Wednesday, November 6, 2019

Oslo Fiasco and MGTOW

Two topics.

The Scandza Forum is a nationalist metapolitical organization that has put on conferences in Sweden...
The Land of the Gods.  Well, if we are talking about HBD, I thought the Land of the Gods was China?  Make up your minds, guys.
…Norway, and Denmark. 
Sweden, Norway, and Denmark…along with England and Germany, the entirety of Europe for Der Movement.
Until recently, I had spoken at every Scandza Forum event. But on Saturday, October 12, 2019, I was prevented from speaking at The Scandza Forum’s second conference in Copenhagen by a raging mob of Communists (complete with the Soviet flag).
So, the reasonable thing of course was just to immediately go to the next conference three weeks later.
Then, on Saturday, November 2, I was prevented from speaking at the second Scandza conference…
I’m shocked, shocked, I say.
Scandza’s inaugural event in Oslo, on July 1, 2017, was the first of its type in Norway, and our Norwegian friends were anxious for us to come back. The theme of the new conference was “Human Biodiversity,” i.e., the variations in genetic potential between the sexes and races. 
That’s not in practice true.  HBD, in reality, is a political movement meant to replace kinship-based racial activism with a inter-racial alliance based on IQ and other traits, with Jews and Northeast Asians at the top of the hierarchy.
Human biodiversity undermines the bedrock assumption of modern egalitarianism, namely that differences in social outcomes between the races and sexes can be explained by mutable human ideas and institutions, so that by changing ideas and institutions, we can arrive at an egalitarian society. 
Oh yes.  In other words, it is right and proper that Jews and Chinamen dominate “Western” societies.
If, however, different social outcomes are based on biological differences, then they will persist even after all forms of unequal treatment are removed. Past that point, egalitarian social engineering projects are based on delusions and can only increase the miseries of the world.
The idea of White self-determination is a delusion.  It is only right and proper that Whites be subjugated to Jews and Chinese.  This is all putting aside that HBD is a pseudoscience that does not do hypothesis testing, but lies and manipulates facts to support political agendas.
The speakers included Dr. Kevin MacDonald, Professor Emeritus of Psychology at California State University, Long Beach, talking about his new book Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition…
Discussed here previously, exposed as warmed-over Kempism and illogical scholarship.
Dr. Helmuth Nyborg, Professor Emeritus of Psychology at the University of Aarhus and a prolific author of scientific books and articles; and Dr. Edward Dutton, editor of Mankind Quarterly and author of many books and articles.
Dutton…you know, Greg, the guy who labelled your buddy Rushton as a fraud and a thug.
My talk was entitled “The Very Idea of White Privilege.” I argue that the science of human biodiversity undermines the idea of white privilege as used by the Left…
Does it?  According to HBD, Whites should be completely enslaved by Jews and Chinamen.  But we are not completely there yet (maybe except for Derbyshire) …unfair White Privilege!
…but I also argue that there is a sense of white privilege that is grounded in human biodiversity—namely, that whites naturally create societies that are more comfortable for whites than other races—but that this is inevitable, and there is nothing morally objectionable about it. (I will publish this speech on Counter-Currents.)
Wonderful.
This is a complete inversion of the truth…
Sort of like HBD, huh?
Naturally, I was a bit worried about this, for when Marxists lie, people die—many millions of people, actually.
And when HBDers lie, pro-White racial activism dies.
But these were not guys to be trifled with. 
I’m sure they are just as tough going into non-White “no go zones,” eh?
Third, I was being detained and deported not for something I said or did, but for something that somebody else might do after hearing my speech. And remember that my speech was on white privilege, a topic that I feared was more likely to produce boredom than violence.
Likely correct.
Fourth, one of Breivik’s arguments for resorting to terrorism was the Norwegian establishment’s suppression of freedom of speech about immigration and multiculturalism. My talk could not in any way be construed as a call for political violence. But suppressing my freedom of speech is precisely the kind of policy that encourages desperate people to commit acts of terrorism. As John F. Kennedy said, “Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.” Breivik repeated this idea, almost word for word, during his trial. Will these people ever learn?
I have been making those very same points for months here.
Fifth, I knew that arresting and deporting me would bring enormous publicity, significantly increasing my audience.

I found myself rubbing my hands together in glee.
More “D’Nations!”
I told the police that since the conference was over and it was no longer possible to give my talk, I wanted to leave Norway immediately. They seemed a bit surprised by this, probably because they are used to dealing with foreign freeloaders who will do anything to delay deportation.

I told them that I did not want to return to the United States. Instead, I wanted to go to Portugal…
Hey, going to Africa is always interesting, right?
After a couple of hours, I was summoned to speak to my attorney—or, as it turned out, the assistant to my attorney. I was introduced to a young woman who looked Persian or Kurdish. 
Obviously an Afrowop.

Second:




The end result of allowing women into the “movement.”  And, no, contrary to what some of you may believe, that is not - not! - a film of Derbyshire engaging in “measured groveling” to “Rosie.”