The pushback, lies, and spin about randy Blackjack Phil begins.
Absolute HBD scum try to salvage the reputation of the execrable race-mixing fraud Rushton by giving Dutton’s book bad reviews at Amazon. Two examples are below, with my response.
This is a scholarly abomination, in which one of the worst "scientists" of recent times, Edward Dutton, endeavors to savage the reputation of the great J. Philippe Rushton. Dutton has hardly written a thing that wouldn't cause anyone with an IQ over 115 to feel embarrassment for him. He is a blight on the HBD world with his sorry attempts at hereditarian research. Rushton, despite whatever personal flaws he may have had, left psychological science an original, important, and seminal body of theoretical and empirical work. By contrast, it seems Dutton's sole notable effect in life has been to sully HBD with inane, maladroit, and logorrheic text. One must wonder how such an incompetent sees himself fit to accuse as fine a scientist as Rushton of academic misconduct.
First, and most importantly, is what Dutton wrote true or not? If it is, then all this hysterical Type I defense of Rushton – himself the “scholarly abomination”- is so much hot air. Second, how is it possible for anyone to “sully” HBD, when it is a laughably stupid pseudoscience, a pro-Jewish and pro-Asian political movement masquerading as “science?” It’s no coincidence that so many HBDers have Jewish or Asian wives, girlfriends, or family members. Rushton and his Jewish wife. Derbyshire and Brand married to Asians. Ray’s son involved in a relationship with an Asian. Sailer once suggesting he had Jewish ancestry (his wife investigated his biological parents, according to a Sailer post from many years ago). Hart and Levin are Jewish. I don’t know about Lynn, but if he doesn’t have some sort of Jewish-Asian ties, he’s the exception that proves the rule. Third, if Dutton is such a terrible scientist and an incompetent, then why does the “great man” himself – Richard Lynn – coauthor work with Dutton? Does this reviewer consider Lynn to be a “scholarly abomination” as well (if so, perhaps the only good judgement shown by this reviewer)?
This book is trash. I knew Phil Rushton for a number of years, and he was a kind, honorable man, and a brilliant researcher.
Yeah, that’s great. But are Dutton’s accusations true?
Vintage Der Movement, Inc. Hide from the truth. Defend the good old boys network. And be incredible hypocrites. The hypocrisy is at many levels. These guys like to quote Jefferson about valuing truth above all things and needing truth to be known by the world, but when it comes to criticizing Rushton (or Jews), then all of a sudden truth is out the window, and personal loyalty (or political expediency or monetary donations) is valued above all else. In other cases though, personal loyalty is jettisoned, not for the sake of truth, but to peddle HBD lies. The value of truth and of loyalty is on a sliding scale – as Sailer would say: Who? Whom? To defend a corrupt quota queen HBDer like Rushton, the personal loyalty triumphs and truth goes out the window.
Der Movement Inc. is absolutely despicable, utterly corrupt, skin-crawlingly loathsome, disgustingly degenerate, horrendously hypocritical, and based on a foundation of lies and corruption. How could a cause so right and so pure be sullied by such absolute trash, such moral turds?