your coffee. All you had to do was follow the Great Man’s recommendation, right?  What could go wrong?  Just throw prudence and deliberation out the window. But, hey, I though prudence and deliberation were defining characteristics of the big-brained Inner Hajnals?
It wasn't an easy sell. Who wants to move to an isolated compound in West Virginia, three dozen miles from the nearest Wal-Mart?
Indeed.  That’s where the worldwide White Revolution is being organized.  Indoor plumbing optional.
Gliebe volunteered. Or rather, he raised his hand and said, "Me, me, me, me!" according to Robert DeMarais, who attended the meeting.
Who could resist?
Gliebe himself had a reputation as a ladies' man. At one point, he claimed to have six girlfriends at the same time, according to Pringle. When asked about these rumors, Gliebe just laughs and looks flattered as his wife denies them.
Six at the same time?  Gee…Pierce just had his serial monogamy with the Eastern European mail order brides.
"I've always been able to get our message out to females," he says.
The message or something else?
Erika was one woman who didn't need convincing. She met Erich in the fall of 2004 after she called the Alliance to complain about being banned from the Resistance Records online chat room. The two instantly hit it off. On one of their first dates, they danced around a cemetery in Atlanta, where Erika used to live.
“Danced around a cemetery.”  But they’re racially pure and superior, and don’t you forget it!
But Erika's modeling experience and her stripping job at Atlanta's infamous Gold Club didn't sit well with Alliance members. Rumors flew that Erika had danced for black athletes and that the club was owned by a Jew.
Gliebe never understood the furor.
Sure. What’s wrong with the partner of the leader of “worldwide White Revolution” working as a stripper? Who can understand the furor?
"In the real world, I'd be a hero for marrying a Playboy model," he says.
Glad to see he has enough sense to know that the NA has nothing at all to do with “the real world.”
"The Alliance had purchased more than $50,000 worth of swastika-soled boots, supposedly made in China. The boots were meant to be a moneymaker for the Alliance, which also sells books, magazines, jewelry, and tank tops. Pringle called them a waste of money; Gliebe calls them a "great investment."
With that outstanding success, victory is just around the corner. After all, swastika-soled boots, made by Chinese slave labor, are the last and final ingredient required to attract those 250,000 new NA members!  This is the sort of imaginative and strategic visionary leadership that has led Der Movement to the precipice of Total Victory!  Heil!
He says that race-mixing led to the fall of the Roman Empire -- never mind its economic woes or military failures -- and that the founders of India's ancient civilization were white.
But of course.  But – ah! – the racially pure and high quality NA leadership has proven their genetically encoded superiority time and again!  The William Pierce Memorial Statue awaits!  How tall shall it be?


Pay attention, all you "free riders."

Sunday, August 25, 2019

Where Things Stand Indeed

Critiquing Strom's piece.

Dr. Oliver made his assessment as part of a promotional film, After Fifty Years, for the National Youth Alliance — the predecessor of today’s National Alliance. The book the Youth Alliance chose to inspire young people was Francis Parker Yockey’s flawed but powerful Imperium — which is today still available from our Cosmotheist book store.
That’s a pleasant surprise, since Pierce was not selling Imperium back when I perused his book catalog.  He did sell books by McCulloch, as does your book store today. Don't expect much support from so-called "White ethnics" by the way.  Why should they support you if you do not support them?  Why should they support people who despise them?  Good luck achieving your objectives while writing off a significant fraction of the American and world-wide European-derived population.
As we approach 2020, much has changed.
Has it?  Really?
Today, we have much more than Imperium.
Quantity wise, yes. Quality wise, hardly.
We have the great example of what Yockey, in that book, called The Hero of the Second World War — Adolf Hitler — and his titanic, even mythic, struggle — not yet finished, despite his martyrdom — against the Enemies of Life. We have that great example shining in front of us, and shining before the new generations of our Folk, more than ever now, as the tired myths promoted by our enemies deservedly and inevitably expire.
Sigh. Hitler worship is not going to get us anywhere.  Yes, I’m sympathetic to Saint Adolf’s struggles against “the Enemies of Life,” but we also need to be cognizant of the man’s majestic flaws.  Hitler stained his legacy by his propensity for hegemonic war against other European peoples.  An honest reading of history - including by authors like Irving who can hardly be labeled as biased against Hitler - will demonstrate that Hitler's foreign policy was always aimed at territorial expansion to be achieved by dispossessing the Slavs.  His racial views were Nordicist and Germanocentric. I realize that none of that will trouble Der Movement, but the question goes back to whether you honestly want to achieve your ostensible objectives.  If you do, a more balanced appraisal of Saint Adolf would be helpful.
We have the life’s work of Revilo Oliver, the greatest of which he created after 1970 — after the age of 62 — when he renounced conservatism and Christianity, fully endorsed racial-nationalism, and promoted the National Alliance and National Socialism.
Oliver had some good points, but bad points as well – in the end, descending into Type I fetishism and dogma.
We have one of the greatest books of the 20th century, Which Way, Western Man? by the thinker and philosopher — and National Alliance member — William Gayley Simpson.
Another dogmatic and limited fetishist.
We have the life’s work of the founder of the National Alliance, Dr. William Luther Pierce, whose leadership had just barely begun in 1970. Dr. Pierce relentlessly wrote and organized and broadcast his works to the world until his death in 2002…
Ditto.
... — and Will Williams, the current chairman of the Alliance, has dedicated his life to not only preserving those works, but to vividly and repeatedly promoting them and making them available — again and again, week after week, year after year — to new generations of our people.
I’m not sure promoting all of those works is a positive.
Today, unlike in 1920 and in 1970, we have the ability to propagate our message to millions of our people via nationalvanguard.org and our other outlets. It’s been a long time since our pages were visited fewer than a million times per month. 
The Internet shall save us!  We’ve been hearing that tired old tune for about two decades now.  The Alt Right was real prominent on the Internet…where are they now?  How is the NA translating that online success to analog activism?
We — and other racial-nationalists, many of them awakened and inspired by our work — have been so successful in doing this that the Jewish power structure is desperate to shut down our media operations by any means, fair or foul. 
Are you prepared for that contingency?
The hundreds of thousands of young White people who read our words are making themselves known. They have been censored, delisted, banned, and shadowbanned again and again and again — yet, on Twitter alone, they still number in six figures by my estimate and are growing by the day — young people who know that Pierce and Rockwell and Simpson and Oliver and Hitler will be the saints of the future — and its architects. As one wag put it, the only question is: “How tall will their statues be?”
Oh dear god…can you believe this?  Can we stop with this “we will win in the end” optimism that is backed up by 100 years of complete failure HOW are you going to achieve that future?
It is true that the hundreds of thousands who read our words have mostly been free riders. Most have not joined us, or sent donations. Some are doubtlessly intimidated by what the Jews have done to ruin the lives of conscious Whites.
How about a bit more self-awareness as well?  It’s also that these “free riders” have absolute zero confidence in the “movement” and its affirmative action leadership.  They see humiliation after humiliation, defeat after defeat, infiltration after infiltration, endless failure after endless failure. Why should they get involved?  Has the NA in its more recent incarnation been free of this? “Smoky Mountain SS” (or whatever he called himself) delivering NA files to the enemy, and then the DeCourcy fiasco.  Even putting the best face on all of that, it shows questionable judgment regarding the types of people in the organization.  That’s the same type of bad judgment that led to the Hermansson infiltration and the Disqus exposures for other groups.  Can you blame prudent people for not trusting “movement leadership?”  I won’t even get into the Gliebe and Walker era with respect to the NA, etc. – but you have to realize that anyone looking into the group online – the vaunted Internet! – can see (and smell) all the dirty laundry. Thus, people may agree with your writings and broadcasts but they do not believe that anyone involved has the character and competence to be effective leaders. Are they wrong?  Then prove it.  
To those of you who are in that category, let me say two things: 1) There is great safety in numbers. When 250,000 people are supporting the National Alliance instead of just reading our words, we will be strong enough to be a social force that few will want to tangle with, legally or otherwise. 
How are you going to achieve this?  How are you going to straighten your own activist core out, win victories, and be palatable enough to attract 250,000 people? Or 25,000?  Or 2,500?  Or even 250?
Then the fence-sitters will leave the fence in droves — and a quarter million will be just the beginning. They won’t have enough corrupt US Attorneys or jails to make a much of a dent in our numbers or our morale then. In fact, by then, we might have more than a few prosecutors on our side, as well as leaders in every field of our society — when these people see that someone’s finally doing something. 
Ah, the key is – “someone’s finally doing something.”  The problem is that this is not happening. Ball in your court.  Clean up your own operation first.  Can your group go several years in a row without some new scandal, infighting, arrests, embarrassments, etc.?
2) It is, using cryptocurrency — which is not hard to use, quite possible to support our efforts with perfect anonymity. Even we won’t be able to know who you are unless you want us to.
For people to go to the trouble of doing that, they need to have the confidence to know it’ll be put to good use.  NONE of the “movement leaders” have presented us with evidence to build that confidence.
Another reason for the free riders is, I think, a psychological peculiarity of White people: Despite our great propensity for free thought and individual innovation, we are deeply law-abiding people who respect authority and hierarchy. We need psychological permission from a leader before engaging in warlike acts, or going against convention, or going against powerful interest groups. But once that psychological “permission” is obtained, no one is a stronger or better fighter — and conqueror — and destroyer of his enemies — than the awakened White man.
That leader has to be someone respected – not a laughingstock.  Not someone who has more skeletons in their closet than a graveyard.
We need to position ourselves as worthy — and actually be worthy — of leadership. We need to be excellent in everything we do. We need flawless logic and sterling character. We need authenticity and honor. We need the authority that comes from knowledge and truthfulness. We need the moral authority that comes from wisdom — and from right living that will be an example to all who see it. We need to be unforgiving — and totally dedicated to stamping out each and every threat to our people’s existence, forever. We need relentless effort that never tires, never quits. We need to engage the “authorities” of our society and publicly challenge their corruption. Most of all, we need to be strong —for no one and nothing in Nature respects the weak.
Very good.  Get started.  You haven’t even taken the first step yet.
As William Pierce said, the National Alliance needs to embody a society in the making — embody, with excellence, every function needed to assume societal leadership when the time is ripe.
Too bad he failed utterly in achieving any of that when he was alive.
Have we done that yet? No. 
Honesty.
Are we ready to take on such in-depth leadership of our society now? No. No one is. But when the hundreds of thousands see that we are serious about doing exactly that, our cause, in the words of Dr. Oliver, “will move forward with the gathering momentum of an avalanche.”
Doubtful. Wishful thinking.

No offense Kevin, but there’s nothing here.  Granted, of course, I don’t expect you to publicly reveal your plans in any detail (but given the reality of infiltration and System surveillance, it would probably be known anyway), but how about some discussion of strategic direction, at least in general terms?  Again, there’s nothing here, except the usual praise for Hitler, Pierce, and other Type Is, obvious statements on how you need more supporters, calls for more effective leadership, and of course the type of overly optimistic “fascist” thinking mocked by Roger Griffin, exemplified by:
…young people who know that Pierce and Rockwell and Simpson and Oliver and Hitler will be the saints of the future — and its architects. As one wag put it, the only question is: “How tall will their statues be?”
Great.  And how is that future going to be achieved?  How are ANY of the steps required to even make the initial moves to get to that future going to be achieved?  Again, I’m not asking for details, I’m not asking for secrets or anything that can be leveraged against your plans, but just the broadest outlines of a winning strategy.  

But there’s nothing.  There’s always nothing. This is my point.  In 1969 Oliver talked about 50 years of failure and here we are after 50 more years of failure and all we can point to is how popular certain websites are on the Internet.  And when those get deplatformed, then what?

This Strom piece is a gross disappointment. It’s not enough to say that “you should all support the NA.”  It’s not enough to dream about a future in which we debate how tall the William Pierce Memorial Statue should be.  And it’s not enough to talk about what is needed about quality leadership.  You have to DO.  And the first step in DOING – and what you can do right now with the limited resources you have – is to run a professional, sane, disciplined organization that does not provide SPLC gossip every few months via some embarrassment, infiltration, scandal, infighting, or other incident.  Start by stop making avoidable errors. You need to have a different attitude toward the people you hire, the people you accept as leading activists. Warm bodies willing to live on a mountaintop somewhere are not enough. The attitude of “well, these are the only people willing to come out in the middle of nowhere and work for us” is not helpful.  Maybe that’s the problem? It’s a self-perpetuating cycle where the low quality of the operation attracts low quality people who lower the quality of the organization even more. And this all repels quality people. Quality people are not going to be attracted by some micro-group, living out in the woods somewhere, with employees whose major attribute is a willingness to endure those conditions. [Note – I’ve repeatedly written that Pierce’s move out of the DC area and into the WV mountains was a gross error].

The first step is to break this negative cycle.  It would be better to take one step back in order to move forward than continuing down a wrong path.  Better to have three quality people to start with than to have 30 defectives. Better to take the time to build an infrastructure that inspires confidence than to push forward under current conditions with an infrastructure that gives the impression (rightly or wrongly) that you’re trying to lead a worldwide revolutionary movement out of a trailer park. I’m not trying to be overly harsh, just brutally honest.  It’s not like the NA under Pierce wasn’t pulling in money – it was.  It was just all squandered.  It’s not the fault of the “free riders” that that happened.

It's not enough to "be strong." You have to look strong as well. You need to project strength, integrity, and competence in order to inspire the confidence required to attract the supporters you want.  People are not going to come to you just because you say you need them.  People will not sacrifice for a leader or for an organization that produces nothing but embarrassment and failure. Again, the very first step is relatively easy and eminently achievable - stop making mistakes, stop the scandals, stop the bad judgment, stop hiring questionable people, stop with the attitude that anyone is better than no one (is a negative number higher than zero?). You need to build a record that inspires confidence. You need to stop all the "facepalm" episodes.  At this point, an absence of embarrassment and disaster can count as a victory.  Be prudent.  Yes, I know - "no risk, no reward"- but this is not what we are talking about here.  Foolishness and bad judgment is not reasonable risk-taking. Endless failure is not a reward.

Rethink your strategy and tactics.

Saturday, August 24, 2019

A New Definition of Random

The System gaslights as much as the "movement."


Let’s see.  A Negro attacks “people” and with one of the attacks “anti-White statements” were made.  It is reported as “random” attacks on "people" by an unidentified “man.”  

Der System, Der System, Der System marches on.

Friday, August 23, 2019

A Man of Genuine Greatness!

Johnson is right!

See this, emphasis added:
When rapper A$AP Rocky was freed from detention in Sweden and returned to the United States earlier this month, it marked the end of a bizarre saga that at one point involved the president; his son-in-law, Jared Kushner; and the State Department’s top hostage negotiator. Though President Trump’s campaign to free Rocky appeared to end well, a behind-the-scenes battle provides a unique glimpse into the unusual characters and fraught tensions involved in Trump’s outreach efforts to the black community.

According to new details provided by sources involved, Trump’s role in pushing for Rocky’s release started with a reality television megastar calling the West Wing, a mysterious entertainment industry “fixer” and two Trump supporters. The president’s allies who connected Rocky’s team with the White House hoped to facilitate a scene that would bolster Trump’s image among African-Americans. Instead, they say they were left angry when Rocky failed to thank Trump or those around him. 
“Many, many members of the African-American community have called me, friends of mine, and said, ‘Could you help?’” Trump said. “So I personally don’t know A$AP Rocky, but I can tell you he has a lot of support from the African-American community in this country.”
Later that day, Trump announced on Twitter that he had spoken to Kanye West about the case and planned to call the Swedish prime minister.
The two men said they were left disappointed that Rocky didn’t thank the White House — even behind the scenes.
“All he had to do was do a two-minute call to say thank you,” said Scott. “Rocky hasn’t even called us and said, ‘Hey, man, thank you guys. I appreciate it,’ in private. Just in private.”
Meanwhile, not only does Trump do nothing when his White supporters are physically attacked in the streets with impunity, his DOJ actually persecutes those supporters.

A man - a sincere man! - of genuine greatness!



The hero of the Battle of the Bone Spurs.


Wednesday, August 21, 2019

Sallis' Law and Other News

In der news. In all cases, emphasis added.

Amren writes about Italy, so....
JackKrak

OT, I know, any mention of Italian politics always makes me think how we sacrificed so many men there in the war to free a people who, then and now, regularly give about 10-12% of their votes to Communists. Not delusional, Bernie-type leftists, but actual, hard-line Communists.
Tim  JackKrak 

My Dad was there for the invasion of Sicily. And more... As the campaign was winding down his troop ship was converted to a POW one for the voyage back home. So he found a Prisoner who spoke passable English, and gave him his parole and seven dollars, telling him to go find vino and some black shoe polish, on his strict promise to return within the hour. Fifty five minutes later, the POW reappeared at the gang plank as promised, with a basket of Chianti, a shoe shine boy, the shoe shine boy`s big sister and five more POW`s...
Rich at Large 

It seems that Italy's government is always collapsing in any given year. It's part of the "charm" of Italy.
Other news:

Johnson:  Trump is a man of genuine greatness.
Sallis: Trump is a vulgar ignorant buffoon.

Two days after he said buying Greenland wasn't a top priority, President Donald Trump canceled an upcoming trip to Denmark, which owns the mostly frozen island, after its prime minister dismissed the idea.

Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen had called Trump's musing about buying the Danish territory "an absurd discussion" after the former real estate mogul-turned-president began to talk up the idea.
Trump said Sunday that he was interested in such a deal for strategic purposes, but said a purchase was not a priority at this time. "It's not No. 1 on the burner," he told reporters.
Trump even joked about his proposal as it came in for ridicule, tweeting a doctored photo of a glistening Trump skyscraper looming over a small village in the Arctic territory.
"I promise not to do this to Greenland," he joked Monday.
But on Tuesday, Trump abruptly canceled the visit, also by tweet.
One can imagine a tweet that would be Peak Trump. For example:
We are buying Greenland as a strategic base to defend Israel! I will appoint A$AP Rocky as Governor General!
The sad thing is that would be a perfectly plausible Trump tweet.

Tuesday, August 20, 2019

Reality Contra Johnson, 8/20/19

Why Trump won.

Greg Johnson continuously gaslights his readers to accept the nonsense that Trump is sincere since he could have won the nomination and election by being an ideological clone of Jeb Bush but chose not to. Thus, Trump really believed in what he professed during the campaign, he wasn't an obvious fraud and buffoon as I stated back then, no, Trump, a "man of genuine greatness," really meant all that he said, and his supporters in Der Movement cannot be criticized for believing it.

According to this absurd "take" on the election, it was Trump's charming personality and not his right-wing populism that led to victory.  Of course, in my opinion, all of this is justification for Johnson to refuse to admit being wrong about Trump - wrong on a level that is astonishing - so that his position as a "movement leader" can be safeguarded from legitimate criticism about his bad judgment.  

In my opinion, Trump won ONLY because he staked out positions to appeal to White voters feeling demographically swamped and who wanted someone to defend their interests.

Let's see what others have said. 

From before the election, but after Trump won the nomination:
Most of Trump’s supporters back him not because of his rudeness and brutality but despite it. They think it worthwhile to pay the price of such outbursts because of other things for which they think Trump stands—say, his critique of illegal immigration, international trade agreements, or our foreign policy.

Here is the PNAS study.  Read it well.  Hmmm...if anxiety about loss of White majority status was a major driver for Trump support in 2016, then does it make sense that these same voters would have supported Trump if he had mimicked Jeb's open borders, pro-amnesty, pro-immigration stance toward demographic change?   That political science study clearly supports Sallis and utterly refutes Johnson.

Trump himself understood it:
In the same rally, he pointed out something that voters at his events frequently raise — that despite reservations about his personality, they approve of his message on tackling illegal immigration, hitting Isis harder, and doing better deals around the world.
The reality is quite clear. The facts are quite clear.  What is not clear is why anyone in the "movement" continues to support Johnson.

So, is this one of the voices of WN 2.0 or WN 3.0?  Inquiring minds want to know!

Monday, August 19, 2019

Norman Lowell Interregnum Interview

Interesting.


I agree with Lowell in about 95% of what he says, and the other 5% are minor things that are not relevant to the main points, the main objectives. Of that 5%, I have to disagree with Lowell’s opinion of certain books and racialist leaders, and I have always stressed science and dismissed theosophy.  But those are details. I have always supported and endorsed the main tenets of Lowell’s Imperium Europa idea, and I do so once again.  He is always an effective voice of reason against the petty nationalism that infests much of “far right nationalism” in the West today.  Unfortunately, it seems like all of the websites associated with him are either no longer functioning or the domain registrations have expired. I would advise getting those back up and running.

One more point about this podcast.

When people like Leonard talk about the “Italian” language, they seem to imply that there is some long-standing and coherent Italian language that is naturally and historically spoken by all (real) Italians, but those bizarre southerners (alone) speak their own isolated dialects. The reality of course is that there have historically been different dialects throughout the Italian peninsula and islands, and one of those, Tuscan/Florentine, was used to develop a language to tie together the peoples of the nation.

Read this, emphasis added:
The standard Italian language has a poetic and literary origin in the writings of Tuscan writers of the 12th century, and, even though the grammar and core lexicon are basically unchanged from those used in Florence in the 13th century,[18] the modern standard of the language was largely shaped by relatively recent events…The language that came to be thought of as Italian developed in central Tuscany and was first formalized in the early 14th century through the works of Tuscan writer Dante Alighieri, written in his native Florentine…In addition to the widespread exposure gained through literature, the Florentine dialect also gained prestige due to the political and cultural significance of Florence at the time and the fact that it was linguistically an intermediate between the northern and the southern Italian dialects.[16]:22 Thus the dialect of Florence became the basis for what would become the official language of Italy.  Italian was progressively made an official language of most of the Italian states predating unification, slowly replacing Latin…
Milanese dialect is just as "not Italian" as is Neapolitan dialect.  There are, and historically have been, many dialects in Italy; the Florentine dialect was that which became the basis for a national language.  So, this is another issue for which the fetishists can calm down about and wipe the sweat off their foreheads.

Sunday, August 18, 2019

Sallis, Strom, and Racial Purity

Depends who writes it, I guess.

Remember this essay?  Remember the criticism the basic points received from the Nutzi peanut gallery?

Read this from Strom, emphasis added:
We have common ancestry with every living creature on this planet, if you go back far enough. So the old racialist idea of “purity” — meaning an unbroken, nearly identical lineage going “back to Adam” — was wrong from the start. Purity is the wrong word; those who used it were unaware of the ever-evolving nature of life. They were ignorant of evolution, which is a branching process; they didn’t know that all the races, varieties, subspecies, and species that ever lived are branches on one metaphorical tree — and that, going backwards in time, all the branches eventually converge into one at the root.
Question: Is the crazed mestizo “Chechar” going to accuse Strom of “sophistry?”  Does Strom – long associated with radical Nordicists like Pierce – have a “Medicist” agenda?  Or is he just talking hard science and plain common sense?

So: If Sallis writes it, then it’s bad.  If Strom writes it, it’s acceptable.  The exact same point, expressed by two different people, received in completely different ways.  Does that tell you anything?  

Then, this:
As the writer David Sims tells us, “Morally speaking, a flaw is anything that works contrary to survival. In any proper moral system, survival has the highest value. Why? Because nothing matters to the dead. Because neither truth, nor justice, nor freedom, nor prosperity have any value at all to extinct groups. Because only to something alive may anything else be good. If a moral system gives to anything but survival the highest place of value, sooner or later a conflict will arise between survival and whatever that other thing is.
Agreed, and that’s a point I was making long ago at Majority Rights, arguing against both the cognitive elitism of GNXP, and the aracial conservatism of John Ray.  We care about various ideas, in the last analysis, based upon how they affect us as people, as evolved organisms, and an idea does not benefit a group if that idea contributes to that group’s demise, or even if it doesn’t positively contribute to that group’s survival.

Regurgitating obviously wrong ideas about an absolute racial purity, which is easily discredited by the Left, does not serve the cause of survival.  A forward-looking emphasis on EGI and evolution (concepts that are not incompatible, by the way, regardless of “movement” lies that EGI favors “genetic stasis”) does enhance group survival – such arguments are proofed against an honest scientific critique.