Who Should You Listen To In the Dark Days Ahead?

Me or them?

This is your “movement” – 

Joe Dixon  

The McVeigh bombing and The Order were creations of the government and they guys that are in prison today are the fall guys. It wouldn't surprise me if the character that they called McVeigh is happily sunning himself on some tropical beach living under an assumed name or maybe under his real name.

Amren marches on:

John Flower  Michael Whalen Look under Alphaville (1965) at the end of this article. I get a lot of my thoughts disallowed, erased and even re-written here because he does not appreciate my point of view or respect my privilege to share my thoughts.

My thoughts have actually been re-written and when I attempt to return them to my original words, it is disallowed. I have to avoid using certain words in this/every thought in order to have them allowed.

AmonGothII  John Flower He gets a number of us. I try not to visit this site as much as I used to. It's taken a sorry turn for the worse since I originally started in 2007. See alot of others who have left altogether and some like me have scaled back. Comments is only decent aspect of this site, and now being snowflake effeminate moderated.

The Nordicist Durocher gloats…with some squid ink at the end to confuse the stepandfetchits. How are your Herrenvolk doing these days, Durocher?

Very cognitive, very elite.  No doubt that the TROPICAL COLORED Chinese are supporting their TROPICAL COLORED allies as part of THE TROPICAL ALLIANCE. [Please ignore that weeping off in the corner…that’s just Derbyshire in a fetal position]

When you read this, remember that the Quota Queens were calling Trump “a man of genuine greatness,” a man of “sincere” belief, an American Caesar who is the “last chance for White America.”  Even here, Costello labels Trump a “last hope.”  I, on the other hand, accurately labelled Trump as a “vulgar ignorant buffoon” even before the 2016 election.

Now, it’s true that we are all in big trouble if Trump loses.  But, you know, it didn’t have to be that way.  If Der Movement had taken my advice, and used the past four years to QUIETLY build in depth, build a real infrastructure – while at the same time leveraging mainstream right-wing populism (NOT “movement” antics) to “trigger” the Left in a manner to cause chaos to benefit that QUIETLY building vanguardist activism, we would not be in this position today, regardless of the outcome of the election.  Der Movement basically did the worst thing possible – frittered away the past four years AND triggered the Left by “movement” antics that shined the light of Leftist fury on racial nationalism, instead of diverting it to expanded right-wing populism and Trumpism.  Trump could have been the perfect foil to absorb the Left’s attention, with careful stirring of the pot by our side – INDIRECTLY, while racial nationalism grew in the shadows.  But, no.  The Quota Queens had to have their Unite the Right, had to have their meetings and Twitter accounts, had to put on a show to reinforce their status and their “D’Nations.”  You all listened to the losers who were WRONG about Trump, instead of listening to Sallis, who was (almost) always right.

So, assuming the worst occurs, ask yourself this question – who should you listen to in the dark days ahead – the folks who are always, always, always wrong about virtually everything or the folks who are right, say, 95% of the time?

Put another way – in times of crisis, should you follow inept affirmative action cases whose only reason for being in positions of leadership is that they “chose the right ancestors,” or should you follow individuals with a proven track record of good judgment and of typically being correct in their predictions and suggestions?

I’ll certainly write more in the future on what needs to be done, but to be brief – what we need is more electoral politics, more legal action, and more infrastructure building – and less freakishness and bizarre dogmas and less grifting for “D’Nations” from useless do-nothings. That applies to whatever electoral outcome occurs, but if Trump loses, the electoral politics and legal action efforts move way up to the top of the list.  I’ve written about this before – explaining why and will no doubt do so again.   All I’ll say now is that if the Quota Queens think that “business as usual” is going to suffice, they are leading you all right off the cliff (but not before they milk you of your “D’Nations”).

Never forget this.  We all talk about the Hermansson fiasco, but this was almost as bad.

Amren declares war against White ethnics? - 

The Dispossessed Majority by Wilmot Robertson — An extremely valuable racialist text…

I’ve warned all of you stepandhfetchits repeatedly.  They really do despise you.

Odds and Ends, 6/29/20

In der news.

In preparing for possible legal and government regulation action against certain left-leaning institutions, I came across one vulnerability that may be useful.  Interestingly, certain Far Right entities are probably even more vulnerable to the same approach.  I obviously will not discuss what it is here – I’m not in the business of assisting the Left nor of warning the Quota Queens.  I’ll simply continue to plan ahead for possible legal action against the aforementioned leftist entities (if necessary).

But I will say that this all confirms to my mind the ineptness and reckless stupidity of the Quota Queens, and the manifest inferiority of WN 2.0 (WN 1.0, insofar as I know, didn’t make the same error). It also underscores to an even greater extent how moronic and inefficient the Left is – for all their massive resources they leave low hanging fruit unplucked.  Or is it that they are afraid that the same approach can be leveraged against them? Perhaps that is it.  But given the anarcho-tyranny of a biased legal and government system, do they really need to worry about it?  Will the same consideration of System protection of the Left (i.e., protection of itself) hamper my own anti-leftist efforts in this regard?  On the other hand, for some entities, the thing they fear most of all is bad publicity. So, in that sense, the Left has far more to lose (given that the Right is already always portrayed badly in any case) unless the Left’s control of the media results in their bad publicity being squashed.  But in today’s era of the Internet and social media, I’m not sure that even the Left can put a lid on bad publicity.

Moving on...

In the short story Never Meet Again by science fiction writer Algis Budrys, a German scientist lives in a late 1950s alternative reality in which the Axis won the war and Germany is a prosperous and happy National Socialist regime. The scientist is himself personally unhappy because he blames the Nazis for the death of his wife.  So he designs a device that allows him to travel to an alternative reality that he thinks will be better – one in which Germany lost.  So, he does so – and ends up in a real dystopia, our reality, in which he turns up in Soviet-controlled dark and dreary late 1950s East Berlin. All around is squalor and miserable people. There, he meets that reality’s version of his wife, still alive, overjoyed to see him, since he himself was killed by an American bombing in this reality.  At which point, the wife, upon learning what he had done, turns him over to the Soviet authorities who want him to rebuild his machine to be used as an anti-American weapon.  Budrys was, in the word of the Alt Right: “based.”

Then we have Tau Zero by Poul Anderson, who was of Scandinavian descent, a book which pictures a future Earth ruled by (an ethnically homogeneous and very Nordic) Sweden.  That book displaces porn as onanistic material for Durocher.  Put that book down Durocher, lest you get a priapism.

The Slavic soul.

A perfect example of why Counter-Currents is despicably dishonest – a commentator there writes:

I don’t see eye to eye with Nicholas R. Jeelvy on a lot of things, but he hit it out of the park with this analysis. “Racist Liberal” only came about as a term of insult in March 2020 in response to White Nationalists who were opposed to the COVID-19 shutdown. Basically, COVID exposed a schism between WN’s who support freedom and individualism vs. WN’s who come from a Leftist or even Communist background and thus are highly in favor of collective measures, which they justify under the guise that they are “protecting society.” Hunter Wallace, Richard Spencer, Matt Parrott, Keith Woods, Eric Striker, Marcus Cicero of Daily Stormer fame, and numerous Twitter accounts – especially the ones using fake Black People names – are all in favor of collectivism and “What’s Good For Society” over individual liberty for White men and White women. The term “Racist Liberal” was invented by these people.

Excuse me, but the “collectivism and ‘What’s Good For Society’ over individual liberty for White men and White women” mindset this commentator decries is not only exhibited by “Hunter Wallace, Richard Spencer, Matt Parrott, Keith Woods, Eric Striker, Marcus Cicero of Daily Stormer fame” BUT ALSO BY GREG JOHNSON HIMSELF.  And does the “great man” come in to reply to this comment and defend his covid-19 views?  Of course not. Later in the thread he responds to someone asserting that the sneering Frenchie poodle “scientist” won the covid-19 debate because Johnson’s ego is bruised by that, but he doesn’t directly defend his collectivist pro-lockdown views when those are ascribed to a “Leftist or even Communist background."

Johnson won’t do it, but I will, since I’ve been more on the covid-19 is a serious threat side as opposed to the flubro side.  Talking about “Leftist or even Communist” is simply ad hominem.  Collectivist action could be fascist, national socialist, Far Right, what have you. The good old “freedom and apple pie” USA always had no problem with collective action in wartime; the military draft being a prime example. Indeed, sometimes society requires protecting, and that usually entails collective action and investment in common social goods, not “sturdy individualism.”  “Freedom and individualism” requires collective action for protection, as others with less adherence to those principles will use collective action to strip those from you. Better collective action voluntarily by Whites, in a White manner, sacrificing some “freedom and individualism” to save the remainder, than to have alien outsiders use collective action to strip the White man of everything.  And, as I’ve said before, and I’ll say it again, the whole covid-19 lockdown issue is a strange “hill to die on” for the rah-rah individualists. Maybe being so militant would have served better as regards forced racial integration, affirmative action, mass immigration, etc. But I suppose defying White doctors and scientists is easier than defying Colored militants and their Jewish controllers, eh?

Introducing the Costello Counter-Currents diet plan.

This is TOO:

Let’s look at the term aryan used by hitler the nazis and also the roman salute. The iranians are these days some of the most racially mixed peoples, on averege 15% east indain also part arab and so on. Hence the old aryans are dead.

The term “Aryan” is moronic.  The “Aryans” were never what the fetishists though they were.

As for the roman salute, most italians are mixed with arabsa and north africans these days, partially as an effect of the roman empire.

Sallis’ Law in action again.  Remarkable that after the Roman genetics study – mysteriously completely ignored by Der Movement – that we continue to have such comments, but there you go.  What about East Asian/Siberian admixture in Northern Europe?  Move on, move on, there’s nothing to see there – and it’s of great benefit to all humanity, and don’t you forget it!

The swastika, is mainly used in india, where whites tried to stay separate but all mixed with non whites to some degree, the cast system probably reflects an attempt at keeping the mixture lover for parts of the population.

The cast system?  By the way, when were there “Whites” in India, in the sense of the word meaning Europeans?  The British control to be sure, but before that?  India was never “White” to begin with – “beige” perhaps?

Gene tests of hitlers relatives has shown mixture with berbs, north africans (could be berbs and arabs occupied spain, then spain occupied The Netherlands that is a neighbour country to germany which is bordering austria)…

First, that’s the NRY.  Second, amusingly, we note here that any potential admixture in Hitler is blamed on…Spain.  But of course. And what is a "berb?" The same as a "blurb?"

Hence all the choices of symbols by the nazis hevily represents racemixing. The ideology also led to 40 million people dying, most of them whites, 8 million of them german.

The Nazis supported race-mixing!  QED!  But, hey, at least the Iranians, Italians, Indians, Nazis, and Hitler knew basic spelling, which is more than what can be said about this minor Herrenvolk nobility.

This is correct.

Hey now!  It’s time to discuss the racial admixture of the “dago” Frank Rizzo and his “big meatballs.”

Standing six-foot-two and built like a rhinoceros, Frank Rizzo has been called “larger than life”…

Are you sure that’s not “five-foot-two?  After all, we don’t want the moldering corpse of Humphrey Ireland to get confused or anything.

Der Religion and Der Movement and Der 1970s

In all cases, emphasis added.

First, an observation. The three main branches of Christianity tend to reflect the character of the European peoples who form the focal point of each branch.

The shallow pomp and pageantry of Catholicism reflects the superficial lack of depth of the gesticulating Med. Thus: Schettino.

The staid and grim bloodless moralizing of Protestantism reflects the humorless virtue-signaling Nord.  Thus: Merkel.

The otherworldly spirituality of Orthodoxy reflects the irrational religiosity of the tormented Slav.  Thus: Rasputin.

Greg Johnson’s cluelessness.  He doesn’t seem to realize that on a civilizational level, on the level of global racial conflict, the petty nationalism he supports is akin to individualism and the pan-Europeanism he opposes is akin to collectivism. Yes, indeed, only enemies would promote individualism in such a scenario.

Question: What recent “movement” book production was so poorly edited that “public” was rendered as “pubic?”  Raise your hand if you know what I’m talking about here.  Affirmative action!

See this.

We need a half million dollars a year donation so that we can really have the media operations we need; so we can take the pressure off of me and my family alone so that I can direct a sizable and competent staff, and so I can publish and write the important books I need to create before I die; so we can have a daily video presence instead of just a weekly radio presence; so that our media can expand to include channels tailored to women, tailored to Second Amendment supporters, tailored to young people, et cetera; so we can issue press releases and demands and statements to public officials on a daily basis; and much much more.

Kevin Strom, meet Peter Brimelow.

You know, for all my differences with the National Alliance, I’d much rather see them get this money than have it essentially flushed down the VDARE toilet.  I can trust Strom to at least do more than “create and manage Internet publication.”  

You should also donate to Salter.

And to the Free Expression Foundation.

I would rank those in importance as: Salter higher than the Free Expression Foundation which is higher than the National Alliance.  VDARE I would not rank at all.

By the way, isn’t it interesting how the search results differ comparing DuckDuckGo to Google?  Search for “Kevin Strom” in the former and you get his website as the top hit.  Now try the same in Google…good luck.

Greg Johnson, August 2019:

Trump is toast in 2020 no matter what…He will lose in a landslide.

Greg Johnson, June 2020:

Trump needs to make sure this is repeated 1 million times, and he will cruise to re-election.

I’ll let the reader decide for themselves what to think about those two comments, particularly as the second one was made without any acknowledgement of the first.

See this.  That’s one of the e-thots mocked here at this blog, and one of them that Johnson vigorously defended.

Consider this comment in light of recent events; including this portion of the comment:

Lauren can spend her earnings on any frilly, silly, frivolous thing she wants.

Greg Johnson is an unmitigated disaster for the “movement.”  He is wrong about – what? – probably 50% of the things he writes.  Maybe more.

I’ll say it again – I blame all of YOU out there for the continued presence, and authority, of this comic buffoon, this zero-judgment disaster, in your beloved “movement.”  

Laughable from Amren.  The “scientists” are all HBDers, with several pseudoscientific frauds mixed in. Of the five writers, three were out-and-out Nordicists, with Sam Francis being a borderline fourth. So, in essence: HBD-Nordicism, precisely what one would expect.

Yockey:

The domestic disease-elements within the Culture which wish to retain the outmoded ideas and methods of the Past and to fight against the creative spirit which is actualizing a Cultural mission, are the forces of Culture-retardation. These have been brought into the service of the Culture-distorter. Actually these elements simply desire to lead, but are themselves incapable of leadership, and therefore devote their lives to opposition to great formative Ideas, creative spiritual currents, and leaders of vision and genius. They are the churchills, the spaaks, the gaulles, the rejects of higher history who offer themselves to the forces of negation and destruction. The most critical form of the disease of Culture-retardation is the condition in which it seeks to prevent the realization of the Idea of the Future even at the shame of allying with outer forces, the degradation of becoming their vassal, and the risk of destroying the entire Culture. Before showing the effect of the disease-elements on the external relations of the Culture, their internal effects must be summarized.

It seems to me that the “petty nationalist” ethnonationalists are perfect examples of Culture-retardation. 

Let’s see:

The domestic disease-elements within the Culture…

Yes, they are White.

… which wish to retain the outmoded ideas and methods of the Past and to fight against the creative spirit which is actualizing a Cultural mission…

Yes, they oppose pan-Europeanism and Imperium and instead support the divisive and destructive atomized petty nationalism of the past.

These have been brought into the service of the Culture-distorter.

Yes, they are in an alliance with the Jew-infested HBDers.

Actually these elements simply desire to lead, but are themselves incapable of leadership…

Don’t we know that!

Rewriting this:

White ethnics when they realize they have more political power by withholding their support from anti-White ethnic “movement activism” rather than groveling harder.

This is important.  Step one – stop wasting money on VDARE and the other Quota Queens.

Whigger Cannon?   Compared to today, the 1970s were inferior in science and technics, medical care, cars, and hairstyles – and superior in virtually everything else. Some people mock the clothes fashions and architecture of the 1970s, but I for the most part prefer them. What can top my grandfather’s burgundy pants or the unique patterned and colored suit jackets and sports jackets of that time?  What constructs built today can match those built in the 70s, which wonderfully resemble the sort of buildings one might see in a low budget scifi film of the 1960s or early 1970s? Movies, literature, sports, comic books – all clearly superior in the 1970s.  TV shows are a matter of taste – in general, I prefer the 70s style. Politics, of all types, were more serious back then. Society – even though rapidly degenerating – was infinitely more sane then than today. And, hey, the US nuclear arsenal was relatively new back then – as we are essentially using the same weapons today (Super Duper!).  And in the 70s, the French and Chinese were still blasting away with above ground nuclear tests. Those were the days my friend!

The Madness of King Sultan

And other items.

I’ve been re-reading the book Peter the Great by Robert K. Massie, and there is an interesting passage there about the Ottoman sultans and their harems:

The harem was a closed world of veils, gossip, intrigue and – at any moment of the sultan’s choosing – sex…As all the women in the harem were totally dependent on how well the sultan was pleased, all were eager for opportunities to reach his bed and, once in it, desperate to please. So much so that several sultans, surfeited with endless days and nights of passion supplied by platoons of eager, adoring women, went, quite simply, insane.

Note the part about “intrigue.” Indeed, the women – far from being innocently “adoring”- were always conniving to have their sons elevated to the sultanship. And if they had no sons themselves, they would support the ambitions of their allies among the other harem women who had such. Intrigue!

And here’s my point, looking at this from a MGTOW perspective. I hypothesize that the women intentionally drove the sultans insane through sex. Indeed, sex was their only weapon (they were no doubt better suited to nag the Sultan to madness, but that would not have been tolerated). Thus, particular groups of intriguing women plotted to leverage “endless days and nights of passion” to drive the Sultan mad, and thus easily manipulated, controlled, and, eventually, disposed of, for the benefit of the heir. At which point the process of feminine evil (a redundancy?) would start once again, with another victim, the new Sultan, so targeted.

By the way, Peter the Great was of part Tatar ancestry, through his “black haired” and “almond eyed” mother of Crimean Tatar descent. Raciology!  

Reading The Turner Diaries, chapter XI, November 30 entry, the description of the anti-White “anti-racist” hysteria at the Chicago Human Relations Council rally – including the deranged and bloody killing of a white “honky” cat – strikes home given the madness we have seen unfold in America (and Western Europe) recently. Also interesting is Pierce’s description of “swarthy, kinky-haired little Jewboys” as the ones firing up the crowed. They’re HuWhite!

I support this group.

Der Movement in Der News, 6/26/20

Sallis right again.

From a Counter-Currents article, I was alerted to this Amren book review.  The review is fine as far as it goes, but it ends on an interesting note (emphasis added):

Author Marisa Abrajano, whose origins we can only imagine from her name and appearance, teaches political science at UC San Diego. Zoltan Hajnal also teaches at UC San Diego. Zoltan is a Hungarian name, so it’s unlikely his ancestors came over on the Mayflower. White Backlash is published by Princeton University Press.

This is the perfect symbol for our degenerate times. Foreigners tell the American founding stock how benighted and deserving of oblivion we are, and are published by one of the country’s most prestigious academic presses. We have work to do.

Now, if Abrajano is some sort of Hispanic, that individual’s ethnic activism in favor of “Latino” immigration makes sense. But note the implication that White Americans of Hungarian ancestry are also “foreigners” who are, naturally, expected to “tell the American founding stock how benighted and deserving of oblivion we are.”

That’s quite remarkable.  First, all it takes is irritation over an obnoxious book to let all of the Anglo animus toward White ethnics come flowing out. Brotherhood of Europeans indeed! Second, is there any evidence that Hungarian-Americans in general harbor grudges against America’s founding stock and wish to tell them “how benighted and deserving of oblivion” they are?

On the other hand, there is voluminous evidence that Jews, in general, actually do have such attitudes, and have actively engaged in anti-White and, more specifically, anti-Anglo activism for a century or more (e.g., see all of MacDonald's work on that issue).  But alas, if “Zolton Hajnal” was instead named “Moshe Finkelstein” we can very much doubt that the same comment about “foreigners” would have been made in that case. And, did the ancestors of “racial status quo” Weissberg and “multiracial White separatist state” Hart come “over on the Mayflower?”

It has been the contention of EGI Notes that Der Movement has nothing to offer to White ethnics (and here “White” excludes Jews), and Der Movement does nothing but continue to support that assertion.

Side note – Hey!  I thought that the “HBD race realists” loved anyone named “Hajnal.”  Isn’t “Hajnal” a holy name among HBDers?

Then we have VDARE’s recent problems with web site hosting.  Readers of this blog, knowing my frequent harsh criticism of VDARE and Brimelow, may be surprised that I fully support VDARE in this case (*).  But you should not be surprised, since I am a vigorous supporter of free and unfettered expression, and my vision of the Internet is as an open marketplace of ideas - a “free for all” where views are openly aired and critically examined. VDARE should be able to do their thing, and I mine, and then we’ll see who makes the better arguments.

Indeed, it are some of my cowardly critics who are the ones afraid of free debate, not me.

And I do not want to hear excuses for web hosting companies that “they are privately owned entities and can do what they want.”  Besides the fact that these companies form a de facto monopolizing cartel, the fact is in today’s America, people do NOT have the right to do with their private property what they want. If you are a real estate property owner, try advertising rent to “Whites only” and “no Blacks allowed” and then get back to me about “private entities can do what they want.” And don’t give me nonsense about “immutable categories” being protected either, since, even if we disregard evidence of a genetic basis for political views, the fact is that religion is also an officially protected category as well in the sense that you cannot rent to, say, "Protestants only" with “no Catholics or Muslims allowed.”  Religion is not immutable or else converts and apostates would not exist. With respect to “identity,” for many people politics trumps religion, so that’s no excuse either.

*But perhaps if those hundreds of thousands of dollars per year had instead been going to build a legal infrastructure and free speech-friendly web hosting, this problem wouldn’t have occurred in the first place.

I agree with this.

Dalton Fraud Redux

Dalton challenging Durocher, Jeelvy, and Costello for the title of worst Far Right writer. In all cases, emphasis added.

Laugh at this.

Yes, there will be resistance—from local law enforcement and local protesters, but not from “antifa” (whoever the hell “they” are).  

So, Dalton supports the “there is no such thing as Antifa" narrative?”  Whoever the hell they are?  Have you been watching the news recently, moron?  What happened at Unite the Right? When Counter-Currents holds meetings in hotels, who are they hiding from when they conceal their meeting place? Who goes from hotel to hotel searching for them to break up the meeting?  Who harassed Johnson and Polignano when they were living in California? Who has attacked small groups of rightists meeting in restaurants?  Who drove Amren from their DC-area hotels? Who was attacking Spencer's college speaking tours, causing them to be cancelled?  An imaginary group in scare quotes? At this point, can we take anything Dalton says seriously?  How about HE schedules some public, well-advertised meetings?

Certainly, a single large event, like Charlottesville, can be targeted by a large number of radical leftists.  

And a single small event can be targeted by a small number of radical leftists.  Also note that, later in this screed, the fraud Dalton states that the "leftist Jews" can mobilize effectively only in New York and DC.  But here it is "Charlottesville."  

But that’s precisely why we need numerous, simultaneous, independent, local groups.  Massive decentralization virtually guarantees that neither the feds, nor antifa, nor any large national group will effectively target you.  

Excuse me, you laughably naïve and inept Quota Queen – all of these groups are not simultaneously coming into existence. There will be a phase – the difficult start to the project – in which isolated new groups are forming.  And these will be targeted one by one. The groups are not all going to spring into existence simultaneously overnight throughout the country. 

My critics are overly-cowed by pictures on TV.  

And cowed by the actual experiences of many activists so targeted.  But, hey, if Dalton is not "cowed," I invite HIM to be the very public face of the White resistance.  Advertise weekly rallies in your city square. Openly announce your library meetings. Publicly advertise regular pro-White meetings at a local hotel.  Don't be cowed, Dalton, don't be cowed!

Jews and their allies are experts at puffing up their perceived power.  But outside New York and Washington DC, their power on the ground declines dramatically.  

Really?  Next time Unite the Right can be held, say, in Virginia!  Charlottesville sounds like a good idea. Spencer can speak at Michigan State.  No problem!  Amren can hold their meetings at a TN state complex - no security needed, right?  After all, it's not New York and DC, so no problem!  Certainly, they won't need to go to court to force the state of TN to pay exorbitant security costs, right you mendacious fraud?

Is this raging idiot Dalton serious?  

The multi-city riots of recent days were conducted mostly by opportunistic Black criminals and random anarchists; it was not a centrally-planned effort, and such people pose virtually no threat to local White groups.

This is gaslighting nonsense. The same groups of thousands that can shut down a city – you think dozens of those, the hardcore leaders, can’t be mobilized against your blithely naïve “advertise your library club and see who shows up" meetings?  How come every time such a project has been undertaken it has collapsed?  Meeting after meeting - in America and in Europe - has been attacked, or relocated, or cancelled because of the people who "pose virtually no threat."  You know, the folks who showed up at Charlottesville armed, who attack people in the streets with impunity (can Spencer show his face in public without being punched?), who sent Trump hiding in a White House bunker, who have support from the mass media and major corporations, who set up an "autonomous zone" in Seattle - these are just random groups of Negro criminals and assorted roving anarchists, right?  

Furthermore, I hate to disparage commenters, but I can’t stop wondering how many leftist/Jewish trolls we attract here at TOO.  Probably a fair number.  

Three points.  First, this is a typically disgusting and fundamentally dishonest Type I maneuver – declare that your critics are “Jews” or other infiltrators. Second, if even a website can attract a “fair number” of “leftist/Jewish trolls” then what about your local small groups?  Moshe Finkelstein merely needs to exchange his yarmulke for a horned helmet and claim his name is Lars Finksson and he’ll be all set. Third, if you actually do set up your "local groups" what stops idiots like Dalton accusing sincere activists they disagree with being "leftist/Jewish trolls?" Given the history of Der Movement, actual infiltrators will be welcomed, while authentic activists will be insulted and rejected.

We need to keep in mind:  If someone’s “comments” or “suggestions” are virtually identical to what a Jewish or leftist opponent might say, then we need to take them with a huge grain of salt.  

Yes, indeed.  What would a Jewish or leftist opponent suggest? That Antifa ("antifa" in scare quotes) doesn’t really exist (whoever the hell "they” are, indeed!). Maybe pretend that someone can openly organize pro-White activism with no real risks whatsoever? Let a thousand flowers bloom - and then cut them all down.

Our opponents would like nothing better than that we do nothing—hence, for them, every suggestion for concrete White action is necessarily stupid, unworkable, or doomed to failure.  

Not every suggestion. Just the ones that actually are stupid, unworkable, or doomed to failure.  Like yours.

Right.  Don’t believe it.  Critical comments are welcome, but they should be coherent and constructive.  Mindless opposition serves no purpose, other than to cast suspicion on the commenter.

Why isn’t this coherent and constructive?  Oy vey!  If you disagree with Dalton you are mindless!  If you disagree with Dalton you’re a Jewish leftist!  Again, if TOO is a hotbed of Jewish infiltrators, as you claim, doesn’t that support the view that your “small local groups” will be similarly infested?

More pragmatically, what actual risks would White activists face? 

YOU and your supporters can be the role models. YOU show us the lack of risk. I await Dalton and the TOO commentators who support him to put a nice video on YouTube, introducing themselves to the world - real names of course - and inviting us all to their weekly library meetings. Let's see who shows up.  Right?  What actual risks?  Are you serious?  Is this supposed to be a serious essay or a poorly written comedy?  Dalton must believe that White activists are all cowards or delusional paranoids.  No risks!  So, why aren't they all out openly organizing?  Cowards!  Paranoids!

Is being fired a real threat?  Perhaps, depending on the person and the circumstances.  But first, I think such threats are generally overblown; a few high-visibility cases get lots of media time, thanks to our Jewish friends, but realistically, this is a small risk for most people.  

And you know this how?  Gee, what would a Jewish leftist do? Encourage self-doxxing perhaps?  

Secondly, there are large groups of people for whom ‘firing’ is not a threat at all:  retirees, students…

Students!  Gee, what could ever happen to a student?  Obviously nothing!  Your typical high school or college student faces no risks whatsoever!  Is Dalton mentally retarded?  Gee, they won't be harassed, right?  Not physically attacked, right?  Not unfairly graded, right?  Not suspended or expelled, right?  Not blacklisted from future employment, right?  Hey, Mr. PhD, did YOU come out publicly, under you real name, as a student?

…stay-at-home moms and dads, the self-employed, the family-employed, those with strong support systems (like unions), and so on.  Not to mention—the already unemployed!  Lots of those around lately.  No doubt there are plenty of folks in a position to attend such a group.

Jewish trolls no doubt will be in a perfect position.

Then a reader turns the tables on me, asking for data for my claim that any nation of 330 million is ungovernable.  This is actually incidental to my argument, but in short, to respond to the critic, there is a lengthy history—dating back to Plato and Aristotle—of a “size theory of politics.”  This suggests that only small populations can achieve rational and stable governmental forms along with high qualities of living.  Contemporary data suggests that 10 to 20 million is perhaps the most that can be rationally and justly governed.

Ignore all history, and currently extant nations, that prove otherwise.  You can of course define “rationally and justly governed” as you wish to prove your point, but it doesn’t change the fact that actual reality – as opposed to Ancient Greeks extolling the virtue of city states (and how did those turn out?) - refutes Dalton’s assertions.

I believe Dalton has now won the prize for worst writer on the Far Right. The level of cluelessness, stupidity, ignorance, arrogance, blithe naivete, advocacy of activities that can cause people on our side real and life-changing harm, coupled with calling critics "mindless" and "leftist/Jewish trolls" - this is a level of tragicomedy never before observed in "movement" circles.

Inuit or Idiot?

Costello again.

Why not promote a diet than can lead to cancer and heart disease?  It’s all good!

Der Right is a ludicrous joke.

Laugh at this. The whole point of racialism is that human racial groups are different; keep this in mind as Costello justifies the GI system health aspects of a “carnivore diet” for Whites because of…Inuits.

I mean, these Quota Queens are so helplessly inept and remarkably self-UNaware that it is simply astonishing.

Of related interest.  Now, maybe that WCRF data doesn’t apply to Inuits. But I’m not an Inuit.  Are you? Is Costello?

Gee…maybe the Inuit aren’t the best population for Europeans to model their diets after? Maybe - who knows! - radically different racial groups are actually (gasp!)...different?

Also see this.

See this.

See this.

The Inuit living on fresh raw meat and fresh raw fish would actually manage to get enough vitamin C, and particularly, there's a lovely traditional Inuit staple called muktuk which is the skin of the beluga whale, and this has a lot of vitamin C in it.

Somehow I doubt that Costello is eating muktuk.  Counter-Currents is the absolute worst.

He’s going to monitor the situation!  LAW AND ORDER!

Local Strategizing

Ideas.

Following up on the Dalton strategy controversy, we read this comment (spelling corrected):

NorthWitchsays:

June 19, 2020 at 5:22 pm

I was just coming to say this. It seems to me childishly naive to think whites can just form organizations and go from there. If it were that simple it would have been done long ago. The current situation is one in which every single thing whites have ever built is being torn asunder. Absolutely no one is going to stand by twiddling their thumbs while a White Lives Matter group books a library room for meetings. The library would never allow it; anyone who shows up would lose his job; his children will face both violence and retaliation by teachers at school and elsewhere; he would lose his bank account; he may lose his children. Not to mention such a group would end up comprised primarily of feds. This is not a workable path forward.

While that reflects some of my own critiques of Dalton, it goes too far in the other direction. The basic problem I have with Dalton’s local organizing approach is not the fundamental idea itself, which I support and have long advocated. Instead, I find fault with the ludicrously shallow, blithely superficial, and painfully naïve manner in which he discusses the topic. Essentially he says – “Hey! Get together with some like-minded friends [Sallis note – just like that], tell your library you want space for 'White Lives Matter' meetings, publicly advertise, and see who shows up.”  Frankly, I almost burst out laughing reading his piece.

It is humorously ironic how the behavior of Der Movement activists and “leaders” so contradict their ideology.  They assert that certain European ethnies are racially superior, having evolved in the frigid northern climes (where the cold winds blow!); they are, naturally far-sighted, strategic, prudent, and stoic, in contrast to the gibbering, gesticulating southerners who can’t think past their next plate of pasta. And yet it are these superior types who exhibit an order of magnitude less foresight and long-term thinking that the dumbest ghetto Negro, and, apparently, a cringing subhuman like myself needs to state the obvious.

To actualize even a small scale level of what Dalton proposes will take months, if not years, of careful planning and preparation (you know, what the last four years of Trump could have been used for).  Where to begin?  Just off the top of my head, with about five seconds of consideration, I can tell you that you will need a dependable meeting place. You can do the Amren government building approach, but that’s most appropriate for larger gatherings. Smaller gatherings will either have to be (a) cryptic without the host (hotel, meeting hall, etc.) knowing its true nature (and that won’t last long, that’s for sure) or (b) private, such as at someone’s home (or place of business if they are self-employed and work outside the home (although problems exist here as well). Very small scale meetings at a home can work at first; however, given the overall possibilities and risks, it would be preferable if the homeowner was retired or self-employed, with no small children, etc. You will absolutely, 100%, require dependable legal representation, and this should preferably be (if possible) with a lawyer or law firm that is at least rightist-oriented and/or dedicated to free speech and association (if not outright fellow travelers). Having “friends in high places” in the local administration, law enforcement, business community, etc. would help, but you cannot depend on that to be possible in all, or even most, cases.  Having strict codes of conduct is a must.  REAL extreme vetting – not “are you Swedish?” – is a must, but BEFORE you ask ordinary folks to share that level of information you must already establish an infrastructure that provides sufficient confidence that going through the vetting process won’t backfire on those being vetted. For example, having comically transparent infiltrators assisting with the vetting is not a good idea. Apparently the Herrenvolk need a swarthoid to tell them things like that.

The “chicken and egg” nature of the problem means you need to have a minimum cohort of like-minded, more or less absolutely dependable, people to start with, to establish the infrastructure, preferably people you know well enough that the extreme vetting in their case will have already occurred through your long-term relationship with them and/or their long-term commitment to pro-White activism.  

All of this, and more, will require money, but don’t whine about that, when a cursory look at ProPublica’s not-for-profit database informs us how hundreds of thousands of dollars per year are being wasted on greedy "activists" who essentially do absolutely nothing. The money is there, it is just being misdirected.  How to get it properly directed is a mission for all you racially superior folks out there.  Indeed, if any pro-White groups taking in “D’Nations” want to make themselves useful they can start putting together guides for local organizing, including information on our-side-friendly legal help and all of the other “nuts and bolts” intricacies required. They can help the dependable central cadre of a local group find each other. Properly leveraging the resources we have, instead of wasting them on stupidities and grifters, can help enormously.  Can they do at least that?  If not, why are they being sent money for?

Information people have on approaches for local meetings and organizing, things that work, should be shared – PRIVATELY – among dependable individuals.  A cadre of dependable people need to be identified, particularly people with a long established history of pro-White activism, and these need to share information and ideas and plan strategically for local organizing.  There will no quick fixes.  Anyone who thinks that you can go from the idea to the actualization in a few weeks is a fool and cannot be trusted. Essentially, you need a dependable infrastructure in place BEFORE you try to reach out beyond your small founding cadre.  You need to establish that you know what you are doing, have covered the bases, have prepared for contingencies, and that you take the concerns of people seriously. You need a record of success. Can you reproducibly and safely conduct meetings with your cadre?  Can you point to your legal representation?  Does your leadership have a long history in activism, and are not just some college libertarians who want to get “edgy” with Pepe and Kek?  Are you SERIOUS? “Seeing who shows up” is not a serious proposal, at least not for the early stages. How can we take seriously anyone who would propose that?  

In the 1990s, we had analog meetings, in both public and private venues.  We used private residences as needed.  Yes, things then were not as bad as today, and, yes, sometimes mistakes were made (typically revolving around the same bugaboo - lack of security and foresight about such), but, still, overall, meetings took place and there were some successes – and it wasn’t like there was no opposition back then either. If the knuckle-dragging WN 1.0 crowd can do that, can the heroic masters of WN 2.0 organize a single meeting that doesn’t end in disaster?  Or is that asking too much from the types who brought us Unite the Right and Patrik Hermansson?

Critics may assert that I merely talk here in generalities and don’t provide many concrete details.  Yes, that’s the point, such details should not and must not be discussed on a public forum.  One could even make the case that the entire discussion, starting with Dalton’s original piece and followed by criticisms and updates, should have occurred in private, among a restricted group of dependable people. But Dalton’s piece was public, so the responses were as well, but nothing beyond the content here should be public.  At this point, further extrapolation of the issue should be "offline," so to speak.

And I reiterate my call for “movement leaders” to make themselves useful, if they can, and provide information and support for local organizing.  Even though most of these “leaders” are tragicomic incompetents, they do have some resources, some connections, some information, some experience, and whatever (positive) that they can provide is better than nothing.

Read this.

The point here is that all conventional strategies designed to move White dissident thought from the fringe to the mainstream may be doomed to failure because they neglect the fact we aren’t even on the same spectrum of political possibility, or even within the same psychological framework. We are exiles, declared to be total anathema. To label something evil is to imply it is willfully engaged in the chaotic, unnatural, and sadistic. Evil implies an unregenerate irrationality as well as a complete detachment from morals. It also implies the willful infliction of suffering, and perhaps also a joy in it. Fighting from this position with appeals to things like IQ differences, crime rates, the data on police shootings of Blacks and Whites, or blandishments about the right of all peoples to self-determination, is probably entirely pointless.

There may be truth to what Joyce says here. But reflect upon a point I often make at this blog – this situation (in this case Joyce’s contention that “White dissident thought” is equated with evil) exists after many decades of “movement activism,” after millions of dollars of “D’Nations and dues,” after millions of man hours of effort by the ran-and-file. What does this tell you? Can we admit that Der Movement has been an utter failure and its “leadership” is composed of comically inept affirmative action cases and grasping grifters who suck up “movement” money with more avidity than a black hole absorbing the mass of a nearby star?

What is really required, therefore, is a “fight fire with fire” strategy that embodies emotionality and triggers psychological responses that resonate on a deeper level, beyond consciousness. This necessitates a propaganda designed exclusively to instill feelings of disgust, fear, and hatred for those opposed to White interests. In the final analysis, it must be hammered home that our opponents are not wrong, weak-willed, venal, or corrupt — they are morally, politically, and spiritually evil. They belong in the lowest Hell.

Fine. And how to go about doing this?  How to propagate this worldview when the entire “megaphone” is in the hands of the Left, and decades of “movement activism” have left us utterly helpless and hopeless?  How about some pragmatic input?  How about showing us how it is done?

George Kocansays:

June 20, 2020 at 6:49 am

China et al. have plenty of friends and collaborators in the US.

Yes – meet HBD.

And with all of Johnson’s recent attacks against Trump, the Teflon Quota Queen cannot admit being wrong about the man.  Accountability?  Quota Queens don’t need no stinkin’ accountability!

A Brief EGI Question

To consider.

I have argued that non-functional genes as well as functional genes constitute a genetic interest.  However, since functional genes influence their own replication, they can be considered to be, on a “per capita” basis, of greater interest.  If this is so, are dominantly expressed genes of greater interest than recessive?  Or is this opposite true, at least if certain recessive traits are more valuable in terms of adaptive fitness, not only for the alleles that encode them but for the entire distinctive genome?

Odds and Ends, 6/21/20

In der news. In all cases, emphasis added.

Another example of how ethnonationalists ruin everything they touch:

1999, a manifesto of a second 'European Liberation Front' was published in Paris, but there is apparently no more active organisation of that name now. The manifesto takes its ideological inspiration from Yockey, and from Otto Strasser, who was expelled from the Nazi Party by Adolf Hitler in 1930.

Despite the pan-European style of its title, the ideology of the manifesto is ethnic and racial nationalism…

Take over the name of Yockey’s organization and then promote an opposing ideology.  Very good!  Hail Der Movement!

Authentic pan-Europeanism does not exist in any organization of which I am aware over the last 50 years or more, except Lowell's in Malta.

Forney on Spencer Part I.  Part II.

Note that I do not agree on Forney on all his comments, but, nevertheless, the rank-and-file needs to understand where their affirmative action program leads.  I also find Forney’s glee at Spencer’s problems unseemly.  It is not funny, it is a tragedy.  I don’t care about Spencer himself, but we all need to realize that the White public – you know, the folks that your “movement” wants to recruit from – do not make fine distinctions between Spencer, Johnson, Forney, Taylor et al.  It’s all one.  Spencer’s downfall therefore reflects badly on the entirety of racial activism in the public "mind."  

That downfall, ultimately, derives from the lack of judgment of “movement” “elites.”  Spencer should never have been allowed to be the head of NPI in the first place; that position should have gone to an older individual with more experience, maturity, and gravitas. Spencer should instead have been groomed for electoral politics, as the smiling young face of the Far Right, with mature adults as his behind-the-scenes handlers. 

The past cannot be changed. But going forward, the affirmative program needs to be eliminated.  That is step one.  It’s not a case of a single rotten apple that needs to be gotten rid of, it’s a whole case.  And as soon as one apple becomes so horribly decayed that it is thrown out, another one joins in. The entire crate needs to be thrown out, and the entire process of picking rotten apples changed.

A sincere man of genuine greatness.

Glad to see we got dem dere Republican conservative judges like “Earl Warren Jr.” Roberts there.

I’m no fan of Rushton, but the retraction of his hypothesis paper was unfair and disgusting, and I agree with this analysis, which is a refutation of leftist hysteria that helped get the paper unfairly retracted.  I also agree with the analysis in that the author of the leftist attack on Rushton-Templar doesn't understand what pleiotropy is, possibly confusing it with epistasis (or who knows what).  I am also amused by the leftist critique of Rushton-Templar for having a "political bias." Hoho!  What about the leftist critic's bias?  Would he care to inform us on his views on say, race in America?  What's his party affiliation?  Who did he vote for in 2016? What about, say, Lewontin's biases?  Any comments on that?

If the Rushton-Templar paper was inherently flawed – even as a hypothesis – and this somehow escaped the notice of the reviewers at that time, then the appropriate response is to write a paper (for publication) refuting the Rushton-Templar logic and/or do studies that produce data refuting the Rushton-Templar hypothesis. Retracting the paper is politically motivated censorship, leading us to a scientific dark ages. The retraction is a disgrace.

Hey, it’s time for Trump to tweet LAW AND ORDER!  That’ll fix it.  Fat Don is like, you know, demonstrating his sincerity and his genuine greatness!

I was looking at Amazon reviews of Robert Griffin’s One Sheaf One Vine book, of interest to me since I am one of the people featured in it.  Two excerpts from the comments I found amusing:

1. Interesting anthropological study. Nothing really new here, but contains only interview available of Alex Linder. No other interviews with people who would go on to become personages. 

That’s a stinging rebuke of my lack of accomplishment I suppose.

2. Another observation I make, is that none of the people in the book, offer any solutions to the racial problems they criticize. In numerous cases, they simply flee those high-'diversity' problems by moving to other, whiter states. But none of them seem to envision the new domiciles undergoing future change.

Let’s see.  I spend a significant portion of my interview talking about practical things that should be done.  So it would seem that this individual lacks any reading comprehension skills whatsoever.  As well, with respect to the second half of the criticism, I’m not one of the “numerous cases” since that’s nowhere in my section.

Also interesting is that if you search on Amazon for a book like this, you get “suggested reading” consisting of a host of anti-White diatribes.  Like Google, Amazon is another company I am going to personally “deplatform” from any spending.

Thus in summary: Sallis right, Johnson wrong.

Kevin Strom:

The purpose of the race that is is to bring into being the race that is to come. Let’s concentrate on that. Let’s concentrate on being the ones who decide that.

I have been in this cause of ours for nearly 40 years. I have seen and heard and read so much wasted verbiage about why Russians or eastern Europeans generally, or southern Europeans generally, or even other odd subracial or national combinations should be read out of the White race. I have heard it all, please don’t repeat it to me. I’m sick of it.

The group or groups which coalesce to save our endangered race will be the ones who determine its genetic future. Beyond the obvious aesthetic that we know White when we see it, and a future that can include (but not be totally ruled by) accurate genetic testing, that’s all we need to know. If the White future is primarily Russian or Hungarian, so be it. If the White future is primarily pan-European American with strong German, Anglo, and Irish components, so be it. If the White future is predominantly Greek or Italian or Bulgarian or Nordic, so be it. None of us are in a position to pick and choose right now, nor does such picking and choosing make sense during this crisis.

Let’s just admit that every single group and sub-group of Europeans has racially devolved — due to dysgenics, due to genetic drift, due to past mixtures. Let’s just admit that every single White nationality could be — and, if we have anything to say about it, will be — helped by a healthy dose of eugenics.

But never forget this: We are targeted and marked for death as Whites. It is as Whites — not as dolichocephalic Red Nordids, or Paleo-Atlantids, or western Europeans only — that we must become awakened and fight back.

Very good; I obviously agree.  But then Strom has to admit that much of the work of Pierce and of the National Alliance was and is de facto opposed to that pan-European view. As regards Pierce accepting people with fractional Amerindian ancestry (and Pierce’s gibbering about “Caucasian” Amerindian tribes is nonsense - whatever their appearance, they are racial aliens from Asia), we must remember that the “Indian princess” stories – real or imagined – typically derive from “Nordish” Anglo-Americans. They’ve always gotten a “pass” for that – the “Pace Amendment” for example.

By the way, even Yockey himself wasn’t immune to a touch of Nordicism, with respect to his rhapsodizing about “Northern barbarians” in both Imperium and, more especially, Thoughts Personal and Superpersonal. I suppose we can forgive Yockey for that lapse, since the broader “movement” he derives from has always been marinated in Nordicism, but it is rather hypocritical of him given his pontifications about horizontal vs. vertical race.  And what would he think today, with all of the “Northern Barbarians” being the biggest race cucks of them all?

And by the way, Yockeyites past and present should know that The Doctrine of Fascism they so admire was really written by Giovanni Gentile, not Benito Mussolini.  But Gentile was one of those two foot tall superstitious Sicilians who so vexed Humphrey Ireland, so who cares about facts?

Newly discovered!  A film clip of Humphrey Ireland being overwhelmed by the scurrying Sicilian hordes.

A Thousand Points of Blight

Some fairly bad advice…mixed in with some good. In all cases, emphasis added.

See here.

The United States is irredeemably corrupt. It cannot be salvaged and it cannot be saved.  The entire political and economic infrastructure is lost.  We have neither a democracy nor an oligarchy, but rather a Judeocracy: rule by Jewish power and Jewish money.  Jews are assisted at all levels by Whites (and others) who act as their willing front-men, and who thus disguise the deeper workings of the system.  Republicans, Democrats, Greens, Libertarians—they’re all the same.  No party has the guts to confront the Jewish power structure.  The media, of course, is also hopelessly corrupted by Jewish influence; witness the battle between CNN, MSNBC, and even Fox News, to see who can display greater fealty to Jewish interests. Thus we can expect nothing but biased and malicious reporting from any of them.  The American system cannot be reformed; we should not even try.

I agree with “The American system cannot be reformed” but not “we should not even try." The “trying” is not for the actual reform, but for the downstream effects.  For the sake of propaganda and public mobilization, there should be one branch of pro-White activism in electoral politics that takes a “save America” standpoint for public consumption.  It is important to get fellow travelers elected at the federal level, and the time is not right for the bleak “the United States is irredeemably corrupt. It cannot be salvaged and it cannot be saved” as a rallying cry for national-level electoral politics.

American corruption can work to our advantage. As the US continues on its path of decay and decline, more and more opportunities will emerge for White nationalists.  

Excuse me, but your beloved “movement,” with its rigid ethnic affirmative action program that allows only Anglo-Germanic leadership, completely botched all of the opportunities over the last four years, all of the possibilities inherent in right-wing populism post 2016, and have left us worse off, activism wise, today than we were before Antifa Don Trump was elected.  Please explain how a “movement” based on continuous failure, “led” by laughably inept incompetents and “D’Nations”-hungry grifters, is going to effectively take advantage of the “more and more opportunities.”

The American Judeocracy will inevitably destroy itself; it’s only a question of time.  Jewish misanthropy and kleptomania will consume itself and the whole federal infrastructure in the process.  However, the American system will likely not collapse in a sudden, catastrophic paroxysm.  Rather, it will be a slow and steady loss of integrity, of stability, of coherence, and of credibility.  This is what has happened in the latter stages of most all imperial-like political entities in history.  Eventually, the political system and the ruling authorities simply lose the willpower and ability to intervene against rebels or invaders.  We are seeing precursors of this in the Seattle “autonomous zone.”  This works massively to our benefit.

This is where the analysis starts to go off the rails.  It is not going to be anarchy, but anarcho-tyranny.  The same corrupt and inept America that stands by helplessly with respect to the “Seattle autonomous zone” will mobilize every resource to attack and destroy a similar entity originating from the pro-White Right. “Eventually, the political system and the ruling authorities simply lose the willpower and ability to intervene against rebels or invaders.” That depends who those “rebels and invaders” are. It’s going to be a long, long time before the System is going to lose the willpower to intervene against Whites (unless the federal structure itself is so infiltrated by fellow travelers to make this possible) and it will be much longer before the ability to do so is lost.  The “twigs and branches” types grossly underestimate state power and grossly overestimate their ability to resist that power.

White Nationalists should assist the process of decline. 

Now the analysis really not only goes off the tracks but starts crashing into a wall.  This is the “accelerationist” “worse is better” paradigm we’ve been hearing for decades.  Unfortunately, given reality, worse is often simply worse.  “Worse is better” presupposes that Whites behave as other races, that there is some threshold at which (many, most, majority) Whites will resist (and here I am merely talking about political, social, and economic resistance – not Turner Diaries fantasies).  This paradigm operates under the assumption that foreign actors will not and cannot intervene to our detriment.  If the decline is coming, and if it is inevitable, White nationalists should be focusing on POSITIVE actions to organize whatever Whites DO resist and try to help the remainder of salvageable Whites decide that they too need to resist. Whites are not going to be attracted to our side if they see us actively helping to destroy, rather than being positive and constructive forces.

The more ethnic diversity, more economic disruption, more political division, and more crime that we experience, the faster will be the process of decline.  As bad as it looks, “Black Lives Matter” is doing us a favor.  Arsonists and looters are doing us a favor.  The moronic liberal elites who defend these low-lifes are too ignorant to realize that such actions are undermining their very system of power.  Recent events are making clear to millions of Whites that a multiracial, Jewish-run America will be a catastrophe in the future.  And they can’t be too happy about it.

First, we cannot assume that “millions of Whites” are responding in the manner that we wish. And what percentage of the total White American population are those “millions?”  And if they are not happy about it what makes you think they’ll flock to White nationalism if we are actively contributing to the same woes the Whites are so unhappy about?  Why should Whites support a “movement” that is openly and actively working to make the lot of Whites more difficult?

So, let’s help the process along:  More Latino and Asian immigration!  More Blacks in corporate America!  More Jews in Washington!  More aid for Israel!  More affirmative action!  More leftist street marches!  Defund the police!  More looting!  More arson!  We can use the liberal Zeitgeist against itself—use its own logic to drive it into the ground.

This is astonishingly wrong-headed.  I’ve outlined my reasons above.  What we SHOULD be doing is increasing the chaos and balkanization through positive activities – democratic multiculturalism, White mobilization, explicitly White electoral politics, etc. We do not need to be actively promoting the negative trends that “millions of Whites” see as a catastrophe. Simply by promoting pro-White policies in a positive manner we will “heighten the contradictions” and destabilize the System indirectly.  To actually support these destructive tendencies and reinforce the media’s “bugaloo” smear is wrong.

Washington is rapidly losing the moral and political basis for effective action. Trump’s various stupid proclamations and (in)actions and the paralysis in Congress are all good signs.  We are seeing federal dysfunction at all levels: in the response to the coronavirus, in various military conflicts around the globe, and in international relations.  The US is being pushed around by hostile nations, and our allies—even the Jewish-dominated ones in Europe—are increasingly ignoring us.  Again, this is all good news.

Not if Whites are cucking or such despair that they give up.  Give them something positive to grab onto.

Whites deserve, and have the right, to self-rule. There is no good reason why Whites anywhere should submit to rule by Jews, Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, or any combination of these.  This is not because such people are “inferior”; rather, every race and every ethnicity has its own values and its own culture, rooted in genetics, and these should not be imposed on unwilling Whites.  Whites have the right to be proud of their values and their cultural achievements, which comprise the highest and greatest achievements in human history.  Let the other races build their own nations and their own cultures, in their own lands  And let them live with the consequences.

Fine.

White self-governance cannot be achieved at a national level in the US—not for a century, at least. 

During this 100 year period foreign powers will be doing nothing inimical to White interests when American power collapses, right?

We need to give up on Washington.  The federal system needs to end, and governance rebuilt at the local level.  A nation of 330 million is ungovernable, even of a single ethnicity…

China and India do not exist.

…a multiracial nation of this size is utterly unsustainable.  Perhaps someday, many decades down the road, a kind of White American coalition or confederation will be possible; but not in our lifetimes.  Again, this is not bad news.

Well, if you’re a Chinaman, maybe so.

Start local, start small. 

Be snug in your hobbit hole!

Given that there will not be a federal White nationalist movement or party…

Yes, let’s just assume a priori that’s impossible and not even try!

…we need to look for local or state-level groups advocating White self-rule—or at first, White identity and White self-interest.  Here’s one suggestion:  Start a local “White Lives Matter” group.  

With extreme vetting.  First question – “are you Swedish?”  Second question – “are you Dave Lewis the movie critic and not David Lewis the writer for The Stranger?”

What’s good for the goose…  

Maturity.

This process can be very small and very simple.  One person can reserve a room in a library, school, or church basement.  One person can reach out to friends, spread the word on social media, or print up flyers to post around town.  

At which point the SPLC and Antifa will know about it faster than your legitimate target audience will.

Pick a day and time, book a room, advertise—and see who comes.  

See who comes – Hermansson, Lewis, Antifa…

Even a small turnout is a start.  

Just Hermansson and Lewis.

We ought not forget that, in Germany many years ago, National Socialism began with weekly meetings of just seven or so men (“the same old seven,” lamented Hitler).  If you get seven at first, consider it a victory.

Hail victory!  Of that seven, four will be spies and the other three moles.

“It’s just a club.” At first, any such “WLM” group will likely be a mere discussion group:  politics, news, local developments.  Think of it as a social club:  like-minded Whites getting together, on a regular basis, to discuss issues of common interest.  This alone, as innocuous as it might seem, is a radical step in today’s climate.  The sheer existence of a WLM group will likely draw negative attention; be prepared, stay cool, stay calm, stay rational.  You have a right to your own self-interest. 

Unfortunately, in today’s America, your assumptions about your rights are not enough.  Step one is to prepare for contingencies, and that includes competent and dependable legal representation. 

Use negative publicity to your advantage.  

Worked well for Spencer, after all.

Remember: Anyone who accepts BLM but rejects WLM is an evil “racist.”

That’ll be a convincing argument to those bashing you over the head with a bike lock, with impunity.

Become politically active. As the group grows, establish some structure:  take attendance, collect modest annual dues…

“D’Nations!”

…have officers.  Watch out for spies and moles; they are inevitable, but can be managed.  

Certainly.  After all, the Far Right has a record of managing that real well.  You know, I realize that a public post is not the appropriate place to discuss the details of security measures. However, the off-hand blithe assurance that spies and moles “can be managed” does a disservice to the reader who would try and put these proposals into practice.  Spies and moles are a serious, serious, existential problem for any pro-White organization, particularly a small one started organically by local residents (rather than one established by an existing large scale organization).  Indeed, in some locales, if you are not careful, it may be the mole that actually establishes the local group.  There needs to be high level discussion and planning among established “movement” activists with respect to these activities. Unfortunately, the affirmative action policy ensures that either such planning will never take place or it is does it will be completely inept and ineffective.

Once the group is stable, then you are in a position to engage in local politics.  Write op-eds or post things on a local blog.  Make yourselves known; be open, be public.

And reserve a hospital bed. Seriously though, you need to plan ahead for negative contingencies. This fellow is writing this in a manner that makes it sound like a breathlessly novel idea never before proposed or attempted.  Wrong.  Now try and figure out why the approach has not been successful and work backward to establish first principles for planning.

Have definable and clear local objectives, moving toward a White society. It doesn’t matter if you live in a city, suburb, or rural area:  establish a group, meet regularly, and get engaged.  If your area is already mostly or all White, there should be little resistance.  

Certainly!  After all, every single militant opposed to pro-White politics is non-White!

If it is majority-minority, consider moving.  If your area, like mine, is a mostly-White suburb but with encroaching non-whites, put up resistance.  

Such as?

The larger objective is for White self-determination and self-rule, and this starts by making non-whites realize that they are no longer welcome here. 

Enforced how?

Pick a local geographic region—neighborhood, city, or county—and declare it White.  

Is this serious?

Don’t hold a vote, don’t look for a majority—just declare it.  

I declare that I am Fuhrer of the Milky Way galaxy – nay, the entire universe!  Declaring it makes it so!  Bow down before your God Sallis!  Just declare it!

This is essentially what a bunch of Seattle hooligans and degenerates recently did; again, that blade cuts both ways.  How outrageous!—a dozen (say) local folks declare their neighborhood or city to be White!  And then they have the nerve to say, publicly, that non-whites are not welcome, and should leave!  Revolutionary!  But that’s what it takes.  No ugliness, no violence, no cross-burnings.  Just a polite and civil statement:  This is now a White area, and non-whites are no longer welcome. Orania in America.

Followed immediately by Colored and Leftist rioting, police attacks against Whites, and the National Guard called in.

Develop a local identity. This will likely mean creating your own distinctive logo or slogan.  

The Hobbit in the Hole Gang!

Put them on stickers, letterhead, flyers, T-shirts, flags, yard signs.  

Victory is nigh!  Create a logo of Johnson snug in his hobbit hole and put it on a yard sign.

Spread them around.  You want to see these things on cars, houses, neighborhood kiosks, etc.  Even people who won’t attend a meeting might be sympathetic and put a sign in their window.  

Sure they will.

Public visibility has a tremendous effect.

Indeed it will.  Worked wonders for Unite the Right.

Let’s pause here a moment. 

Try and get your priapism to become flaccid.

By the above simple and elementary acts, Whites everywhere can take concrete steps to reassert their right to self-governance.  Groups need not adhere to any specific ideology, nor align with any particular White movement.  To be counted under the broad heading of “White nationalist,” groups need only endorse something like the follow general precepts:

[I won’t comment on those, or even reproduce them here; he’s preaching to the choir]

Additionally, we need not worry excessively about who “counts” as White.  In the vast majority of cases, it is obvious:  those whose ancestry derives from indigenous European peoples and nations.  There are ambiguous cases, such as Ukraine, Belarus, and Russia, that deserve more discussion.  

Why are those cases ambiguous?  They are “indigenous European peoples and nations.”

More important, though, is who is not White:  Jews are not White, despite their own frequent proclamations to the contrary.  Arabs or other Middle Easterners are not White.  Hispanics and Latinos are not White.  ‘White’ is not simply a matter of skin color; it is also a question of heritage, of worldview, of culture, and of values.  Don’t be fooled by light skin or blond hair.[5]

It his footnote this fellow writes:

[5] Mixed-race individuals are also problematic, but again, they are a small minority.  Roughly speaking, we can say that anyone with three-quarters or more of White heritage counts as White, presuming that they do not adhere to non-White values or culture.

So, on the one hand, a Russian or a White “Hispanic” is ambiguous or no good, while on the other hand a quadroon who adheres to White values and culture is A-OK.

Why is Der Movement one continuous face palm? 

This said, we can console ourselves in the fact that America is still a predominantly White nation, and will be so for many years to come.  White Americans currently number about 195 million, in a nation of nearly 330 million.  And even though our numbers are projected to decline slightly in the coming decades, we will still long be the numerically-dominant ethnicity.  Hispanics here could top 100 million by 2050, but that is roughly half of White numbers; Blacks will not number more than 55 million or so, and Asians not more than 45 million.  And we mustn’t forget that American Jews number only some 6 million.  One of our strengths is our numbers, and we must always bear this in mind.  Jews and other non-Whites certainly know it, and they fear it.  Large numbers of active Whites spell doom for them.

“Active” is the key word here.  Most Whites are "active" only to the extent of grabbing for their next Big Mac, or kneeling to Negroes.

Still, based on combined effects, America will be a ‘majority-minority’ nation at least by 2045, and coalitions of non-Whites, led by Jews, could soon exercise even more power than they do at present.  And the trends for the end of this century are even more dire.  This is unacceptable, hence the urgent need for White action on many fronts.

The changing demographics are dire and create the need for “White action.”  And what has this author proposed?  Remember:

So, let’s help the process along:  More Latino and Asian immigration!”

Face palm.

Let’s conclude with a few final points, in our drive for White nationalism.

Gradually assume more power, quietly and nonviolently. As local White or WLM movements grow, and as intimidated non-Whites…

Yes, we’ve seen how intimidated non-Whites are of Whites the past few weeks.

…move out, White groups will be able to assume a greater civic role, just by default.  Volunteer groups can provide social services, self-police, and participate in local schools.  White nationalists will then naturally come to gain power in local politics, exercising yet more autonomy.  

Can you imagine people like Spencer and Johnson trying to do any of that?

All the while, the autonomous zones should continue to grow, by declaration.

By declaration! I do declare!

The biggest threat will come from local and state police, and potentially state National Guards. Small, decentralized White autonomous zones generally need not fear the feds.  Yes, we all remember Waco and Ruby Ridge, but those were anomalies of the past.  With a degraded federal justice system, and with (hopefully) dozens of White zones popping up around the country, the feds will be in no position to confront them. 

Delusion. In fact, quite the opposite – the American military is becoming so degraded and so politicized that its optimal role will be precisely that of stamping out White dissent.  The only way around this is infiltration at the federal as well as local level.  But since the Quota Queens have wasted the last half century, options are limited.

The larger threat, I think, is from local and state authorities.  Fortunately, these groups are now being alienated on a large scale.  As current policemen resign in disgust, less and less qualified people will take their places, resulting in growing inefficiency and incompetence.  Eventually they will be unable to, or chose not to, take action against peaceful civilian groups who only seek self-governance.  

Sure!  A federalized “local” police – which is on the agenda – full of Coloreds, will just sit back and let Whitey set up their zones, “intimidating” non-Whites.

Remember, the goal here, at least initially, is to create White autonomous zones which are self-governing and relatively independent from state or federal authorities.  The central tactic is to ‘walk away slowly,’ rather like you might do when confronted by a maniac with a large knife.  Don’t antagonize, don’t threaten—just walk away.

What the hell does that actually mean?  So, if the authorities come in, just walk away from the “autonomous zone” you’ve invested in creating?  If this is a possibility, maybe we need to carefully rethink the strategy.

Undermine Jewish financial power. Jewish power derives almost exclusively from their vast wealth; 6 million American Jews control some $50 trillion in assets.[6]  But this is denominated in corrupt, inflated, debt-ridden, and intrinsically valueless US dollars.  Therefore, we need to declare the US dollar worthless, and move our financial assets into new, local currencies—perhaps something we might whimsically call ‘Aryan Bucks.’  

"Aryan Bucks." That’ll have the “normies” flocking to you, no doubt. The Quota Queens have absolutely no sense whatsoever.

AB’s could, by law, be held and spent only by Whites.  They would be declared worthless and illegal in the hands of Jews or other non-Whites. 

Hey!  Why didn’t Pierce think of that for The Turner Diaries?

At first, both currencies would have to circulate in parallel, but as quickly as possible, Whites would want to migrate to their own financial system.  The political and economic benefits from this step alone would be enormous.

Does anyone really believe that Whites are going to ditch dollars in favor of “Aryan bucks?”

Accelerate growth of autonomous zones. As White zones grow, and as disaffected Whites move into the newly-declared regions, the remaining areas will grow darker in complexion.  This will only accelerate the decline of multiracial America.  Ideally, a positive feedback situation will emerge in which Whites rapidly move into local safe-zones as the other regions collapse.  This makes expansion all the easier.

Numerous local White zones, incidentally—meaning, several in each state or large city—make for a much more practical strategy than, say, picking a few large rural areas.  There aren’t many White Montanans or Californians ready to move to rural Arkansas, but they might be willing to move an hour or two away to a local zone in a familiar area.

They’ll uproot themselves, and then “walk away quietly” once the authorities come in.

Be prepared to fight, as a last resort. If we are smart, we can achieve nearly everything we want non-violently.  But sadly, that may not always be the case.  Therefore, as Corey states, we will need to be armed.  At present, something like 35 million White households own at least one gun; presumably, most by the man in the family.  So let’s say we have 35 million armed White males in this country—an awesome force, indeed.  

Awesome!  Of those, how many would fight?  And if they did, how long would they last against tanks and fighter planes?

If there is one thing Jews and Blacks fear more than White men, it’s White men with guns. 

Yes, the last few weeks we’ve seen how afraid they’ve been.  The delusion is strong with this one.

I wouldn’t hesitate to state that armed White American civilians constitute the most formidable fighting power on Earth.  

Billy Bobb is gonna shoot down dat dere Chinese hypersonic nuclear missile with his shotgun. Pellets flying everywhere!

No one—not even the Jewish-run American military—could defeat them. 

Crazed.

If the US military can’t subdue a few thousand low-IQ Muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan, they haven’t a prayer against millions of pissed-off Whites.  

Those “few thousand low-IQ Muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan” are willing to fight and die, they are in shape, they can live off the land, and they have the support of the local population.  Billy Bobb doesn’t want to miss his Monday night football, has a BMI of 10,000, lives off the local Walmart, and is despised by the majority of Whites.

This is our ace-up-the-sleeve.  

Do you have a rabbit up their as well?  Or is that just in your hat?

But we need to use it judiciously.

Indeed.

Ideally, White autonomous zones would pop up like mushrooms around the country:  a few in each major city, several in the rural areas of each state.  

And they’ll close down as soon as a dozen noodle-armed Antifa start throwing rocks.

Under good circumstances, they might grow and join together, combining their collective power.

Power!  0 + 0 = 0

These “thousand points of White,” as I like to think of them, would pose an insurmountable problem for federal and local authorities…

For about five minutes.

…especially if they were peaceful, and especially at the early “club” phase.  

You mean, the phase at which noodle-arms and purple hairs would wreck the place in half an hour?

Being decentralized, there is no single pressure point for the feds to squeeze; they would have to address multiple, simultaneous local issues at once. 

So, it may take a hour rather than five minutes.

And if there were still on-going riots, or economic chaos, or some new pandemic, …well, the authorities will quickly reach the end of their rope.  And then we win.

Good luck.

Thomas Dalton, PhD, has authored or edited several books, including a new translation series of Mein Kampf…

Of course.

Look, if you dismiss the majority of the piece that is crazed delusion, there are good ideas there. We DO need local organizing and community building.  But we need it done by people who have an idea of the difficulties involved, people who can strategize and plan for contingencies.  The Heroes of Charlottesville and the Heroes of Hermansson are incapable.  Do you think that local activists – the same morons who slavishly support the aforementioned heroes – would do any better?  Is there ONE example of this strategy being effectively actualized?

Without quality people – in leadership as well as the rank-and-file - all such projects are doomed to failure.  

As I was writing this riposte, I note the following comment:

Reply

JRM

JRMsays:

June 19, 2020 at 12:54 pm

I’m not sure what to make of this. Prof. Dalton seems to be suffering from some loss of persective, perhaps due to the quickening pace of social disintegration we are all seeing of late. Prof. Dalton has done good work before; he deserves our indulgence. But come, let us reason together.

After an initial push for accelerationism, the article takes flight in a fantasy of successful White organization on a micro level. A “thousand points of light” is well

chosen for appropriation in the title. There probably needs to be an interim segue which discusses the amount of time, or conditions for, the transition from acceleration to grass-roots organization. Real accelerationism is a dangerous game to play, and the author owes a bit more detail if he wishes to prompt serious effort on the part of others. Acceleration and grass-roots organization for White interests are not the same thing at all. How does the author wish us to pursue the accelerationist part of his scheme? Should we donate to BLM? Vote for Biden?

“One person can reserve a room in a library, school, or church basement. One person can reach out to friends, spread the word on social media, or print up flyers to post around town. Pick a day and time, book a room, advertise—and see who comes.”

Right. See who comes, indeed. This may be the single worst piece of advice ever published on this site. Libraries, schools, and churches are already in enemy territory. Any effort to avail use of these would likely be denied. If permission were granted, the blowback from Leftists could be potentially fatal. As for “social media” – please. Social media statements would be censored, result in bans, or firings from jobs. The author seems tone deaf on this topic. I can’t go a day without reading about someone being fired for being insufficiently supportive of BLM on social media. The new trend is to get the spouse fired, too.

“You have a right to your own self-interest. Use negative publicity to your advantage. Remember: Anyone who accepts BLM but rejects WLM is an evil “racist.””.

This does not work. Whites no longer have a clear right to self-interest. Sounds crazy, but try putting this principle to the test. I can guarantee loss of livelihood and/or jailtime. It is now also established dogma that non-Whites cannot be guilty of racism. Racism can only be performed by Whites. This is all but law in this country now.

“The chief threat to White well-being comes from the global Jewish lobby…”

Partially true. The biggest, most existential threat comes from Jewish control of the courts and educational apparatus. But the more immediate stumbling block is the large number of young Whites who identify with black causes. These hoards of brainwashed young Whites are an army of zombies that can be used as blunt force against established White communities and values. They are ready to defend blacks and black values on command. They will be the first to come at you with a bike lock or skateboard. So be prepared to go to war with your own kind when you advertise your “White Book Club” or discussion group.

There are good points in the article. There are worthwhile strategies. But the chronological and conditional order for them is not detailed. There will be a time for some sets of actions; and there will be another time for another set to come into play. I firmly believe once the Federal Gov. collapses, we can seize the opportunity for a massive rebuilding project. It will take time. Right now is too soon to act in any way that exposes your identity to the Fed Gov or Antifa.

This system is unquestionably entering into its final chapters. The actual collapse might take fifty years. Or it might take a few months. Things are moving much faster now than they were even a year ago.

My advice: buy land; get the hell out of the cities; stock up on ammo and weapons; learn to farm, fish, and hunt. Have White children and homeschool them. Teach them what you wished you had been taught about “democracy” and “minorities”.

Keep your eye on the pressure from both the Gov. and the blacks and or Hispanics. Is there wholesale slaughter in the cities with little justice for White people? At what point do you know in your heart that your local LE is unable to respond meaningfully, and all personal defense must be handled by you?

Defend yourself and family first, and start making neighborly connections to fellow Whites so you know who can be trusted when GOV is no longer able to exert its will.