Thursday, October 31, 2019

Incel Rebellion

Reaching out to the disenfranchised.

Extending from “movement” discussion about the woman problem, I note this comment:
I have no problem with “losers in their mama’s basement” being in our movement. These are the white people who, in addition to whatever faults they might or might not have, have been systematically discriminated against as whites (particularly as white males) and systematically demoralized and even made mentally ill by the sick anti-white indoctrination that they have received from the schools and the media.
If we can’t embrace and help these people — welcoming them while recognizing that the abuse they have suffered will have affected their personalities and character, then what are we here for? I know what I’m here for — to defend myself and my fellow white people, especially my fellow white males who have suffered the double whammy of being demonized and discriminated against both as whites and as males.
I agree. That contrasts to “movement leaders” such as Spencer and their constant ridicule against incels and other disenfranchised White men.  

It is absolutely mind-boggling that “movement leaders” publicly and aggressively mock, ridicule, and attack their followers and, more importantly, potential followers as “incels,” and “manlets” and other System-approved insults against disenfranchised White men. This can be called, for want of a better term, “Chad posturing,” failed “movement leaders” engaging in high school-level “throw the nerds in the locker” ego-stroking chest-beating to the detriment of the well-being of racial activism.

The idea that all “incels” – never mind the MGTOWs (many of whom actually have voluntarily given up on women, contrary to those who claim MGTOWs are simply incels in denial) – are pimply-faced losers hiding in their parents’ basements, and hence worthy of being rejected from racial activism, is just System propaganda.  Now, of course, some of them are just such people, but not all, and, likely, not most. I believe that most incels are simply (White) beta males who are shut out of the sexual marketplace by female hypergamy, crazed feminism, and the racial-sexual caste system that places White men at the bottom of hierarchy (and the anti-incel “movement leaders” thus tacitly support this anti-White hierarchy). Instead of embracing these White men, instead of calling them brothers and welcoming them into the fold of pro-White activism, our gaggle of “leaders” reject them and force them into an unnatural aracial alliance with non-White incels (mostly Asians). The self-defeating stupidity of this is breathtaking (but not surprising).

The “movement” surprisingly had the correct “take” on the Sky King episode, but they are unable to realize that for every person who indulges in a romantic gesture of defiant self-destruction, there are literally thousands, if not tens of thousands, of similar individuals who haven’t quite reached that point yet, and who are excellent human material for a dissident movement.  Instead of enthusiastically reaching out to this mass, and selecting from it the best quality recruits, the “movement” scorns them.  After all, we can’t all be as successful as the Prince of Pilleater and the King of Charlottesville now, can we?  If these “leaders” believe they need to eschew incels because they don’t want their “movement” tainted by “losers” then they have the entire situation backwards. The incels instead would be justified eschewing a pathetic “movement” that is defined by constant failure.

And I would like to point out that mainstream conservatives - and, yes, that means Bannon too - contemptuously attempt to use incels in an instrumental manner,  And then we have that estrogen-enriched effeminate freak Wylie pontificating publicly about it. The incels get it from all sides. Disenfranchised by society.  Hated by the Left.  Targeted by the Matriarchy. Exploited by conservatives.  Mocked and ridiculed by the Chad Right.

As a side note, I won’t even go into detail about the utter stupidity of the “manlet” slur, as if height is some sort of relevant criteria for a man to be a successful and competent activist. Richard “wrecked the Alt Right” Spencer and Greg “strangely obsessed with the height of Tom Cruise” Johnson are perfect examples of this. They can mock "manlets" all they want, but they can't escape the taint of their own constant comic ineptness and unremitting failure.

Getting back to incels and related individuals, I define the group in question, the group in its broadest dimensions, as Incels-MGTOW-Men’s Rights-Manosphere: IMMM. These IMMMers – and here I specifically refer to White men only – can be a potent force. Dissident movements often have recruited among the socially disenfranchised, but the point is to select the best among those. Of the many White IMMMers there are large numbers who are quality individuals, and of those, there may be thousands, maybe tens of thousands, who have the potential to be high-tier activists. The National Socialists recruited their Brownshirts from among the disenfranchised.  Given the ascetic nature of the Legionaries of Romania, there were no doubt proto-incels and proto-MGTOWs among them. These were not “losers.”  They were political solders, or a caliber much greater than the sniggering Beavis-and-Butthead “Chads” and grifters who prance and preen on the “movement” stage with their attitude of superiority over those less well off (but who ask for “D’Nations” from them). We may have among the current IMMMers similar people of quality as the Legionaries, solid human material for pro-White racial activism. Thus, we observe yet another opportunity being recklessly squandered by the incompetent Quota Queens lifted to positions of leadership by the "movement's" ethnic affirmative action policy.

I will give advice of “dos and don’ts” to IMMMers, starting with the “don’ts”. Don’t give in to despair. Don’t engage in acts of violence, lashing out, which does nothing but empower female victimology as well as destroy your own life, while practically accomplishing nothing and actually damaging the cause you profess to believe in.  Don’t make common cause with racially alien men, whose presence in your country plays an important role in your own dispossession and disenfranchisement, and who are given advantages by the System over you. And don’t believe that White racial activism is completely defined by the Chads, freaks, queers, and grifters who mock you and your plight, or who ignore you in favor of the Matriarchy.

Do become as successful as you can in your life.  Yes, the deck is stacked against you, but you still have room to maneuver, you can still rise in the face of your oppression, and your success will be an extended middle finger to the System, the Yeastbuckets, and the mocking Chads.  Do become racially conscious, embracing a militantly revolutionary pan-European nationalism.  Do get involved in politics, broadly defined, make your voice heard, infiltrate the System, vote, run for office, start blogs, network, and get out into the world and make an impact to defend your interests and those of your kind. Do support revolutionary voices who speak out in defense of disenfranchised White men, such as the Ted Sallis/EGI Notes/Western Destiny groupuscule. Do send the link to this post around like-minded colleagues, spread the word about this blog and what it stands for. Create your own groupuscules…JUST DO.

It is time to make your voices heard.  It is time to stand up like men and make your impact on society, in a manner that will have lasting effect, not by some infantile acting out. It’s time to get out of the shadows and into the light, into the arena, into the fray of politics, broadly defined, as well as metapolitics. It is time for defiance, a time to make a stand.  It is time for the Incel Rebellion to demonstrate to an uncaring society, to the sneering of the SJW Left and the mocking of the Beavis-and-Butthead Right, that you will no longer be ignored, that you are a force that must be accommodated. Review the Dos and Don’t’s and do the former and don’t do the latter.  And help spread the word about those who support you, such as this blog and its associated groupuscule.  

As regards the latter, note that I ask nothing from you except assistance in "spreading the word."  Unlike the grifters of the "mainstream" Far Right, I do not ask for money, unlike the mainstream conservatives I do not ask that you go out and vote Republican, and I derive no income from this blog so my request to "spread the word" is not rent-seeking behavior.  My objectives are purely political and personally disinterested - to actualize pro-White policies, to pursue White interests, to remake society, and, in particular, to defend the interests of the natural leaders of White society - White MEN.  This battle is your battle as well.

Smash the System!  
(but do it wisely, prudently,and legally)


Wednesday, October 30, 2019

Odds and Ends: Behold the Female

And other items.

Behold the female:

Do Chinese women menstruate?  Seriously though, given the enormous genetic distance between Europeans and East Asians (note to Derbyshire), what makes these authors believe that their findings are generalizable?

Men do breast cancer research. Women help the cause in the only manner they are capable.

Resigns in disgrace.  Blames “revenge porn.”  Agency, where art thou?

Evolved to manipulate the male sex drive?  What stage in their cycle were those women flashing their breasts during the World Series? Probably much pre-menopausal female behavior can be ascribed to hormonal fluctuations rather than to rational thinking.

Read this.  Works with a virus.  Refused the vaccination.  Can’t handle a mouse without accidentally injecting herself with the virus.  Can’t remember what strain of virus she was using for the experiments.  I think milady should just stick (no pun intended) to things she can handle – like flashing breasts – and leave the lab work to fully evolved humans (men).

The evil of the XX chromosomes strikes again.  Just like the Carter case.  My explanation? Envy. Just as non-Whites hate, and want to destroy, Whites because of racial envy over inherent White superiority in all things (except for adaptive fitness), so do women hate, and want to destroy, men because of inherent male superiority in all things (except the ability to control sexual urges).  Just like non-Whites leverage White guilt and pathological altruism to exact their racial revenge, so do women leverage their sexuality to destroy men. They do so purposely and with malice aforethought. 

Related to the female issue:

Three take home points from Durocher:

First, he deals with issues that can be construed to be critical of women and the role women play in the West’s decline.  Any snide tweets from Sir Gaslight about this?

Second, his comment about the rise of homosexuals in Der Movement having at least partially to do with their lack of having nagging women around “enforcing social norms” is consistent with my assertion that those same homosexuals have no right to lecture heterosexual men about the place of women in racial activism and in the broader society. Not having to deal with the female in any sort of meaningful personal manner, the homosexual contingent’s input is as “useful” as are the racial comments of (high trust no doubt) SJW Whites who live in all-White areas but who sing the praises of racial diversity (for the rest of us).  By the way, the rise of the homosexual contingent is also due to the intense self-promoting networking their clique has been doing for the past 15-20 years, and their cynically instrumental promotion of certain "movement" dogmas in order to gain increased influence over the great unwashed of rank-and-file activists and over naive (heterosexual) "activist leaders."

Third, Durocher’s despicable hypocrisy is on display once again when he writes about the “truth hurting” when it comes to biological group differences. This is a guy who only wrote about East Asian admixture in Northern Europe after weeks of ridicule from EGI Notes and then engaged in bizarre hand-waving to convince his readers that said admixture (the extent of which he understated, by the way) is of “great benefit to all humanity.” 

Other items:

Consider Judge Napolitano – that puff-haired Levantine wop whose face looks like it was formed by a spastic child jamming its fingers into a ball of putty. If we assume that Arabic Andy is a man of the Right, we observe a difference between Left and Right.  If a leftist commentator were to (rarely) criticize a liberal Democrat politician, particularly a President, they would criticize from the Left, they would accuse the individual in question of being insufficiently liberal, insufficiently progressive. They would never adopt rightist talking points to attack someone ostensibly on their side.  Rightists on the other hand routinely adopt leftist talking points to publicly criticize rightist political figures. Trump can, and should, be criticized from the Right; instead, “conservative” commentators critique Trump in exactly the same manner as their leftist counterparts. Is it any wonder that the Left always wins?  Of course, in this case, there have been suggestions that Napolitano’s constant sniping at Trump is due to his dago disgruntlement over being passed over for a judicial appointment.  If true, that’s one graceless guinea.

At this point, Der Movement has become a ludicrous caricature of itself.  Is there anyone or anything Swedish that Der Movement is not going to praise, identify with, worship, and be pathologically reticent to criticize in the slightest manner?  Thunberg is an obnoxious little turd, an arrogant flat-faced Ladogan over-flowing with self-satisfied SJW moral posturing, and Der Movement just can’t get enough of her. Forget about jumping the shark, Der Movement has jumped both Moby Dick and the Pequod, and is now hurtling over the Pacific Ocean. All we need now is for Durocher to write an essay describing how Patrik Hermansson is of great benefit to all humanity.  What about Friberg though?  Is that a Swede too far?

Counter-Comments comment about the good and great Greta:
Jud Jackson
Posted October 29, 2019 at 5:34 am | Permalink
Has anybody besides me noticed that she is supposedly 16 years old and yet looks like she has not gone through puberty yet? She looks like she is 11 or 12 at most.
Come now, Jud, don’t you know that those low-hormone k-selected Northeast Asians mature slowly?

Another shallow, superficial Counter-Currents post, the comments for which are better than the post itself. To reduce redundancy: Another Counter-Currents post.

Is this a reference to Pilleater’s revelations about drug use by certain parties at certain racialist meetings, combined with the drunken podcasts from DC-area loft apartments?

I’ll agree that such cliques are destructive.  Other ones are as well.  Pilleater commented on those also.


Tuesday, October 29, 2019

Hood vs. Metapolitics

Let’s consider.

Look at this again.  Emphasis added:
Obviously, public opinion affects what’s politically possible. Yet the Overton Window model is flawed because power can shape public opinion. There’s no neutral “marketplace of ideas.” It takes resources and platforms to spread a message.
Without strong political leaders, the government doesn’t govern. Policies are irrelevant. The media rule.
It’s time to rethink the Overton Window. The truth is already on our side. Many people already agree with us on most issues. If that were enough, we’d have already won.
Instead of trying to shock public opinion, we should focus on demanding platform access, creating financial networks, and building institutions and communities the media can’t destroy. Instead of focusing on ideology, we should focus on logistics. We need to change conditions on the ground and make it easier for white advocates to organize. Otherwise, we risk ending up like Georgia Clark, pleading for help from leaders who have already abandoned us.
If we consider Yockey’s definition of politics as “activity in relation to power,” then what Hood is talking about here is an emphasis on politics, broadly defined, as opposed to so-called “metapolitics.”

Is Hood correct?  It depends on what he means by "the truth is already on our side" and that people already agree with us. If he’s referring to the general idea that Whites have rights, Whites are under attack, Whites have legitimate interests and should be able to pursue those interests, and that Whites have to fight for racial preservation and a future for themselves and their civilization then, yes, the truth is “on our side” (putting aside the issue of who “our” is). How many White people already agree with us is questionable but, in broad terms, Hood is correct from this perspective.

However, if by “truth” Hood means the totality of Der Movement’s lies, half-truths, obsessions, dogmas, fetishism, and freakishness, then he’s 100% wrong.

Keep in mind though that the Left has been very successful in leveraging politics to achieve their goals, even though the Left is famous for its internal ideological squabbles.  They have been capable of doing both at the same time - power politics rallying around foundational paradigms while still struggling internally to sort out the deeper meaning underlying their paradigms.

Thus, the Far Right can and should engage in politics based on broad paradigms while the struggle for the mind, heart, and soul of racial activism continues. The two things are of course linked, in both directions.  First, the more powerful the Far Right becomes, the more familiar the masses will become to the deeper paradigms, and the more disgusted and repulsed they will become by Der Movement’s retarded dogmas, thus ending and reversing progress.  Long term progress will be attainable only if the correct paradigms underlie political activism.  Second, initial success in the political sphere will give more power for activists in the internal struggle to influence the paradigms; hence, political success by fetishists will backfire and doom long term success.

The main point I believe that Hood is making is that metapolitics is not sufficient; politics, activity in relation to power, is essential.  Anyone who is claiming that “changing the culture” – independent of politics – can lead to victory is either delusional or are openly lying to you.

I’m not a mind-reader and I am hesitant to ascribe secret agendas to any person; thus, I will not mention anyone by name.  In general, however, I suspect that, in some cases, what happened is that some of these people were genuine and sincere in their initial activism, but became disillusioned over time, and realized that they sacrificed the opportunity for a real career for a losing proposition. They then decided to grift and cynically extract a living from the “movement,” focusing on activities that will achieve nothing, all the time citing the inevitability of victory – just as long as people keep on sending them donations.

Regardless of those people, and regardless of the specifics of what Hood actually meant by “truth,” I endorse the main thesis of the last part of his essay.  Power is important; without power, all of the “truth” in the world won’t save you.  To get power, you need politics.

The grifters will, in response, invoke the example of the implosion of the Soviet Union and of communism in Eastern Europe. They’ll clam that it collapsed under the weight of its own lies, ineptness, and contradictions (will the same happen to Der Movement?). In actuality, that was only half the story, the internal problems of the Soviet bloc became fatal because that bloc was being pressured from the outside, primarily by the USA under Reagan, and, more generally, by decades of Cold War competition from the “West.”

There is no similar pressure being put against the System from the outside.  Oh, people will invoke ”Russia and China” – as if the civic nationalist Putin regime is itself not part of the System, and likewise for the White hating regime of China (*).  You can say that, well, even if the struggle is between competing factions of the same System that can still result in a useful collapse of part of the System.  But rather than collapse we’ll just get an internal power re-alignment of the System; Whites will continue to be enslaved, but the big bosses will have epicanthic folds rather than yarmulkes. There is no real “outside” here to exert pressure on the System as a whole.  Hopes about “peak oil” and “environmental collapse” are equally misguided, and “The Green New Deal” demonstrates how the System will leverage its own problems to bolster its own power and the anti-White paradigm at the foundation of its worldview. So, no my dear grifters, without the hard practical work of politics, broadly defined, there will be no change.  All of your “metapolitics” can be shut down by brute force; “truth” is meaningless when you are silenced and deplatformed, with no real outside power pressuring your enemies to force them to make concessions to you. Suvorov’s Law came into force in the USSR because the combination of internal problems and external pressure forced Gorbachev’s hand in implementing reforms. The “external” and “outside” pressure against the System is going to have to come from dissident forces within the System itself.

Hood is correct.  Johnson and all of the “we just need to change the culture” people are wrong. You can’t “change the culture” in the midst of severe repression. Only Suvorov’s Law can save us – the System has to be pressured into making concessions that begins the process of inevitable collapse. In the absence of a viable outside pressure source to “heighten the contradictions,” the “outside” source has to come from within – leveraging the System’s power against itself in a form of sociopolitical ju-jitsu – electoral politics and the holding of some of the levers of authority no matter how small (initially), democratic multiculturalism, community building and activism – practical, real world activity in relation to power.  In a word – politics.

*Speaking of the Chinese, the recent episode of Chinese illegal alien human smuggling exposes as a lie all of Derbyshire’s self-serving nonsense about an “Arctic Alliance” between Whites and East Asians. Asians are part of the problem, they are invaders the same as any other colored people.  How in the world is Chinese illegal immigration and human trafficking any different from that of, say, Hispanics invading the US? How is the Chinese invasion of Europe, legal and illegal, different from any of the other Global South influxes? There is no difference, except that “Rosie” is Chinese and not Hispanic, Black, or Muslim.  




Monday, October 28, 2019

Odds and Ends, 10/28/19

Several issues.

About the MX missile.  I don’t know what’s worse there – the stupidity of Ronnie Raygun and Caspar Jewberger wanting to have the MX regardless of the utility of the basing scheme, Jimmy Carter’s liberal naivete, or the pure selfishness of those Utah ranchers (societal consensus, eh?) putting their personal comfort and economic interests ahead of the security of their nation. As far the first goes, I remember “dense pack” (accurately termed by some wags at that time as “dunce pack”- a completely stupid gamble which, if the underlying premise was wrong, would have led to the entire MX force being destroyed by a small surgical Soviet strike). Jimmy Carter was always a pathetic embarrassment, and I guess that high trust northern hunter gatherers with their jokes about “commodes” would sell out their nation for another head of cattle.  Winners one and all no doubt. The best option would have been the Scowcroft plan, minus the stupidity of "arms control."  The Midgetman as a mobile deterrent force was a good idea, and could have constituted the bulk of the American ICBM force. Having a limited number (but more than just 100) of MX missiles in silos would then have made sense (but not "dense pack," just regular silo deployment), if those missiles were held in reserve in case a surgical first strike was necessary (with the retirement of both the Titan II and then the MX, America currently has no ICBM with a heavy throw weight, and is now dependent on the aging Minuteman III).
Brandon Martinez
Posted October 27, 2019 at 5:56 am | Permalink
You must be a woman, throwing insults at awake men who don’t buy the fairy tale that females are anything but mindless robots who follow anything that suits their temporary interests in society.
Only a small percentage of women can actually think for themselves. The rest are just parrots of the established set of ideas that society tells them is correct.
And your claim that the majority of white women vote for “populist” parties is a laughable hoax. Prove it.
If only white women voted, I’d venture to say that not a single nationalist party would come to power ever again.
The only language that women understand is brute force.
Excellent.  Excellent.

A sane woman:
Elenka
Posted October 27, 2019 at 1:21 pm | Permalink
Women will be welcomed and honored in the movement when they take seriously their roles as respectful daughters, faithful wives, dignified mothers, and wise matrons. I assume male hostility is caused by the lack of these feminine roles in a man’s life. And I am not upset or offended by male hostility. How can it be otherwise? Men react to women. Ladies, know your place, in the home and on the farm, not in the office or at the ballot box.
If we assume this is really a woman, we note that she is more realistic about the female, and more considerate of male interests, than is Greg Johnson.  Very revealing indeed.

Another high trust northern hunter gatherer no doubt.  Building that societal consensus and all. No different than a typical organized crime Afrowop swarthoid engaged in illegal alien smuggling for money.  All equally disgusting.

Of course the Colored Chinese criticize the USA for “racial inequality.”  After all, White-hating Yellows must make common cause with their White-hating Black and Brown brothers as part of their Tropical Alliance.  And Derbyshire’s “Arctic Alliance?”  A pathetic figment of his imagination, a sweaty fantasy engaged in as he performs his “measured groveling” (his words, not mine) to “Rosie.” 

Once again I ask – does Unz pay contributors to The Unz Review?  Just asking, because I wonder what motivates the alleged “White nationalists” Johnson and Durocher to contribute there.  After all, Johnson has his own blog, and Durocher used to regularly contribute to Counter-Currents, The Occidental Observer, and other WN blogs.  Why write for a HBD Jew who previously labeled White nationalism as the biggest threat to America?  It’s not just the shekels, is it?

One can ask another question about Durocher, but, no, I’ll just sit back and laugh at the dunce-like utter cluelessness of Der Movement.  Dr. Jekyll is becoming a dim memory by now.

The HBD-Nordicist-Ethnonationalist alliance continues.

Sunday, October 27, 2019

Grist for the Mill

More hard truths about the female.

Behold the female (emphasis added):
Psychologist Leon F. Seltzer has offered explanations for the phenomenon of male serial killers attracting female sex partners based on evolutionary psychology. Serial killers, in his view, are cases of alpha males that tend to attract women. This is because such males were good at protecting women and their offspring in our evolutionary history. Women nowadays may consciously realize that it is unwise to date a serial killer, but they are nevertheless attracted to them, as he notes "as a therapist I've encountered many women who bemoaned their vulnerability toward dominant men who, consciously, they recognized were all wrong for them". As evidence of women's fantasy preference for dominant men, he refers to the book A Billion Wicked Thoughts: What the World's Largest Experiment Reveals about Human Desire by Ogi Ogas and Sai Gaddam. Seltzer discusses Ogas and Gaddam's argument that this fantasy is the dominant plot of most erotic/romantic books and movies written for women but the fantasy always holds that this male dominance is conditional, "it doesn't really represent the man's innermost reality.”
One of the most infamous examples of hybristophilia is the large number of women attracted to Ted Bundy after his arrest. He often drew scores of women at the jammed courtrooms of his trials each day. Bundy allegedly received hundreds of love letters from women while he was incarcerated.

Jeffrey Dahmer, a serial killer, is said to have had amorous women sending him letters, money, and other gifts during his time in prison.
Serial killer Richard Ramirez married a female groupie in prison who had written him over 75 letters. During his trial, dozens of women flocked to the courtroom to catch a glimpse of him.
Charles Manson's groupies are also examples .
Terrorists such as Anders Behring Breivik and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev have also been the objects of hybristophilia.
Hundreds of love letters.  Hundreds.  For every single individual male serial killer or other male celebrity criminal - someone openly and obviously identified as defective by society - there are large numbers of ordinary "normal" women madly in love with them. And then there are the findings (this is just one example) that show that men with a criminal record are more successful with women than are law-abiding men.

Women: A sex selected by evolution to be demented sociopaths in the modern world.  All grist for the mill for Der Movement.  Indeed, sociopathic male grifters would want vacuous female airheads around, and this is more so if the males in question are impervious to the sexually manipulative behavior of (in particular, attractive) women. The women are part of the "D'Nations" herd and can be lures to bring in thirsty beta males as more cattle to be milked for "D'Nations."


Counter-Currents comment:
Brandon Martinez

Posted October 26, 2019 at 2:34 am | Permalink
If you believe that a substantial portion of modern white women can be “red-pilled” and join our cause, you are severely deluded. Women follow the crowd, and the crowd is against us. Only when fascist dictators came to power did women get in line out of necessity. If it’s not a necessity, they will simply tow the line of the predominant cultural narrative being set by our enemies. Trying to win over white women to white nationalism is about as futile as trying to win over jews or blacks to it. It is a wasted effort and energy better placed elsewhere, such as in obtaining political power.
Yes. Now, let us be clear here.  My comments about women are all about plain honesty and ice-cold realism. I never said that women should be completely excluded from activism. Consider the Legionary movement.  It was all male, but had an associated women’s group. That is reasonable, particularly if the women in their own group are held to high standards as are the men.  But we should never forget the reality of sex differences and never forget that the women should be subordinate to the men.
Greg Johnson

Posted October 25, 2019 at 6:33 pm | Permalink
I think she is a groupie. She was sleeping with Eli Mosley, and the scuttlebutt at the time was that she was dragging on more than Richard Spencer’s cigarette while he was still married, and while she was with Mosley — or at least pretending publicly to be with him.
Johnson should ask the following two questions – if Spencer is really as vacuous and destructive and amoral as you apparently believe he is, then how did he so quickly rise to prominence in the “movement?’’  Why did he so quickly get folks like Regnery trusting in him?  An honest answer to those questions would have to include an acknowledgment that Der Movement’s ethnic affirmative action program is a very real thing, and that Spencer checked off all of the boxes – none of which included the item of actual merit.

Let’s all feel bad now for this horrendous little Ladogan, whining about being mistreated online. Welcome to the rough-and-tumble of celebrity politics, you obnoxious semi-mongoloid twit. No one forced you to be a public figure, with your harridan “how dare you” and all the rest.  A perfect example of the female mentality.  This is where Johnson, as usual, gets it all wrong.  It’s not that WE say “women have no agency.”  It is that women themselves, when the going gets too tough, start whining as if THEY believe they have no agency, and therefore should have no accountability for their actions. They want equality of rights, but no equality of responsibilities.  They behave like spoiled children. 
Greg Johnson

Posted October 26, 2019 at 4:10 pm | Permalink
There aren’t millions of people in the movement.
And the Alt Right did crash and burn because of bad decisions made by bad leaders.
Yes, indeed; case in point: Greg Johnson.
Greg Johnson

Posted October 26, 2019 at 4:02 pm | Permalink
Whenever you see a sycophant like Evan McClaren or Chris Dulny, I want you to think of a tiny fish that clings desperately to a big fish for the ride — as well as for the privilege of eating its shit.
You forgot to include John Morgan on that list.

Saturday, October 26, 2019

A Brief Riposte to Johnson

Joan of Arc, Joan of Arc, my hobbit hole for a Joan of Arc!
Greg Johnson

Posted October 26, 2019 at 5:49 am | Permalink

The entire female sex is indicted because some women send love letters to serial killers.
The entire male sex is somehow not indicted because of the serial killers, however.
There is no female Mozart because there is no female Jack the Ripper. – Camile Paglia

I don’t know, Greg, for every male serial killer imprisoned – obviously a defect condemned by society – there are dozens (hundreds?) of “normal” women sending him love letters.  And we are still waiting for the female Mozart to compensate.

Any rational person understands the difference between the very rare phenomenon of isolated murderous male psychopaths and the much larger numbers of “normal” women – people we interact with on a daily basis, I’m sure – obsessively infatuated with those defective killers. Johnson is (as usual) just being an obtuse jackass here.

By the way, this is directly relevant to the issue at hand, because if women become involved in racial activism because of their schoolgirl infatuation with some Alt Right Beavis or Butthead “bad boy,” instead of having a deep ideological commitment, she’s more likely to turn apostate and do real damage.

I would have responded to you directly on your (pitifully regressing) blog, but I’m “banned” there, don’t you know.

Justice for the Embittered

Fisking Johnson.

Laugh at this, emphasis added:
First, what does it even mean to ban women from a largely anonymous online movement, which lacks any barriers to entry or standards of membership
Sound like the “extreme vetting” at a Counter-Currents meeting. Isn’t that part of the problem Greg?  That there are no “barriers to entry or standards of membership?” Shouldn’t those things exist, and be based on merit and behavior and not on an affirmative action program or the mirror test (if someone can fog a mirror held up to their nose, they’re in)?
We can’t ban women from the internet. 
Too bad, huh?
We can’t ban women from reading our websites, listening to our podcasts, watching our YouTube videos, etc. We can’t ban women from writing for our websites…
Actually you could ban known women from writing, which you choose not to do.
…commenting on our websites, or donating to them if they simply use pen names. (For all I know, the person who sent in the question is a woman.)
Well, we certainly don’t want to decrease potential “D,Nations” now, do we?
Of course some parts of the movement can exclude women. I don’t think we should accept the essentially feminist assumption that all organizations and realms of society should admit women, much less aim for male/female parity. I also think that it is quite natural for radical politics to attract more men than women. And just as combat units and police forces function better without women, so might some White Nationalist political organizations.
Uh, yes.
But even if it were possible to entirely exclude women from White Nationalist politics, doing so would be dumb and self-defeating.
Because Greg, with much personal experience in dealing with women, says so. The defenders of women need to answer certain questions.  Why do men who are serial killers, mass murderers, men who kill their families, when in prison, get inundated with love letters – often containing photos of the nude or scantily-clad nubile women who wrote the letters – and pleading offers of marriage?  Why do men with a criminal record have more female sexual partners than law-abiding men?  A sex hard-wired for crazed sociopathy is not the best material for a “movement” desperate for an increase in personal quality.  Think about it.
If women want to contribute their money, ideas, time, and social capital to the movement, that makes us stronger, not weaker. Beyond that, we are never going to actually win unless we can convince a substantial percentage of the female population that we represent their real interests. And we will never do that if we allow the tone of the movement to be set by embittered misogynists, to say nothing of people who proclaim “White Sharia” and “Islam is Right About Women.”
Yeah, Greg, those memes – that I agree are stupid – are promoted by people who you enthusiastically declared as “the new voices of WN 3.0.”  What does that say about your judgment – or absolute lack thereof?
Leftists love to dismiss realism about racial differences as racial hatred. But that’s not necessarily true. Feminists love to dismiss realism about sexual differences as misogyny, the hatred of women. But that’s not necessarily true either.
Yes, see above.  Women: A sociopathic sex that rewards the worst among men with the most sexual access.
However, just as there really are people in our movement who hate other races, there are people in our movement who genuinely hate women.
Just as the goal of our movement should be to drain the swamp of diversity in which race-hate breeds, we should also try to address the underlying causes of hatred between the sexes.
And just as we will not achieve our goal in the racial sphere if we allow simple race hatred to define our movement, we will not achieve our goals in the sexual sphere by allowing misogynists to set the tone either.
Are the “goals in the sexual sphere” set by O’Meara and Brendon/Brandon?
White Nationalists are mature enough to recognize that hatred between the races and sexes is the inevitable product of the current system. We also need to be mature enough to recognize that indulging embittered haters will destroy any chance to rectify our problems.
Crazy and bitter!  Johnson’s own obsessive hatred of Richard Spencer, is of course, not based on any bitter personal animus but just plain good sense!  Criticize Johnson though and you are just plain nuts!
Second, talking about excluding all women because of doxers like Katie McHugh makes no sense. Should the movement also exclude all men, because some men are doxers as well? That would put an end to 100% of doxings, but it would also put an end to the movement itself. 
And we can’t have that.
Surely we can be a bit more surgical about excluding certain types of people to minimize such problems in the future.
Yes, Greg: Hermansson, Lewis, Brandon/Brendan, Pilleater, most of the people you currently have writing for your blog…
Third, the very same people who want to blame women for problems in the movement also often deny that women exercise any moral agency. But if women have no agency, then they bear no responsibility either. But clearly somebody is to blame for these operational security and public relations disasters, and by their own logic, misogynists would have to blame men.
Yes, exactly, we blame men like Johnson who allowed all sorts of tragicomic lapses in operational security.  We blame Steadman as well.
And in truth, men bear a lot of the blame. 
Indeed.
By all accounts, McHugh, Samantha, and another unnamed woman who doxed Coach Finstock were not ordinary women. They were Alt-Right scene groupies. Like rock groupies, they were attracted to an overwhelmingly misogynistic subculture. Women who are drawn to such environments are surely high in masochism and low in self-worth. They then worked their way through the scene, passing over nice guys until they ended up with manipulative sociopaths. 
Please Greg tell us - which “movement leader” is not a manipulative sociopath?
But when they realized that masochistic self-indulgence was not making them happy, they bailed out.
Then, once they had become sufficiently embittered to feel justified in harming innocent people, they went to the enemy and started doxing people, including people who had only been kind to them. This is the sort of pure evil that makes people dream of the eternal fires of hell to restore justice to the world.
Oh, yes, and some of us dream of such fires to restore justice to racial activism.  Feeling warm yet Greg?
What makes such evil possible? I think a good part of it can be explained by bitterness. Bitterness takes root when someone is wronged and does not receive justice.
Hmm…then Sallis was wronged and did not receive justice.  Good of you to admit it Greg.
Bitterness turns into a kind of neurosis. Embittered people vent their wrath not on the people who wronged them, but on people who didn’t wrong them but merely remind them of the people who did. 
Absolute self-serving bullshit.
And if such people have any pangs of conscience, bitterness easily silences them: “Why should I care about these people’s suffering? Where were they when I was suffering? Who cared about me?”
Nonsense.
So how do we lessen the likelihood of such disasters in the future?
First, we really need to dispel the atmosphere of misogyny in the movement, which attracts damaged people of both sexes. Race realism–yes. Race hate–no. Sex realism–yes. Hatred between the sexes–no. Our movement will never win unless we treat such hatreds as social problems to be solved. And we cannot credibly promise to solve them in society as a whole if we allow them to run rampant in our own ranks.
But, hey, Anglin is one of the new voices of WN 3.0, and don’t you forget it!  Johnson is a buffoon.

Also: Hatred against White ethnics is A-OK.
Second, we need to exclude groupies. But we also need to exclude the kinds of sociopathic males they gravitate toward. 
You mean like Jeelvy, you hypocrite?

…I am a bad worker. I am often late for work, and when I do arrive, I arrive with the insomniac’s world-contemptuous scowl overlaid against a stubbled jowl. I resolve office politics with threats of violence, and I’ve been known to disappear for hours on end, only to return in a state of mild inebriation. I write monograph-length critiques of TV shows from ten years ago during office hours… my successes are due more to innate charisma and an ability to charm people into forgiving my worst offenses rather than effort or passion. You have to be either crazy or my mother to hire me – in fact, the latter is my employer.
If we stand for the restoration of Western civilization, then we stand for monogamy not polygamy. We stand for fidelity, not adultery. We stand for healthy relationships, not pathological ones. Which means that playboys, sluts, adulterers, and abusers are part of the problem, not part of the solution.
Ho ho!  Is that why your response to Pilleater’s complaints was to chuckle about how if Brandon/Brendan thinks some hapless male meeting attendee is “cute,” he’s just going to “flirt” with them?
If someone you know is playing the field, using and discarding movement groupies, he is playing with fire. He is putting his own short-term gratification ahead of the health of our cause. That’s a problem, and you need to say something.
Say something…like Pilleater did.
Third, we need to drain the swamp where bitterness and wrath breed. We have to do something when people in our movement wrong one another. We need to have some sympathy for victims of injustice, even for victims who are not entirely innocent. And the best form of sympathy is to give them justice, which means there have to be punishments for wrongdoers. 
So, Greg, when will you resign from the “movement?”
People who dox others are evil and deserve no sympathy today. But if they had received sympathy and justice when they were wronged, things may have worked out differently, and we would all be better off.
The Alt Right in America crashed and burned because it was run by a mafia of drunkards, druggies, sociopaths, and buffoons, as well as swarms of remora-like fanboys, sycophants, and enablers. 
Greg, don’t be so hard on yourself.
I fear that we are going to be hearing a lot more such stories from Samantha and people like her for years to come. But the movement for white survival will not falter as long as we treat such disasters as opportunities to learn rather than excuses to quit.
This comically self-unaware post indicates that Greg hasn’t learned yet.

Speaking of women, let us listen to that philosopher Lee Priest.

The HBD-Nordicist-Ethnonationalist alliance, manipulated behind the scenes by Jews, continues onward, as I predicted.

More of an ethnoimperialist invading the nation of another people, demanding sexual access to their women.  

Jews promote alien immigration into Italy, just as do dreadlocked German whores, Norwegians, and Richard Gere.  The only thing Lind got wrong with his analysis of “American Tribes" is that he limited it to the USA.  The Nord-Jew-Colored Alliance is international.

While the disgusting “human being” Trump celebrates putting Black criminals back on the streets, Proud Boys members are being sent to prison for self-defense, and the Trump DOJ persecutes the Rise Above Movement.  But he’s a sincere man of greatness, and don’t you forget it!

Victory is inevitable, right Greg?

Friday, October 25, 2019

Embracing Defectives

“Scumbag behavior.”

This is the Alt Right.  Jeelvy:
For example, my current employment makes zero to negative economic sense. Despite (or maybe because) of my intellect, I am a bad worker. I am often late for work, and when I do arrive, I arrive with the insomniac’s world-contemptuous scowl overlaid against a stubbled jowl. I resolve office politics with threats of violence, and I’ve been known to disappear for hours on end, only to return in a state of mild inebriation. I write monograph-length critiques of TV shows from ten years ago during office hours. What value I do produce is mercilessly exploited, and my successes are due more to innate charisma and an ability to charm people into forgiving my worst offenses rather than effort or passion. You have to be either crazy or my mother to hire me – in fact, the latter is my employer.
This is the sort of person Greg Johnson has writing for him now.  We’re really on target for community building with such high quality and personable individuals like Jeelvy!  A response:
Voryn Illidari
Posted October 24, 2019 at 8:14 am | Permalink
It’s hard to take seriously anything you write when in the first half of the article you proudly admit that you are a drain on your own family’s business and that you threaten fellow employees, presumably your own family members, with threats of violence. It doesn’t matter how you intellectualize this or what kind of “traditionalist” or otherwise antimodern argument you cobble together to justify it. This is fucking scumbag behavior and you owe your mother an apology and probably also a resignation. I’m sure you’ll call any prescription for responsible behavior a “Boomer” point of view, but it’s the truth (I’m a millennial, btw.)
There are two possibilities here. Either Jeelvy is being honest about his behavior in which case he’s simply a terrible human being who would likely act similarly to fellow activists, or he’ll claim to be “joking” in typical Alt Right Beavis-and-Butthead fashion – just childish “tough guy” posturing.  In either case, for a blog like Counter-Currents with pretensions of being a highbrow intellectual effort, Jeelvy’s writing is an embarrassment.

The main problem is not Jeelvy himself; after all, Alt Right juvenile jackasses are a dime-a-dozen.  The problem is Johnson, who runs such absolutely nonsensical childish stupidity on his blog. I should probably just stand back with a sense of schadenfreude and let Counter-Currents implode, but this is just too much.

One riposte would be to point out examples of juvenile writing and joking at EGI Notes.  The problem there is that I’ve made clear, many times, that the purpose of such writing is to ridicule and mock the stupidity of Der Movement (Jeelvy being a perfect example); the writing in this case is intentional parody of the likes of Jeelvy, Durocher, the entire Alt Right, the fetishists, all of it. Further, EGI Notes has always been a middlebrow blog (Richard Lynn’s Pseudoscience being lowbrow); Western Destiny is my highbrow blog. Counter-Currents itself is supposed to be highbrow.  Thus, the comparison fails.

And the purpose of these critical posts?  It is important to demonstrate to the rank-and-file that Der Movement is intellectually, morally, and ethically bankrupt, and is full of people who are, like Jeelvy, not serious.

And here we observe a perfect example of why all of the “movement” talk about “rejecting defectives” is a lie.  Der Movement actively embraces defectives.  Defectives welcome!  This Jeelvy should have nothing to do with pro-White activism, but instead is an honored writer for Counter-Currents.  Remember the accusations of Pilleater?  He claimed cocaine use at Amren meetings and homosexual sexual harassment at Counter-Currents meetings. That’s the reality.  Jeelvy is the reality. Talk about eschewing defectives is just self-serving nonsense.  Without defectives, 99% of "racial activism" would vanish overnight.

Consider the niche space of racial activism being like a garden – it is now overgrown with weeds that are choking off any useful growth. Without a thorough weeding, nothing productive is possible.  The rank-and-file have to be convinced that weeding is absolutely required.


Thursday, October 24, 2019

Skorzeny and Jeelvy

Two idiots.

This book, and this one is also on the same subject, about a minor but very interesting episode of WWII, deconstructs the Skorzeny myth. These books persuasively argue that Skorzeny was an inept blowhard, a publicity hound who got credit for a successful raid to which he contributed little and actually almost ruined. General Student and others deserve the real credit.

Skorzeny, worshipped by some in Der Movement, is a clear example of Der Movement’s obsessions and fetishes.  An Austrian Nazi - and ostensibly a politically dedicated Nazi – Skorzeny also I presume wins points because of his negative views of Italians, as chronicled in Irving’s Hitler’s War. But, alas, the Aryan Superman Skorzeny was not only an incompetent fraud, but also a traitor who worked for Jews.

I mean, too bad he’s not alive today, he’s got what it takes to be a WN 2.0 hero!  Maybe Unz would give him a column at The Unz Review.
Nicholas R. Jeelvy

Posted October 24, 2019 at 12:35 am | Permalink
The establishment has to pretend like we don’t exist and prop up alt-lite grifters and milquetoasts. It’s called “unthinging”.
At the same time, another wing of the establishment is censoring those grifters, who are more fragile to censorship than us, because they depend on numbers rather than truth.
The beast is scratching at itself, folks. The beginnings of victory are visible.
Victory is coming!  All you gotta do is send in dem dere “D’Nations!”  Remember those who give live in the golden age today!  This guy writes for Counter-Currents and has the nerve to talk about “grifters.”  These guys got balls the size of Jupiter.

Wednesday, October 23, 2019

The System is Killing White Men

Some items.

The System is killing White men (emphasis added).
“What’s interesting is that Hispanics and blacks who started off at lower levels of life expectancy, they have continued to make progress. They’re not in the deaths of despair category for the most part,” Brookings Institution’s senior fellow Carol Graham told Yahoo Finance, adding that “The entire trend is driven by premature mortality among less-than-college-educated whites, mainly in the middle-aged years. That’s a pretty big marker that something’s really wrong.”
Wrong?  Hey!  I thought the destruction of the White man was a feature of the System, not a bug.  Shouldn’t the attitude of these types be “job well done, full steam ahead?”
Women and blacks became more optimistic over time, beginning in the 1970’s when gender and civil rights improved,” Graham wrote in the report. “The one group that experienced drops in optimism around the same time were less-than-college-educated white males, not coincidentally when the decline in manufacturing began.
What mendacity. Note how they try to blame it all on economic reasons, even though they say that for Negroes and Yeastbuckets, they “became more optimistic over time, beginning in the 1970’s when gender and civil rights improved” – and that was precisely the time that optimism among White men declined.  That’s the key to “not coincidentally,” not the hand-waiving about “decline in manufacturing.” Economic concerns may play a factor, but not the major role.  As evidence that it is not all about economics, see the following form the same article:
“We uncovered those death patterns,” Graham says. “What struck me is that poor African-Americans were three times as likely to be optimistic about the future as poor whites,” Graham said. “The metric that really stands out is not sort of happy, unhappy. Happy today doesn’t matter a whole lot. It’s hope for the future or lack thereof that’s really linked with premature mortality.”
Gee, the lack of economic opportunities are not harming those “poor African-Americans” who see hope for a future in a System that literally worships them, while poor Whites, and all Whites, particularly men, view the future with despair, as they are the “devil” of the System. Indeed, opinion polls for Whites in general show they are more pessimistic than Coloreds about the future; even “highly educated Whites” are more pessimistic.

Don’t blame it all on the economy, liars.  It’s more about race and culture.

Read this excellent Hood piece.  Emphasis added:
In contrast to leftists, President Trump focuses on public opinion. He talks big but does little. He cites favorable polls to prove his greatness. His campaigning and governing styles are contradictory. He advocates policies he doesn’t implement, such as an executive order on birthright citizenship, a remittance tax, or a flag burning ban. Rather than legitimizing ideas, this discredits them. Instead of encouraging supporters, he betrays them.
But Trump is a sincere man of genuine greatness, right Greg?
It’s time to rethink the Overton Window. The truth is already on our side. Many people already agree with us on most issues. If that were enough, we’d have already won.
In general, yes. With respect to specifics, such as HBD and racial fetishistic dogma, no.
Instead of trying to shock public opinion, we should focus on demanding platform access, creating financial networks, and building institutions and communities the media can’t destroy. Instead of focusing on ideology, we should focus on logistics. We need to change conditions on the ground and make it easier for white advocates to organize. 
I agree on all, and this is very consistent with ideas I have proposed here previously.  There needs to be an emphasis on actually achieving concrete objectives, rather than nitpicking on the typical “movement” ideological and memetic obsessions. We need to fight social pricing, ensure access to the public square (both digital and analog), and real community building (which everyone talks about, but no one actually does anything about).
Otherwise, we risk ending up like Georgia Clark, pleading for help from leaders who have already abandoned us.
Leaders such as the sincere God Emperor of genuine greatness, Antifa Don Trump.

Now, I’ve already spent much time and effort here deconstructing the abysmal stupidity of extant ancestry testing, but it is worthwhile to read this, which in some ways compares favorably to some of the points I’ve made here in the past.

An amusing comment that I’ve found online (emphasis added): 
So basically the ancestry DNA test claims I'm 58% Great Britain! I am not even from Great Britain, I'm German I live in Great Britain though
Whew!  It’s good he doesn’t live in Uganda, imagine what results he would have gotten then!

In all seriousness, AncestryDNA may be the worst test out there…either that or 23andMe…both are borderline D/F grades in my opinion, absolutely horrid. AncestryDNA specializes in providing bizarre data points that overlap with zero. 23andMe isn’t much better. They’re competing for last place, putting a lot of effort there. Probably using the raw data for health-related issues may be the best use of that nonsense.

The lack of proper parental populations for Europe is a major problem.  I believe that this is a fundamental reason why the results for European-derived peoples seemingly get worse and more absurd every time that these companies “update” their tests. These companies seem to be going “PC” and adding reference populations from non-White, non-European populations; and since results are modeled based on the available reference population samples, the more non-White references you add, the greater the probability  of assigning ancestral components to those populations. Indeed, there seems to be a correlation between the politically-motivated stress on adding “diverse” parentals and increasingly absurd results. We need more parental populations from Europe – where most of the people using the rests derive their ancestry from. 

Let’s take an example. Imagine a testing company wants to determine the ancestral proportions of Iraqis. They model the “admixture” under four scenarios. One – a large reference population from Iraq; many Iraqi samples as parentals. Two – few samples from Iraq, but many samples from Jordan, Germany, and Ghana. Three - the same as two, but with the addition of a large number of reference samples from South Asia. Four – the same as two, but with the addition of a moderate number of samples from Turkey and a large expansion of the samples from sub-Saharan Africa. Now, under those four scenarios, will the results from a given set of Iraqis be the same, or even very similar? Hardly. They would be markedly different. Only when there is a significant number of reference samples from the specific population of the person or persons being tested will the results be reasonably accurate, and even then the results can be altered when there are significant changes in the types and numbers of other reference populations used to model the “admixture.” These are facts that cannot be responsibly evaded by the testing companies, although they’ll like to pretend that this is not a factor.

The current state of commercially available ancestry testing means that such testing is virtually useless for significant numbers of European-derived people. Actually, less than worthless, as the results are absolute incorrect. Again, the major advantage of this testing is using the data to make an "end run" around the paternalism of the medical community and getting a handle on health issues - assuming that the data are accurate, which is an issue that needs to be confirmed if something "bad" is discovered.