Introducing a new psychological term.
A stupidity one often sees is labeling Hitler as a “psychopath” (or “sociopath”). I assume that my critics would use the same terms to describe my own alleged “insanity.” However, when looking at the actual traits that accompany those aberrations, the descriptions do not really fit. Hitler, for example, saw himself on a historic and heroic holy mission that involved self-sacrifice – hardly the realm of psychopaths. Hitler endured a relatively ascetic lifestyle and cared about something greater than himself: the well-being of his people. Again, not psychopathy. Hitler was a successful and disciplined political leader, who rose to the heights of world history, hardly some disordered sociopath or selfishly uninhibited psychopath. Then what was he?
I propose a new term that is the mirror image of the psychopath: the moralpath.
A moralpath is a person whose idealism, sense of justice and righteousness (what the pragmatists would label “self-righteousness”), and inwardly developed moral code is at a level that they would do virtually anything – including war and genocide – to achieve what they perceive as “doing the right thing.”
This personality type is seen in both the Far Right (almost always among men) and the Far Left (both men and women), among WNs as well as SJWs. Historically, this is where one places Hitler; in literature, Captain Ahab comes to mind as well as Raskolnikov. The moralpath is inherently “Faustian” in character and actions. In pop culture, there is Rorschach in The Watchmen, Batman, and even Ledger’s Joker character – whose acts are performed to prove a point about free will and the meaningless of rules – fits here as well. These are not really psychopaths or sociopaths, although there are some traits that overlap, such as antisociality and a lack of remorse. But the moralpath values truth and self-sacrifice, not a devious cunning to achieve self-interested hedonistic goals (like the “gamesters” who pride themselves on their "dark triad” traits).
Getting back to real life, the description of Francis Parker Yockey’s personality – a “magnificent sickness in which he could only see north and not northeast or northwest” – fits perfectly with the moralpath type. Indeed, Lawrence’s “dreamers of the day” -
All men dream: but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dreams with open eyes, to make it possible.
- are moralpaths.
Moralpaths (of the Right) are valuable but also dangerous, they are necessary but not sufficient for success. They are necessary because without them the enterprise collapses into compromised and corrupted mainstreaming, ends and means get confused, and there is no grand vision to pursue. They are not sufficient, because when unleavened with pragmatism, moralpathy can end in disaster. There needs to be cooperation between moralpaths and pragmatists to achieve the sociopolitical goals they hold in common.