In der news.
According to HBD Nordicism:
1. Egalitarian northern hunter gatherers, with high trust, and genes for altruism, but also
2. Honor-driven, elitist, hierarchical, dominant Indo-European steppe warriors
Further, Nords are:
1. Highly individualist Inner Hajnals, but also
2. Conformists with a Law of Jante culture who adhere to social norms to build collective goods and peaceful, cooperative societies
And then the chicken Morlocks are at the same time both ethnocentric collectivists and low-trust selfish uncooperative jerks who refuse to contribute to collective social goods for the community.
These seeming contradictions are solved by understanding that the core here is that, in any given context, what is "good" is how Nords behave (and in contrast, "bad" is runty chicken Morlock behavior). Context differs from one situation to another, so "good" will differ and the complete incompatibility is ignored. After all this is not only not science, it doesn't even rise to the level of pseudoscience. It's a bad parody of blind religious faith, a form of self-worship (akin to Jewish behavior).
Supremacist language always attracts the wrong people. If it is in favor of your own group, then it attracts those who have nothing going for them other than their belonging to the favored group (and we know what precinct of Der Movement that describes). On the other hand, favoring another group as superior to your own, outgroup supremacist language (and we know who does that), attracts an even sicker species of defective, likely characterized by psychosexual fetishes (e.g., "measured groveling"). It's best to just speak honestly about the strengths and weaknesses of different groups (supremacist language focuses on the strengths and ignores the weaknesses of the favored group) and to base ingroup solidarity on shared (genetic) kinship and culture, not on some sort of "superior" hierarchical ranking, or on a masochistic desire to be enslaved by a "superior" group.
Mosely, Yockey, Evola, and Pound:
Their marbles lost, but genius found.
Or perhaps it’s just The System’s guise
To sully, defame, and pathologize
All those eccentric in speech and prose
Who point out the emperors’ lack of clothes.
Err, excuse me, isn't that what Johnson does to the dreaded Ted Sallis - pathologize criticism? Didn't he sully and defame me by writing that I am suffering from "insanity" and stating that I am a "paranoid piece of crap," because I have the temerity to point out the deficiencies of Der Movement, including that of Counter-Currents and of Johnson himself? Isn't the hypocrisy obvious?