The Once and Future Year: 2019-2020

Looking back and ahead.

Questions/predictions for 2019 made here a year ago. Let’s review some of them.

Is the new focal point of the American “movement” in 2019 going to be the Alt Wrong?  Is the new focus the emerging Counter-Currents-Amren-VDARE-TOO-HBD axis?  How much damage will that do to the “movement” before it collapses as did its Alt Right predecessor?

Essentially, this has continued with Counter-Currents continuing to shill for HBD.

Question: Will the Silkers make peace with the Alt Wrong, and look the other way as regards Jewish influence, as long as Asian interests are being served?

No, not yet.

Question: Will the Alt Wrong be so clumsy – and not quite as optics-friendly as I wrote above – that they’ll let Jews and Asians play a more direct and public role in White racial activism?

Well, not really, although Unz is still lurking behind the scenes.

Who is going to be the “mainstream movement” opposition to the Alt Wrong? Will Strom finally – finally! – speak out against Jew/Asian worshipping HBD?  

No, he has not yet done so.

Or will the Alt Wrongers try to appease the WN 1.0 by appealing to their vanity and ethnic fetishism?  

Well, yes, they always do this. Particularly, Durocher writing for Unz with his warmed over hyper-Nordicism is the perfect example here.  Devlin in Counter-Currents writing about HBD is another clear example of this.

Who will Greg Johnson feud with next?  

Pilleater. I also note that Polignano vanished from an overt association with Counter-Currents after Friberg’s revelations about Polignano’s comments about Johnson.

Will the Alt Wrong alliance last through the end of 2019?

Yes, it did.

Who is the next prominent HBDer to either die and/or be exposed as was Rushton?  Will 2019 be the year of Lynn?

No, unfortunately not.

What will be the next sex scandal in Der Movement?  Will it happen in 2019? Heterosexual?  Homosexual? Bisexual?  Transgender?  Inter-racial?  Adultery/cuckoldry?  Pedophilia? S and M?  Bestiality?  Necrophilia? Some combination thereof?

The Pilleater Chronicles.  See this.

Which Way Trumpian Man?  Will 2019 lead to impeachment?  

Yes.

What outrageous errors will the Quota Queens make in 2019?  What leftist will they label an “alpha shitlord” (trust the phyzz!)?  

All the errors were documented here throughout the year.  As far as leftist "alpha shitlords" - leftist Hubert Humphrey, essentially – we need more men like him, according to Counter-Currents.

What leftist academic or movie director will they label “a man of the Right?” 

No one – not that I noticed.  This didn’t happen.

One can imagine some Old Kingdom Egyptian mummies getting gene-tested as 85% Middle Eastern and 15% sub-Saharan African, and the peanut gallery will declare – “Arthur Kemp was right!”  The mind boggles!  Possibilities, possibilities!

We had the Rome paper  That has been so far essentially ignored by Der Movement, for reasons that should be obvious reading my summary of the findings.

Prediction: White women will continue acting badly in 2019, and Johnson will continue to mumble about “Joan of Arc.”  It’s sort of like Whites and Blacks - the men who defend women the most are the ones who have the least experience and interactions with them.

Greta Thunberg – the heroine of Counter-Currents (and of Durocher). Then we had O’Meara lecturing heterosexual men about their attitudes toward women at Counter-Currents.

Also, we saw that the testing companies continued to be exposed as shilling a majestically flawed product.

Looking ahead:

I am not going to make predictions about the 2020 Presidential election after the error I made back in 2016.  I will say that I expect Trump will continue to be a fraud and he may shift right in his campaign rhetoric in order to fire up his dispirited base.

I expect that Counter-Currents will continue its sad decline with respect to content – we’ll be seeing more of the likes of Jeelvy in the year to come. Johnson will continue to be Gaslighting Greg.  Johnson will – especially if Trump wins - pretend he never wrote that “Trump is toast in 2020 no matter what.”

The HBDers – both the Jeurasian and Nordicist factions – will continue to lie about race and racial science.

Spencer disavowing the Far Right in 2020 – 50:50 chance.  

I predict that one of the following – Johnson, Spencer, AIM - will suffer some sort of major defeat or embarrassment or failure in 2020.

I predict that attempts will be made to revive the Alt Right – in spirit if not in name - due to the Trump campaign, but that it’ll be a farce.

I predict that there is some sort of ongoing, significant infiltration of the Far Right going on right now, but whether it’ll be overtly discovered in 2020 is unknown.  A (unlikely, in my opinion) possibility is that the infiltration will be announced at such a time and in such a manner to attempt to harm Trump’s re-election chances, although this is just pure speculation (I’m not confident about the timing. I am confident that something is going on, but when the other shoe will drop, it is hard to say).  

Given the upcoming election, we can expect more embarrassing endorsements, obsessions, and disavowals from the candidates concerning people such as Princess Tulsi Coconut and Andy Eggroll.  At the same time, the Quota Queens, moving forward past the election, will pretend that they never endorsed a non-White woman who supports reparations for Negroes (Duke with Coconut) and promoted both Coconut as well as a White-hating Chinaman who wants to buy off White acceptance of their racial dispossession with $100 per month (Spencer and Johnson with Eggroll).

After the Greta Thunberg and Hubert Humphrey comedies, who will be the next “Nordish” leftist to be praised by the likes of Counter-Currents (‘we need more people like them”) or Durocher (“a great benefit to all humanity”)?  John Lindsay?  George McGovern?  Bill Clinton?  

We will likely see more evidence, more surface manifestations, of the “movement” version of “the deep state” – the intersection between the homosexual cabal, the HBDers, the Nordicists, etc. Every once in a while some sign emerges of this, like a flash of lightning in a dark stormy sky, illuminating the hidden realities.

And of course we end the year much as we started it, with the usual "movement" nonsense, with a few breaks of sanity mixed in.  Thus:

Derbyshire weeps.  From a sane Counter-Currents commentator:

ia
Posted December 29, 2019 at 6:24 am | Permalink
I have lived in China. It’s an ecological disaster zone, a pollution nightmare denuded of all wild animals. They routinely torture animals. For example, feeding pigs strychnine in order to cause weight gain before selling for human consumption. They use the body parts of various animals in teas. An example would be tiger parts to give them courage. They are behind the poaching throughout the 3rd world.

Because of their routine abuse of dogs there was an outbreak of rabies in one province. The Chinese authorities had men clubbing any dog they found and throwing its half-dead body in a truck bed. They killed 50,000 dogs this way. In one town the Chinese hung two dogs in the public square.

Yes, let’s emulate the Chinese.

Hey!  Watch it now (from the same source thread:

Victor Henderson
Posted December 28, 2019 at 5:23 pm | Permalink
Dont be too ethousiatic…..i feel like many white ethno-nationalist are really underestimating non-whites and especially the whole notion of black people having a low IQ which based on my own observations are far from the truth. The poverty in africa is also been made bigger then it really is, as France is one the major factors to african poverty in its formor colonies. The jews are succesful as group because they have religous comminality and majority come from german-jewish backgrounds which is aslo a factor…Spielberg, Zuckenberg, Weinstein etc all Germans. Here in western Europe i see many groups of west african orgin/heritage doing extremly well and scoring high on academic levels higher then the natives whites and east asians and exeeding well. . I also feel we are to focused on black this and that….while east asians have taken over population wise places like Australia, New Zealand, Canada and parts of west coast america and Europe. The chinese are making major moves behind the scenes. At the same time muslims from middle east, north africa and asia are getting babies left and right in Europe. These things have to be discussed more in essence. Many muslims are focused on dominanting the west and the same with asians and in particular the Chinese diaspora community.

Reply
Astra
Posted December 29, 2019 at 1:54 pm | Permalink
Best comment. Please, someone must write an article about this, or a series of them. Especially about asians and their developments. It’s so underestimated, but they should be feared for a reason. It does not look well at all. We are so few.

Some people are not getting the HBD and Silker memo.  East Asians taking over is the WHOLE POINT of HBD.  Chinese diaspora community?  The Silkers openly declared that they want colonies of East Asians living in the “West,” with black-booted Chinese girls with guns as “the border guards of the West.”  

Thus, the lead Silker expressed himself thus:

Sacrosanct European territories in the Americas, Australia and New Zealand will likely need to become smaller at any rate in order to be maintained and defended. But with the increased manageability of defense will come an opportunity to offer cooperation to Asians to have some sacrosanct territories of their own in these places.  

We already have Chinatowns. Now there could be some intermittently disbursed along the borders of the Mediterranean and among European cities with border and migrant control an explicit part of their mandate.

They not only OPENLY STATED that, but provided photos of what they perceive their Asian masters (dominatrices?) to be. Long time readers of this blog will remember and know of what I write.  

There are factions of Der Movement that have the fairly open goal of subordinating Whites to Asians (and/or Jews). So what’s the surprise about any of it now?

Sounds like a description of Der Movement.

Here's a very easy prediction for 2020: Expect more outrageous hypocrisy from Counter-Currents.

Counter-Currents: The absolute worst, most outrageously hypocritical Far Right site on the Internet. Oh yes, let’s preach the wonders of “ethnonationalism” and “petty nationalism” while engaging in ethnosupremacist ethnoimperialism, living in the nations of other peoples and taking their women.

What is it about Counter-Currents that attracts all of the ethnoimperialist hypocrites in Der Movement?

I’m at the airport right now. Being in Eastern Europe for the past two years, I’ve spent a lot of time at various European airports. In regards to my personal life, I’ve found myself in a revolving cycle of meeting Eastern European women on Tinder, taking them on dates to the local IKEA, and then breaking up and saying goodbye to them at the airport…Without divulging too much personal information, I’ll simply focus on some relationships I had with women that I dated in Ukraine, Latvia, and Hungary.

Yeah…should we take bets whether this person is of Ukrainian or Latvian or Hungarian ancestry?  Even if he is of one of these ancestries, what about the others?  If he’s mixed, that’s not the original stock as per petty nationalist purity. Therefore, it is 100% certain that he violated the ethnic homogeneity of at least two of those nations.

In summary, Counter-Currents is Ground Zero of ethnoimperialist violation of the ethnoracial sovereignty of European nations.

Yukio Mishima and Der Movement

It’s no surprise.

Is it any surprise that Der Movement is fascinated by Japanese author and right-wing ultranationalist Yukio Mishima?

Mishima has something to offer to many different factions of Der Movement. He was Japanese, so the HBDers love him. The Silkers not only like Mishima because of his racial background, but because Mishima’s work Kyoko’s House reflects the very essence of Silk Road White nationalism:

Schrader also incorporates scenes from Mishima’s book Kyoko’s House into the second chapter, in which the young Osamu (Kenji Sawada) sells his body to the loan shark Kiyomi (Reisen Lee) to save his mother’s restaurant from debt. Osamu becomes Kiyomi’s love slave at first, until their relationship turns into sadomasochism. “Your skin is so beautiful,” she tells Osamu after slicing his flesh, “I just had to cut it.” Their romance becomes one of pain and pleasure, beauty and destruction, a sense of purpose and existence through annihilation, culminating with Kiyomi preparing to bring Osamu to a blissful death.

One can imagine the White omega male Silkers fantasizing that they are a White Osamu and that some black-booted Chinese girl with a gun (a border guard of the West!) plays the role of Kiyomi.  After all, race-tinged sexual masochism is what Silk Road White nationalism is all about.

Speaking of the sexual angle, Mishima was a homosexual (albeit one who had a wife and children while still being more or less openly gay) – note that Mishima’s self-destructive tendencies are consistent with his homosexuality (a la Forney’s analysis of homosexuality) - and as a bodybuilder no doubt titillates the gay faction of the Alt Right.  

Of course, the Traditionalists admire Mishima for his ideology (Mishima being more racially acceptable, no doubt, than Evola), and the ethnoracial fetishists can have some sort of connection to Mishima since he can pass for David Bromstad’s (more White-looking) brother – or perhaps pass as Bjork’s father.

There's something for everyone!  It’s all good!

Now, Mishima undoubtedly was an interesting person and one can have sympathy for his right-wing views and his Japanese ultra-nationalism,  But, I'm not Japanese, nor East Asian more generally, nor are all those Type I "traditionalists" foaming at the mouth over Mishima and his (over-rated) legacy. I don't know - maybe if Der Movement concentrated more on Codreanu and less on Mishima, it might learn something.  But, alas, the lure of debasing themselves before the Altar of Asia is too much - the Japanese man must have priority.  I'll note that it seems like Mishima fetishism in the "movement" rises and falls concomitantly with the interest in HBD; there's probably a cause-and-effect relationship there.

More Movement Stupidity, 12/29/19

More nonsense.

Mission accomplished for Devlin’s Counter-Currents article – slavish China worship.  Yes, China is real innovative and all.  That’s why, on an almost daily basis, we read news reports of Chinese stealing Western science and technology.

Copy, copy, copy, steal, steal, steal.

It doesn’t matter though…HBD is ALL about enslaving Whites to Jews and East Asians and the treasonous e-rag Counter-Currents is doing its part to promote the Jewish-Asian agenda.

FINALLY!  Someone gets it!  Read the thread.  Kinship and survival, and then advancement – not HBD. Collective action, not sweaty pontificating about “individualistic high trust northern hunter gatherers.”  Superiority that is earned, not a racial birthright, and defined by a fighting spirit ending in victory.

The year 131…sigh.  Doesn't Strom know that he's embarrassing himself?

The comments here are quite remarkable.  Women complain about “misogyny” while practicing misandry. What else is new?

Translation of this: She wants a White man.  Cue Derbyshire breaking out in a cold sweat.

Can Der Movement reform itself?  The pot calls the kettle black,eh?

Many say President Trump has been betrayed. He’s got bad advisers, he hired the wrong people, his daughter and his son-in-law are screwing everything up. Charlie Kirk and TPUSA are co-opting the youth movement and getting money from conservative donors. The Never Trumpers sabotaged him from day one and prevented “his” people from getting in the Administration. We’re like Russian peasants, moaning, “Oh, if only the Tsar knew!”

Hello Greg Johnson!

We’re kidding ourselves. The conservative movement won’t be reformed from within and neither will the Trump Administration. They are what they are.

And neither will Der Movement.

Is the solution to create a new nationalist party? It’s been tried before. In 2000, Pat Buchanan ran a third-party campaign but it didn’t get anywhere.

And of course, nothing’s changed in 20 years,right?

At the time, Donald Trump heaped abuse on him, saying he was “intolerant” of blacks and homosexuals and that he was “in love with Adolf Hitler.”

He, at least Trump is sincere about his radical liberalism, right Johnson? Trump is a genuinely great hardcore leftist.

I propose two objectives. The first is to offer a nationalist critique of conservatism, not to save it from itself, but to discredit it. If “the movement” changes and joins our ranks, well and good. If not, we must relentlessly critique it.

Rewrite:  I propose two objectives. The first is to offer a nationalist critique of Der Movement, not to save it from itself, but to discredit it. If “the movement” changes and joins our ranks, well and good. If not, we must relentlessly critique it.

Conservatives are vulnerable because they are not serving the interests of their constituents. We know from the 2016 campaign that national populist ideas are more prevalent among ordinary Republicans — and many white Democrats — than the staid program of Conservatism Inc.

Quota Queen “leaders” are equally vulnerable.

There are some good people in “the movement.” However, the movement itself is largely a grift.

Hood is talking about “conservatism” there, but it really applies to Der Movement, Inc., a money-making enterprise.  Give those “D’Nations” so the likes of Johnson and Brimelow can live there coastal, blue state lifestyles – remember, those who give live in the Golden Age today!

They live in fear of journalists and they need to keep the money flowing. Joe Sobran said it best years ago: “It was all a game, or a way of making a living.”

Rewrite: They live in fear of Far Right criticism and they need to keep the money flowing. Ted Sallis said it best years ago: “It was all a game, or a way of making a living.”

Conservatism Inc. probably can’t be reformed, and it has formidable defenses against takeover from within. How we respond requires some counter-intuitive thinking.

The same applies to Der Movement,Inc.

From an intellectual perspective, we should be hammering Donald Trump, and I have…We were there from the beginning…

MAGA!  Pepe!  Kek!  Thise milk jugs are waiting – start chugging!

Should we vote for President Trump? I won’t tell anyone what to do. Frankly, my position now is we must see how the campaign develops.

What an idiot.  After telling us how Trump tricked all the rubes in 2016 and subsequently betrayed his base, now we “must see how the campaign develops.”  That’s great.  And if Trump feints right once again, I assume all the Alt Right suckers will support him?  And, hey, didn’t Johnson state that Trump was “toast in 2020 no matter what” and will “lose in a landslide?”  What's the point then?  Oh, now the "no matter what" no longer applies, and Johnson now asserts that Boris "Turkic" Johnson's victory makes Trump's reelection more probable.  The earlier comment goes right down the memory hole.  After all, what's is more Orwellian than Der Movement?

Under the Tuscan Sun

And other news.

Read this, emphasis added:

BACKGROUND:

The origin of the Etruscan civilization (Etruria, Central Italy) is a long-standing subject of debate among scholars from different disciplines. The bulk of the information has been reconstructed from ancient texts and archaeological findings and, in the last few years, through the analysis of uniparental genetic markers.

METHODS:

By meta-analyzing genome-wide data from The 1000 Genomes Project and the literature, we were able to compare the genomic patterns (>540,000 SNPs) of present day Tuscans (N = 98) with other population groups from the main hypothetical source populations, namely, Europe and the Middle East.

RESULTS:

Admixture analysis indicates the presence of 25-34% of Middle Eastern component in modern Tuscans. Different analyses have been carried out using identity-by-state (IBS) values and genetic distances point to Eastern Anatolia/Southern Caucasus as the most likely geographic origin of the main Middle Eastern genetic component observed in the genome of modern Tuscans.

CONCLUSIONS:

The data indicate that the admixture event between local Tuscans and Middle Easterners could have occurred in Central Italy about 2,600-3,100 years ago (y.a.). On the whole, the results validate the theory of the ancient historian Herodotus on the origin of Etruscans.

Let’s see:

1. That is consistent with the Etruscan sample in the Rome paper, assuming a reasonable amount of genetic continuity in non-Roman (by “Roman” here, I specifically mean the city itself, not the era) Italy.

2. This suggests that, contra Der Movement, in non-Roman Italy, certain ancestries that the fetishists ascribe to “Roman Empire-era slaves and migrants” or to “the Moops” may well have been present before the Empire, or before the Republic itself, and can be considered part of the native Italic population of pre-Roman Empire times.

3. Richard Lynn’s population genetics fantasies are undermined, and Rienzi’s riposte to “Hippocrates” in Amren supported (of course).

But, are we surprised to learn who is always, always wrong and who is always, always right?

He’s a sincere man of genuine greatness!  Do you know who should be impeached?  Greg Johnson should be impeached by the “movement.”

As I keep on saying – there is enormous room for right-wing populism in electoral politics in America,  There are plenty of “meat and potatoes” issues that can be used to rally White disaffection. Maybe Der Movement needs a bit more maturity, and fewer Quota Queens and fewer idiots screaming “Kek.”

Counter-Currents once again shilling for HBD.  You see, this is the real message the Judeophilic Yellow Supremacists want you to get (re: IQ):

Northeast Asians, including Chinese, Japanese, and Koreans, average 105, slightly higher than Europeans. Ashkenazi Jews average as high as 112 (or even higher according to some estimates).

And this is the sugar they use to make the poison more palatable:

Thus, in Europe, we find the highest intelligence in Finland and the Germanic countries (German, Dutch, Anglo-Saxon and Scandinavian).

I've been saying that this is the HBD strategy for a long time and I've been proven right once again (what else is new?).

Pseudo-Hapa Bjork – who looks like Yukio Mishima’s (or David Bromstad’s) sister – is obviously of great benefit to all humanity!  By the way, this is the individual that Bjork was romantically involved with.  No doubt, Bjork's behavior - of great, great benefit to all (all I say!) humanity - is quite "high trust."

Andrew Fraser wanna-be Hampton:

Many reactionaries condemn America’s founding as a “Judeo-Masonic” plot or an egalitarian horror. America has always been evil and it must be destroyed to bring about the Catholic (or Evropean) imperium. This is an autistic view that many on the Dissident Right have embraced. It may make sense to some Europeans, but it dooms American identitiarians to irrelevance.

Let’s rewrite:

Many deranged fetishists condemn pan-Europeanism as an omnidominant “Mediterranean” plot or a panmictic horror. Europe to the south of Vienna and east of Berlin has always been evil and it must be destroyed to bring about the Anglo-Germanic fatherland. This is an autistic view that many on the Dissident Right have embraced. It may make sense to some sweaty Type I fetishists, but it dooms the West to irrelevance.

Counter-Currents - without a doubt the worst, and most destructive, "Far-Right" site on the Internet. 

Counter-Currents comment:

She also perpetuates Lewontin’s Fallacy: that intra-group variation exceeds inter-group variation, showing that population groupings are arbitrary or non-functional.

Der Movement, in its self-destructive “butt-hurt” (in some cases, literal no doubt) blacklisting of all things Ted Sallis, ignores that I convincingly completely refuted Lewontinism here, by actually demonstrating that ANY human group, even those randomly formed, will always demonstrate “more genetic variation within than between.” 

It’s a fact completely without meaning with respect to classification. You can take any human group – Japanese from Tokyo, red-headed Walloons from Belgium, Hottentots from Africa – divide those single groups into random smaller groupings of individuals, and there will always be “more variation within than between.” You can randomly mix any and all of those populations into a single group, and the same will hold.  And if you don’t believe it, do the calculations yourself.

Come now, Richie, as your pal Greg says, Trump is a sincere man of genuine greatness.

What Trump wants as a base. Hey, maybe those two can go to the White House and dictate policy just like West and Kardashian do.  Trump is sincere – sincere I say! – in his genuine greatness!

Hampton weeps.

More sincere and genuine greatness.

Security and Coordination in a Clandestine Organization

Important reading.

Some background information.

Maybe Der Movement should be reading things like this instead of screaming “Kek” and chugging gallons of milk, but what do I know?  Obviously, I’m not in tune with “youth culture.”

We develop a model of an underground organization. The model is designed to highlight the tradeoff between the operational capacity and operational security of clandestine groups. The underground in this paper is defined by a collection of individual cells that are united by a network of internal communications. The attributes of this network, we show, have important implications for the vitality of an underground group in the face of regime efforts to identify and target its component cells. We examine the implications of various network designs for group performance in the short run, and the implications the group's short run performance will have for its operational prospects in the long run. In the final section of the paper, we discuss the conditions under which a conflict between a regime and an underground organization will reach three alternative equilibria. The results of this paper will be useful to those interested in both the design and dismemberment of clandestine organizations.

When reading the paper, please do not be misled by footnote one, which describes the entity under consideration as one that has illegal goals and uses primarily illegal means. Pro-White activism, particularly in America, is in the unique situation in which the primary goals and means are (at present) legal, but nevertheless sharply persecuted by both governmental and non-governmental actors. Thus, the article applies just as much to the legal goals and means that are persecuted by the System as to illegal ones.  In addition, it is possible to adapt the information presented for the types of situations similar to that experienced by racial activists, even if these are different from what is described in the paper.

To briefly summarize the main points of the paper and their relevance:

1. There is a tradeoff between organizational capacity (the effectiveness of the group, its ability to actualize objectives) and organizational security (its ability to evade detection and compromise by the enemy).  This is of course obvious, but is rarely so starkly presented. The more aggressive, open, action-oriented, integrated, and willing to attack the power centers of the enemy, the more vulnerable the group is to detection and counter-attack. The more secure, the more isolated from the enemy, the more resources invested in operational security, the less growth, capacity, and actualized effectiveness there is of the group. Of course, capacity is in the long run tied to security; a group detected, compromised, and destroyed obviously will have no capacity.  However, with respect to the ongoing functioning of the group, the tradeoffs are clear. 

The “movement” has historically compromised organizational security in favor of organizational capacity; unfortunately, the latter has failed to yield any victories.  Essentially, organizational security has been sacrificed for nothing. At the current time, I would advise the “movement” to focus more on the organizational security end of the spectrum; particularly if capacity is going to be limited regardless, an emphasis on security can assure the continued existence of the group and allow for the possibility of future secure growth, and the ability to expand capacity in a sustainable manner. This will of course require an understanding of operational security that includes “extreme vetting” that goes beyond asking “are you Swedish?”

2. As the size of a cell increases, the ability of leadership to exert effective control over the cell decreases.  Codreanu wisely limited Legionary “nests” to thirteen members.  If the group sustains growth, the number of cells must also increase concomitantly.  This of course requires the necessary effective cell leadership to be available.

3. The greater the ability of the cells to coordinate their activity – for example via effective inter-cell communication – the greater the possible organizational capacity.  This comes at a cost of decreased organizational security. Communication can be nonsecure or secure. Nonsecure communication requires fewer resources and allows for more rapid use of organizational capacity; however, organizational security is usually compromised.  Secure communication incurs costs of resource investment (that could have been used for growth and/or action), but allows for greater security. The cost/benefit ratio will of course be influenced by how effective the enemy is in detecting, blocking, infiltrating, and otherwise compromising communication.

Given all of the problems the “movement” has had regarding this, the more secure, the better. With respect to the tradeoff between redundant communication that is robust to enemy blocking but is more vulnerable to detection vs. thinner communication connections that are vulnerable to jamming/blocking but are more secure, the latter is in my opinion preferable at the current time.  A distributed communication system, allowing more cell autonomy in communication – more decentralized – would have to be “secure and thin” in order to maximize operational security, to prevent compromise of one cell to “taint" and compromise others.  Indeed, one major benefit of the cell system is to prevent compromise from spreading (the Hermannson infiltration is an example of such spreading). Thus, a “high level of interconnectivity” can result in increased organizational capacity, but this is usually outweighed by increased vulnerability.  Mathematical modeling by the authors, summarized in Table 1 of the paper, outlines the results of a comparative analysis of different scenarios, including that of variation in communication connectivity and security. The benefits of increased security in the face of a competent enemy are clear.

4. The group can have its man focal point (“headquarters”) at the periphery of the enemy or at the enemy’s central point (e.g., a capital or other major city). The former is more secure but more restrained as far as possibilities for action, the latter is the converse. “Eastern” modes of revolutionary cell systems tend to build in the periphery (e.g., rural) and expand toward the center; the “Western” models tend to start at the inner core of the enemy and expand outward. The latter is worse for security and historically has been more effectively compromised by the enemy.  

Was Pierce therefore correct to go to the mountaintop, despite my criticism?  There are tradeoffs to consider.  I still stand by my criticism.  The National Alliance was (and is) not an illegal guerilla organization. The top leadership of activist groups are public figures, they are not attempting to avoid detection by the System.  So, there is no reason vis-à-vis detection to avoid the central node of the enemy. The major concern is physical security as well as operational security with respect to information gathering since it is expected to be easier for the System to monitor the center than the periphery. All that said, I have previously discussed the advantages of having leadership close to the centers of society and there is nothing in this article that argues against that as long as we are talking about public, overt, legal activity.

5. The group can exhibit growth, with respect to recruiting more members (with a requirement for more cells), or there can be decay, as cells are successfully targeted by the enemy, there is a net loss of members, etc. Both growth and decay can be self-reinforcing, and a present concern is that the failures of the Alt Right have started a self-reinforcing loop of decay.

There are tradeoffs also between investing in growth and investing for the capacity for action.  A group with extra resources can focus on growth while maintaining a certain level of operational action, or the opposite – increasing the frequency and level of action while keeping growth constant.

Essentially, the group has three possible outcomes.  First, an inability to grow beyond its base, in which case it never becomes a viable threat to the System and may in fact get eliminated; second, self-sustaining growth, in which case it becomes a “political contender” and may “defeat and displace the standing regime;” or third, a case in which neither the group nor the System can win outright, and a stalemate is reached, in which control over different parts of the territory is achieved by each side. One can speculate that this third situation is not stable long term, unless actual political separation of the territory occurs. Currently, Der Movement reflects he first possible outcome, primarily due to poor leadership and horrifically bad strategic decisions.

I would like to point out that the authors’ mathematical modeling shows that improving internal security is one effective strategy for ensuring survivability and growth for the group. Internal security being, of course, one of the “movement’s” greatest weaknesses, as the Far Right is seemingly infiltrated at will by the Left, with virtually no effort required.

Conclusion

Even if the organization finds an optimal balance between capacity and security, victory is not guaranteed.  The relative strength of each side is crucial, and an “ebb and flow” of fortunes between the two sides may in fact occur, with a protracted struggle.  A “functional win” by the standing regime can be achieved by, as the authors state, forcing the revolutionary organization back to “an equilibrium position that is sufficiently low to neutralize any threat it might pose to regime stability, even if is able to remain in the game.” This equilibrium may be maintained unless some internal or external change occurs to destabilize the equilibrium – that is undoubtedly why Der Movement fantasizes about various “collapse” scenarios that would break them it out of the pathetic cul-de-sac it has been in for decades.

Of related interest, by the same authors, on recruitment:

We examine the role played by popular expectations in the process of political mobilization and the dilemma this poses for nascent revolutionary organizations. In any target population, we argue, there will be a small ‘hard core’ minority of unconditional supporters of each side. The large majority of individuals (though they may have definite sympathies toward one of the two sides) can be influenced to support either side depending upon their predictions of others' behavior and their related estimates of each side's prospects. The conditional nature of such support, we argue, poses an early mobilization problem for revolutionary challengers. The revolutionary opposition begins the struggle from a position of weakness. The expected returns to membership are, therefore, quite low and the expected costs of association are correspondingly high. Why would anyone join such a high risk enterprise in the first place? Revolutionary groups attempt to overcome this challenge through the use of symbolic violence. Group violence is used as a surrogate variable by would-be supporters to estimate the size and relative prospects of the armed opposition. This process, if properly managed, can result in a situation in which agent expectations eventually become self-confirming, permitting the group to ‘jump start’ the mobilization process and achieve a self-sustaining level of revolutionary activity.

The “movement” can, at the current time, substitute “successful activity” for “symbolic violence.”  If Unite the Right had been successful, that may have been a step forward, but since it was a botched disaster, it had the opposite effect.

Odds and Ends, Liddell

Liddell, etc.

Colin Liddell 2017:

“I think gays can be particularly useful to the alt-right,” Alternative Right editor Colin Liddell told me. “Our movement is a revolutionary and taboo-busting movement, and gays have the right ‘psychological equipment’ for that. And, because of their lack of immediate family, gays often have a stronger feeling for their ‘wider family.’ The left has successfully displaced this sentiment to the fake ‘gay community’ or to leftist causes in general, but the true wider family for gays is their particular tribal or ethnic group.”

Colin Liddell 2019.

Of course, Liddell was writing for Counter-Currents in 2016-2017.  Later, in 2019, with that podcast with Forney and Friberg, the "Grand Alt Right Feud" was underway.  Like Spencer, Liddell's attitude toward homosexualism changed based on "movement" feuding. In contrast, the attitude of EGI Notes has been consistent.  On the one hand, I believe that a homosexual can be a useful activist as long as they don't promote a homosexual agenda within racial activism. On the other hand, I agree with "Common Sense Counselor" that homosexuals shouldn't be leaders - but otherwise, as long as no agenda is being pushed, being activists is fine.  Unfortunately, those I am aware of do in fact push an agenda.

In response to this retarded Liddell essay (not surprisingly at the Jew HBD Unz site) we read this (apparently from the same Zman I otherwise critique):

Z-man says:

January 25, 2019 at 6:40 am GMT • 300 Words

Blaa, blaa, blaa, a lot of typical, rehashed critique of the Italian war effort.

Italy wasn’t ancient Rome in 1939. Germany, Britain and France had surpassed ‘The Boot’ in technology since the industrial revolution. Mussolini’s own economics minister told him that Italy would not be ready for a modern war until 1942. They aided the Germans in the Battle of Britain with Fiat bi-planes going against sleek Spitfires and didn’t have any large numbers of modern fighters until, yep you guessed it, 1942. Their Navy lacked radar but their submarines and commando divers still did a lot of damage to British shipping and the Royal Navy. The Army had lighter tanks compared to the heavier more modern British ones.

True the Italian people weren’t convinced of fighting against the British or French or even the Russians but that is a testament to their intelligence and realistic attitudes not apathy. They eventually did fight anyway. In Africa they met with defeat at the hands of better armed British forces but poor Italian leadership and tactics also were to blame as they spread their forces thin along the coast. But they did regroup before the Germans came to help. When Rommel came in with his Afrika Korps most of the troops under his command were still Italian. In fact the first defeat of the US Army were at the hands of mostly Italian units in the Kasserine pass in Tunisia. As for Russia the German positions were almost hopeless on all fronts including the flank defended by the Italians. The carnage there was immense. Once the Allies invaded Sicily yes the Italians gave up too quickly but the writing was on the wall. Still ten thousand allied troops died in Sicily, many at the hands of discouraged Italian troops. If Hitler had been assassinated in ’44 the Germans would have probably surrendered at that point, a year earlier, to the Allies also.

More Liddell.

The case of Adam Gemeli, the UK sprinter that Lemaitre narrowly beat for the 200m, seems to indicate this. As an athlete of Persian and Moroccan descent, Gemeli is “near-White” and physically could pass as a Southern European.

This is the obviously non-White Gemeli, who no sane person would confuse with a Southern European.

See here.

And here.

Liddell is crazed.  Note that Liddell wrote that at Counter-Currents, where Johnson shills for homosexuality on the pretext that opposing homosexuality is like Nordic vs. Mediterranean divisive conflict.

It’s Der Alt Right.

I agree that Joyeux Noel is a good movie, about a brief incident of pan-European amity amidst an ethnonationalist bloodbath.  Thanks ethnonationalism - you've done so much for us!  There are still ethnonationalist filth today who openly promote self-described petty nationalism.  Enemies all.

By the way, one unfortunate part of that movie was that the "German" officer was portrayed as Jewish, despite looking Germanic and displaying typically Germanic behavior.  A very incongruent note among an otherwise excellent film.

Merry Christmas Heterosexuals

Der Movement for the holidays - and fisking about homosexuality.

Merry Christmas, suckers!  Keep on giving "D'Nations" - remember, those who give live in the Golden Age today!

But, but, but...Der Movement does good, it is fighting for the White race.

Keep on dreaming.

Remember…don’t objectify milady!  No, wait…(Putting aside that now, after pushing the idea that grossly obese landwhales are “curvy and sexy,” we now have sagging aging hags promoted as paragons of feminine beauty).  In any case, ”female” and “agency” in the same sentence is an automatic oxymoron, unless “agency” is preceded by “no” or “do not have.”

Get ready for the next Alt Right podcast  That’s right!

I would like to take a critical look at this essay, commenting on certain excerpts:

First, homosexuality is beside the point.

Then why does Counter-Currents focus on the subject so much?

Because of the distorting lens of the Jewish media, it is easy to think that all homosexuals are promoters of the Jewish agenda. 

Jew, Jew, Jew, Jewey, Jew, Jew.  Can we discuss the topic without knee-jerk Jew-baiting?

White Nationalism should be a one-issue political outlook. 

If so, then why must we discuss this topic?  Why does Counter-Currents “take a side” on this issue, not only with essays such as this, but with the essays (and books) by James O’Meara and Buttercup Dew?

White Nationalism is for the interests of whites and against the interests of our racial enemies. Period. Anything else is beside the point. 

The problem is that “the interests of whites” can be interpreted by different people in quite different ways. Moral, aesthetic, health-related, spiritual, etc. values can be viewed as important for such interests.

That means that White Nationalists must work to unite all whites into a self-conscious racial community, rallying around our common racial interests. 

All?

White Nationalism has only one message for homosexuals: white homosexuals have more important interests in common with other whites than they do with non-white homosexuals. We have to resist falling for any form of the divide and conquer strategy used by our enemies to destroy our solidarity as a prelude to destroying our race. Battles between gays and straights, men and women, pagans and Christians, Nordics and Mediterraneans, Celts and WASPs, Germans and Slavs, etc. have no place in the White Nationalist movement. These will always be used by our enemies to divide and subvert us.

What hypocrisy!  Let’s see: “We have to resist falling for any form of the divide and conquer strategy used by our enemies to destroy our solidarity as a prelude to destroying our race. Battles between…Nordics and Mediterraneans…have no place in the White Nationalist movement. These will always be used by our enemies to divide and subvert us."

This coming from a site that has proudly featured the anti-“Mediterranean” ramblings of Andrew Hamilton and Ash Donaldson, that praises Humphrey Ireland, and promotes the HBD cult.  By the criterion of  “…have no place in the White Nationalist movement. These will always be used by our enemies to divide and subvert us” – then Counter-Currents has no place in the White nationalist movement, as it can be used by “our enemies to divide and subvert us.”

If Johnson has no problems with the aforementioned authors (as well as the likes of Colin Liddell [in the past] and John Morgan), then why not feature the writing of Andrew Joyce about homosexuality as well?

I have met a number of homosexuals in the contemporary White Nationalist movement, and I have my suspicions about a few others. 

Indeed. I have heard things about certain people as well.

All of these people, however, are intelligent and accomplished. 

Unlike those dumb, useless, and brutish heteros.

They are real assets to the movement. 

Really? The ones I know about or have heard about are, in my opinion, net negatives.

They are masculine, and appreciate masculine things like facts, logic, and forthright action.

Jack Donovan has described some of that “forthright action.”  Bite the pillow!

And even effeminate gay men can make a real contribution. Pim Fortuyn was ideologically a mixed-bag, but he had the potential to move the Netherlands significantly to the right, and his fruity persona only helped his cause. The media found it difficult to paint a flamboyant old fop who fussed over floral arrangements and doted over his lapdogs as the next Hitler.

What was tolerated in the socially liberal Netherlands would not be so well accepted elsewhere.  I believe most White Americans would be repulsed by a “flamboyant old fop.”

A unified White Nationalist movement does not require that all the different White Nationalist subgroups follow the same strategy. That would be counterproductive. The more different strategies pursued, the more chance that someone will hit on a winner. 

We’re still waiting for that winner to show up.

It does not require that all groups co-operate with one another either. It does not require that they like one another. It does not require that gays and straights share pup tents and take showers together. 

Brendan/Brandon is disappointed.

The minimum requirement for white unity is simply this: we all must focus our energies on pursuing our common goal by whatever path we choose, and we must resist wasting our time and energy on squabbles that divide us.

Again: Andrew Hamilton, Ash Donaldson, and Humphrey Ireland.  You hypocrite.

Second, intolerance of homosexuality is Jewish.

Insane. I suppose that’s why the Jews are constantly promoting homosexuality and why traditional Christianity, despised by the Jews, opposes homosexuality.

Westphal is apparently a Christian. If you ask Christians why they think homosexuality is a sin, they cannot point to any saying of Jesus. Jesus saw fit to condemn divorce but not sodomy. Christians have to turn to the Old Testament, to the record of the Jews and their wanderings, crimes, superstitions, and hatreds. There we find homosexuality condemned as a capital crime. Why? The whole aim of the Jewish law is to set Jews apart from the rest of humanity. The Jews condemned buggery because they and all their neighbors were engaging in it. Homosexual pederasty, which still remains a taboo in our culture, was widely practiced by the ancient Aryan peoples of the Mediterranean world. The Persians, Greeks, and Romans all practiced it, including some of the manliest men in history and legend, like Achilles and Alexander the Great.

So what?  First of all, I don’t care what Christians or Jews support or oppose.  I make up my own mind.  Second, what people did in the past is irrelevant. 

Technically, the Greeks and others were not pedophiles, who pursue children, for they focused their attention on young men who were well past puberty…

Like Pilleater?

But there is no question that homosexual behavior was not only tolerated by ancient Aryan peoples, it was considered normal, in some cases even ideal. It was ascribed to the gods (Zeus and Ganymede) and lauded by poets, philosophers, and historians. It is hard to maintain hateful Jewish attitudes toward homosexuality if one really understands and appreciates the greatness of classical pagan civilization.

Regardless of what is on the Old Testament, the Jews of today, who are relevant to us today, promote homosexuality.  And one does not have to “understand and appreciate the greatness of classical pagan civilization” by agreeing with, or appreciating, all facets of that civilization. Let’s see…they viewed Germans as barbarians, and celebrated the defeat, slaughter, and enslavement of those German barbarians. Does Der Movement appreciate that? I doubt that very much. Consider what Caesar did to the Gauls. Does Der Movement appreciate that? Should we tolerate treating today’s Celto-Germanic peoples in a similar fashion?

As poisonous as the Old Testament’s moral condemnation of homosexuality may be, it is based on a realistic conception of human nature. Judeo-Christianity condemns homosexuality as a sin. A sin is a matter of choice. And nobody is immune to sin. If a heterosexual is a person who is immune to homosexual attractions, then the Judeo-Christian viewpoint implies that there is no such thing as a heterosexual. If a homosexual is a person who cannot help but be attracted to people of the same sex and has no choice in the matter, then the Judeo-Christian viewpoint implies that there is no such thing as a homosexual either. There are just people, all of whom have the capacity to be tempted by homosexual attractions and to choose heterosexual attractions. Thus there is no room for moral self-righteousness.

Retarded sophistry. Who cares about the goddamned Old Testament?  We can condemn homosexuality on biological, aesthetic, and social grounds without invoking scripture.

Matters became worse in the late nineteenth century, when psychologists—some but not all of them Jews—created a new paradigm for understanding sexuality. There were no longer homosexual and heterosexual desires, which can be found in all people and can be controlled by our faculty of choice. There were now homosexual and heterosexual people, and what made a person one or the other was generally thought to lie outside of our choice and control. One’s sexual proclivities suddenly became a whole “lifestyle,” a whole “identity,” giving sex an inflated importance in the scheme of things. It was not long before Freud started speculating that the whole soul can be understood in terms of sexuality. This new and false conception of sexuality has caused immense suffering and damage to our race.

Jews!  Jews!  Excuse me…if it is all a matter of “our faculty of choice,” then why can we tell that someone is homosexual just by listening to their voice? Or in some cases by looking at their face? Are we, in December 2019, denying a strong biological basis for sexual preferences?  And, if is “choice,” then can homosexuals please choose to be heterosexual, thus ending the problem?

First of all, it has created a great deal of anxiety for men and women who experience homosexual attractions at one time or another. In pagan societies, these desires could be acknowledged, understood, and even expressed if one chose to. In Judeo-Christian society, such desires were repressed, but their mere presence said nothing more about one’s identity than one is a sinner and subject to temptation—just like everybody else. Today, homosexual desires cause great anxiety and psychological anguish. People worry if they fall into a small and stigmatized sexual subspecies, totally different from the rest of humanity. A young man gets aroused wrestling with a friend and suddenly has a psychological crisis on his hands. He wonders if he is sick. He feels alienated from his family and peers. He wonders if he will have to move to the city and buy a feather boa.

Projection? Homosexuals seriously – very seriously – inflate instances of nominally heterosexual people experiencing “homosexual attractions.” Johnson should realize that many – I would say most, more likely the vast majority – of heterosexuals go through their lives without once experiencing such attractions. 

Second, this anxiety has chilled same-sex friendships and male bonding, and it is the bonded male group, the Männerbund, that is the foundation of all higher forms of civilization, particularly Aryan civilizations. It is amazing to read accounts of male friendships from earlier centuries, for example in Augustine’s Confessions or Montaigne’s Essays. It was possible for men to frankly express their love for one another without fearing the stigma of homosexuality, because that was an identity that simply did not exist before the late nineteenth century. (Today, these expressions of affection are read through the distorting lens of “queer theory,” and Augustine and Montaigne and countless other figures have been “outed.”)

I don’t know.  Maybe if young men can attend Alt Right meetings without being “flirted” with by homosexuals, then a “Mannerbund” could be possible.

Third, those who decide that they do not merely have homosexual desires, but are “homosexuals” are trapped by this self-concept into an exclusively homosexual lifestyle, which not only carries health risks…

This makes no sense.  Why would an “exclusively homosexual lifestyle” carry health risks while a “partially” homosexual lifestyle not?  The risks might be statistically higher in the former case, but still substantial in the latter. It’s not like there’s a threshold that needs to be reached before health risks occur. A single homosexual encounter can result in a life-changing infection or structural bodily damage.

…but also prevents them from affirming whatever heterosexual desires they might also have. It cuts them off from marriage and family life, which could be combined with homosexual relationships openly in pagan societies and on the sly in Judeo-Christian societies.

“On the sly.”  I’m sure the wives would be thrilled if they knew that their husbands are sleeping with men.  Get tested, milady!  Virus testing awaits!

Fourth, it has created the heterosexual, who thinks he is immune from same-sex attractions. 

Created?  CREATED!!!????  Excuse me, heterosexuals are not “created,” unless by “creation” you mean conception and birth. The idea of Johnson here apparently is that there aren’t any people who are innately purely heterosexual. They all have homosexual yearnings, don’t you know, perhaps satisfied by getting groped in a men’s room, or propositioned at an Alt Right meeting. Excuse me, but this is pure fantasy.  

This allows some heterosexuals to fuse Jewish intolerance with self-righteousness, turning them into queer-bashing bullies.

Is wishing to avoid interacting with homosexuals equate with being a “queer-bashing bully?”

All these destructive consequences could be alleviated if we freed our minds from the legacy of Jewish hatred and intolerance. 

Gaslighting nonsense.  Intolerance of homosexuality is not “Jewish.”  If anything, the opposite is true.

Queer-bashers are in the grip of Jewry without even knowing it. 

Oh, please.  This is just transparent pandering to Der Movement’s knee-jerk anti-Semitism. “If you dislike homosexuals, then you are secretly in thrall to the Jews.”  Nonsense.  The same “movement” tells us that “the Jews” control the media, have an outsized influence on popular culture, dictate social and political mores, and are over-represented in academia and the professions.  Yet, society moves steadily in the direction of the LGBTQ agenda.  What does that tell you?