What is Populism? is a truly terrible, even contemptible performance. Müller is Professor of Politics at Princeton University, so he’s not totally stupid. What’s stupid is the Left-liberal democratic ideology and system that he defends. One gets the impression that he has lived so long in the echo chamber of academia and the middle-brow press that he has never really articulated and challenged his own political convictions. You’d think that would come with the territory as Professor of Politics at Princeton. But they don’t make Princeton professors like they used to. I think Müller stumbles so badly because, for perhaps the first time in his life, he has blundered out of the cave into the sunlight.
But take heart: an establishment this out of touch is truly doomed.
That was a reasonably good analysis by Johnson. As he is a full time activist – living off donations – he certainly has the time to read, and review, all these books. One problem is that he’s preaching to the choir here. How to get these analyses out to a broader population? After all, I thought Counter-Currents was all for the “big tent” and wants to normalize WN?
Johnson should challenge Muller to a debate on the subject of populism. There’s not much of a chance that Muller would accept, but what do you have to lose (assuming Johnson believes he could win such a debate)? In the off chance Muller accepts, that would be a major promotion of Johnson’s views; if Muller objects, or ignores the invite, he can be publicly accused of intellectual cowardice.
This is a relevant point to my concerns about funding – I don’t begrudge anyone living off donations as long as they earn it. The question is whether anyone is earning it, according to my standards. Giving a forum to scum like Derbyshire is not a step in the right direction in that regard. Breaking through the System’s cordon sanitaire to promote positive memes would be step in the right direction. Activists should only contribute donations to those people doing positive things. But, alas, the walking wallets disagree with my assessment and will continue to fund retrograde destructiveness. Such is life.
As regards this: “But take heart: an establishment this out of touch is truly doomed.”
Does that apply to Der Movement, Inc. as well? We can only hope. And the fate of the Alt Right give us good reason to hope. The good old boy network is not invincible, even with the narrow confines of racial activism itself (and it is that context I am talking about, as the network is absolutely inept – far from invincible – in tackling the System).
Whites as a defeated and despairing race.
Why not? They thought they were electing a pro-White right-wing populist as President, and instead they got a radically left-wing Antifa supporter.
Interesting how Sailer talks about Whites as a race. Hey, Breezy Steve, I thought that White nationalism is “impossible” because we can’t figure out who is, or is not, “White?’ But you seem to do so in every other column. Of course you include Jews as “White”- what was your ancestry again? And does Unz pay you?
An excellent gamester comment below. Note how Asians are included in the non-White hordes. Colored is as colored does. They are all the same.
For reasons that are a mystery to me, I like to put myself into the shoes – or more accurately, into ‘da haid’ — of a nonWhite in America or any White country. What I feel on these jaunts into their skulls is their simple and unbridled joy, their unshaken belief in a bright future that rests on this one, single foundation: wypipo will continue to play by the rules.Those rules being, that we (I’m back to me now, a White) will continue to be the inanimate backdrop of social capital that lays a nice habitat for blacks, browns and yellows though our competence, niceness, our imbecilic good cheer. One-man-one-vote and the browning of America mean that we’ll resign ourselves to the shifting electoral reality just like individual trees continue to stand around and cast shade and look pretty no matter how many trees around them are cut down.Whether we’re talking about a 70-IQ black or the 110-IQ Asian, they lack the flexibility of imagination that would let them envision a dynamic system within which, when pressure is turned up on Whites, Whites stop playing by the rules of present-day’s strange, unstable moment of transition between the old complacent America of plenty and the new America whose myths of plurality are becoming Boomer-relics.
While Roissy writes about “pasta naggers,” I write about BOTH the Italian question and about “cuck naggers.” This blog attempts to be honest about, and critical about, all ethnies, while the quota queens are ever-so-selective.
This is interesting. Fascinating that they didn't prioritize a particular Borreby individual, but, what can you say?
I was listening to a Radio Europa podcast which was going well until the commentators started critiquing the idea of a European Imperium, using all sorts of retarded straw man arguments. It doesn't matter how often one points out that even an extreme integrationist like Yockey supported local sovereignty. No sir! Those horrific "Greek Orthodox" people are going to torment you mercilessly by their very existence, so no Imperium for you! Of course, having nice "Commonwealth" West Indians and South Asians around is all fine and dandy, eh?. In other words - Rotherham good, Brittas Bay bad.
Ahhh...cuck naggers. Shakin' mah haid...amirite? [Gamesters weep]
OK, to be fair, they don't want the Blacksters and Brownsters around either. But their hysterical reaction to the Imperium idea, without discussing the nuances, is despicable, and deserves to be mocked.