Biological Origins of Male-Female Behavioral Differences

The lies of feminism.

Some biological realities here.

When offered the choice of playing with either a doll or a toy truck, girls will typically pick the doll and boys will opt for the truck. This isn't just because society encourages girls to be nurturing and boys to be active, as people once thought. In experiments, male adolescent monkeys also prefer to play with wheeled vehicles while the females prefer dolls — and their societies say nothing on the matter. 

The monkey research, conducted with two different species in 2002 and 2008, strongly suggested a biological explanation for children's toy preferences. In recent years, the question has become: How and why does biology make males (be they monkey or human) prefer trucks, and females, dolls? 

New and ongoing research suggests babies' exposure to hormones while they are in the womb causes their toy preferences to emerge soon after birth. As for why evolution made this so, questions remain, but the toys may help boys and girls develop the skills they once needed to fulfill their ancient gender roles.

It is indeed unfortunate that we require scientific studies to confirm casual observation and solid good sense; however, undoing decades of unrelenting Leftism will require doses of strong medicine.

Some Breakthrough Comments

Some good sense.

With respect to this, we read (emphasis added):

Pierre de Craon

December 30, 2015 - 2:56 pm | 

If the goal of Mr. Highlands was to exhibit a mind-set that out-Semites the Semites in vulgarity of carnal focus, he may be a contender for the gold. Others must decide the matter, however. I can’t help feeling that this is a field of combat whereon even to be present is to be tainted.

Bob

December 30, 2015 - 1:41 pm | 

With regard to the candidacy of Donald Trump, I find myself taking some comfort in the fact that I have in the past held beliefs that have been proven out to have been wrong.

I have maintained from the very beginning that the Trump candidacy was nothing more than the establishment’s attempt to direct the very real anger of American Whites into supporting a major party candidate rather than coalescing into a real political opposition movement. I continue to believe this to be the case because logic and history continue to point to this as the most likely “truth”, but I find myself more and more hoping that this too is another one of those episodes where I will be proven wrong.

How sad is it that my hopes and dreams are to be invested in something which every fiber of my being tells me is not real?

Bob

Nick Dean

December 30, 2015 - 1:19 pm |

We cannot and need not lie.

This is a White movement not a Right movement.

If we take the old left mantra ‘no enemies to the left’ to have been successful, and then honestly transfer it to real politics, then we say ‘no enemies more pro-White’.

This is in direct contrast to the way the Alt-Right uses the phrase, ‘no enemies to the right.’ They just want a pass from real racial nationalists for being too open to Jews and Chinese wives.

We aren’t making breakthroughs when these compromises become culture, our enemies are.

And with respect to Devlin's comment about the importance of discussing the intersection of race and sex because we are a sexually reproducing species: I agree, and in general I have no problem with Devlin's work. The problem is with scum like Roissy, who promotes "sitting poolside" while having casual sex with non-White women so as to "increase your sexual marketplace value."  Not much sexual reproduction for Whites going on there.

A Breakthrough Imbecile

Absolute nonsense.

Read this stupidity.

Let's see: let's celebrate Roissy the Race-Mixer, who promotes nihilistic hedonism, revels in his non-White sexual partners, tells White men that having sex with Negresses will increase the men's "sexual marketplace value," who asserts that men who care about their race, culture, and society are "chumps" - yes, alright, that's a sign of progress no doubt!

Touchback Trump, he of the part-Jewish family, who believes that criticism of affirmative action is "very tough" on the "African-American community" - yes, indeed, Der Trumpening will ride into the White House like Ronnie Raygun.  Sure, we can all retire from racial activism with the new Trump administration - Donald Trump, who declared he wanted Oprah Winfrey (a possible girlfriend for Roissy?) as his running mate.  And Ron Paul?  Are any idiots still thinking "sound money for brown people" Ronnie is worth a damn for anything?

Red Ice Radio has had some good material, including Salter, but some of the conspiracy mongering is plain silly.

The Right Stuff (which by the way terms gamesters as "pussynerds" and criticizes libertarians like Paul, but let's not expect consistency from a website like TOO) also has some good material, but their forums are the typical dregs of absolute "movement" stupidity and imbecilic trolling, and, truth be told, snark doesn't compensate for thoughtful analysis (which is why I restrict the former to Richard Lynn's Pseudoscience and indulge in the latter elsewhere, particularly Western Destiny).

In summary, most of the "signs of progress" mentioned in the TOO article are signs of decadence, signs of a pathetic and embarrassingly self-unaware "movement."  As represented by the "game" crowd, all these "signs of progress" deal with societal degeneration by joining in: sexual hedonism, race-mixing, conspiracy-mongering, HBD pseudoscience, fossilized dogmas, obsessions with White Knights who don't give a damn about the White Race.

That's the price of the affirmative action that Trump denounces - it puts into place people for reasons other than merit and ability. Endless decades of the "movement's" affirmative action program has led to decadence and decay being championed as progress.

What a way to end 2015 and begin 2016: more of the same from a failed "movement."

Frank Salter on Australian Radio

Why should Aboriginal rights trump those of the Anglo-Australian founding stock?

Listen here.

Twelve minutes of Salter's good sense is worth more than any pile of dogmatic "movement" texts.

Counter-Currents MacDonald Interview

Good, but with some problems.

I listened to this.

Mostly good. I wasn't thrilled with the excessive Trumpism: the man is useful for creating chaos, but all this "man on white horse" breathlessness is pathetic. How many times has the "movement" been burned? Doesn't anyone ever learn? I wont't even mention the pro-Orbanism.

The main problem was with all the HBD-style flim-flam. Any theory of European history and behavior has to include Neolithic farmers. Fact is, varying degrees of Neolithic ancestry is found throughout Europe, including Northern Europe, and one cannot conflate the whole issue to Indo-Europeans vs. Northern Hunter-Gatherers. 

Is there evidence for increased "clannishness" in Southern Europe? Let's take a look at national individualism vs. collectivism. Does it go along with the dogmatic narrative? Italy is fairly high in individualism despite having more Neolithic ancestry. Despite being high in the Hunter-Gatherer ancestry, Russia has much greater collectivism. Hungary is resisting the refugees, and is low on collectivism. Italy and Greece, the assumed "clannish" nations, are taking in immigrants and refugees, and are sending out ships to rescue refugees at sea. How does that all fit into the narrative? And if these behaviors are genetic, shouldn't people of these ancestries living in America recapitulate Old World behavior? Do they? Data? Or is this all more "just so" stories to retroactively fit square peg data into round hole theories? 

And why does anyone in the "movement" take trash like "HBD Chick" seriously? Her "theories" have as many holes as what was discussed in the podcast. HBD is all highly politicized pseudoscience. 

What is wrong with all these people?

Behold The Man

Western Destiny review of Julian Young's Nietzsche biography.

Read here.

Update: Some spelling/grammar corrections have been done, and an extra paragraph on Nietzsche's mental breakdown has been added.

Joyce on Sexology, 12/16/15

Some comments and criticisms.

Joyce has some interesting comments on sexology.

Who is responsible for the outpouring of modern degeneracy?  Do we really need to ask?

Kevin MacDonald has noted that the Frankfurt School categorized healthy Western norms, nationalisms, and close family relationships as an indication of psychiatric disorder. By contrast, in the last few decades of the nineteenth century Jewish intellectuals began championing Western society’s outcasts and non-conformers. Using these outcasts, Jewish intellectuals could fight a proxy war against Western homogeneity, and wage a clandestine campaign for the acceptance of pluralism.

By subtly supporting the position of the socially and sexually deviant, these Jewish figures could gain acceptance or inconspicuousness in the newly atomized society, while simultaneously undermining the very health of the homogenous nation.

Remember that the next time some HBDer starts rhapsodizing over the wonders of Jewish IQ.

An excellent example of this nightmare becoming reality is one of the latest terms concocted within our atomized society:  Otherkin. According to Google, Otherkin are people who identify as partially or entirely non-human. Some say that they are, in spirit if not in body, not human. In any normal, healthy society this nonsense would be regarded as puerile or insane, and it certainly wouldn’t be indulged. But today, in the wake of Frankfurt School victory, the Otherkin community is just one of several growing realms for the bizarre.

Equally, in a society that has succumbed to Frankfurt School ideology one would expect to find that those most markedly different from the normal and healthy would be held up as alleged examples of the best of humanity.

Particularly relevant to our contemporary society, Ellis also astutely pointed out (206) that “there seems to be a certain relationship between the social reaction against homosexuality and against infanticide. Where the one is regarded leniently and favorably, there generally the other is also; where the one is stamped out, the other is usually stamped out.” Ellis’ astute remarks on the context behind the Jewish outlawing of homosexuality, and the use of violence against it by ancient cultures such as the Peruvians, bear further reflection. This is particularly the case given that there is a strain of inverts within our movement who propagandize their cause by weakly arguing that antipathy towards sexual inversion is due to the influence of “Judeo-Christian morals” rather than ethnically universal concerns around demographic health.

I agree with Joyce’s skepticism toward that “strain” in the “movement.”  It’s not that we are saying “no homosexuals allowed” – it is more of “can you stop talking about it, directly or indirectly, all the time?"  I remember back in the early 2000s when Yahoo groups were starting. I was interested in racial nationalist groups.  In my searches I came across one that asserted that they were “serious gay national socialists.”  A few minutes of analysis of their site confirmed that their “gay national socialism” was all about dressing up in Nazi uniforms and advertising such serious political activism as “U Piss I Drink” (no joke; that was one theme).  It’s one thing for an activist to keep their private life private, in the closest so to speak.  It is another to confuse racial activism with homosexual activism.  If nothing else, a sincere concern for EGI would mitigate against any attack on traditional sexual morality.

But, let us be consistent.  What about other destructive strains?  Should we promote miscegenation, including and especially with those wonderful yellow and brown Asians?  Should we denounce Poles while embracing “Sikh shopkeepers?”  Should we accept mendacious Desis “in our movement” who pose under false ethnic identities and start promoting intra-European feuds? In my opinion, a sincere homosexual of our race is infinitely better than a lying Ganges “family man” trying to turn Whites against one another.

This demographic concern was vital to the interpretations and views of non-Jewish sexologists. Since homosexuality, permitted to spread via fashion, leading to “acquired perversion” in the young, is socially linked to acceptance of abortion and infanticide, it acts to “check the population” and should thus be controlled and quarantined in a state that wishes to improve its demographic health.

The means of quarantine suggested by Ellis were not harsh or unreasonable. Society should refrain (215) from crushing the subject of abnormality with shame but, in an eerie premonition of the “Pride parades,” he argued that society should never allow the invert to “flout his perversion in its face and assume that he is of finer clay than the vulgar herd.” Since the genetic dead-end facing inverts was, in Ellis’ view, penalty enough, society should confine its approach to the sexually abnormal to the “protection of the helpless member of society against the invert.” Essentially, Ellis’ advice was to decriminalize the behavior of inverts and end societal shame surrounding it, but also to prevent inverts from flouting their abnormality, and from having physical, pedagogical or ideological access to children. Such was the approach of a broad swathe of opinion in mainstream (non-Jewish) sexology up to Weimar period. And this is largely the position taken by the Russian state today.

That is essentially a correct stance to take.

For Ellis as an evolutionist, a good indication of the pathology of homosexuality is that it is a reproductive dead end. Homosexuality has always been a puzzle to evolutionary biologists given that same-sex attraction would tend to lower reproductive success. However, since homosexuality has generally been stigmatized in historical societies, men with homosexual tendencies often married and procreated in order to avoid the penalties of being publicly homosexual…

What’s interesting is that many homosexual men have, throughout history, been able to father children.  This means they have been able to be sufficiently physically aroused by a woman to perform.  Should these men be more properly termed bisexual?  Or is homosexuality sufficiently “plastic” than even men who profess no sexual attraction to women are still able to perform with women?  If so, is their homosexuality truly genetic?  One wonders about the reverse?  I would think that – System propaganda about “most people are bisexual” aside – very few heterosexual men would be able to perform homosexual acts if required by social convention.  And yet, the argument by Joyce and other traditionalists is precisely that:  societal acceptance of homosexuality promotes its practice by those who otherwise would not be so inclined (and Ancient Greece is brought up as a possibility).  I actually agree with this latter view, which complicates my analysis.  

One may speculate a combination of genetic and environmental influences, resulting in a spectrum of types. Thus, a majority of today’s population (I say nothing about Ancient Greece) is strongly heterosexual, with no “invert” possibilities. Some fraction of the population however is weakly heterosexual – these are people who would conform to societal expectations of heterosexuality in a traditional society, but who may become homosexual or at least bisexual in a more permissive society. There may be a small fraction, very small, who are strongly homosexual and who would be unable to function with a member of the opposite sex. This is all hypothesis, and needs to be evaluated in an objective manner (unlikely in today’s pro-deviant climate).

Christmas Wish: Delenda Est HBD

Crush the infamy!

From here:

 …but they don’t offer an overall vision that can galvanize the masses against the establishment and inspire a cultural revival that is European rather than about IQ scores and pro-Asian in its celebration of IQ scores in abstraction from any sense of people-hood.

That's right. "Pro-Asian" is a marked understatement.  HBD is a radical, militant political movement which has as its objective the humiliating enslavement of European-derived Whites to Jews and Asians.

To put it in a Derbyshirian way: HBD is all about the "measured groveling" of Whites before the Altar of Asia.

Don't you have any sense of pride, White man?  Aren't you going to resist the HBDers putting the yoke on you, for you to be the goyisch cattle serving a Jewish/East Asian/South Asian ruling caste?

And with respect to the difference between real science and HBD quackery, I once again point you to Harpending's comments at approximately 8:00-9:30 here.  Real science is skeptical questioning and hypothesis testing. HBD is composed of dogmatic "true believers" who follow cult leaders (e.g., Lynn) and become hysterical at any attempt at criticism or clarification.

And that's because HBD is not science and is not about an authentic attempt to understand reality.  it's the political-academic arm of Asiatic world conquest.

You should "walk away" from HBD real fast.

A Thought For Christmas and the Upcoming New Year

Something to strive for.

Now, then, be the prophet and the fulfiller one. 

-                                                    -  Captain Ahab

From Moby Dick, by Herman Melville.

Behold the Female

Hard truths.

Read here. 

Some useful excerpts, emphasis added:

The nature of the female 

One needs only to see the way she is built to realize that woman is not intended for great mental or for great physical labor…Women are suited to being the nurses and teachers of our earliest childhood precisely because they themselves are childish, silly and short-sighted, in a word big children, their whole lives long: a kind of intermediate stage between the child and the man, who is the actual human being, ‘man.’

Natural weapons 

In the girl nature has had in view what could in theatrical terms be called a stage-effect: it has provided her with superabundant beauty and charm for a few years at the expense of the whole remainder of her life, so that during these years she may so capture the imagination of a man that he is carried away into undertaking to support her honorably in some form or another for the rest of her life, a step he would seem hardly likely to take for purely rational considerations. Thus nature has equipped women, as it has all its creatures, with the tools and weapons she needs for securing her existence, and at just the time she needs them; in doing which nature has acted with its usual economy. For just as the female ant loses its wings after mating, since they are then superfluous, indeed harmful to the business of raising the family, so the woman usually loses her beauty after one or two childbeds, and probably for the same reason.

Female truth 

The fundamental defect of the female character is a lack of a sense of justice. This originates first and foremost in their want of rationality and capacity for reflexion but it is strengthened by the fact that, as the weaker sex, they are driven to rely not on force but on cunning: hence their instinctive subtlety and their ineradicable tendency to tell lies: for, as nature has equipped the lion with claws and teeth, the elephant with tusks, the wild boar with fangs, the bull with horns and the cuttlefish with ink, so it has equipped woman with the power of dissimulation as her means of attack and defence, and has transformed into this gift all the strength it has bestowed on man in the form of physical strength and the power of reasoning…Women are guilty of perjury far more often than men. It is questionable whether they ought to be allowed to take an oath at all.

Feminine charms 

Only a male intellect clouded by the sexual drive could call the stunted, narrow-shouldered, broad-hipped and short-legged sex the fair sex: for it is with this drive that all its beauty is bound up. More fittingly than the fair sex, women could be called the unaesthetic sex. Neither for music, nor poetry, nor the plastic arts do they possess any real feeling or receptivity: if they affect to do so, it is merely mimicry in service of their effort to please. This comes from the fact that they are incapable of taking a purely objective interest in anything whatever, and the reason for this is, I think, as follows. Man strives in everything for a direct domination over things, either by comprehending or by subduing them. But woman is everywhere and always relegated to a merely indirect domination, which is achieved by means of man, who is consequently the only thing she has to dominate directly. Thus it lies in the nature of women to regard everything simply as a means of capturing a man, and their interest in anything else is only simulated, is no more than a detour, i.e. amounts to coquetry and mimicry.

Absence of genius 

Nor can one expect anything else from women if one considers that the most eminent heads of the entire sex have proved incapable of a single truly great, genuine and original achievement in art, or indeed of creating anything at all of lasting value: this strikes one most forcibly in regard to painting, since they are just as capable of mastering its technique as we are, and indeed paint very busily, yet cannot point to a single great painting; the reason being precisely that they lack all objectivity of mind…They are sexus sequior, the inferior second sex in every respect: one should be indulgent toward their weaknesses, but to pay them honour is ridiculous beyond measure and demeans us even in their eyes.

Property and inheritance

That the property which has cost men long years of toil and effort, and been won with so much difficulty, should afterwards come into the hands of women, who then, in their lack of reason, squander it in a short time, or otherwise fool it away, is a grievance and a wrong as serious as it is common, which should be prevented by limiting the right of women to inherit.
 

Immigration Insurance

Breezy still doesn't get it.

Read this nonsense.  Yeah, great idea - which completely ignores damage done to EGI. Typical HBD - all about the proximate; ultimate interests are completely ignored. But, then, they have to be ignored don't they?  If we started worrying about kinship, that means no Chinese sexbots for the "awkward squad" nerds, no Jamaican mongrels pontificating about race, no mendacious Desis practicing ethnic nepotism while telling Whites that such ethnic nepotism "is not adaptive,"

With kinship and EGI, the whole HBD house of cards comes tumbling down, eh Breezy?

This Is Conservatism

Conservatives: enemies on our left.

Piece of filth Kevin D. Williamson, cuckservative extraordinaire, expresses the conservative view of racial nationalists:

Yes, there are racists in the world, and they are engaged in politics, mainly in the form of basement-dwelling losers with Dungeons & Dragons avatars oinking about on Twitter. They are a significant consideration if you are Donald Trump’s psephological engineers. 

And this is the conservative worldview on race relations:

Everybody understands racism, too, and all people of good will reject it…

We can debate "no enemies to our right" (that is, if there is anyone to your right), but as far as enemies on your left - everyone to your left is an enemy, including and especially conservative trash, like the Jew-loving and Negro jock-sniffing losers at National Review, feebly "fighting battles" to the amused mockery of the Left, and defending a "conservatism" which is exactly what extreme liberalism was 50 years ago. And 50 years from now, assuming a nation called "The United States of America" still exists, and that National Review still exists as a forum of mainstream cuckservatism, then the "Kevin Williamsons" of the future will be defending the "extreme conservatism" of Obamacare, Black Lives Matter, gun control, open borders, UN control of the US military, etc. (also known as the Jeb Bush 2016 political platform).

In a White ethnostate, conservatives should be among the first to be strung up. They are the lowest form of filthy scum imaginable - what would have been considered the shitlibs of the 1950s are the "conservatives" of today. The conservative motto: always surrender. Yesterday's lost position is "backwards" and rejected by "all people of good will," and the latest leftist victory becomes enshrined as the new status quo to be defended by cuckservative numbnuts - until such time that position is defeated by the Left, and is abandoned for a new "conservatism" even farther to the left than before.

Derb System Shilling Update, 12/23/15

A confused Derbyshire.

Following up on this, we now see the complete comments here.

Right.  First, he agrees with the obvious fact that the USA has a one party system, and then he proceeds to start shilling for the System saying that there really are differences between the parties.

Which is it?  I think that years of living in a racially/culturally divided household has unhinged the man's mind, to the point that he's asserting two contradictory memes at the same time.

The End of Globalization

Excellent Greg Johnson essay.

Read here.

Most of the wealthy should have their total assets confiscated and should be sent to wok breaking rocks in reeducation camps.

How Is That Mainstreaming Working Out For You, 12/23/15

The System is really accepting the FN into the mainstream, isn't it?

Read here.

No worries, Durocher can defend her in court (cue the "Pink Panther" music playing in the background).

Marine has all the negatives and none of the positives of the "movement" - she has the freakishness, buffoonery, and rejection by the mainstream, while at the same time lacking ideological integrity and radicalism.

Well done!

No, Ching Chang Chung, There Are Not Two Political Parties

Shilling for the system.

Read here.

At this blog, we have previously discussed Derbyshire's promotion of "working within the system," and the fear of White racism that informs that shilling for the system.

Now he does it again, trying to convince us that the GOP traitors are somehow a viable patriotic party, distinct from the Democrats.

Derb's "argument" fails at two levels. First, a real political party is NOT supposed to have internal "diversity" on absolutely fundamental issues, and what is more fundamental than immigration/demographics?  

So, we have the Democrats more or less 100% for open borders, and then we have the Republicans only some of whom are for open borders, and that's a good thing?  That's "two separate parties?'' Is he serious?

Second, he admits that the anti-immigration element in the GOP "never seems to be able to manifest itself in legislative action."  Thus:

I have to allow that there is at least some nominal diversity in the GOP. It never seems to be able to manifest itself in legislative action, but it’s there in some potential form.

Indeed, the GOP controls Congress and they keep on giving Obama pro-immigration budget gifts. it's a joke.

So, obviously, the USA in general has a SINGLE POLITICAL PARTY, with two wings - the Left Democrat wing, and the Center/Center-Right Republican wing. 

And the reason for Trump's popularity is that he has stepped outside that consensus, which is a very small and mild breath of fresh air.

Derbyshire is such a mendacious manipulator of reality, and for such obvious self-interested reasons, that it staggers the imagination. Why do ostensibly sincere folks persist in giving this creature a platform?

More Political Delusion

VDARE article in general agreement with my recent analyses.

Read here.

Obama is playing the same tired game: White Americans have "economic insecurities" that are being exploited by "race-bating" Republicans.

Boring...or as the VDARE article so cogently notes, the GOP may be "dog whistling" to the base, but that dog never gets any treats. There's a solid list of historical GOP treason against Whites listed there.

All of these analysts refuse to acknowledge that while, yes, economic insecurity is an important issue, the fundamental anxiety is about race, culture, demographics. 

I'll say it again: The System's fundamental basis, its raison d'être, is hostility toward Whites and toward White interests. Therefore, representatives of the System cannot even acknowledge, much less care about and act upon, the promotion of White interests, for that would undermine the very System of which they are a part. 

This cannot be stressed often enough.

While Trump's utility is as a bringer of chaos and division, one must look at practical politics as well. I believe there is little chance that Trump as the GOP candidate could win a national election. That's fine as far as it goes as long as chaos and balkanization occurs.  However, a Trump loss as the GOP candidate could potentially damage the political legitimacy of right-wing populism for several electoral cycles, poisoning the well for future, better, right-wing populists.

Perhaps the best outcome is for the GOP Establishment to "screw" Trump, nominate a cuckservative, and see the Trumpite base abandon the party, wrecking the GOP and smashing the political status quo in this country.

In The News, 12/21/15

Insanity keeps on rolling along.

Two of the "movement's" favorite countries, Germany and Austria, are behaving in a manner that we can term, to borrow a phrase from Bernie Levanters, "pathological." Actually, it should be the opposite: those nations that take in refugees should be those facing sanctions and legal action. I also like the women-baby pictures used by the media to depict refugees and migrants, most of who are actually violent young men.

Building upon a post from yesterday, we observe Bernie's "pathological" delusion continues.   Details about what Trump said about "cheering Muslims" are irrelevant to the main issue, shown by opinion polls, that a significant fraction of American Muslims support radical Islam. That's a fact that off of Sanders' Middle-Eastern flim-flam cannot change. Sanders can babble all he wants about economics; the emptiness of his analysis was exposed by yesterday's post here.

Hillary the liar.  Is she "pathological" as well, Bernie Asiatic?  Interesting that the reality is that ISIS mentions airstrikes in their recruitment, yet the System continues to promote airstrikes despite that. The reason was also discussed in yesterdays post. The System is a ratchet that moves ONLY in an anti-White direction. Any major decision of the System can be predicted based upon whether it helps or harms Whites.  If it helps, it will be opposed.  It it harms, it be will promoted.  That's it.

And here we see Ayn Rand fan Paul Ryan.  The support in the "movement" for racially destructive Jewess Rand could be baffling, but then I remember the stupidity of the "movement" - it's infatuation with "libertarianism" and its obsession with particular racial phenotypes that the Jewess cleverly used to describe the sociopathic "heroes" of her stories, to make those "heroes" more appealing to the types of nitwits who believe that the poisonous memes of a Jewish hag have a deep positive meaning for "our cause."

That's why I reject a "big tent" (real) movement - one has to oppose evil and stupidity, not embrace it. I mean, the "movement's" ultimate hero, Saint Adolf, also rejected the "big tent" and followed a rock hard ideology, supplanting and/or assimilating rivals. Interesting how the "movement" rejects that sound advice from their hero, but will accept ludicrous racial theories about "drooping Czech moustaches."

Deluded Democrats vs. Der Trumpening

Misunderstanding Trump.

Sanders.  Bernie asserts that Trump’s popularity is due to the legitimate “economic anxiety” of his supporters. Trump exploits this anxiety by scapegoating “Mexicans and Muslims” and thus he diverts attention away from the fatcat predatory capitalists really causing all the problems. Bernie will free these supporters from Trump’s trickery by bringing them into a grand, aracial, far-left coalition.

Well, Bernie my Levantine friend, Democrats have tried to “appeal to economic interests” and “free middle class White Americans from GOP trickery” for decades, and yet the Democratic Party continues to lose White support. Levels of support of working class and middle class White American men for Democrats is laughably low. What makes you think you can do better?

More to the point: if the real issue is economics and exploitation of the working class by the wealthy, then why aren’t these folks supporting Bernie rather than Donald?  Well, Sanders may answer that most of these folks are Republicans and so he needs to reach out to them and convince them. But that would reveal where Bernie’s whole diagnosis is wrong.  If most of Trump’s supporters are Republican voters, and I think we can all agree that this is the case, then these are people who voted (those that did bother to vote) for Romney in 2012 – Mitt Romney, the very archetype of a fatcat predatory capitalist; Romney, whose views on economics are worse than that of Trump for the working class.

Now, why is that?  After Bush butchered the US economy, why did these working class folk vote for McCain in 2008 and then for Mr. Bain Capital Outsourcing Mitt Romney in 2012?  The answer is that race and culture trump (no pun intended) economics. The answer is that the Democrats long ago abandoned middle class and working class White Americans, Democrats made failed and feeble attempts to win back those people through the sort of wrong-headed arguments Sanders is now making, and the Democrat Establishment as exemplified by Clinton has essentially completely given up on these people. The GOP abandoned working class Whites as well, but, bereft of any choice, those Whites either voted for Republicans who very actively “dog whistled” on social issues, or they stayed home on election day (Romney could have won with more support from that direction).

The real anxiety being exploited by Trump is that of race and culture: his supporters are justifiably anxious over losing their country. Economics are part of that, sure, but only a part. Trump is the ONLY candidate who addresses this anxiety. It is for that reason he wins the support of the Republican voters and he also wins the support of working class Whites who despise the Democrats (because the Democrats despise them), but who couldn’t bring themselves to vote for Mitt "strap your dog to the roof of your car” Romney.

A pro-minority, pro-immigrant, far-left Jewish socialist is not going to be able to compete with Trump for these people.

That said, I would advise Trump to move to the left economically if he finds himself in the general election – that will solidify his working class support, immunize himself from economic arguments which while secondary to race/culture still have some power, and allow him to poach some Democrat voters.

Clinton.  Carpet-munching corrupt reptile Hillary Clinton, whose political career is predicated upon being “married” to Bill Clinton, asserts that Trump is “the best recruiter for ISIS.”  Whether or not that is true is irrelevant.  ISIS has no ICBMs or other strategic weapons that would allow them to target America from overseas. They are a threat to America solely because they have supporters living in the USA, willing to engage in terrorism (as we have recently seen).  Trump is the only candidate who addresses that fact.  The response of all the other candidates, all the System candidates, to “bomb ISIS,” will do nothing but inflame their supporters already here (opinion polls show a significant fraction of Muslims living in America support radical Islam), and all the supporters yet to arrive as “refugees” and “immigrants.”  In the old days, foreign wars were justified to the American people as “we have to fight them there so we don’t have to fight them here,” but now it is “we have to fight them there because they are already here” and the actual reality is “the more we fight them there the more we will have to fight them here.”  After 9/11 the USA went to war in the Middle East, radicalizing a new generation of Muslims, because (1) that is what Israel wanted, and (relevant here) (2) we “couldn’t” do the sane thing and stop Muslim immigration (it actually increased!), so the rubes had to be satisfied by waging war against “the ragheads” overseas.  Diversity trumps (heh) all, then as now.

The problem is that the System’s fundamental basis, its very foundation, is hostility to White interests. System politicians like Sanders and Clinton (and almost all Republicans as well – do not forget) are inherently unable to accept or even comprehend much less actualize any appeal to White interests – for that would undermine and repudiate the very System of which they are a part. So they talk about “economics” or “ISIS” and continue to lose working class and middle class White Americans.

Can Whites Learn Something From South Asians?

Actually, yes.

Read here.

Whites may want to start considering that whole "mob fury" thing. Now, this blog is 100% pacifistic and I denounce - in the strongest terms possible! - even the mere hint of violence. Just saying - since South Asians are such great "cognitive elitists" maybe we can learn a thing or two from them.

Odds and Ends, 12/19/15

Cheer up, things will only get worse.

An interesting Yahoo comment, presumably from an Eastern European in Italy as an exchange student:

NikolaA
I am an exchange student here in Italy, not EU but from Europe. To get my residence permit, as part of the procedure I had all my fingerprints taken, as well as various combinations (1 finger, 2 fingers together, whole hand and so on). I also had to pay 107 euros and present all kinds of documents (that I can support myself and so on). I am poor, just a student, but I still respect Italian law. That being said, if I see someone cheering when these leeches come I want to take a pipe and hit them in the head, even if that means I will be deported or whatever the rules are. Not to mention that Italy is filled with Africans and I have to go with colleagues to the supermarkets at night because they stand by the doors in groups and if they see someone alone they start saying something. Really really unsafe. I come from a poor country, we can't afford the newest Iphones but at least we don't fear for our lives in our own country just because we're white and Christian. I can only assume it's worse in Germany and France. Get your act together West, if this is the western dream I kept hearing about when I was a child then consider me disappointed.

By Africans, I assume this person does not refer to Sicilians and other S. Italians (the “movement” view), but rather to recent African immigrant invaders. That would be interesting, since we were all assured, not so long ago, by the good and great “Sir Desmond” Jones, that Italy was 100% homogeneous and demographically secure, to the ends of time, forever and ever, amen.  Obviously then this Yahoo comment is a Medish plot – it’s some sort of Slavic-Medish lie!

An interesting VDARE article here.  The GOP wants open borders for the USA, but let’s police and bomb the borders in the Middle East!  What’s pink-frilled Miss Lindsey at the polls these days, I think it is 0%.

Also, at VDARE, Peter Brimelow unburdens himself:

Last year at the Donor Appreciation Christmas Party that VDARE.com hosted in New York, I repeated a theme I’d been brooding about for a while: miracles happen quite often in politics. They happen in private life too. This picture captures both: my wonderful young wife Lydia…

Yeah, Pete, we know, we know – you’re an old guy with a young wife, and you have a wonderful head of hair (which in an emergency can substitute for a mop).  It would be a real miracle though if you’d stop talking about it.

Jews making movies.  A botched, unpleasant, socially destructive mess.  Who would have ever guessed?

This reminds me of Jurassic Park. In the Gentile-written book, the boy character is a competent and knowledgeable brother who helps protect his girlish younger sister. In the Jew-made movie, the girl is a little feminist hero, protecting her completely useless and wimpy brother. Surprise!  Once again, the Jew emerges as a corrosive solvent, dissolving the bonds of a stable, organic society. They can’t help themselves, it is in their very nature. But why does the victimized society tolerate it?  As someone else noticed:

Lex/Tim – These are almost identical characters but reversed in the genders we saw on screen. In the novel it’s Tim who’s the older brother and the computer/dinosaur whiz while Lex is the useless younger sister. She’s completely pointless in the book and immature...

More Evidence Supporting a Connection Between Racial Diversity and Autism Prevalence

Causing autism.

Half the increase in prevalence is “unexplained.” Note the increase started to “take off” from the mid-1970s, when the post-1965 alien influx starting being felt throughout America and there was increased diversity experienced not only in “real-life” personal contact but also through exposure to images in the media.

More prevalent among boys – males historically being the ones to defend the tribe against alien incursions. The amygdala is larger in males than in females. Indeed that paper states:

Lastly, autism, a developmental disability that is characterized by significant deficits in emotion, communication, and social interaction, is approximately four times as common in males than in females. The social and emotional deficits in autism have been speculated to result in part from an altered amygdala function in individuals with autism, partly on the basis of similar deficits that have been observed in patients with lesions to the amygdala (Adolphs and others 1995). The link between the amygdala and autism is further supported by neuroimaging evidence that the amygdala in children with autism undergoes abnormal development (Schumann and others 2004).

The amygdala functions in the response to race and skin color, providing a mechanistic connection between racial diversity and autism.  Greater amygdala function is observed both in autism and in response to the racially alien.  Coincidence?

There also seems to be higher autism rates among non-Hispanic White children in the USA.

Are the high rates in South Korea due to exposure to White and Negro Americans since the time of the Korean War?  Hence, in any given majority culture, an influx of aliens and alien images generates the diversity that causes higher prevalence of autism.  Perhaps the higher prevalence will be seen in the children of the aliens themselves, being exposed to novel majority phenotypes?  Diversity harms everyone.

Some evidence suggests that in European countries, autism prevalence has increased along with diversity with no clear link to “MMR vaccines.”  It’s not the vaccines, my friend, maybe it’s the South Asian doctor administrating the vaccine, whose physical appearance damages the amygdala of your child.

Mixed-race/multiracial seem to have high rates of autism. That not only blasts another hole in Zivian “hybrid vigor” flim-flam, but consider the implications. The mixed race have a neural network, including the amygdala, etc., derived from distinct racial groups, and they are being constantly exposed to people of different races, even within the family. Their race-recognition/amygdala “software” will be permanently “scrambled.”

Why hasn’t there been a serious and OBJECTIVE study examining the link between increasing racial diversity and increased autism?  And the racial diversity must be measured not only by actual “on the ground” diversity, but also diverse imagery in the mass media. A White child may live in a predominantly White city, state, or nation. But if they are bombarded with images of alien hominid phenotypes through TV, movies, books, Internet, comics, etc. then the exposure is there. How much autism has been induced for example by flooding the media with images of Malik?  Science is – or should be – about skepticism, and trying to disprove (falsify) hypothesis.  Those that resist falsification are more likely to be true, but we always have skepticism.  However, the testing needs to be fair, thorough, and without political motivations. The diversity-autism link may be false, but it needs to be fairly evaluated. Fat chance of that – and fat chance of finding being release if the link is supported by the evidence.

In the News, 12/18/15

More items to cheer up the despondent reader.

Aren't you glad the USA has a Republican Congress!  Whew, they're really defending the interests of the base, eh?  And here's another one for you.

The GOP hates you, White man.  What are you going to do about it?  Likely: nothing. Interesting new opinion polls suggest (if you can believe them) that Republican voters do not consider immigration a "make or break" issue.  On the one hand, opinion polling is a well known fraud used to manufacture, rather than register, opinion. On the other hand, those results are more or less what one expect from the pathetically inferior festering lump of biomass known as the White Race.

Jeb is throwing a fit. Good to see he shows "high energy" about something - reneging on his promises in order to thwart the will of the White Republican base in order to pander to immigrants, illegals, refugees, terrorists, and traitors. With all this reneging on promises, "Der Trumpening" should run as an Independent if he doesn't get the GOP nomination.

The Hollow Blogger. It’s all there, the incoherent rambling, praise for the Chinese, sly attempts to divide Europeans against each other: Durocher, the enemy of the White race. Durocher: the lowest form of filthy scum imaginable.  Durocher: an embarrassment to the great French people. Durocher: the human turd. A prime objective of any White ethnostate will be hunting down scum like Durocher for trial, with the ultimate penalty as the outcome.

NEC Watch, 12/17/15

He tripped and fell.

Are you a NEC in the UK?  If so, you have it made, sexually speaking. Any absurdity will come to your defense.

A Saudi millionaire has been cleared of raping a teenager after claiming he might have accidentally penetrated the 18-year-old when he tripped and fell.

Maybe he can take up residence in Rotherham?  Move on, move on, there's nothing to see here. Just another example of Roissy's "May-December" romances.  He's an alpha!

The Amygdala, Race, and Autism

An interesting connection.

First, read here.

An increased pattern of brain activity in the amygdalas of adults with autism that may be linked to the social deficits that typically are associated with the disorder. Previous research has shown that abnormal growth patterns in the amygdala are commonly found among young children diagnosed with autism. 

Then read here.

Replicating past research, greater amygdala activity was observed for Black faces than White faces. Furthermore, dark-skinned targets elicited more amygdala activity than light-skinned targets. However, these results were qualified by a significant interaction between race and skin tone, such that amygdala activity was observed at equivalent levels for light- and dark-skinned Black targets, but dark-skinned White targets elicited greater amygdala activity than light-skinned White targets. 

Both race and skin tone affect amygdala activity.  My original South Asian theory of White autism hypothesized that the ‘intermediate” phenotypes of South Asians – Caucasian “(“White”) but with dark skins, and with facial features typically different from that of European Whites – confuses the race recognition “software” of the amygdala in young White children, damaging the amygdala “hardware” as a result, leading to aberrant development and function of that brain structure, finally resulting in autism.

Is this the reason autism rates have increased in White countries with the rise of NEC immigration (1965 Immigration Act in America, and the North African/Middle Eastern flood in Europe)?  And, in general, overall increases in inter-continental population diversity seems associated with increased rates of autism. Maybe East Asian phenotypes are responsible as well? That would seem likely.